PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jean-Marc Regimbeau

Publications and source records attributed to Jean-Marc Regimbeau.

26 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Simplified staging for hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The current American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) fails to stratify patients adequately with respect to prognosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The ability of the currently proposed tumor (T) categories to effectively stratify the survival of 557 patients who underwent complete resection for HCC at four centers was examined. Independent predictors of survival were combined into a new staging system. RESULTS: Using the current AJCC T classification, patients with T1 and T2 tumors had similar 5-year survivals (P =.6). In addition, the survival of patients with multiple bilobar tumors (T4) matched that of T3 patients (P =.5). Independent predictors of death were major vascular invasion (P <.001), microvascular invasion (P =.001), severe fibrosis/cirrhosis of the host liver (P =.001), multiple tumors (P =.007), and tumor size greater than 5 cm (P =.01). Based on our results, a simplified stratification is proposed: (a) patients with a single tumor and no microvascular invasion, (b) patients with a single tumor and microvascular invasion or multiple tumors, none more than 5 cm, and (c) patients with either multiple tumors, any more than 5 cm, or tumor with major vascular invasion (P <.001). Severe fibrosis/cirrhosis had a negative impact on survival within all categories. The survival of patients with lymph node involvement matched that of patients with major vascular invasion (P =.3). CONCLUSION: The current AJCC staging system for HCC is unnecessarily complex. We propose a simplified model of stratification that is based on vascular invasion, tumor number, and tumor size and incorporates the effect of fibrosis on survival.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: multivariate analysis of 707 patients.

The aim of this study was to determine by univariate and multivariate analyses the factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage (AL) after large bowel resection. From 1990 to 1997 a series of 707 patients underwent colonic or rectal resection (without a stoma). Patients were divided into two groups: those with clinical anastomotic leakage (group 1) and those without it (group 2). AL occurred in 43 of 707 patients (6%). The overall mortality was 2.2% and was significantly higher in patients with AL than in those without: 5 of 43 (12%) versus 11 of 664 (1.6%), p < 0.001. Univariate analysis showed 15 variables associated with the risk of AL: previous abdominal or pelvic irradiation (p = 0.02), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score > 2 (p = 0.04), leukocytosis (p = 0.02), renal failure (p = 0.03), steroid treatment (p = 0.01), duration of operation (p = 0.001), intraoperative septic conditions (p = 0.006), total colectomy (p = 0.009), transverse colectomy (p = 0.02), difficulties encountered during anastomosis (p = 0.001), ileorectal anastomosis (p = 0.02), colocolic anastomosis (p = 0.01), abdominal drainage (p = 0.05), and blood transfusion intraoperatively (p = 0.006) and postoperatively (p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that only preoperative leukocytosis (p = 0.04), intraoperative septic conditions (p = 0.001), difficulties encountered during anastomosis (p = 0.007), colocolic anastomosis (p = 0.004), and postoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.0007) were independent factors associated with AL. The risk of AL increased from a range of 12% to 30% if one risk factor was present, to 38% with two factors, to 50% with three factors. After colorectal resection and intraperitoneal anastomosis, a temporary protective stoma is proposed in selected patients with high risk factors for AL, as observed in our study.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Extent of liver resection influences the outcome in patients with cirrhosis and small hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The long-term outcome after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is influenced by parameters related to the tumor and the underlying liver disease. However, the extent of the resection, which can be limited or anatomical (including the tumor and its portal territory), is controversial. METHODS: Among 64 Child-Pugh A patients with cirrhosis who underwent curative liver resection for small HCC (< or = 4 cm) between 1990 and 1996, 34 patients underwent limited resection with a margin width of at least 1 cm, and 30 patients underwent anatomic resection of at least 1 liver segment with complete removal of the portal area containing the tumor. The 2 groups were comparable in terms of epidemiologic and pathologic parameters. The major end points were: (1) in-hospital mortality and morbidity; (2) overall and disease-free survival; and (3) rate and topography of recurrence. RESULTS: The 30-day mortality (6% vs 7%) and morbidity (52% vs 47%) rates after limited and anatomic liver resection were not statistically different. The 5- and 8-year overall survival rates after limited versus anatomic resection were, respectively, 35% versus 54% (P <.05) and 6% versus 45% (P <.05). The 5- and 8-year disease-free survival rates were, respectively, 26% versus 45% and 0% versus 21% (P <.05). Local recurrence was more frequently observed after limited resections than after anatomic resections (50% vs 10%, P <.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cirrhosis and a small HCC, anatomic resection achieves better disease-free survival than limited resection without increasing the postoperative risk. Therefore, anatomical resection should be the treatment of choice and considered as the reference surgical treatment compared with other treatments.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Prognostic histologic indicators of curatively resected hepatocellular carcinomas: a multi-institutional analysis of 425 patients with definition of a histologic prognostic index.

Despite growing information on the clinical behavior of hepatocellular carcinoma, the histologic features associated with survival are not well characterized. Clinical and pathologic data on 425 patients who underwent complete resection for hepatocellular carcinoma were reviewed. Six microscopic features, namely, microvascular invasion, nuclear pleomorphism, mitosis, tumor architecture, growth interface, and tumor necrosis, were examined. Independent predictors of survival were identified and combined into a simple prognostic index. By univariate analysis, microvascular invasion, seen in 51.3% of patients (p <0.001), nuclear grade 3, present in 42% of the cases (p <0.001), and mitosis (p <0.008) were significant predictors of poor survival. Hepatocellular carcinoma with a compact growth pattern had a better prognosis as compared with macrotrabecular (p = 0.014) and acinar (p = 0.051) patterns. By multiple regression analysis, only microvascular invasion (p <0.001) and nuclear grade 3 (p = 0.008) were independent predictors of poor survival. The predictive values of microvascular invasion and nuclear grade allowed the construction of a hepatocellular prognostic index (HPI) whereby HPI = (microvascular invasion status x 0.459) + (nuclear grade x 0.287), with microvascular invasion either absent (0) or present (1) and nuclear grade scored as 1, 2, or 3. Using a cut-off of 0.746 (corresponding to at least nuclear grade 2 with microvascular invasion), two groups could be segregated: fair prognosis (HPI < or = 0.746), with a 50% survival of 5.06 years, and poor prognosis (HPI >0.746) with a 50% survival of 2.71 years (p <0.001). HPI was more discriminating than Edmondson grade, with Edmondson II hepatocellular carcinomas dispersed in both fair and poor prognosis groups. Microvascular invasion and nuclear grade 3 emerge as strong prognostic indicators, and their combination provides adequate prognostic stratification. Practically, hepatocellular carcinoma can be stratified in two groups with regard to prognosis: 1) fair prognosis group (nuclear grade 1 with or without microvascular invasion and nuclear grade 2 without microvascular invasion), and 2) poor prognosis (nuclear grade 2 with microvascular invasion and nuclear grade 3 with or without microvascular invasion). The combination of these histologic parameters provides adequate prognostic stratification.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Preoperative predictors of survival after resection of small hepatocellular carcinomas.

OBJECTIVE: To determine preoperative predictors of survival that can guide the choice of treatment for patients with small hepatocellular cancers (HCCs). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The treatment of patients with small (</=5 cm in diameter) HCCs is controversial. METHODS: A cohort of 249 patients (69 women, 180 men; median age 62 years) who underwent resection with curative intent for small HCC was identified from a multiinstitutional database. For each patient, the clinical data and pathology slides were reviewed. Six clinical factors (age, gender, preoperative alpha-fetoprotein level, hepatitis serology, number of tumors [single vs. multiple], and Child-Pugh score) and three pathologic factors (hepatitis activity score, fibrosis score, and Edmondson-Steiner tumor grade) that can be determined before surgery were correlated with survival. Log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to determine factors influencing survival. RESULTS: The median overall survival for the entire cohort was 4.2 years. The estimated overall 5- and 8-year survival rates were 41.1% and 19.8%, respectively. Multivariate Cox analysis indicated that fibrosis score, Edmondson-Steiner grade, and Child-Pugh score were simultaneously significant predictors of survival after resection. A prognostic scoring system based on these covariates was derived and applied to the entire cohort. Patients lacking all three risk factors were assigned a score of 1, patients with one risk factor were assigned a score of 2, and patients with two or three risk factors were assigned a score of 3. Pairwise log-rank tests indicated significant differences in survival between scores 1 and 2, scores 2 and 3, and scores 1 and 3. This scoring system retained its prognostic significance when a subset of 98 patients with positive hepatitis C serology was analyzed separately. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with small HCCs who will derive the least benefit from resection can be identified before surgery using a score based on tumor grade and the severity of underlying liver disease. In these patients, transplantation and/or ablation should be considered as possible alternative therapies.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Limits and benefits of exclusive transthoracic hepatectomy approach for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of liver resection in cirrhotic patients for liver hepatocellular carcinoma located near the diaphragm through an exclusive transthoracic approach. METHODOLOGY: Between 1995 and 1999, 19 cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma underwent a liver resection through an exclusive transthoracic approach. This approach was indicated in 11 cases for previous upper abdominal surgery, including hepatobiliary surgery in 3 and before liver transplantation in 8. Results of the transthoracic approach were compared to 84 cirrhotic patients who underwent transabdominal limited resection of hepatocellular carcinoma matched for age, sex and localization of the tumor. RESULTS: Resection was feasible by an exclusive transthoracic approach in 18 (95%) cases with a mean operating time of 201 +/- 53 min. In 8 (44%) patients a Pringle maneuver was performed. No postoperative deaths were observed after the transthoracic approach. Pulmonary complications rate was significantly higher (P < 0.001) after transthoracic resection compared to transabdominal resection (67% vs. 25%, P < 0.001). In contrast, ascites were observed in only one (5%) of the transthoracic group compared to 35 (42%) in the transabdominal group (P < 0.01). The resection margin was positive in 3 (17%) after transthoracic approch and in 1 (2%) patient after the transabdominal resection (P < 0.02). In patients who underwent liver transplantation after the transthoracic approach, total hepatectomy was performed without increasing difficulties. CONCLUSIONS: The transthoracic approach is a safe procedure for resection of hepatocellular carcinoma located under the right diaphragm in cirrhotic patients. However, this approach allows only limited resection with a high risk of positive margin, resulting in a restriction of indications either for patients with previous major abdominal surgery than before liver transplantation.

Adult↗