PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Janet Dancey

Publications and source records attributed to Janet Dancey.

16 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Phase I study of gefitinib, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD), toxicities, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of gefitinib combined with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (IFL) in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Starting doses were gefitinib 250 mg/day orally without interruption, irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) as a 90 min intravenous (i.v.) infusion, 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. and leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalations involved increasing gefitinib to 500 mg then increasing irinotecan to 125 mg/m(2) and 5-FU to 500 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received therapy. The starting doses proved to be the MTD, as attempts to increase the dose of either gefitinib or the chemotherapeutic agents resulted in dose-limiting toxicities. Gastrointestinal effects and bone marrow suppression were the principal toxicities; however, only 1/17 (6%) patients treated with the MTD had severe (grades 3-4) diarrhea and severe neutropenia occurred in only two (12%) patients. Partial responses occurred in 10/17 patients receiving the MTD and another five had stable disease. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 12.2 and 26.6 months, respectively. In ten patients treated with the MTD, the steady-state PK of gefitinib was not affected by IFL nor did gefitinib appear to influence the PK of either irinotecan or 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: Gefitinib can be safely combined with an intermittent weekly schedule of IFL. Evidence of promising activity should encourage further clinical evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib, combined with multiagent chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Phase II trial of nolatrexed dihydrochloride [Thymitaq, AG 337] in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of nolatrexed in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients were entered onto this study. Nolatrexed was administered every 3 weeks as a 24-h continuous intravenous infusion of 725 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days. Doses were adjusted to maintain a dose level that produced > or = grade 2 toxicity. Response was assessed after every two cycles. Plasma pharmacokinetic samples were assayed using a validated high performance liquid chromatography ultraviolet method. RESULTS: Thirty-nine (81%) patients were evaluable for response. The mean number of cycles received was 2.8 (range 1-12). The mean dose intensity was 700 mg/m(2)/day (SD of 71). One patient had a partial response (2.6%) for 7 months. Eighteen (46%) patients had SD, 20 (51%) patients had progressive disease. The median duration of SD was 93 days. The median overall survival was 32 weeks [95% CI (22-37)]. The most frequent Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were stomatitis (25%), dehydration (23%) and asthenia (21%). There was no evidence of cumulative toxicity. The overall median plasma concentration (C (max)) was 14.20 microg/mL (range 1.41 to 119 microg /mL) with no accumulation observed between cycles 1-6. CONCLUSION: This phase II study of nolatrexed in advanced HCC patients, demonstrated minimal activity and significant stomatitis. Hence, it does not warrant further study as a single agent for this disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Quality of life analyses in a clinical trial of DPPE (tesmilifene) plus doxorubicin versus doxorubicin in patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer: NCIC CTG Trial MA.19.

BACKGROUND: DPPE (tesmilifene) plus doxorubicin (DOX) demonstrated a significant improvement in survival versus DOX in a phase III clinical trial in advanced breast cancer. However, DPPE is associated with unusual toxicity in the form of hallucinations, nausea and vomiting which were anticipated to impact on short-term quality of life (QOL). METHODS: Standard National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) approaches were applied as the primary method to analyze the QOL data from this trial. This includes cross-sectional comparisons, together with a global test for the QOL response rate. Sensitivity analyses were also performed for selected QOL domains and items, using other types of summary measures and statistics. RESULTS: Two hundred seventy one patients (89% of randomized) submitted the baseline QOL questionnaires and were included in the QOL analysis. No statistically significant difference in QOL response between treatment arms was found for any domain or item except nausea and vomiting (P = 0.04). Cross-sectional comparisons showed statistically significant differences for some domains/items at specific assessment times with all differences favoring the DOX alone arm. Patients on DPPE/DOX arm were significantly worse in terms of average and median pain change scores. CONCLUSION: Different analyses yielded slightly different conclusions but, in general, the QOL analyses were concordant and showed that patients on DOX alone had fewer disease and treatment related adverse events and better QOL. Interestingly, the QOL response analysis also showed that aggressive premedication regimens appear to ameliorate potential negative effects of DPPE on emesis and nausea as measured by patient assessed QOL.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2006

A phase II trial of perifosine, an oral alkylphospholipid, in recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Novel, effective therapies are warranted in the management of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Perifosine is an oral alkylphospholipid that inhibits AKT phosphorylation and has shown preclinical antitumor activity in head and neck cancer cell lines and xenografts. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase II trial of perifosine in patients with incurable, recurrent or metastatic SCCHN. Previous therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease was limited to no more than one prior chemotherapy and one prior targeted/biologic agent regimen. Patients had to have measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and adequate laboratory parameters. Perifosine was given as a loading dose of 150 mg every 6 hours x 6 doses orally in the first two days, with antiemetic prophylaxis, followed by 100 mg/day orally without interruption. Administration via gastrostomy tube was allowed. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles (eight weeks). Biomarkers in pathways potentially affected by perifosine, including AKT, P-AKT, P38, p53 and p21 were measured on tumor tissue by immunohistochemistry by manual and automated methods. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were enrolled. No objective responses were observed. One patient had stable disease as best response and 18 patients progressed at first evaluation. The median overall survival time was 5.5 months and the median progression-free survival time was 1.7 months. The most frequent toxicities were gastrointestinal (constipation, nausea, vomiting) and fatigue. One patient developed grade 4 anorexia. Although the sample size was small, a significant correlation was detected between high expression of P38 and AKT in baseline tumor tissue and better survival. CONCLUSIONS: Perifosine in the doses and schedule used lacks single-agent activity in SCCHN. Our data do not justify further investigation of perifosine as a single agent in SCCHN.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Dose escalation trial designs based on a molecularly targeted endpoint.

Traditional phase I dose-finding studies for chemotoxic agents base dose escalation on toxicity, with escalation continuing until unacceptable toxicity is observed. Recent development of molecularly targeted agents that have little or no toxicity in the therapeutic dose range has raised questions over the best study designs for phase I studies. Two types of designs are proposed and evaluated in this paper. In these designs, escalation is based on a binary response that indicates whether or not the agent has had the desired effect on the molecular target. One design is developed to ensure that if the true target response rate is low there will be a high probability of escalating and if the true target response rate is high there will be a low probability of escalating. The other design is developed to continue to escalate as long as the true response rate is increasing and to stop escalating when the response rate plateaus or decreases. A limited simulation study is performed and the designs are compared with respect to the dose level at the end of escalation and the number of patients treated on study.

Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic↗
PubMed2005

Phase II trial of temsirolimus (CCI-779) in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Study.

BACKGROUND: Temsirolimus (CCI-779) is a small-molecule inhibitor of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and represents a rational therapeutic target against glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). METHODS: Recurrent GBM patients with < or = 1 chemotherapy regimen for progressive disease were eligible. Temsirolimus was administered in a 250-mg intravenous dose weekly. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were treated. The incidence of grade 3 or higher nonhematologic toxicity was 51%, and consisted mostly of hypercholesterolemia (11%), hypertriglyceridemia (8%), and hyperglycemia (8%). Grade 3 hematologic toxicity was observed in 11% of patients. Temsirolimus peak concentration (Cmax), and sirolimus Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve were decreased in patients receiving p450 enzyme-inducing anticonvulsants (EIACs) by 73%, 47%, and 50%, respectively, but were still within the therapeutic range of preclinical models. Twenty patients (36%) had evidence of improvement in neuroimaging, consisting of decrease in T2 signal abnormality +/- decrease in T1 gadolinium enhancement, on stable or reduced steroid doses. Progression-free survival at 6 months was 7.8% and median overall survival was 4.4 months. Median time to progression (TTP) for all patients was 2.3 months and was significantly longer for responders (5.4 months) versus nonresponders (1.9 months). Development of grade 2 or higher hyperlipidemia in the first two treatment cycles was associated with a higher percentage of radiographic response (71% v 31%; P = .04). Significant correlation was observed between radiographic improvement and high levels of phosphorylated p70s6 kinase in baseline tumor samples (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Temsirolimus is well tolerated in recurrent GBM patients. Despite the effect of EIACs on temsirolimus metabolism, therapeutic levels were achieved. Radiographic improvement was observed in 36% of temsirolimus-treated patients, and was associated with significantly longer TTP. High levels of phosphorylated p70s6 kinase in baseline tumor samples appear to predict a patient population more likely to derive benefit from treatment. These findings should be validated in other studies of mTOR inhibitors.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Phase II study of CCI-779 in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: Loss of PTEN, which is common in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), results in activation of the mammalian target of rapapmycin (mTOR), thereby increasing mRNA translation of a number of key proteins required for cell-cycle progression. CCI-779 is an inhibitor of mTOR. The primary objectives of this study were to determine the efficacy of CCI-779 in patients with recurrent GBM and to further assess the toxicity of the drug. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: CCI-779 was administered weekly at a dose of 250 mg intravenously for patients on enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs (EIAEDs). Patients not on EIAEDs were initially treated at 250 mg; however, the dose was reduced to 170 mg because of intolerable side effects. Treatment was continued until unacceptable toxicity, tumor progression, or patient withdrawal. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled; 29 were not on EIAEDs. The expected toxicity profile of increased lipids, lymphopenia, and stomatitis was seen. There were no grade IV hematological toxicities and no toxic deaths. One patient was progression free at 6 months. Of the patients assessable for response, there were 2 partial responses and 20 with stabilization of disease. The median time to progression was 9 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: CCI-779 was well tolerated at this dose schedule; however, there was no evidence of efficacy in patients with recurrent GBM. Despite initial disease stabilization in approximately 50% of patients, the durability of response was short. Because of the low toxicity profile, CCI-779 may merit exploration in combination with other modalities.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in clinical development.

In cancer cells, aberrant signaling through the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activates pathways that stimulate many of the properties associated with neoplasia, including proliferation, migration, stromal invasion, tumor angiogenesis, and resistance to cell death-inducing signals. Because of the frequency of abnormalities in receptor signaling in human cancers, the EGFR is an attractive target for therapeutic development. Monoclonal antibodies and small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors are the two classes of agents that are the furthest advanced in clinical development. Although pharmacologic and mechanistic differences exist between the two classes, the results of preclinical studies suggest that both inhibit proliferation, have little normal tissue toxicity, and are additive/synergistic with standard therapies. The results from early clinical trials have indicated that both classes of agents are well tolerated and have antitumor activity. However, the first Phase III studies to be completed have not shown an improvement in survival with the addition of the monoclonal antibody C225 to cisplatin in patients with head-and-neck carcinoma or the addition of the kinase inhibitor ZD1839 to chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung cancer. Ongoing and future studies must address issues related to the selection of patients for study, dose and schedule of administration, monotherapy vs. combination treatment, and combinations with standard and investigational agents.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗
PubMed2004

Phase III study of N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl) phenoxy]ethanamine (BMS-217380-01) combined with doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone in metastatic/recurrent breast cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Study MA.19.

PURPOSE: N,N-diethyl-2-[4-(phenylmethyl)phenoxy]ethanamine (DPPE; tesmilifene) is a novel agent that augments chemotherapy cytotoxicity in vitro and in vivo. A phase II trial combining DPPE and doxorubicin (DOX) in metastatic breast carcinoma showed increased response over that expected with DOX. We report a phase III trial comparing DOX with DPPE plus DOX in metastatic or recurrent breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Anthracycline-naive women with measurable metastatic disease were randomly assigned to receive, every 21 days, either DOX 60 mg/m(2) intravenously or DOX during the last 20 minutes of an 80-minute infusion of DPPE (5.3 mg/kg), in both cases to cumulative DOX doses of 450 mg/m(2). Patients receiving DPPE were aggressively premedicated to ameliorate toxicity. End points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and response duration (RD), quality of life (QOL), toxicity, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A planned interim analysis failed to detect an RR difference more than 5%. The study was closed to additional accrual and all DPPE was discontinued. The final analysis was conducted as planned after 256 progression events (median follow-up, 20.5 months). There was no significant difference in RR, RD, or PFS between arms. DPPE plus DOX was statistically superior to DOX in OS (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.91; P =.021). DPPE plus DOX was associated with more gastrointestinal and CNS toxicity. No consistent influence on QOL was detected. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated no advantage in RR, RD, or PFS but significantly superior OS for DPPE plus DOX. Additional studies of DPPE are warranted.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2004

Quality of life assessment of second-line docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy: results of a prospective, randomized phase III trial.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: Docetaxel second-line chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has previously been shown to improve survival significantly compared with best supportive care (BSC). This multicenter phase III trial prospectively investigated quality of life (QOL) in NSCLC patients treated with either second-line docetaxel or BSC. Patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, performance status < or =2, and adequate biochemistry and hematology were eligible if they had received > or =1 platinum-based chemotherapy regimens. Patients were randomized to docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (n=49) or, after protocol amendment, to docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (n=55), or to BSC (n=100), with Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS) and/or QLQ-C30 (with LC13 module) assessment every 3 weeks. RESULTS: Longitudinal analysis including all available assessments over time showed statistically significant differences in patient-rated pain scores in favor of docetaxel overall (P=0.005) or docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (P=0.003) compared to BSC. Trends in favor of docetaxel were noted on observer-rated scales for fatigue and pain for all docetaxel patients, and for total LCSS score, appetite and fatigue with docetaxel 100 mg/m2. Changes from baseline to the last available assessment (end point) showed significantly (P<0.05) less deterioration in LCSS pain score in patients with docetaxel (75 and 100 mg/m2 combined) than with BSC. An improved mean pain score with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 was contrasted with a deterioration in mean pain score with BSC (P<0.01). There was also significantly less deterioration in the global QOL today score with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (P<0.01). Similar trends were recorded with QLQ-C30 assessments. CONCLUSIONS: Second-line docetaxel therapy for advanced NSCLC significantly improves survival with a trend towards less deterioration in QOL compared with BSC.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Phase I/pharmacokinetic study of CCI-779 in patients with recurrent malignant glioma on enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs.

OBJECTIVES: CCI-779 is an ester of the immunosuppressive agent sirolimus (rapamycin) that causes cell-cycle arrest at G1 via inhibition of key signaling pathways resulting in inhibition of RNA translation. Antitumor activity has been demonstrated using cell lines and animal models of malignant glioma. Patients receiving enzyme-inducing anti-epileptic drugs (EIAEDs) can have altered metabolism of drugs like CCI-779 that are metabolized through the hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme system. The objectives of this study were to determine the pharmacokinetic profile and the maximum tolerated dose of CCI-779 in patients with recurrent malignant gliioma taking EIAEDs. STUDY DESIGN: The starting dose of CCI-779 was 250 mg intravenously (IV) administered weekly on a continuous basis. Standard dose escalation was performed until the maximum tolerated dose was established. Toxicity was assessed using the National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria. RESULTS: Two of 6 patients treated at the second dose level of 330 mg sustained a dose-limiting toxicity: grade III stomatitis, grade 3 hypercholesterolemia, or grade 4 hypertriglyceridemia. The maximum tolerated dose was reached at 250 mg IV. Pharmacokinetic profiles were similar to those previously described, but the area under the whole blood concentration-time curve of rapamycin was 1.6 fold lower for patients on EIAEDs. CONCLUSIONS: The recommended phase II dose of CCI 779 for patients on enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs is 250 mg IV weekly. A phase II study is ongoing to determine the efficacy of this agent.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Issues and progress with protein kinase inhibitors for cancer treatment.

Identification of the key roles of protein kinases in cancer has led to extensive efforts to develop kinase inhibitors for the treatment of a wide range of cancers, and more than 30 such agents are now in clinical trials. Here, we consider the crucial issues in the development of kinase inhibitors for cancer, and discuss strategies to address the challenges raised by these issues in the light of preclinical and clinical experiences so far.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

A phase I trial of adenovector-mediated delivery of interleukin-2 (AdIL-2) in high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Preclinical studies demonstrate that intratumoral delivery of adenovirus expressing IL-2 eradicates pre-established tumors in mice and confers immune protection from rechallenge. To explore the activity of AdCAIL-2 in prostate cancer, a Phase I clinical trial was conducted in patients with localized disease and Gleason score >7 or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >10 plus Gleason score 7. A total of 12 patients were injected 4 weeks prior to prostatectomy in a dose-escalation study at doses of 10(9), 5 x 10(9) and 10(10) PFU of virus. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Side effects included perineal discomfort, hematuria, flu-like symptoms in two patients and urinary hesitancy in one patient. Pathology demonstrated an inflammatory response consisting predominantly of CD3+CD8+ T lymphocytes with areas of tumor necrosis. Intracellular cytokine staining of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes demonstrated increases in both gamma-interferon and IL-4 secreting T cells after vaccination. PSA levels fell in five of five evaluable patients treated at the lowest dose (mean decline of 33.3%, range 17-69%). At higher doses, PSA values initially increased after injection, then fell to baseline prior to surgery. This trial demonstrates the feasibility and safety of intraprostatic adenovector-mediated IL-2 gene delivery.

Adenoviridae↗
PubMed2002

Update on epidemiology and therapeutics for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

This chapter presents updated information on the trends and patterns of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) diagnoses as well as new information on chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic options for NHL treatment. In Section I, Dr. Brian Chiu summarizes the current knowledge regarding the etiologic factors and patterns of NHL as well as suggests future epidemiologic studies based on these preliminary results. In Section II, Dr. Bruce Cheson and colleagues outline new chemotherapeutic and small molecule antineoplastic agents with unique mechanisms of action such as protease inhibitors, farnesyl transferase or histone deacetylase inhibitors, and antisense oligonucleotides. In Section III, Dr. Julie Vose reviews the anti-lymphoma effects of monoclonal antibodies, radioimmunoconjugates, idiotype vaccines, and immunologic enhancing adjuvants with respect to mechanisms of action, clinical trials, and their potential for patient therapy.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗