Biomedical subjects

Janet C'de Baca

Publications and source records attributed to Janet C'de Baca.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Psychiatric disorders in a sample of repeat impaired-driving offenders.

OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to assess alcohol- and drug-use disorders and other psychiatric disorders in a sample of repeat driving under the influence (DUI) offenders. METHOD: We interviewed offenders to estimate lifetime and 12-month prevalence of psychiatric disorders as designated by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (alcohol and drug abuse and dependence, major depressive or dysthymic disorder, bipolar disorder, post- traumatic stress disorder [PTSD], and obsessive-compulsive disorder). The offenders interviewed (385 men, 74 women) were those who had been adjudicated in the Multnomah County, OR, Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants Intensive Supervision Program. Psychiatric diagnoses were assessed using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview. RESULTS: The majority of respondents (53.8%) were alcohol dependent. Sixty-five percent of men and 79.7% of women had at least one lifetime disorder comorbid with alcohol abuse or dependence. The most prevalent lifetime non-substance-use disorder was major depressive or dysthymic disorder (30.9%) followed by PTSD (15.3%). Approximately 40% of subjects reported meeting criteria for lifetime nonalcohol drug abuse for at least one drug type, and 30% were drug dependent for at least one drug type; overall, 54% of all offenders had drug abuse or dependence disorders. CONCLUSIONS: Assessment and treatment services for repeat alcohol-impaired driving offenders should be sufficiently comprehensive to provide care for drug-use disorders and other psychiatric problems.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Reclassifying DIS-III-R alcohol use disorders to DSM-IV criteria in a sample of convicted impaired drivers.

OBJECTIVE: This study used data gathered from the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, Version Three, Revised (DIS-III-R), which calculated diagnoses based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition, Revised (DSM-III-R), criteria and rescored the data to be compatible with the criteria of the Fourth Edition of the DSM (DSM-IV) for lifetime alcohol abuse and dependence. METHOD: A psychologist reassigned questions from the DIS-III-R according to DSM-IV criteria. Another clinician evaluated the rescoring criteria and discrepancies were discussed and resolved. Using these criteria, SAS code was written to automate the rescoring of responses to DIS-III-R questions to DSM-IV diagnoses from a population of DWI offenders. RESULTS: There was a fair-to-good level of agreement between the DSM-III-R and rescored DSM-IV diagnoses (kappa = .65). Three hundred forty-eight subjects classified as alcohol dependent using DSMIII- R were reclassified as alcohol abuse in the DSM-IV rescore. Among subjects who were alcohol dependent based on DIS-III-R criteria, the distribution of DSM-IV diagnoses was similar across gender, age, and ethnic groups. There was no difference in agreement between DSMIII- R and the rescored DSM-IV diagnoses by age category. However, women and Hispanics had significantly higher weighted kappa statistics than men and non-Hispanic whites. CONCLUSIONS: Our rescoring results were consistent with earlier studies that compared DSM-III-R and DSM-IV diagnoses. Here, we offer an approach that may be useful to investigators who used the DIS-III-R in earlier studies. The DIS-III-R questions corresponding to DSM-IV criteria for alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence are on our Web site at www.bhrcs.org, along with the scoring algorithm.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Impaired-driving recidivism among repeat offenders following an intensive court-based intervention.

PURPOSE: Repeat impaired-drivers resist successful rehabilitation. This paper describes and evaluates an innovative court-based intervention for repeat impaired-driving offenders, the driving under the influence (DUI) Intensive Supervision Program (DISP) developed in Multnomah County, Oregon. METHODS: The hazard of re-offending was compared between DISP participants (N=460) and a comparison group (N=497). The stratified Cox proportional hazards model was used to model the hazard of re-offense, adjusting for matching criteria and stratified by county of residence. RESULTS: Adjusted hazard of DUI re-offense for DISP participants was 0.52 that of comparison offenders (95% CI=0.36-0.76). DISP clients also had lower arrest rates for driving while revoked/suspended and for all other traffic offenses. CONCLUSION: Preliminary results suggest the DISP is an effective means of reducing recidivism among repeat impaired-driving offenders.

Accidents, Traffic↗

PubMed2004

Accuracy of alcohol diagnosis among DWI offenders referred for screening.

BACKGROUND: Most US courts use screening programs to evaluate substance-abuse problems of convicted driving while impaired (DWI) offenders. Typically self-report information determines need for treatment. However, little is known about the accuracy of self-reports of alcohol-use problems in this population. METHODS: DSM-III-R alcohol abuse and dependence diagnoses from an initial, court-ordered screening evaluation of 583 female and 495 male convicted DWI offenders were compared with diagnoses and other self-reported information from a voluntary, noncoerced interview 5 years after the screening referral. RESULTS: At initial screening, 16.8% of offenders were diagnosed with alcohol abuse and 20.1% with alcohol dependence. At the 5-year interview, 19.9 and 60.1% received a retrospective diagnosis of alcohol abuse or dependence at the age at which they were screened. Significantly fewer of those with a retrospective alcohol diagnosis reported that their alcohol use self-reports at screening were "very accurate" compared to those with no retrospective diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Although many DWI offenders undergoing screening have diagnosable alcohol-related problems, underreporting is common, leading to inaccurate diagnosis and, therefore, a missed treatment opportunity. The research community and policymakers should review and reform the current screening system for alcohol-impaired drivers to better address this serious public health problem.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Quantum change: ten years later.

Ten years ago, 55 people shared their stories of personality transformation and sudden extensive cognitive and behavior changes. We termed this type of change "quantum change" (QC). The majority reported that because of their experience, their lives were much better, and most were confident the changes would last. Thirty people from the original study were re-interviewed. Most remembered quite vividly the QC experience reported 10 years earlier. The QC experiences fell along a continuum, with some describing their QC as a one-time event that dramatically changed the way they lived, others experienced repeated changes that were either of similar intensity to the initial experience or milder than the initial experience, and some framed the initial change experience as one aspect of a continuing growth process. These dramatic changes have continued, and none described a return to old ways of being.

Behavior↗

PubMed2004

Psychiatric disorders of convicted DWI offenders: a comparison among Hispanics, American Indians and non-Hispanic whites.

OBJECTIVE: Alcohol-impaired offenders have high prevalence rates of psychiatric disorders; however, differences in prevalence rates among ethnic minorities have not been investigated. This study compares lifetime prevalence estimates of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders (alcohol and drug abuse and dependence, nicotine dependence, major depressive disorder [MDD], dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder and antisocial personality disorder [ASPD]) among Hispanics, American Indians and non-Hispanic whites convicted of driving while alcohol-impaired. METHOD: Offenders (758 women, 631 men) previously referred to a screening program in Bernalillo County, NM, were interviewed for this study using a structured diagnostic interview. RESULTS: Adjusting for age, education, income and marital status, Hispanic women had significantly higher rates of alcohol abuse (odds ratio [OR] = 2.2) and lower rates of alcohol dependence (OR = 0.3), drug abuse (OR = 0.4) and nicotine dependence (OR = 0.3) than non-Hispanic white women. American-Indian women showed significantly lower rates of alcohol dependence (OR = 0.5), nicotine dependence (OR = 0.2) and MDD (OR = 0.3) than non-Hispanic white women. Hispanic men had significantly lower rates of alcohol dependence (OR = 0.6), drug dependence (OR = 0.5), nicotine dependence (OR = 0.2), MDD (OR = 0.5) and ASPD (OR = 0.4) than non-Hispanic white men. American-Indian men also reported significantly lower rates of drug dependence (OR = 0.5), nicotine dependence (OR = 0.2) and ASPD (OR = 0.3) than non-Hispanic white men. CONCLUSIONS: After statistically adjusting for demographic differences, minority groups were in general less affected by substance abuse problems and had similar or lower rates of other psychiatric disorders when compared with non-Hispanic whites.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Are drunk-driving offenders referred for screening accurately reporting their drug use?

Several studies report that a substantial percentage of offenders arrested for impaired driving test positive for drugs of abuse besides alcohol. Current guidelines recommend screening offenders for both alcohol and other drug use, yet little is known about the accuracy of self-reports of drug use in this population. We compared drug abuse and dependence DSM-III-R diagnoses from an initial, court-ordered screening evaluation of 583 female and 495 male convicted drunk-driving offenders with diagnoses obtained via a voluntary, non-coerced interview 5 years later. At initial screening, fewer than 6% of offenders were diagnosed with drug abuse or dependence. Among offenders who did not receive an initial drug diagnosis, 28% subsequently reported having experienced drug use problems consistent with a retrospective diagnosis of drug abuse or dependence by the age at which they were screened. Half of those with a retrospective diagnosis of drug dependence reported their initial screening responses were "very accurate". We conclude that, although many drunk-driving offenders undergoing screening have diagnosable drug problems, a high proportion under-report their drug use. We suggest that certain modifications to screening procedures, such as urine drug screening, reducing barriers to treatment, and training counselors in motivational interviewing techniques, may increase accurate identification of drug use problems in this population.

Adolescent↗