Biomedical subjects

Jean-Luc Velay

Publications and source records attributed to Jean-Luc Velay.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Remembering the orientation of newly learned characters depends on the associated writing knowledge: a comparison between handwriting and typing.

Recent data support the idea that movements play a crucial role in letter representation and suggest that handwriting knowledge contributes to visual recognition of letters. If so, using different motor activities while subjects are learning to write should affect their subsequent recognition performances. In order to test this hypothesis, we trained adult participants to write new characters either by copying them or by typing them on a keyboard. After three weeks of training we ran a series of tests requiring visual processing of the characters' orientation. Tests were ran immediately, one week after, and three weeks after the end of the training period. Results showed that when the characters had been learned by typing, they were more frequently confused with their mirror images than when they had been written by hand. This handwriting advantage did not appear immediately, but mostly three weeks after the end of the training. Our results therefore suggest that the stability of the characters' representation in memory depends on the nature of the motor activity produced during learning.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

The influence of writing practice on letter recognition in preschool children: a comparison between handwriting and typing.

A large body of data supports the view that movement plays a crucial role in letter representation and suggests that handwriting contributes to the visual recognition of letters. If so, changing the motor conditions while children are learning to write by using a method based on typing instead of handwriting should affect their subsequent letter recognition performances. In order to test this hypothesis, we trained two groups of 38 children (aged 3-5 years) to copy letters of the alphabet either by hand or by typing them. After three weeks of learning, we ran two recognition tests, one week apart, to compare the letter recognition performances of the two groups. The results showed that in the older children, the handwriting training gave rise to a better letter recognition than the typing training.

Child, Preschool↗

PubMed2005

Premotor activations in response to visually presented single letters depend on the hand used to write: a study on left-handers.

In a previous fMRI study on right-handers (Rhrs), we reported that part of the left ventral premotor cortex (BA6) was activated when alphabetical characters were passively observed and that the same region was also involved in handwriting [Longcamp, M., Anton, J. L., Roth, M., & Velay, J. L. (2003). Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing. NeuroImage, 19, 1492-1500]. We therefore suggested that letter-viewing may induce automatic involvement of handwriting movements. In the present study, in order to confirm this hypothesis, we carried out a similar fMRI experiment on a group of left-handed subjects (Lhrs). We reasoned that if the above assumption was correct, visual perception of letters by Lhrs might automatically activate cortical motor areas coding for left-handed writing movements, i.e., areas located in the right hemisphere. The visual stimuli used here were either single letters, single pseudoletters, or a control stimulus. The subjects were asked to watch these stimuli attentively, and no response was required. The results showed that a ventral premotor cortical area (BA6) in the right hemisphere was specifically activated when Lhrs looked at letters and not at pseudoletters. This right area was symmetrically located with respect to the left one activated under the same circumstances in Rhrs. This finding supports the hypothesis that visual perception of written language evokes covert motor processes. In addition, a bilateral area, also located in the premotor cortex (BA6), but more ventrally and medially, was found to be activated in response to both letters and pseudoletters. This premotor region, which was not activated correspondingly in Rhrs, might be involved in the processing of graphic stimuli, whatever their degree of familiarity.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Interhemispheric relationships in 4- to 14-year-old children pointing to lateral targets.

Some developmental changes in movement control are not monotonic during childhood, which leads us to question how hemispheric relationships develop since they are closely involved with visuo-manual coordination. We tested right-handed children between 4 and 14 years of age performing pointing movements with the right and left hand towards visual targets located in the right and left hemifield. The analysis of movement parameters showed a left hand advantage in reaction time, but this is mainly due to the contralateral movements relative to the semifield of target presentation, suggesting that hemispheric asymmetry is not achieved even in older children. Interhemispheric transfer was evaluated through the difference between crossed (opposite hand and hemifield side) and uncrossed (same hand and hemifield side) movements. The difference was significant at all ages, and decreased with age between 4-6 and 7-9 years. It moved from early asymmetry in favor of the left-to-right interhemispheric transfer to adult-like symmetry at 10-14 years. The long development of hemispheric specificity and interhemispheric communication suggested by our results might be associated to asynchronous development of various processes involved in visuo-motor coordination, leading to qualitative changes in visually directed movement during childhood described in the literature.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Visual presentation of single letters activates a premotor area involved in writing.

In the present fMRI study, we addressed the question as to whether motor-perceptual interactions might be involved in reading. Recognizing the letters encountered when reading is generally assumed to be a purely visual process, yet because we know how to write, we also possess a sensorimotor representation of the letters. Does simply viewing a letter suffice to activate the corresponding motor representation? To answer this question, we asked right-handed subjects first to look at and then to copy single letters or pseudoletters. We established that the visual presentation of letters activated a part of the left premotor cortex (BA6) that was also activated when the letters were being written by the subjects. This premotor zone resembles Exner's area, which is thought to contain the motor programs necessary for producing letters. Visually presented pseudoletters, which had never been written before by the subjects, did not activate this region. These results indicate that the writing motor processes are implicitly evoked when passively observing letters. The cerebral representation of letters is therefore presumably not strictly visual, but based on a multicomponent neural network built up while learning concomitantly to read and write. One of the components might be a sensorimotor one associated with handwriting. This finding shows the existence of close functional relations between the reading and writing processes, and suggests that our reading abilities might be somehow dependent on the way we write.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Interhemispheric sensorimotor integration in pointing movements: a study on dyslexic adults.

In addition to reading disorders, numerous deficits have been found to be associated with dyslexia, suggesting that various neurological factors might be involved in its etiology. In the present study, we focused on three of the deficits which have been thought to accompany and to a certain extent, to explain dyslexia: an abnormal pattern of hemispheric asymmetry, abnormal hemispheric communication, and abnormal motor control. The aim of the present study was to determine whether adults with reading difficulties perform differently from control subjects in a visuo-manual pointing task, in which the subject was required to point with the right or the left hand to targets appearing to the right or left of a central fixation point. A total of 14 dyslexic adults and 14 control adults participated in this experiment. Motor control was assessed based on the time taken to perform the pointing task, hemispheric asymmetry in terms of the inter-hand differences in the reaction and movement times, and hemispheric communication based on the interhemispheric transfer time under crossed conditions, where the hand and the target were not on the same side. The results showed that neither hemispheric asymmetry nor interhemispheric transfer differed between dyslexic and control adults. However, the dyslexics were significantly slower when performing the pointing task. These results are in agreement with the hypothesis that dyslexia may involve a mild motor deficit.

Adult↗