PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jaume Padilla

Publications and source records attributed to Jaume Padilla.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

The effect of acute exercise on endothelial function following a high-fat meal.

The transient impairment of endothelial function following a high-fat meal is well established. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD) decreases between 2 and 6 h post ingestion. Whether this impairment can be reduced with acute aerobic exercise has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to investigate if a single sustained aerobic exercise session can counteract the postprandial attenuation in brachial artery FMD associated with the ingestion of a high-fat meal. Eight apparently healthy adults (five men, three women), age 25.5 +/- 0.8 years, performed three treatment conditions in a counter-balanced design: (1) low-fat meal alone (LFM), (2) high-fat meal alone (HFM), and (3) one session of aerobic exercise presented 2 h after ingesting a high-fat meal (HFM-EX). The examination of brachial artery FMD was performed at baseline and 4 h following the ingestion of the meal for each treatment condition. A 3 x 2 (treatment x time) repeated measures ANOVA exhibited a significant interaction (P = 0.019). Preprandial FMDs were similar (P = 0.863) among all three treatment conditions. The FMDs following the LFM (7.18 +/- 1.31%) and HFM-EX (8.72 +/- 0.94%) were significantly higher (P = 0.001) than the FMD following the HFM (4.29 +/- 1.64%). FMD was significantly elevated above preprandial values following the HFM-EX (5.61 +/- 1.54 to 8.72 +/- 0.94%, P = 0.005) but was unchanged following the LFM (6.17 +/- 0.94 to 7.18 +/- 1.31%, P = 0.317) and the HFM (5.73 +/- 1.23 to 4.29 +/- 1.64%, P = 0.160). These findings suggest that a single aerobic exercise session cannot only counteract the postprandial endothelial dysfunction induced by the ingestion of a high-fat meal, but also increase brachial artery FMD in apparently healthy adults.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

A comparison between active- and reactive-hyperaemia-induced brachial artery vasodilation.

The measurement of brachial artery vasodilation in response to a hyperaemic stimulus has been used extensively to assess changes in endothelial function. However, whether or not similar changes occur in response to an active hyperaemic stimulus is unknown. The purpose of the present study was to compare brachial artery vasodilation in response to an active compared with a reactive hyperaemic stimulus following a known perturbation of endothelial function. Eight apparently healthy adults were assigned to four treatment conditions in a counter-balanced design: (i) low-fat meal with active hyperaemic stimulus (LFM-A), (ii) high-fat meal with active hyperaemic stimulus (HFM-A), (iii) low-fat meal with reactive hyperaemic stimulus (LFM-R), and (iv) high-fat meal with reactive hyperaemic stimulus (HFM-R). Meals were ingested at 08:00 hours on each treatment day. Brachial artery vasodilation was assessed via ultrasound 4 h after ingestion of each meal. The active hyperaemic stimulus was induced by 5 min of rhythmic handgrip exercise, whereas reactive hyperaemia was induced by 5 min of forearm occlusion. Brachial artery vasodilation was expressed as the percentage change in diameter from baseline to post-active/reactive hyperaemia. Using a 2x2 repeated measures ANOVA, a significant stimulusxmeal interaction (P=0.025) was found. Simple main effects revealed no difference (P=0.541) in brachial artery vasodilation between LFM-A (5.75+/-1.64%) and HFM-A (6.39+/-1.45%); however, a significant decrease (P=0.014) in brachial artery vasodilation was found in the HFM-R (4.29+/-1.64%) compared with the LFM-R (7.18+/-1.13%) treatment. In conclusion, the measurement of brachial artery vasodilation in response to active hyperaemia did not detect a change in endothelial function following a single perturbation meal, whereas reactive hyperaemia did.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Variability of flow-mediated dilation measurements with repetitive reactive hyperemia.

To capture the response of an acute intervention, multiple post intervention measurements of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) must be performed. The effect of repetitive reactive hyperemia on endothelial function and the measurement of FMD are unknown. The purpose of this investigation was (1) to examine the effect of repetitive reactive hyperemia on brachial artery FMD and (2) to determine whether brachial artery FMD is stable during a 2-h morning period. We investigated FMD in 20 apparently healthy college students on three randomized treatment days every 30 min (T30), 60 min (T60), and 120 min (T120) throughout a 2-h morning period (08.00 h to 10.00 h). An ANOVA (p > 0.05) and ICC (> 0.40) were both needed to confirm no difference among repetitive reactive hyperemia treatments. In response to repetitive reactive hyperemia, there was no difference (p = 0.307; ICC > 0.40) within the first and last FMD measurements of each treatment condition or between treatment conditions (p = 0.344; ICC > 0.40). FMD was similar (p = 0.348) throughout the 2-h morning period. In conclusion, repetitive reactive hyperemia over a 2-h period has no effect on FMD measurements in apparently healthy college students. In addition, this study found no time trends for FMD measurements during the 2-h morning period to allow for pre/post intervention FMD measurements.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Accumulation of physical activity reduces blood pressure in pre- and hypertension.

PURPOSE: The effectiveness of lifestyle physical activity to reduce BP in prehypertension/hypertension is unclear. The purpose of this study was: 1) to investigate the magnitude and duration of ambulatory BP (AmBP) reduction after the accumulation of one day of lifestyle physical activity (PAaccum) in normotension, prehypertension, and hypertension; and 2) to determine the relationship between energy expenditure (EE) and BP reduction. METHODS: Subjects were eight normotensive (112.3/73.1 +/- 1.6/1.9 mm Hg), 10 prehypertensive (124.3/79.3 +/- 1.2/1.6 mm Hg), and 10 hypertensive (139.7/83.3 +/- 3.7/3.7 mm Hg) adults. EE was analyzed during the PA and corresponding control (C) treatment; AmBP was analyzed for 12 h after the PAaccum and corresponding C. EE of the PA (EEPA) was calculated as the total EE for the duration of the PA. Steps to analyze and compare the BP reduction after PAaccum were: 1) determination of the duration of the BP reduction (95% CI), 2) determination of the magnitude of the BP reduction (paired t-tests of C vs PA), 3) determination of the area of the BP reduction, and 4) comparison of the areas (independent t-test) between prehypertension and hypertension. Correlation between EE(PA-C) and BP reduction was examined RESULTS: No BP differences were found for normotension or for DBP in any group. Significant difference in SBP after the PAaccum were found for prehypertensives (magnitude; area = 6.6 +/- 2.3 mm Hg; 21.7 +/- 15.2 mm Hg x h(-1)) for 6 h and for hypertensives (12.9 +/- 4.3 mm Hg; 123.4 + 42.8 mm Hg x h(-1)) for 8 h; area was significantly different between groups. No correlation was found between EE(PA-C) and BP reduction. CONCLUSION: The PAaccum reduces SBP in hypertension and prehypertension but does not appear to be related to the EE(PA-C). PAaccum can be utilized as an approach to treat prehypertension and hypertension.

Adult↗