PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jean-Marc Cohen

Publications and source records attributed to Jean-Marc Cohen.

10 recordsLinked to original sources

Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?

OBJECTIVE: Breast carcinoma is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in women of North America. The combination of breast conservation surgery and radiotherapy has become a standard of treatment for the majority of breast cancers. It is critical to obtain clear margins to minimize local recurrence. However, avoiding multiple re-excisions for margin clearance helps optimize cosmetic results in patients undergoing breast conservation surgery. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology (IOTPC) may decrease the need for multiple re-excisions and thereby improve cosmesis. The literature suggests that IOTPC can be useful in evaluation of margins. Klimberg et al. evaluated the touch preparation technique prospectively in 428 patients undergoing breast biopsy for undiagnosed breast masses. Margin evaluation was correct in 100% of the lesions and was used to re-excise the margins when touch prep results were positive. They reported a diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100% for the touch prep technique. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no published data on the role of IOTPC for evaluation of margins in re-excision cases. This report describes our experience with IOTPC for margin assessment for re-excision partial mastectomy at Beth Israel Medical Center (BIMC). The purpose of this study is to determine whether IOTPC is reliable for evaluating margins in patients undergoing re-excision for involved or close margins. METHODS: A prospective study of 30 patients, who have undergone re-excision partial mastectomy for involved or close margins after breast conservation surgery with the use of IOTPC for margin assessment at BIMC was performed. The re-excision lumpectomy specimens were oriented by the surgeon intra-operatively and were submitted fresh to pathology for cytologic assessment. The touch prep method consisted of touching the corresponding margin onto the glass slide. The principle of this technique is that if cancer cells are present they will stick to the slide, while fat cells will not. A slide was prepared for each re-excision specimen. Air-dried samples were stained immediately using the Diff-Quik method and examined under the microscope by a cytopathologist. RESULTS: Thirty patients underwent re-excision lumpectomy for involved or close margins with touch preparation cytology for assessment of 68 margins. Twenty-six patients had invasive ductal carcinoma and/or ductal carcinoma in situ, three patients had invasive lobular carcinoma and the remaining one patient had a combination of invasive lobular and ductal carcinoma. There was a correlation between touch prep cytology and final pathology in 56/68 margins, which accounts for 82.4% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Intra-operative touch preparation cytology for assessment of margins in patients undergoing re-excision lumpectomy for involved or close margins has a sensitivity of 75%, specificity of 82.8%, positive predictive value of 21.4%, and negative predictive value of 98.2%. This high negative predictive value and a single false negative margin are quite significant. Therefore, based on our experience, IOTPC can be a useful tool for intra-operative assessment of margins for patients undergoing re-excision partial mastectomy.

Biopsy↗

Clinical Experience With Mammary Ductoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Most breast cancers begin in the ductal epithelium with normal cells and progress to atypia and finally to carcinoma. Mammary ductoscopy enables one to directly visualize and sample the ductal epithelium and, therefore, identify early changes cytologically. This article describes our initial experience with mammary ductoscopy at Beth Israel Medical Center. METHODS: A prospective review of all patients who underwent ductoscopy at Beth Israel Medical Center from November 2001 to February 2004 was performed. The indications for ductoscopy were a persistent nipple discharge, high-risk status, or intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing lumpectomy. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients underwent ductoscopic evaluation of 88 ducts. Of the 32 patients who underwent office ductoscopy, 15 were high risk, and 17 had spontaneous nipple discharge. Spontaneous nipple discharge was the indication for ductoscopy in 40 of 42 intraoperative procedures. The remaining two patients underwent ductoscopy for margin assessment during breast conservation, and final pathologic analysis revealed negative margins. Thirty-eight of the 40 patients who had spontaneous nipple discharge had abnormal findings during ductoscopy and therefore underwent ductoscopically guided duct excision. Carcinoma was the final diagnosis in 5 (8.8%) of the 57 patients who were scoped for nipple discharge. CONCLUSIONS: Mammary ductoscopy is a potentially useful tool in the evaluation of patients with spontaneous nipple discharge. This is a well-tolerated office procedure with minimal risks and complications. Mammary ductoscopy may have a role in the assessment of high-risk women. Further research is necessary to confirm these potential applications.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Association of breast cancer with papillary lesions identified at percutaneous image-guided breast biopsy.

BACKGROUND: The management of papillary lesions identified on image-guided breast biopsy remains controversial. In the literature, data regarding papillary lesions are limited because of small sample sizes. The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of atypical ductal hyperplasia and malignancy associated with papillary lesions identified on image-guided breast biopsy. METHODS: This study is a retrospective review of 9,310 consecutive image-guided biopsies performed at our institution between January 1996 and November 2003. Patients were included if they underwent an excisional biopsy after a papillary lesion was diagnosed on image-guided biopsy. RESULTS: Papillary lesions were identified in 153 (2%) of the 9,310 image-guided biopsies performed, and 87 of these patients underwent subsequent excisional biopsy at our institution. Breast cancer (in situ or invasive) was identified in 15 patients (17%), and 16 patients (18%) had atypical ductal hyperplasia identified at excisional biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that excisional biopsy should be considered when a papillary lesion is identified at percutaneous image-guided breast biopsy. The final surgical pathology may impact the treatment plan, risk reduction, and/or surveillance for more than a third of patients diagnosed with a papillary lesion on image-guided biopsy.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Cytology of primary central nervous system neoplasms in cerebrospinal fluid specimens.

Although two-thirds of tumors occurring in the central nervous system (CNS) are primary neoplasms, only 10% of positive cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens are from primary CNS tumors. In this study, we reviewed the cytologic findings of 21 positive CSF specimens from primary CNS tumors. A computer search identified 21 cases of positive CSF specimens from patients with primary CNS tumors from the archives. Follow-up included review of medical charts and histologic correlation. The specimens were from 20 patients (9 females and 11 males). Their ages ranged from 6-83 yr, old with a mean of 30 yr. The cases included 9 medulloblastomas, 7 gliomas (3 glioblastoma multiformes, 2 anaplastic astrocytomas, and 2 ependymomas), 2 germinomas, 2 non-Hodgkin's large B-cell lymphomas, and 1 ganglioneurocytoma. Two cases were classified as suspicious and the remaining as positive for malignancy. Immunocytochemistry was employed in 3 cases to support the cytologic diagnosis. These cases included one large-cell lymphoma (leukocyte-common antigen-positive), one germinoma (placental alkaline phosphatase-positive), and the ganglioneurocytoma (neuron-specific enolase- and synaptophysin-positive). There were no false-positive cases. Our results suggest that positive CSF cytology in patients with a primary CNS tumor is a reliable indicator of malignancy and reflects leptomeningeal involvement. The use of immunocytochemistry is helpful in confirming the cytologic impression in some cases.

Adolescent↗

Postlactational microcalcifications.

A case of postlactational microcalcifications is reported. A 42-year-old woman presented for screening mammography 2 months after completion of breast-feeding. Comparison to her pregravid screening mammogram revealed the appearance of multiple groups of indeterminate microcalcifications bilaterally (BIRADS IV). She underwent bilateral stereotactic core biopsies of representative areas, yielding benign pathology. There have been anecdotal accounts and five reported cases of lactational microcalcifications in the radiology literature. We discuss the possible etiologies as well as implications of this mammographic finding.

Adult↗

Malignant fibrous histiocytoma, giant cell type, of the breast mimicking metaplastic carcinoma. A case report.

BACKGROUND: We report a case of malignant fibrous histiocytoma, giant cell type (MFHGC), of the breast. A review of the literature failed to reveal cytology-based reports on this entity. The cytologic similarity of breast MFHGC on fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) to other malignant breast neoplasms, including carcinoma with osteoclastlike giant cells, metaplastic carcinoma and breast sarcomas, as well as benign reactive processes, makes the recognition of this tumor challenging. CASE: A 72-year-old woman presented with a 5-month history of an enlarging breast mass. FNAB of the mass showed a hypercellular smear composed of cohesive, branching clusters of spindle cells with ovoid, focally hyperchromatic nuclei and inconspicuous nucleoli. Interspersed osteoclastlike giant cells, some associated with clusters of spindle cells, were uniformly seen throughout the smear. The background was hemorrhagic, with cellular debris and occasional spindle cells and lymphocytes. No ductal epithelial or myoepithelial cells were seen. An incisional biopsy was performed, followed by radical mastectomy. The histologic examination was diagnostic of MFHGC. The diagnosis was supported by immunohistochemical and electron microscopic studies. CONCLUSION: MFHGC, also called primary giant cell tumor of soft tissues, is composed of a mixture of histiocytes, fibroblasts and bland-appearing osteoclastlike giant cells with a multinodular growth pattern. Although MFHGC rarely occurs in the breast and the definitive diagnosis is difficult based on cytology alone, the diagnosis can be considered when a cytologic examination reveals a hypercellular, spindle cell smear with osteoclastlike giant cells in the absence of ductal epithelial or myoepithelial cells.

Aged↗