Are drug-eluting stents cost-effective? It depends on whom you ask.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
Biomedical subjects
Jason Ryan
Publications and source records attributed to Jason Ryan.
Drug-eluting stents for ST[corrected]-elevation acute myocardial infarction: do we need randomized trials?
Since their introduction, drug-eluting stents have rapidly altered modern medicine's approach to coronary artery disease. Before the development of drug-eluting stents, standard bare-metal stents were plagued by in-stent restenosis, requiring repeat revascularization in as many as 15-20% of patients during the first 6-12 months following implantation [1]. The currently approved drug-eluting stents have dramatically reduced this complication by using a polymer-impregnated coating that elutes either paclitaxel or sirolimus to inhibit smooth muscle proliferation. The pivotal TAXUS-IV [2] and SIRIUS [3] trials compared drug-eluting stents with standard bare-metal stents and found rates of target vessel revascularization ranging from 3 to 4.1% in stable coronary artery disease patients - far lower than that had been seen previously with conventional standard bare-metal stents. After their approval in April 2003, drug-eluting stents use in clinical practice expanded rapidly. Within 9 months of their introduction, drug-eluting stents comprised 35% of all stent implantations in the United States [4]. In the last year at our own institution, drug-eluting stents comprised over 85% of all stents implanted. Despite their extensive use, data regarding the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in certain clinical scenarios are limited. To date, the only published data supporting drug-eluting stents in ST[corrected]-elevation acute myocardial infarction come from the retrospective Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital registry [5] and the randomized, controlled single high-dose bolus tirofiban and sirolimus-eluting stent vs. abciximab and bare-metal stent in myocardial infarction study [6]. In this chapter, we discuss the theoretical risks and benefits of drug-eluting stents for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction, the available data regarding their use, and the areas in which future studies are needed.
Coated Materials, Biocompatible↗
Unintended consequences: the accreditation council for graduate medical education work-hour rules in practice.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Accreditation↗
Statins decrease perioperative cardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery: the Statins for Risk Reduction in Surgery (StaRRS) study.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to assess whether statins may decrease cardiac complications in patients undergoing noncardiac vascular surgery. BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular complications account for considerable morbidity in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Statins decrease cardiac morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary disease, and the beneficial treatment effect is seen early, before any measurable increase in coronary artery diameter. METHODS: A retrospective study recorded patient characteristics, past medical history, and admission medications on all patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, aortic surgery, or lower extremity revascularization over a two-year period (January 1999 to December 2000) at a tertiary referral center. Recorded perioperative complication outcomes included death, myocardial infarction, ischemia, congestive heart failure, and ventricular tachyarrhythmias occurring during the index hospitalization. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions identified predictors of perioperative cardiac complications and medications that might confer a protective effect. RESULTS: Complications occurred in 157 of 1,163 eligible hospitalizations and were significantly fewer in patients receiving statins (9.9%) than in those not receiving statins (16.5%, p = 0.001). The difference was mostly accounted by myocardial ischemia and congestive heart failure. After adjusting for other significant predictors of perioperative complications (age, gender, type of surgery, emergent surgery, left ventricular dysfunction, and diabetes mellitus), statins still conferred a highly significant protective effect (odds ratio 0.52, p = 0.001). The protective effect was similar across diverse patient subgroups and persisted after accounting for the likelihood of patients to have hypercholesterolemia by considering their propensity to use statins. CONCLUSIONS: Use of statins was highly protective against perioperative cardiac complications in patients undergoing vascular surgery in this retrospective study.
Acute Disease↗