Biomedical subjects

Janine Becker

Publications and source records attributed to Janine Becker.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The clinical significance of adaptation to changing health: a meta-analysis of response shift.

AIMS: When individuals experience changes in their health states, they may alter their internal standards, values, or conceptualization of quality of life (QOL). Such 'response shifts' can affect or distort QOL outcome measurement, which is of particular concern when evaluating medical or psychosocial interventions. Although clinicians and researchers acknowledge the occurrence of response shifts, little is known about the magnitude and clinical significance of those effects. To fill this gap in knowledge about response shift phenomena, we performed a meta-analysis on published QOL articles on response shift. METHODS: Extensive literature searches and multiple contacts with researchers yielded a collection of 494 articles for potential reviewing. We retained only published longitudinal studies that measured response shift, resulting in 26, of which 19 reported the requisite data for computing an effect size (ES). We calculated and compared the ESs for each study with regard to potential moderator variables: the QOL domains measured, disease group investigated, sample size, and response shift method used. We rated studies for quality to allow ES weighting. RESULTS: When we examined ES absolute values, we found that ES magnitude was small, with the largest ESs detected for fatigue, followed by global QOL, physical role limitation, psychological well-being, and pain (mean absolute value(ES(weighted)) = 0.32, 0.30, 0.24, 0.12, and 0.08, respectively). ESs varied considerably in direction. Aggregating raw ES scores over all studies led to positive and negative values canceling each other out (mean directional ES(weighted) = 0.17, 0.02, -0.01, 0.06, and 0.02, respectively). We found little evidence of an effect for the moderator variables examined. CONCLUSIONS: A definitive conclusion on the clinical significance of response shift cannot currently be drawn from existing studies. For a number of reasons, ES estimates were primarily based on then-test results, a method that is not without criticism, such as its susceptibility to recall bias. We recommend a standardized approach for reporting results of future response shift research to advance the field and to facilitate interpretation and comparisons across studies.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed2006

[Standardized diagnosing: computer-assisted (CIDI) diagnoses compared to clinically-judged diagnoses in a psychosomatic setting].

BACKGROUND: Within the past two decades, there has been an increasing trend towards the use of empirically-based, standardized instruments to diagnose mental disorders. The purpose of this study was to investigate the congruence between clinically-derived and standardized computerized diagnoses using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) in a psychosomatic setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: N = 230 inpatients treated at the Department of Psychosomatic Medicine, Charité Berlin, were diagnosed for mental disorders by experienced clinicians and by the CIDI according to the diagnostic criteria of ICD-10 and DSM-IV. RESULTS: Congruence between computerized and clinically-derived diagnoses for all mental disorders was fair to poor (kappa = 0.0 - 0.33). The diagnostic congruence of somatoform (F45), anxiety (F40 - 41), depressive (F32 - 34), eating (F50) and dissociative disorders (F44) and disorders due to psychoactive substance use (F10 - 19) was fairly low (kappa = 0.19 - 0.33). Diagnostic congruence of diagnoses of reactions to severe stress (F43) and obsessive compulsive disorders (F42) was particularly poor (kappa = 0.0 - 0.01). CONCLUSION: Overall diagnostic congruence between computerized and clinical diagnostics was unsatisfactory. Thus, the validity of computer-assisted standardized interviews - like the CIDI - is questionable in a psychosomatic setting.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Development of a computer-adaptive test for depression (D-CAT).

Depression is one of the most prevalent mental health problems and measuring depressive symptoms becomes increasingly important in science as well as medical practice. Computer Adaptive Tests (CAT) based on the Item Response Theory (IRT) promise to enhance measurement precision and reduce respondent's burden. Our aim was to develop a CAT application to measure depressive symptoms. Three thousand two hundred seventy psychosomatic patients answered an overall of 11 mental health questionnaires at the University Clinic in Berlin. Three independent reviewers rated 144 items out of these questionnaires as indicative of depressive symptoms. All items underwent six empirical steps to analyze unidimensionality, local independence and item discrimination. Finally 64 items could be used to calculate item parameters applying a Generalized Partial Credit Model (GPCM). CAT scores were estimated using an 'expected a posteriori' algorithm (EAP). Two simulation experiments showed that for theta values within the range of 2SD around the mean (98% of the cases), the latent trait can be estimated out of approximately six items with a predefined standard error of [Symbol: see text] 0.32 (reliability rho [Symbol: see text] 0.90). The CAT-scores correlated high with scores of all depression items (r = 0.95), with the Beck Depression Inventory (r = 0.79) and with a CES-D 8 item short form (r = 0.76). We conclude that the Depression-CAT measures depressive symptoms with high precision and low respondent burden.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

[Disturbed regulation of self-esteem in patients with overt versus covert self-destructive behaviour].

OBJECTIVES: According to psychoanalytic models self-harming patients are characterised by an unstable self-system and a disturbed regulation of self-esteem. This is presumed to be denied or dissociated to a greater degree by those who harm themselves secretly (factitious patients) as compared to those who show open self-harm. It is hypothesised and empirically tested that self-destructive patients have more profound disorders of narcissistic self-regulation than patients without self-destruction, and that this should be more evident in patients with overt self-destructive behaviour. METHODS: The sample consists of 354 psychosomatic patients, 32 of whom demonstrated self-destructive behaviour (18 exclusively overt and 6 exclusively covert types of behaviour, according to Willenberg et al.). The narcissism inventory was applied. RESULTS: Self-destructive patients showed higher levels on the "threatened self"-dimension than psychosomatic patients without self-harm. Overtly self-harming patients showed a higher degree of narcissistic self-regulation than covertly self-destructive patients. CONCLUSIONS: This supports theoretical assumptions of a disturbed regulation of self-esteem in self-destructive patients, especially in overtly self-harming patients.

Adolescent↗