PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jean M Pottinger

Publications and source records attributed to Jean M Pottinger.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Improving methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus surveillance and reporting in intensive care units.

BACKGROUND: Routine culturing of patients in intensive care units (ICUs) for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) identifies unrecognized carriers and facilitates timely isolation. However, the benefit of surveillance in detecting prevalent and incident carriers likely varies among ICUs. In addition, many assessments underestimate the incidence of acquisition by including prevalent carriers in the at-risk population. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using accurate at-risk populations to evaluate the range of benefit of admission and weekly surveillance cultures in detecting otherwise unrecognized MRSA in 12 ICUs in 5 states. RESULTS: We assessed 142 ICU-months. Among the 12 ICUs, the admission prevalence of imported MRSA was 5%-21%, with admission surveillance providing 30%-135% increases in rates of detection. The monthly hospital-associated incidence was 2%-6%, with weekly surveillance providing 7%-157% increases in detection. The common practice of reporting incidence using the total number of patients or total patient-days underestimated incidence by one-third. Surgical ICUs had lower MRSA importation but higher MRSA incidence. Overall, routine surveillance prevented the misclassification of 17% (unit range, 11%-29%) of "incident" carriers, compared with clinical cultures, and increased precaution days by 18% (unit range, 11%-91%). CONCLUSIONS: Routine surveillance significantly increases the detection of MRSA, but this benefit is not uniform across ICUs, even with high compliance and the use of correct denominators.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Improving the assessment of vancomycin-resistant enterococci by routine screening.

BACKGROUND: As infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) increases in hospitals, knowledge about VRE reservoirs and improved accuracy of epidemiologic measures are needed. Many assessments underestimate incidence by including prevalent carriers in at-risk populations. Routine surveillance cultures can substantially improve prevalence and incidence estimates, and assessing the range of improvement across diverse units is important. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study using accurate at-risk populations to evaluate the range of benefit of admission and weekly surveillance cultures in detecting unrecognized VRE in 14 patient-care units. RESULTS: We assessed 165 unit-months. The admission prevalence of VRE was 2.2%-27.2%, with admission surveillance providing 2.2-17-fold increased detection. Medical units were significantly more likely to admit VRE carriers than were surgical units. Monthly incidence was 0.8%-9.7%, with weekly surveillance providing 3.3-15.4-fold increased detection. The common practice of reporting incidence using the total number of patients, rather than patients at risk, underestimated incidence by one-third. Overall, routine surveillance prevented the misclassification of 43.0% (unit range, 0%-85.7%) of "incident" carriers on the basis of clinical cultures alone and increased VRE precaution days by 2.4-fold (unit range, 2.0-2.6-fold). CONCLUSIONS: Routine surveillance markedly increases the detection of VRE, despite variability across patient-care units. Correct denominators prevent the substantial underestimation of incidence.

Academic Medical Centers↗

Predominance of a single restriction endonuclease analysis group with intrahospital subgroup diversity among Clostridium difficile isolates at two Chicago hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the epidemiology and relatedness of Clostridium difficile isolates in two geographically separated hospitals in a large metropolitan area, each with unique patients and personneL DESIGN: Observational descriptive molecular epidemiology of clinical C. difficile isolates. SETTING: Two tertiary-care hospitals in Chicago. METHODS: Consecutive C. difficile isolates from the clinical laboratory of a Veterans Affairs hospital during a 13-month period were typed by restriction endonuclease analysis (REA). During an overlapping 3-month period, stool specimens that tested positive for C. difficile toxin from patients at a nearby county hospital were cultured and the recovered isolates typed by the same method. RESULTS: Nineteen (68%) of 28 nosocomial isolates at the smaller, Veterans Affairs hospital belonged to REA group K. Within this group of closely related strains, 9 distinct REA types were recognized. Twenty-one (72%) of 29 nosocomial isolates at the larger, county hospital also belonged to group K. However, the predominant REA types within group K differed markedly at each institution. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate a high degree of similarity among nosocomial C. difficile strains from different hospitals in the same city and suggest the possibility of an extended outbreak of a prototype group K strain with subsequent genetic drift at the two different institutions.

Chicago↗

Molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a Veterans Administration Medical Center.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether patients who were colonized or infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) persistently carried the same strain and to identify the extent of strain variation within a population of patients. DESIGN: Molecular typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of stored MRSA isolates. SETTING: A Veterans Administration Medical Center with 288 hospital, 45 intermediate-care, and 75 extended-care beds. ISOILATES: Between January 1991 and March 1993, 91 patients had MRSA identified in routine cultures. One hundred isolates from 57 patients (63%) were available for typing. RESULTS: Before 1988, only occasional MRSA isolates were identified. By 1993, 50% of S. aureus isolates from unique patients were resistant to methicillin. PFGE identified 7 MRSA strains, 3 of which were identified in specimens from 1 patient each. The most common strains were SD4 (20 patients), SD1 (12 patients), SD2 (12 patients), and SD5a (5 patients). Twenty patients had 2 or more isolates obtained at least 1 week apart (mean, 30.7 weeks; range, 1 to 102 weeks). Of these patients, 12 were colonized or infected with only one strain (mean time observed, 25.1 weeks; range, 1 to 82 weeks). Eight patients had at least 2 different strains (mean time observed, 39 weeks; range, 2 to 102 weeks). CONCLUSION: Numerous MRSA strains circulated in this endemic setting, 40% of patients observed over time were colonized or infected with more than one strain. Molecular typing was an essential tool for evaluating the epidemiology of MRSA in this setting.

Bacterial Typing Techniques↗