Mortality in ICE Detention-Reply.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Journal Article↗
Biomedical subjects
Jason R Andrews
Publications and source records attributed to Jason R Andrews.
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology Enhanced Prevalence and Incidence Criteria (STROBE EPIC): An Extension of the STROBE Statement.
Prevalence and incidence are fundamental metrics with numerous applications in epidemiology. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline lacks specific items for reporting studies of disease prevalence or incidence. To address this gap, the STROBE Enhanced Prevalence and Incidence Criteria (STROBE EPIC) extension was developed in accordance with established methods for reporting guideline development. The authors generated an initial list of reporting items, conducted a modified Delphi process, and convened a face-to-face consensus meeting to confirm the need for a STROBE extension and to generate an early version of the checklist. They conducted 2 further Delphi surveys, first extending from typhoid and other invasive salmonelloses to all infectious diseases, and then to noncommunicable diseases and injuries. Finally, experts piloted the checklist on relevant manuscripts to critically assess if it was clear, concise, complete, and free of errors. An executive group curated the checklist after every survey round. The STROBE EPIC checklist comprises 47 items in the domains of title (1 item), abstract (2 items), introduction (1 item), methods (25 items), results (6 items), discussion (7 items), and other information (5 items). STROBE EPIC items address reporting of study design, adjustment factors for underreporting and underdiagnosis, denominator population estimation, case ascertainment methods, factors producing artefactual changes to observed disease prevalence or incidence, limitations of incomplete surveillance coverage, generalizability of short-duration studies, and data availability. The authors anticipate that the STROBE EPIC extension will be used by researchers, authors, modelers, burden-of-disease researchers, peer reviewers, and journal editors to optimize the presentation of epidemiologic evidence to support diverse health policy decisions.
Humans↗
Comparison of phylogenetic metrics of transmission between symptomatic and asymptomatic tuberculosis in individuals who were incarcerated in Brazil in 2008-24: a retrospective genomic epidemiology study.
BACKGROUND: Tuberculosis control efforts have traditionally targeted symptomatic individuals; however, the role of asymptomatic cases in sustaining transmission is increasingly recognised. We aimed to quantify the contribution of asymptomatic tuberculosis to recent transmission using genomic and epidemiological data from a high-transmission setting. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective genomic epidemiology study of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates collected in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, between Aug 25, 2008, and March 19, 2024. Available isolates underwent whole-genome sequencing. Demographic, clinical, incarceration history, and laboratory metadata were obtained from surveillance records. From Jan 1, 2017, to March 19, 2024, active case finding was conducted in the state's three largest prisons (all male-only facilities), during which sputum samples were collected from individuals irrespective of symptoms and tested using GeneXpert and culture. Comparisons of transmission between individuals with and without symptoms were restricted to individuals who were incarcerated and were identified through active case finding and for whom high-quality, M tuberculosis lineage 4 genomes were available. Metrics of recent transmission included phylogenetic clustering, time-scaled haplotype density (THD), local branching index (LBI), and transmission probabilities inferred using Bayesian Reconstruction and Evolutionary Analysis of Transmission Histories. FINDINGS: 4448 tuberculosis cases were notified in Mato Grosso do Sul in 2008-24. After excluding cases for which M tuberculosis isolates were not available or had low sequencing quality, who had contaminated cultures or mixed infection, or who were infected with non-lineage 4 M tuberculosis, we included 2362 lineage 4 M tuberculosis isolates with high-quality genome sequences. 1849 (78·3%) of 2362 isolates were part of a genomic cluster. Among 2362 individuals with tuberculosis, 1137 (48·1%) were incarcerated at diagnosis. Of these individuals, 505 were identified through active case finding in three male-only prisons. The median age was 30 years (IQR 25-37); 304 (60·2%) had mixed ethnicity, 90 (17·8%) were White, 56 (11·1%) were Black, 13 (2·6%) were Indigenous, and six (1·2%) were Asian. 277 (54·9%) had symptomatic disease and 228 (45·1%) had asymptomatic tuberculosis. There were no significant differences between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in phylogenetic clustering (213 [76·9%] of 277 vs 195 [85·5%] of 228; p=0·37), THD (median 0·39 [IQR 0·06-0·62] vs 0·50 [0·09-0·65]; p=0·12), or LBI (0·00863 [0·00810-0·00988] vs 0·00871 [0·00829-0·01020]; p=0·088). Bayesian transmission trees showed no significant difference in the number of secondary infections inferred from symptomatic compared with asymptomatic individuals (p=0·56). These findings were consistent across genomic clusters and robust to model assumptions. INTERPRETATION: We identified no differences in transmission between individuals who were symptomatic and those who were asymptomatic using multiple genomic measures. In this high-transmission setting, where systematic screening is implemented, our findings indicate that asymptomatic tuberculosis substantially contributes to tuberculosis transmission at the population level. These results suggest that symptom-based case detection alone is likely to be insufficient to interrupt transmission and highlight the importance of expanded screening strategies in high-risk populations. FUNDING: US National Institutes of Health and the Brazilian National Research Council (CNPq).
Humans↗
Comparison of phylogenetic metrics of transmission in symptomatic and asymptomatic tuberculosis.
BACKGROUND: Understanding drivers of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb) transmission remains a critical challenge in high-burden settings. Tuberculosis control efforts traditionally target symptomatic individuals, yet the role of asymptomatic cases in sustaining transmission is increasing recognized. METHODS: We conducted a genomic and epidemiological analysis of Mtb isolates collected in Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil, between 2008 and 2024. From 2017 to 2022, active case finding was performed in three of the state's largest prisons, whereby sputum was collected from individuals irrespective of symptoms and tested by GeneXpert and culture. We evaluated several metrics of recent transmission from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals, including phylogenetic clustering, Time-scaled Haplotype Density (THD), Local Branching Index (LBI), and transmission probabilities inferred using the Bayesian Reconstruction and Evolutionary Analysis of Transmission Histories (BREATH). FINDINGS: We sequenced 2,362 Mtb strains, of which 3.5% (115/2,362) were resistant to at least one drug, and 0.6% (16/2,362) were multi-drug resistant. Most strains were lineage 4, and 78.2% of all isolates were part of a genomic cluster. Among 2,362 individuals with tuberculosis, 1,137 were incarcerated at the time of diagnosis. Among these, 505 were identified through active case finding: 277 had symptomatic disease and 228 had asymptomatic tuberculosis. There was no significant difference in phylogenetic clustering proportion (77% vs. 85%; p= 0.816), THD (median 0.50 vs. 0.39; p = 0.120), or LBI (median 0.00863 vs. 0.00871; p = 0.086) between symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals. Bayesian transmission trees revealed no significant difference in the number of secondary infections inferred from symptomatic compared with asymptomatic individuals (p = 0.56). These findings were consistent across genomic clusters and robust to model assumptions. INTERPRETATION: We identified no differences in transmission from symptomatic compared with asymptomatic individuals, using several genomic measures of transmission, underscoring the substantial contribution that asymptomatic tuberculosis makes to transmission at the population level.
Asymptomatic↗