PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jane Smith

Publications and source records attributed to Jane Smith.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Use of the 'STRATIFY' falls risk assessment in patients recovering from acute stroke.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the predictive validity and reliability of the STRATIFY falls risk assessment tool as applied to patients recovering from acute stroke. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Six stroke rehabilitation units in the North of England. SUBJECTS: All patients with a diagnosis of acute stroke admitted to the participating stroke units during a 6-month study period. ASSESSMENT: on admission, falls risk (STRATIFY), disability (Barthel index), mobility (Rivermead mobility index), cognitive impairment (abbreviated mental test score) and visual neglect (Albert's test) were assessed. Then, STRATIFY was completed weekly and within 48 h of anticipated discharge. Consenting patients were contacted at 3 months after discharge to determine falls. OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of a fall within 28 days of the baseline STRATIFY (in-patient study), falls in the first 3 months after discharge (post-discharge study) and falls during stroke unit stay (reliability study). RESULTS: From 387 patients admitted to the participating units during the study period, 225 contributed to the 28 day in-patient study, and 234 were followed up at 3 months after discharge. STRATIFY performed poorly in predicting falls in the first 28 days (sensitivity 11.3% and specificity 89.5%) and after discharge (sensitivity 16.3% and specificity 86.4%). Agreement was 'fair' between baseline and discharge scores (kappa = 0.263) and 'good' between the pre-hospital discharge score and that obtained in the week preceding discharge (kappa = 0.639). CONCLUSION: STRATIFY performed poorly as a predictor of falls in a heterogeneous population of stroke patients. There is a need for a disease-specific rather than a generic falls risk assessment tool.

Accidental Falls↗
PubMed2005

A randomized trial evaluation of the Oswestry Standing Frame for patients after stroke.

BACKGROUND: Standing is believed to have benefits in addressing motor and sensory impairments after stroke. One device to facilitate standing for severely disabled patients is the Oswestry Standing Frame. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of the Oswestry Standing Frame for severely disabled stroke patients. DESIGN: A single centre, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: An inpatient stroke rehabilitation unit. SUBJECTS: Patients were recruited if they had a clinical diagnosis of stroke, were medically stable and unable to achieve any score on the Trunk Control Test or unable to stand in mid-line without the assistance of two therapists. INTERVENTION: The intervention (n = 71) and control (n = 69) groups both received usual stroke unit care but the intervention group also received a minimum of 14 consecutive days' treatment using the standing frame. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI). Secondary measures included the Barthel Index; the Rivermead Motor Assessment; the balanced sitting and sitting to standing components of the Motor Assessment Scale; the Trunk Control Test and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Blind assessment was undertaken at baseline, six weeks, 12 weeks and six months post stroke. Information on resource use was also collected. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between groups in any of the outcome measures or for resource use. Mann-Whitney U-tests for the RMI change from baseline scores to six weeks, 12 weeks and six months post stroke were p = 0.310; p = 0.970 and p = 0.282, respectively. CONCLUSION: Use of the Oswestry Standing Frame did not improve clinical outcome or provide resource savings for this severely disabled patient group.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Authors' perceptions of electronic publishing: two cross sectional surveys.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate how acceptable authors find the BMJ's current practice of publishing short versions of research articles in the paper journal and a longer version on the web and to determine authors' attitudes towards publishing only abstracts in the paper journal and publishing unedited versions on bmj.com once papers have been accepted for publication. DESIGN: Two cross sectional surveys. SETTING: General medical journal. PARTICIPANTS: Survey 1: corresponding authors of a consecutive sample of published BMJ research articles that had undergone the ELPS (electronic long, paper short) process. Survey 2: corresponding authors of consecutive research articles submitted to BMJ. RESULTS: Response rates were 90% (104/115) in survey 1 and 75% (213/283) in survey 2. ELPS is largely acceptable to BMJ authors, but there is some concern that electronic information is not permanent and uncertainty about how versions are referenced. While authors who had experienced ELPS reported some problems with editors shortening papers, most were able to rectify these. Overall, 70% thought that the BMJ should continue to use ELPS; 49% thought that publishing just the abstract in the printed journal with the full version only on bmj.com was unacceptable; and 23% thought it unacceptable to post unedited versions on bmj.com once a paper had been accepted for publication. CONCLUSIONS: It is acceptable to authors to publish short versions of research articles in the printed version of a general medical journal with longer versions on the website. Authors dislike the idea of publishing only abstracts in the printed journal but are in favour of posting accepted articles on the website ahead of the printed version.

Attitude↗
PubMed2004

Prevalence of psychiatric disorder in Europe: the potential and reality of meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Within the European Mental Health Status Project, over 200 psychiatric surveys concerning members of the European Union (plus Norway) were examined for their potential for meta-analysis with regard to prevalence of psychiatric disorders and basic demographic and social variables. The diversity of samples, methods, analysis and presentation was such that only data derived from GHQ-12 and CIDI studies could be used, and those relating to sex differentials only. METHODS: The statistical program "Stata" was used to compute odds ratios (with confidence intervals) for individual studies, and to produce fixed and random effects estimates of the pooled odds ratio for all studies together, and a measure of heterogeneity. Forrest Plots were also produced. RESULTS: Analysis of GHQ-12 data with a cut-off point of 4, indicating a current or recent "probable mental health problem", showed, as expected, that women had higher prevalence rates than men. However, there was a relatively high heterogeneity score, suggesting that these studies may not be measuring the same thing. Analysis of CIDI results showed homogeneity for major depressive disorder within the last 12 months, with the risk for men about half of that for women. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of advancing epidemiological knowledge, the results are trivial, at most confirming what is already well known. However, the study shows the potential for pooled analysis, with much greater power in epidemiological investigation if consistency could be achieved in research. Various ways in which this might be done are discussed. It also shows the value of personal knowledge and personal networks in fields which are not well handled by electronic literature databases.

Europe↗
PubMed2004

A randomized trial to evaluate an education programme for patients and carers after stroke.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of an education programme for patients and carers recovering from stroke. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: One hundred and seventy patients admitted to a stroke rehabilitation unit and 97 carers of these patients. INTERVENTIONS: The intervention group received a specifically designed stroke information manual and were invited to attend education meetings every two weeks with members of their multidisciplinary team. The control group received usual practice. MEASURES: Primary outcome was knowledge of stroke and stroke services. Secondary outcomes were handicap (London Handicap Scale), physical function (Barthel Index), social function (Frenchay Activities Index), mood (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and satisfaction (Pound Scale). Carer mood was measured by the General Health Questionnaire-28. RESULTS: There was no statistical evidence for a treatment effect on knowledge but there were trends that favoured the intervention. The education programme was associated with a significantly greater reduction in patient anxiety score at both three months (p =0.034) and six months (p =0.021) and consequently fewer 'cases' (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale anxiety subscale score > or =11). There were no other significant statistical differences between the patient or carer groups for other outcomes, although there were trends in favour of the education programme. CONCLUSION: An education programme delivered within a stroke unit did not result in improved knowledge about stroke and stroke services but there was a significant reduction in patient anxiety at six months post stroke onset.

Adult↗