Biomedical subjects

Janet Leatherwood

Publications and source records attributed to Janet Leatherwood.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

The cell cycle-regulated genes of Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Many genes are regulated as an innate part of the eukaryotic cell cycle, and a complex transcriptional network helps enable the cyclic behavior of dividing cells. This transcriptional network has been studied in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (budding yeast) and elsewhere. To provide more perspective on these regulatory mechanisms, we have used microarrays to measure gene expression through the cell cycle of Schizosaccharomyces pombe (fission yeast). The 750 genes with the most significant oscillations were identified and analyzed. There were two broad waves of cell cycle transcription, one in early/mid G2 phase, and the other near the G2/M transition. The early/mid G2 wave included many genes involved in ribosome biogenesis, possibly explaining the cell cycle oscillation in protein synthesis in S. pombe. The G2/M wave included at least three distinctly regulated clusters of genes: one large cluster including mitosis, mitotic exit, and cell separation functions, one small cluster dedicated to DNA replication, and another small cluster dedicated to cytokinesis and division. S. pombe cell cycle genes have relatively long, complex promoters containing groups of multiple DNA sequence motifs, often of two, three, or more different kinds. Many of the genes, transcription factors, and regulatory mechanisms are conserved between S. pombe and S. cerevisiae. Finally, we found preliminary evidence for a nearly genome-wide oscillation in gene expression: 2,000 or more genes undergo slight oscillations in expression as a function of the cell cycle, although whether this is adaptive, or incidental to other events in the cell, such as chromatin condensation, we do not know.

Cell Cycle↗

PubMed2005

PCI proteins eIF3e and eIF3m define distinct translation initiation factor 3 complexes.

BACKGROUND: PCI/MPN domain protein complexes comprise the 19S proteasome lid, the COP9 signalosome (CSN), and eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3). The eIF3 complex is thought to be composed of essential core subunits required for global protein synthesis and non-essential subunits that may modulate mRNA specificity. Interactions of unclear significance were reported between eIF3 subunits and PCI proteins contained in the CSN. RESULTS: Here, we report the unexpected finding that fission yeast has two distinct eIF3 complexes sharing common core subunits, but distinguished by the PCI proteins eIF3e and the novel eIF3m, which was previously annotated as a putative CSN subunit. Whereas neither eIF3e nor eIF3m contribute to the non-essential activities of CSN in cullin-RING ubiquitin ligase control, eif3m, unlike eif3e, is an essential gene required for global cellular protein synthesis and polysome formation. Using a ribonomic approach, this phenotypic distinction was correlated with a different set of mRNAs associated with the eIF3e and eIF3m complexes. Whereas the eIF3m complex appears to associate with the bulk of cellular mRNAs, the eIF3e complex associates with a far more restricted set. The microarray findings were independently corroborated for a random set of 14 mRNAs by RT-PCR analysis. CONCLUSION: We propose that the PCI proteins eIF3e and eIF3m define distinct eIF3 complexes that may assist in the translation of different sets of mRNAs.

Eukaryotic Initiation Factor-3↗

PubMed2005

Negative control contributes to an extensive program of meiotic splicing in fission yeast.

Despite a high frequency of introns in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, regulated splicing is virtually unknown. We present evidence that splicing constitutes a major mechanism for controlling gene expression during meiosis, as 12 of 96 transcripts tested, which encode known components as well as previously uncharacterized ORFs, retain introns until specific times during differentiation. The meiotically spliced pre-mRNAs include two cyclins, rem1 (discovered by Ayte and Nurse) and crs1. Consistent with the use of regulated splicing to block protein production, expression of crs1 in vegetative cells is toxic. Analyses of gene chimeras indicate that splicing is prevented in mitotically growing cells via inhibition, in contrast to the positive control of meiotic splicing in budding yeast. Most strikingly, splicing of crs1 and rem1 is regulated by sequences located outside the coding regions, far from the target introns, a phenomenon previously observed only in metazoans.

Alternative Splicing↗

PubMed2002

Control of replication timing by a transcriptional silencer.

BACKGROUND: Eukaryotic DNA replication starts at many origins. Some origins are used early in S phase, while others are programmed to fire later. In general, late replication is correlated with transcriptional inactivity and with location near the nuclear periphery. However, the mechanisms that determine replication timing are unclear, and the cause-and-effect relationship between late replication, transcriptional inactivity, and location at the nuclear periphery is unknown. RESULTS: Using budding yeast, we show that a transcriptional silencer, HMR-E, can reset the time of initiation of ARS305 from early to late. This resetting requires Sir proteins, which are silencers of transcription. Resetting can also be achieved by targeting Sir4 to ARS305. HMR-E sequences and targeted Sir4, both of which cause late replication of ARS305, also cause transcriptional silencing of the nearby APA1 gene. CONCLUSIONS: Sir proteins are sufficient to reprogram an origin from early to late; that is, Sir proteins are a cause of late replication. Presumably, the tight chromatin structure promoted by Sir proteins favors both transcriptional inactivity and late replication.

Base Sequence↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Connecting ORC and heterochromatin: why?

Considerable evidence connects heterochromatin or silenced chromatin with the Origin Recognition Complex (ORC) which is needed for initiation of DNA replication. In this review we consider biological forces that might be served by this connection. The prevailing view in the literature is that ORC recruits heterochromatin. This seems paradoxical because a replication initiator, ORC, would be recruiting factors which seem to oppose replication by forming inaccessible chromatin structures. Here we suggest a different view, that heterochromatin recruits ORC to facilitate replication of hard-to-replicate heterochromatic regions. We consider how existing data can be reconciled with this viewpoint, and we consider the biological predictions that arise from this perspective

Animals↗