PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Janey L Wiggs

Publications and source records attributed to Janey L Wiggs.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Can we identify people with Alzheimer's disease from examination of the eye? A bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR) study.

BACKGROUND: Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer's disease (AD) is thought to be driven by amyloid-beta and tau deposition in the cerebral vasculature and brain. As the eye is an extension of the central nervous system, this study aimed to determine which neurovascular and neuroretinal changes in the eye are caused by AD rather than associations of the disease. METHODS: Bidirectional two-sample univariable and multivariable Mendelian randomization (MR) methods were applied. Instrumental variables were derived from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of AD and the following ocular features: thickness measurements of central macula (MT), retinal nerve fibre layer (mRNFL), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (mGCIPL), outer nuclear layer (ONL), inner segment layer (IS), and outer segment (OS) from macular region OCT scans; arteriolar tortuosity (AT), venular tortuosity (VT), venular width (VW), fractal dimension (FD), vertical cup-to-disc ratio (VCDR), optic cup area (OCA), and optic disc area (ODA) derived from other imaging methods. RESULTS: There was strong evidence that genetic liability to AD affected the retinal vasculature by specifically increasing AT (β = 0.007;95%CI=0.002,0.011;p-value=0.005) in UK Biobank participants (n=52,798). AD may influence the mRNFL (β=-0.047,95%CI=-0.119,0.023,p-value=0.18) and mGCIPL (β=-0.061;95%CI=-0.14,0.025,p-value=0.16) of the inner retina and OS layer (β = 0.044;95%CI=-0.0001,0.08;p-value=0.05) but the evidence was weak. Multivariable MR analysis showed that a causal relationship between optic disc area and AD (OR=0.76;95%CI=0.62,0.93,p-value=0.009) was probably mediated by refractive error. CONCLUSION: Early cerebrovascular signs of AD may be detected by examination of the eye. Further investigation is required to determine the clinical utility of eye screening for dementia.

Humans

Association of FOXC1 Duplications With Juvenile Open-Angle Glaucoma.

IMPORTANCE: While FOXC1 single-nucleotide variants and deletions are well-established causes of Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome, few FOXC1 duplications have been reported. This study investigated families with duplications encompassing the FOXC1 gene to refine the associated phenotypic spectrum and contribution to glaucoma. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and phenotype of FOXC1 duplications in 2 large glaucoma registries. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective observational genetic cohort study included participants recruited from the Australian & New Zealand Registry of Advanced Glaucoma (ANZRAG) and the Massachusetts Eye and Ear (MEE) cohort from 2008 through 2025. Participants with glaucoma, and available relatives, underwent genomic testing to identify duplications encompassing FOXC1 using exome sequencing and genotyping arrays (ANZRAG) or whole-genome sequencing (MEE). Data analyses were conducted from 2022 through 2025. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Prevalence of FOXC1 duplications, age at glaucoma onset, and phenotype, including ocular and systemic features. RESULTS: Twenty individuals from 10 families (50% female and 50% male; 70% self-described as broadly European [Australian/British, British, English/German, English/Polish, European, or Scottish], 25% as Asian [Chinese or Filipino], and 5% as Latin American [Salvadoran]) were identified with FOXC1 duplications. All genetically tested individuals were diagnosed with glaucoma, demonstrating high penetrance. Seventeen individuals were referred with juvenile open-angle glaucoma (JOAG), 1 with primary open-angle glaucoma, 1 with primary congenital glaucoma, and 1 with anterior segment dysgenesis. The diagnosis of 4 individuals from 1 family with ectropion uveae was revised to anterior segment dysgenesis. Systemic features were reported for 2 participants (10.5%), including subtle dental findings and mild facial dysmorphism. Duplications encompassing FOXC1 were among the most common monogenic contributors to JOAG. In the ANZRAG group, they accounted for 13.5% (95% CI, 6.7%-25.3%) of JOAG probands with a genetic diagnosis, second to MYOC (53.8%; 95% CI, 40.5%-66.7%). In the MEE group, FOXC1 duplications accounted for 9.5% (95% CI, 2.7%-28.9%) of JOAG probands with a genetic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These findings suggest FOXC1 duplications are an underrecognized, highly penetrant, but variably expressive, genetic variation associated with JOAG. Findings for the relatively modest number of individuals in the retrospective study were associated with wide confidence intervals. This limitation is often inherent to studies of JOAG, a rare condition for which individual genetic variants account for only a subset of cases. Despite this, the findings highlight the genetic heterogeneity of JOAG and support the potential importance of considering routine genetic copy-number variant analysis for individuals with JOAG.

Humans