PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Janet Graham

Publications and source records attributed to Janet Graham.

7 recordsLinked to original sources

UGT1A1 genotype testing for irinotecan: A guideline developed by the UK Centre of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation in Pharmacogenomics (CERSI-PGx).

Irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is available as both non-pegylated and pegylated formulations. The non-pegylated formulation is licensed for use in advanced colorectal cancer either in combination with other agents or as monotherapy. However, it is also used off-label across a range of gastrointestinal malignancies and in rare malignancies such as glioblastoma and sarcomas. The pegylated formulation is licensed for use as combination therapy in adult patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Irinotecan is hydrolysed to its active metabolite, SN-38, which is predominantly inactivated by the enzyme uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A1. UGT1A1 is encoded by the gene UGT1A1, which is polymorphically expressed, with allele frequencies varying across populations. Poor metabolizers carry two variants that reduce UGT1A1 enzyme expression or activity, leading to increased risk of irinotecan toxicity. Any patient who is about to be prescribed irinotecan for an epithelial malignancy should have pharmacogenetic testing, to identify clinically relevant UGT1A1 variants, where testing is available. Irinotecan dose should be reduced by 30% at Cycle 1 treatment in poor metabolizers for all indications, with doses titrated thereafter based on tolerability and neutrophil counts. The lack of evidence precludes us from making any recommendation for rare malignancies such as sarcomas. Our guideline is consistent with other international pharmacogenetics prescribing guidelines. This guideline is grounded in the latest evidence but cannot account for all individual factors relevant to patient care. Therefore, prescribers must conduct a thorough assessment of each patient's risk-benefit profile, ensuring that therapy is optimized to maximize benefits while minimizing potential harms.

Humans↗

Critical relationship between sodium valproate dose and human teratogenicity: results of the Australian register of anti-epileptic drugs in pregnancy.

UNLABELLED: To compare the incidence of foetal malformations (FMs) in pregnant women with epilepsy treated with different anti-epileptic drugs (AED) and doses, and the influence of seizures, family and personal history, and environmental factors. A prospective, observational, community-based cohort study. METHODS: A voluntary, Australia-wide, telephone-interview-based register prospectively enrolling three groups of pregnant women: taking AEDs for epilepsy; with epilepsy not taking AEDs; taking AEDs for a non-epileptic indication. Four hundred and fifty eligible women were enrolled over 40 months. Three hundred and ninety six pregnancies had been completed, with 7 sets of twins, for a total of 403 pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: 354 (87.8%) pregnancy outcomes resulted in a healthy live birth, 26 (6.5%) had a FM, 4 (1%) a death in utero, 1 (0.2%) a premature labour with stillbirth, 14 (3.5%) a spontaneous abortion and 4 lost to follow-up. The FM rate was greater in pregnancies exposed to sodium valproate (VPA) in the first trimester (16.0%) compared with those exposed to all other AEDs (16.0% vs. 2.4%, P < 0.01) or no AEDs (16.0% vs. 3.1%, [Formula: see text] ). The mean daily dose of VPA taken in pregnancy with FMs was significantly greater than in those without (1,975 vs. 1,128 mg, P < 0.01). The incidence of FM with VPA doses >or= 1,100 mg was 30.2% vs. 3.2% with doses <1,100 mg (P <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: There is a dose-effect relationship for FM and exposure to VPA during the first trimester of pregnancy, with higher doses of VPA associated with a significantly greater risk than with lower doses or with other AEDs. These results highlight the need to limit, where possible, the dose of VPA in pregnancy.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗

The Australian registry of anti-epileptic drugs in pregnancy: experience after 30 months.

BACKGROUND: Most women with epilepsy need to take antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in pregnancy to prevent the potentially harmful effects of seizures. Retrospective studies have demonstrated an increased chance of having a child with a birth defect (BD) in women with epilepsy taking AEDs. It is uncertain how much of this risk is directly caused by the AEDs and whether certain drugs or combinations are associated with a greater risk. AIMS: To establish a register to evaluate prospectively the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to specific AEDs; to determine whether certain AEDs or combinations were associated with a greater risk; and to determine whether other factors influenced the risk. METHODS: An Australia-wide, prospective, voluntary, telephone-interview based, observational register. Three groups of pregnant women were enrolled: those with epilepsy taking AEDs, those with epilepsy not taking AEDs, and those taking AEDs for a non-epileptic indication. The pregnancy outcomes were evaluated by follow-up interviews and by reference to hospital and treating doctors' records. RESULTS: Over the first 30 months of the study (till December 2001) 334 eligible women were enrolled, with all states and territories being represented. Two hundred and ninety two pregnancies had been completed, of which 256 (88%) resulted in a healthy live birth, 19 (6.5%) a live birth with a birth defect, four an induced abortion because of a detected malformation on ultrasound, one premature labour with a stillbirth and 12 (4%) spontaneous abortions. Of the completed pregnancies, 269 were exposed to at least one AED during the first trimester. The incidence of birth defects in relation to specific AEDs was: valproate (16.7%), phenytoin (10.5%), lamotrigine (7.7%) and carbamazepine (3.3%), none of which was significantly different from that in women with epilepsy not taking an AED (4.3%, n.s.). The dose of valproate taken was higher in pregnancies with BD compared to those without (mean 2081 mg vs. 1149 mg, p<0.0001). The incidence of folate supplementation being taken prior to conception did not differ for pregnancy outcomes with or without BD (70% vs. 66%, n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: The model for the Australian Pregnancy Register appears to be successful, with strong enrolment from all regions over the first 30 months. The study is prospective and includes reference to all new AEDs approved in Australia over the past decade. Analysis of the pregnancy outcomes to date may reveal early trends, but numbers are still to small for any definitive conclusions to be made regarding the relative risk in pregnancy of individual AEDs.

Abortion, Induced↗

Renin-angiotensin system blockade and the risk of hyperkalemia in chronic hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers can cause hyperkalemia in patients with chronic renal insufficiency who are not on dialysis, but the risk of hyperkalemia in hemodialysis patients is unknown. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 251 adult hemodialysis patients to determine if renin-angiotensin system blockade was associated with hyperkalemia, defined as a predialysis serum potassium concentration of 5.5 mmol/L or higher. Medication use was determined by chart review and patient interview. Predialysis serum potassium concentration was measured monthly. RESULTS: There were 367 episodes of hyperkalemia during 1877 person-months of follow-up. After adjustment for potential confounding variables and for clustering of episodes by patient, use of an ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker was associated with a significantly higher risk of hyperkalemia (odds ratio [OR] = 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.4 to 3.4). The increased risk of hyperkalemia with renin-angiotensin system blockade was seen in anuric dialysis patients (OR = 2.3; 95% CI: 1.3 to 4.2), as well as those with residual renal function (OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.0 to 4.1). CONCLUSION: The use of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers is independently associated with an increased risk of developing hyperkalemia in chronic hemodialysis patients. The serum potassium concentration should be closely monitored when these medications are prescribed for hemodialysis patients.

Aged↗