Biomedical subjects

Jean Bouyer

Publications and source records attributed to Jean Bouyer.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2003

Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: a comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France.

This case-control study was associated with a regional register of ectopic pregnancy between 1993 and 2000 in France. It included 803 cases of ectopic pregnancy and 1,683 deliveries and was powerful enough to investigate all ectopic pregnancy risk factors. The main risk factors were infectious history (adjusted attributable risk = 0.33; adjusted odds ratio for previous pelvic infectious disease = 3.4, 95% percent confidence interval (CI): 2.4, 5.0) and smoking (adjusted attributable risk = 0.35; adjusted odds ratio = 3.9, 95% CI: 2.6, 5.9 for >20 cigarettes/day vs. women who had never smoked). The other risk factors were age (associated per se with a risk of ectopic pregnancy), prior spontaneous abortions, history of infertility, and previous use of an intrauterine device. Prior medical induced abortion was associated with a risk of ectopic pregnancy (adjusted odds ratio = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.1, 7.2); no such association was observed for surgical abortion (adjusted odds ratio = 1.1, 95% CI: 0.8, 1.6). The total attributable risk of all the factors investigated was 0.76. As close associations were found between ectopic pregnancy and infertility and between ectopic pregnancy and spontaneous abortion, further research into ectopic pregnancy should focus on risk factors common to these conditions. In terms of public health, increasing awareness of the effects of smoking may be useful for ectopic pregnancy prevention.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Choosing marginal or random-effects models for longitudinal binary responses: application to self-reported disability among older persons.

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal studies with binary repeated outcomes are now widespread in epidemiology. The statistical analysis of these studies presents difficulties and standard methods are inadequate. METHODS: We consider strategies for modelling binary repeated responses and focus on two specific issues: the choice between marginal and random-effects models, and the choice of the time point origin. These issues are addressed using the example of self-reported disability in older women assessed annually for 6 years. The indicator of disability "needing help to go outdoors or home-confined" is used. RESULTS: In view of the observed associations between the responses for consecutive years, the baseline response was considered as a covariate. We compared the marginal and random-effects models first when only the influence of time and age is analysed and second when individual risk factors are studied in an aetiological perspective. There were substantial differences between the parameter estimates. They were due to differences between specific concepts related to the two models and the large between-individual heterogeneity revealed by the analysis. CONCLUSIONS: A random-effects model appears to be most suitable for the analysis of self-reported disability in older women.

Activities of Daily Living↗

PubMed2002

Familial aggregation of fetal growth restriction in a French cohort of 7,822 term births between 1971 and 1985.

An association between fetal growth restriction and increased rates of metabolic and cardiovascular diseases in adulthood has been reported. This study evaluated familial aggregation of fetal growth restriction in term births. The population consisted of 3,505 sibships comprised of 7,822 full-term singleton infants born between 1971 and 1985 in Haguenau, France, and selected from a regional register of births. Sib-sib odds ratios were estimated for being born small for gestational age (SGA), defined as having a birth weight below the 10th percentile of the sex-specific curve of birth weight by week of gestation. SGA births were further stratified according to ponderal index (birth weight/length(3)). After adjustment for maternal factors, the sib-sib odds ratios were 4.8 (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7, 6.3) for all SGA births, 7.7 (95% CI: 4.1, 14.7) for SGA births with a low ponderal index (<10th percentile), and 4.4 (95% CI: 2.3, 8.2) for SGA births with a normal ponderal index (25th-75th percentile). None of the maternal factors investigated significantly influenced the magnitude of these odds ratios. This strong residual sib-sib aggregation suggests a role for genetic and/or shared environmental factors in the etiology of fetal growth restriction, especially when associated with a low ponderal index.

Cohort Studies↗