Biomedical subjects

Jean-Marc Delay

Publications and source records attributed to Jean-Marc Delay.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation in patients with respiratory failure due to severe acute pancreatitis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute pancreatitis (AP) who require mechanical ventilation have high morbidity and mortality rates. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) delivered through a mask has become increasingly popular for the treatment of acute respiratory failure (ARF) and may limit some mechanical ventilation complications. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this retrospective, observational study was to evaluate our clinical experience with the use of NPPV in AP patients with ARF. METHODS: From 1997 to 2003, we documented clinical data, gas exchange and outcome of the 62 AP patients admitted to our intensive care unit. Patients who benefited from NPPV (success) were compared with those who failed (intubated). RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients were intubated at admission and 5 did not develop ARF. Of the 28 patients treated with NPPV, 15 were not intubated (54%). Both groups had a similar PaO(2)/FiO(2) ratio (142 +/- 21 vs. 133 +/- 20; p = 0.127) and severity of illness (Ranson and Balthazar scores). Presence of atelectasis, bilateral alveolar infiltrates and abdominal distension were associated with failure of NPPV. Oxygenation improved and respiratory rate decreased significantly only in the success group. Additionally, the length of stay at the intensive care unit was significantly lower in the success group. CONCLUSION: NPPV is feasible and safe to treat ARF in selected patients with AP who require ventilatory support.

Abdomen↗

PubMed2005

Volume-guaranteed pressure-support ventilation facing acute changes in ventilatory demand.

OBJECTIVE: To compare volume support ventilation (VSV) in which the pressure support level is continuously adjusted to deliver a preset tidal volume, with pressure support ventilation (PSV), in terms of patient behavior and ventilator response when ventilatory demand was increased by addition of dead space to the circuit. DESIGN AND SETTING: Randomized cross-over study in an intensive care unit university hospital. INTERVENTIONS: We assessed in ten patients being weaned off mechanical ventilation the effect of increasing the ventilatory demand by adding a heat-and-moisture exchanger to augment the dead space with a fixed level of PSV and VSV. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Arterial blood gases, breathing pattern, and respiratory effort parameters at the end of each of the four steps. Adding dead space significantly increased minute ventilation and PaCO2 values with both PSV and VSV. Indexes of respiratory effort (pressure-time index of respiratory muscles and work of breathing) increased with both ventilatory modes after dead-space augmentation. This increase was 2.5-4 times with VSV than with PSV and induced overt respiratory distress in two patients. The assistance delivered during VSV decreased significantly after dead-space augmentation, from 15.0+/-6.5 to 9.1+/-4.8 cmH2O, whereas no change occurred with PSV. CONCLUSIONS: With a fixed level of VSV, but not of PSV, an increase in ventilatory demand results in a decrease in the pressure support provided by the ventilator, opposite to the desired response. VSV may conceivably result in respiratory distress in clinical settings.

APACHE↗

PubMed2005

Outcomes of patients with acute respiratory failure after abdominal surgery treated with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation.

OBJECTIVES: Little is known about the physiologic and clinical effects of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) in patients who have acute respiratory failure (ARF) after abdominal surgery. We evaluated our clinical experience with the use of NPPV in the treatment of ARF after abdominal surgery. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated NPPV use during a 2-year period in a medical-surgical ICU of a university hospital. We documented demographic and diagnostic data, gas exchange, and clinical outcomes. We compared patients who were not intubated to those who were intubated after a trial of NPPV. RESULTS: Of 72 patients with ARF after abdominal surgery who were treated with NPPV, 48 patients avoided intubation (67%). Patients in the intubated and nonintubated groups had similar demographic characteristics, and similar American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and simplified acute physiology score II scores at admission. The intubated group had a significantly lower Pa(O2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (Fi(O2)) ratio (123 +/- 62 mm Hg vs 194 +/- 76 mm Hg, p < 0.01) and more extended bilateral alveolar infiltrates (67% vs 31%, p < 0.01) than the non-intubated group. Within the first NPPV observation period, the Pa(O2)/Fi(O2) increased (+ 36 +/- 29% [+/- SD], p = 0.04) and the respiratory rate decreased (28.2 +/- 3.4 breaths/min vs 23.1 +/- 3.8 breaths/min, p < 0.01) significantly only in the non-intubated group. The non-intubated group had significantly lower length of ICU stay (17.3 +/- 10.9 days vs 34.1 +/- 28.5 days, p < 0.01) and mortality rate (6% vs 29%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: NPPV may be an alternative to conventional ventilation in selected patients with ARF after abdominal surgery who require ventilatory support.

Abdomen↗