PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jason Haberman

Publications and source records attributed to Jason Haberman.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Neural activity of inferences during story comprehension.

In this event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, participants listened to and comprehended short stories implying or explicitly stating inference events. The aim of this study was to examine the neural mechanisms that underlie inference generation, a process essential to successful comprehension. We observed distinct patterns of increased fMRI signal for implied over explicit events at two critical points during the stories: (1) within the right superior temporal gyrus when a verb in the text implied the inference; and (2) within the left superior temporal gyrus at the coherence break or when participants need to generate an inference to understand the story. To find the most compelling evidence of neural activity during inference generation, we examined fMRI signal at these two critical points separately for people with high working memory capacity (i.e., those individuals who are most likely to draw inferences during text comprehension). Interestingly, high working memory individuals showed greater fMRI signal for implied than explicit events in the left inferior frontal gyrus at the coherence break compared to low working memory individuals. This present study provides evidence that areas within the superior temporal gyrus and inferior frontal gyrus are heavily recruited when individuals generate inferences, even during ongoing comprehension that demands many cognitive processes. In addition, the data suggest that the right hemisphere superior temporal gyrus is particularly involved during early inferential processing, whereas the left hemisphere superior temporal gyrus is particularly involved during later inferential processing in story comprehension.

Adolescent↗

Neural activity when people solve verbal problems with insight.

People sometimes solve problems with a unique process called insight, accompanied by an "Aha!" experience. It has long been unclear whether different cognitive and neural processes lead to insight versus noninsight solutions, or if solutions differ only in subsequent subjective feeling. Recent behavioral studies indicate distinct patterns of performance and suggest differential hemispheric involvement for insight and noninsight solutions. Subjects solved verbal problems, and after each correct solution indicated whether they solved with or without insight. We observed two objective neural correlates of insight. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (Experiment 1) revealed increased activity in the right hemisphere anterior superior temporal gyrus for insight relative to noninsight solutions. The same region was active during initial solving efforts. Scalp electroencephalogram recordings (Experiment 2) revealed a sudden burst of high-frequency (gamma-band) neural activity in the same area beginning 0.3 s prior to insight solutions. This right anterior temporal area is associated with making connections across distantly related information during comprehension. Although all problem solving relies on a largely shared cortical network, the sudden flash of insight occurs when solvers engage distinct neural and cognitive processes that allow them to see connections that previously eluded them.

Adolescent↗