Biomedical subjects

Jean-Philippe Pin

Publications and source records attributed to Jean-Philippe Pin.

34 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Divergent evolution in metabotropic glutamate receptors. A new receptor activated by an endogenous ligand different from glutamate in insects.

The metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) are G-protein-coupled receptors involved in the regulation of glutamatergic synapses. Surprisingly, the evolution-arily distant Drosophila mGluR shares a very similar pharmacological profile with its mammalian orthologues (mGlu2R and mGlu3R). Such a conservation in ligand recognition indicates a strong selective pressure during evolution to maintain the ligand recognition selectivity of mGluRs and suggests that structural constraints within the ligand binding pocket (LBP) would hinder divergent evolution. Here we report the identification of a new receptor homologous to mGluRs found in Anopheles gambiae, Apis mellifera, and Drosophila melanogaster genomes and called AmXR, HBmXR, and DmXR, respectively (the mXRs group). Sequence comparison associated with three-dimensional modeling of the LBP revealed that the residues contacting the amino acid moiety of glutamate (the alpha-COO(-) and NH(3)(+) groups) were conserved in mXRs, whereas the residues interacting with the gamma-carboxylic group were not. This suggested that the mXRs evolved to recognize an amino acid different from glutamate. The Drosophila cDNA encoding DmXR was isolated and found to be insensitive to glutamate or any other standard amino acid. However, a chimeric receptor with the heptahelical and intracellular domains of DmXR coupled to G-protein. We found that the DmX receptor was activated by a ligand containing an amino group, which was extracted from Drosophila head and from other insects (Anopheles and Schistocerca). No orthologue of mXR could be detected in Caenorhabditis elegans or human genomes. These data indicate that the LBP of the mGluRs has diverged in insects to recognize a new ligand.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

The second intracellular loop of metabotropic glutamate receptors recognizes C termini of G-protein alpha-subunits.

Heptahelical receptor coupling selectivity to G-proteins is controlled by a large contact area that involves several portions of the receptor and each subunit of the G-protein. In the G-protein alpha subunit, the C-terminal 5 residues, the N terminus, and the alpha N-beta 1 and alpha 4-alpha 5 loops play important roles. On the receptor side, both the second and third (i2 and i3) intracellular loops as well as the C-terminal tail probably contact these different regions of the G-protein. It is now accepted that the C terminus of the alpha subunit binds in a cavity formed by the i2 and i3 loops. Among the various G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), class III receptors that include metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors greatly differ from the rhodopsin-like GPCRs, but the contact zone between these receptors and the G-protein is less understood. The C terminus of the alpha subunit has been shown to play a pivotal role in the selective recognition of class III GPCRs. Indeed, the mGlu2 and mGlu4 and -8 receptors can discriminate between alpha subunits that differ at the level of their C-terminal end only (such as Gqo and Gqz). Here, we examine the role of the i2 loop of mGluRs in the selective recognition of this region of the alpha subunit. To that aim, we analyzed the coupling properties of mGlu2 and mGlu4 or -8 receptors and chimeras containing the i2 loop of the converse receptor to G-protein alpha subunits that only differ by their C termini (Gqo,Gqz, and their point mutants). Our data demonstrate that the central portion of the i2 loop is responsible for the selective recognition of the C-terminal end of the alpha subunit, especially the residue on position -4. These data are consistent with the proposal that the C-terminal end of the G-protein alpha subunit interacts with residues in a cavity formed by the i2 and i3 loops in class III GPCRs, as reported for class I GPCRs.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2003

The metabotropic glutamate receptor mGluR5 is endocytosed by a clathrin-independent pathway.

Metabotropic glutamate receptors 5 (mGluR5) are members of the growing group C G protein-coupled receptor family. Widely expressed in mammalian brain, they are involved in modulation of the glutamate transmission. By means of transfection of mGluR5 receptors in COS-7 cells and primary hippocampal neurons in culture followed by immunocytochemistry and quantitative image analysis and by a biochemical assay, we have studied the internalization of mGluR5 splice variants. mGluR5a and -5b were endocytosed in COS-7 cells as well as in axons and dendrites of cultured neurons. Endocytosis occurred even in the absence of receptor activity, because receptors mutated in the glutamate binding site were still internalized as well as receptors in which endogenous activity had been inhibited by an inverse agonist. We have measured a constitutive rate of endocytosis of 11.7%/min for mGluR5a. We report for the first time the endocytosis pathway of mGluR5. Internalization of mGluR5 is not mediated by clathrin-coated pits. Indeed, inhibition of this pathway by Eps15 dominant negative mutants did not disturb their endocytosis. However, the large GTPase dynamin 2 is implicated in the endocytosis of mGluR5 in COS-7. mGluR5 is the first shown member of the group C G-protein coupled receptor family internalized by a nonconventional pathway.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Evolution, structure, and activation mechanism of family 3/C G-protein-coupled receptors.

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent one of the largest gene families in the animal genome. These receptors can be classified into several groups based on the sequence similarity of their common heptahelical domain. The family 3 (or C) GPCRs are receptors for the main neurotransmitters glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid, for Ca(2+), for sweet and amino acid taste compounds, and for some pheromone molecules, as well as for odorants in fish. Although none of these family 3 receptors have been found in plants, members have been identified in ancient organisms, such as slime molds (Dictyostelium) and sponges. Like any other GPCRs, family 3 receptors possess a transmembrane heptahelical domain responsible for G-protein activation. However, most of these identified receptors also possess a large extracellular domain that is responsible for ligand recognition, is structurally similar to bacterial periplasmic proteins involved in the transport of small molecules, and is called a Venus Flytrap module. The recent resolution of the structure of this binding domain in one of these receptors, the metabotropic glutamate 1 receptor, together with the recent demonstration that these receptors are dimers, revealed a unique mechanism of activation for these GPCRs. Such data open new possibilities in the development of drugs aimed at modulating these receptors, and raise a number of interesting questions on the activation mechanism of the other GPCRs.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2003

[How do G-protein-coupled receptors work? The case of metabotropic glutamate and GABA receptors].

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest membrane proteins family in animal genomes. Being the receptors for most hormones and neurotransmitters, these proteins play a central role in intercellular communication. GPCRs can be classified into several groups based on the sequence similarity of their common structural feature: the heptahelical domain. The metabotropic receptors for the main neurotransmitters glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) belong to the class III of GPCRs, together with others receptors for Ca2+, for sweet and amino acid taste compounds and for some pheromones, as well as for odorants in fish. Besides their transmembrane heptahelical domain responsible for G-protein activation, most of class III receptors possess a large extracellular domain responsible for ligand recognition. The recent resolution of the structure of this binding domain of one of these receptors, the mGlu1 receptor, together with the recent demonstration that these receptors are dimers, revealed an original mechanism of activation for these GPCRs. Such data open new possibilities to develop drugs aimed at modulating these receptors, and raised a number of interesting questions on the activation mechanism of other GPCRs.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

No ligand binding in the GB2 subunit of the GABA(B) receptor is required for activation and allosteric interaction between the subunits.

The GABA(B) receptor plays important roles in the tuning of many synapses. Although pharmacological differences have been observed between various GABA(B)-mediated effects, a single GABA(B) receptor composed of two subunits (GB1 and GB2) has been identified. Although GB1 binds GABA, GB2 plays a critical role in G-protein activation. Moreover, GB2 is required for the high agonist affinity of GB1. Like any other family 3 G-protein-coupled receptors, GB1 and GB2 are composed of a Venus Flytrap module (VFTM) that usually contains the agonist-binding site and a heptahelical domain. So far, there has been no direct demonstration that GB2 binds GABA or another endogenous ligand. Here, we have further refined the GABA-binding site of GB1 and characterized the putative-binding site in the VFTM of GB2. None of the residues important for GABA binding in GB1 appeared to be conserved in GB2. Moreover, mutation of 10 different residues, alone or in combination, within the possible binding pocket of GB2 affects neither GABA activation of the receptor nor the ability of GB2 to increase agonist affinity on GB1. These data indicate that ligand binding in the GB2 VFTM is not required for activation. Finally, although in either GB1 or the related metabotropic glutamate receptors most residues of the binding pocket are conserved from Caenorhabditis elegans to human, no such conservation is observed in GB2. This suggests that the GB2 VFTM does not constitute a binding site for a natural ligand.

Allosteric Regulation↗

PubMed2002

Closure of the Venus flytrap module of mGlu8 receptor and the activation process: Insights from mutations converting antagonists into agonists.

Ca2+, pheromones, sweet taste compounds, and the main neurotransmitters glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid activate G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) that constitute the GPCR family 3. These receptors are dimers, and each subunit has a large extracellular domain called a Venus flytrap module (VFTM), where agonists bind. This module is connected to a heptahelical domain that activates G proteins. Recently, the structure of the dimer of mGlu1 VFTMs revealed two important conformational changes resulting from glutamate binding. First, agonists can stabilize a closed state of at least one VFTM in the dimer. Second, the relative orientation of the two VFTMs in the dimer is different in the presence of glutamate, such that their C-terminal ends (which are connected to the G protein-activating heptahelical domain) become closer by more than 20 A. This latter change in orientation has been proposed to play a key role in receptor activation. To elucidate the respective role of VFTM closure and the change in orientation of the VFTMs in family 3 GPCR activation, we analyzed the mechanism of action of the mGlu8 receptor antagonists ACPT-II and MAP4. Molecular modeling studies suggest that these two compounds prevent the closure of the mGlu8 VFTM because of ionic and steric hindrance, respectively. We show here that the replacement of the residues responsible for these hindrances (Asp-309 and Tyr-227, respectively) by Ala allows ACPT-II or MAP4 to fully activate the receptors. These data are consistent with the requirement of the VFTM closure for family 3 GPCR activation.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2002

Common and selective molecular determinants involved in metabotopic glutamate receptor agonist activity.

Several potent and group selective agonists of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) have been docked at mGlu1,2,4R binding sites in the closed conformation of the bilobate extracellular domain. Quisqualic acid and (S)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (3,5-DHPG) were selected for mGlu1R, dicarboxycyclopropylglycine (DCG-IV), LY354740, (S)-4-carboxyphenylglycine (4CPG) for mGlu2R, and (S)-2-amino-4-phosphonobutyric acid (AP4), 1-aminocyclopentane-1,3,4-tricarboxylic acid (ACPT-I), (S)-4-phosphonophenylglycine (PPG) for mGlu4R. The models show a conserved binding pattern for the glycine moiety (alpha-amino and alpha-acidic functions) and group specific bindings for the distal acidic function. The best agonists allow optimized interaction with both lobes of the binding domain. Interlobe connections around the ligand are also described and participate in stabilizing the closed form of the amino-terminal domain. Altogether, the docking models support the proposal that the stabilization of a closed state represents a key step in agonist activation of mGluRs.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed2002

Homer-dependent cell surface expression of metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 in neurons.

The metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors are a family of receptors involved in the tuning of fast excitatory synaptic transmission in the brain. Experiments performed in heterologous expression systems suggest that cell surface expression of group I mGlu receptors is controlled by their auxiliary protein, Homer. However, whether or not this also applies to neurons remains controversial. Here we show that in cultured cerebellar granule cells, the group I mGlu receptor subtype, mGlu5, transfected alone is functionally expressed at the surface of these neurons. Transfected Homer1b caused intracellular retention and clustering of this receptor at synaptic sites. Recombinant Homer1a alone did not affect cell surface expression of the receptor, but in neurons transfected with Homer1b, excitation-induced expression of native Homer1a reversed the intracellular retention of mGlu5 receptors, resulting in the receptor trafficking to synaptic membranes. Transfected Homer1a also increased the latency and amplitude of the mGlu5 receptor Ca2+ response. These results indicate that Homer1 proteins regulate synaptic cycling and Ca2+ signaling of mGlu5 receptors, in response to neuronal activity.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

A model for the functioning of family 3 GPCRs.

Family 3 G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) comprise the metabotropic glutamate (mglu) receptors, GABA(B) receptors, Ca(2+)-sensing receptors and some taste and putative pheromone receptors. All are composed of two domains, an extracellular ligand-binding domain and a transmembrane heptahelical domain that activates G proteins. Here we propose a model for the function of family 3 GPCRs that takes into account their structure. This model fits with specific pharmacological features of some family 3 GPCRs, such as modulation by positive and negative allosteric regulators. The model also reveals differences between GABA(B) receptors and Group I mglu receptors: in the former there is "tight" functional coupling between the two domains of the receptor whereas the "loose" coupling in the latter gives these receptors specific features not shared by many other GPCRs.

Binding, Competitive↗

PubMed2002

Allosteric modulators of group I metabotropic glutamate receptors: novel subtype-selective ligands and therapeutic perspectives.

Recent drug discovery programs aimed at identifying selective metabotropic mGlu receptor ligands by high-throughput functional screening efforts have revealed subtype-selective allosteric modulators of mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptors that are structurally unrelated to glutamate. In contrast to competitive ligands, which bind to the glutamate binding site located in the large N-terminal extracellular domain, these modulators act as non-competitive antagonists, inverse agonists or positive modulators by binding to specific residues in the seven-transmembrane domain. More recent studies to assess the potential of these compounds in in vivo models of nervous system disorders have implicated the mGlu5 receptor subtype as a potentially important therapeutic target for inflammatory pain, anxiety, Parkinson's disease and drug abuse, and mGlu1 and mGlu5 receptors as potential targets for anticonvulsant and neuroprotective therapies. Very recent findings indicate an important regulatory role for intracellular proteins interacting with metabotropic glutamate receptors, which might constitute novel drug targets for modulating metabotropic glutamate receptor activity.

Allosteric Regulation↗

PubMed2002

A single olfactory receptor specifically binds a set of odorant molecules.

The sense of smell is mediated by the initiation of action potential in olfactory sensory neurons during odor stimulation. However, little is known about odorant-olfactory receptor (OR) recognition mechanisms. In the present work, we identified the structural motifs of odorant molecules required to activate mouse OR912-93 by detection of the odorant response using calcium measurement in cells transfected with OR and G(alpha)q and G(alpha)15 proteins. The use of sets of odorants led to the identification of ketones with an aliphatic carbon chain length >or= four carbon atoms and a carbonyl group preferentially located in position C2 or C3. The threshold of detection of these odorants is as low as 10(-6)-10(-8)m. No other odorant ligand, out of 70 representatives of the odorant world, was active. The human ortholog of OR912-93 is not functional, suggesting that apart from a stop-mutation located at the 5'-end that was corrected in the construct, it incurred other deleterious mutations during evolution.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

The intracellular loops of the GB2 subunit are crucial for G-protein coupling of the heteromeric gamma-aminobutyrate B receptor.

The gamma-aminobutyrate B (GABA(B)) receptor is the first discovered G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) that needs two subunits, GB1 and GB2, to form a functional receptor. The GB1 extracellular domain (ECD) binds GABA, and GB2 contains enough molecular determinants for G-protein activation. The precise role of the two subunits in G-protein coupling is investigated. GB1 and GB2 are structurally related to the metabotropic glutamate, Ca(2+)-sensing and other family 3 GPCRs in which the second (i2) as well as the third (i3) intracellular loop play important roles in G-protein coupling. Here, the role of the i2 loops of GB1 and GB2 in the GABA(B) receptor ability to activate G(alpha)-proteins is investigated. To that aim, the i2 loops were swapped between GB1 and GB2 heptahelical domains (HDs), either in the wild-type subunits or in the chimeric subunits GB1/2 that contain the ECD of GB1 and the HD of GB2. The effect of an additional mutation within the i3 loop of GB2 that prevents coupling of the heteromeric receptor was also examined. Combinations of interest were found to be correctly addressed at the cell surface and to assemble into heteromers. Taken together our data revealed the following new information on the G-protein coupling of the heteromeric GABA(B) receptor: 1) the i2 loop of GB2 within the GB2 HD is required for the heteromeric GABA(B) receptor to couple to G-proteins, whereas the i2 loop of GB1 is not; 2) the presence of the i2 loop of GB2 within the GB1 HD is not sufficient to allow coupling of GB1; 3) the GB2 HD activates the Gqi9 protein whether it is associated with the GB2 or GB1 ECD; 4) in the combination with two GB2 HDs, each is able to couple to G-proteins; and finally, 5) the use of mutations in i2, i3, or both within the GB2 HD brings evidence for the absence of domain swapping enabling the exchange of region including i2 and i3 between the subunits.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

PubMed2002

The metabotropic glutamate receptors: structure, activation mechanism and pharmacology.

The metabotropic glutamate receptors are G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) involved in the regulation of many synapses, including most glutamatergic fast excitatory synapses. Eight subtypes have been identified that can be classified into three groups. The molecular characterization of these receptors revealed proteins much more complex than any other GPCRs. They are composed of a Venus Flytrap (VFT) module where glutamate binds, connected to a heptahelical domain responsible for G-protein coupling. Recent data including the structure of the VFT module determined with and without glutamate, indicate that these receptors function as dimers. Moreover a number of intracellular proteins can regulate their targeting and transduction mechanism. Such structural features of mGlu receptors offer multiple possibilities for synthetic compounds to modulate their activity. In addition to agonists and competitive antagonists acting at the glutamate binding site, a number of non-competitive antagonists with inverse agonist activity, and positive allosteric modulators have been discovered. These later compounds share specific properties that make them good candidates for therapeutic applications. First, their non-amino acid structure makes them pass more easily the blood brain barrier. Second, they are much more selective than any other compound identified so far, being the first subtype selective molecules. Third, for the negative modulators, their non competitive mechanism of action makes them relatively unaffected by high concentrations of glutamate that may be present in disease states (e.g. stroke, epilepsy, neuropathic pain, etc.). Fourth, like the benzodiazepines acting at the GABA(A) receptors, the positive modulators offer a new way to increase the activity of these receptors in vivo, with a low risk of inducing their desensitization. The present review article focuses on the specific structural features of these receptors and highlights the various possibilities these offer for drug development.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

A single subunit (GB2) is required for G-protein activation by the heterodimeric GABA(B) receptor.

Although G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been shown to assemble into functional homo or heteromers, the role of each protomer in G-protein activation is not known. Among the GPCRs, the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type B receptor (GABA(B)R) is the only one known so far that needs two subunits, GB1 and GB2, to function. The GB1 subunit contains the GABA binding site but is unable to activate G-proteins alone. In contrast the GB2 subunit, which does not bind GABA, has an heptahelical domain able to activate G-proteins when assembled into homodimers (Galvez, T., Duthey, B., Kniazeff, J., Blahos, J., Rovelli, G., Bettler, B., Prézeau, L., and Pin, J.-P. (2001) EMBO J. 20, 2152-2159). In the present study, we have examined the role of each subunit within the GB1-GB2 heteromer, in G-protein coupling. To that end, point mutations in the highly conserved third intracellular loop known to prevent G-protein activation of the related Ca-sensing or metabotropic glutamate receptors were introduced into GB1 and GB2. One mutation, L686P introduced in GB2 prevents the formation of a functional receptor, even though the heteromer reaches the cell surface, and even though the mutated subunit still associates with GB1 and increases GABA affinity on GB1. This was observed either in HEK293 cells where the activation of the G-protein was assessed by measurement of inositol phosphate accumulation, or in cultured neurons where the inhibition of the Ca(2+) channel current was measured. In contrast, the same mutation when introduced into GB1 does not modify the G-protein coupling properties of the heteromeric GABA(B) receptor either in HEK293 cells or in neurons. Accordingly, whereas in all GPCRs the same protein is responsible for both agonist binding and G-protein activation, these two functions are assumed by two distinct subunits in the GABA(B) heteromer: one subunit, GB1, binds the agonists whereas the other, GB2, activates the G-protein. This illustrates the importance of a single subunit for G-protein activation within a dimeric receptor.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Effect of Glutamate and Ionomycin on the Release of Arachidonic Acid, Prostaglandins and HETEs from Cultured Neurons and Astrocytes.

The release of arachidonic acid (ArA) metabolites from mouse neurons and astrocytes in primary culture has been studied in response to ionomycin or glutamate stimulation. Cells were preincubated with [3H]ArA for 24 h and the radioactivity released was examined by HPLC. In striatal, cortical and hippocampal neurons, glutamate and ionomycin strongly stimulated the release of ArA, but neither prostaglandins (PGs) nor hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acids (HETEs) could be detected. If they were released, these latter compounds represented < 0.02% of the amount of ArA. In contrast, in astrocyte cultures, ionomycin (but not glutamate) strongly stimulated the release of PGs and HETEs as well as ArA. Reversed- and straight-phase HPLC analysis revealed the presence of PGD2, PGE2, PGF2alpha, 12-hydroxyheptadeca-5,8,10-trienoic acid (HHT) and HETEs (15-HETE, 11-HETE and 5-HETE). Indomethacin inhibited the release of PGs and HHT, but also that of 11- and 15-HETE, indicating that these two HETEs may be produced through the cyclooxygenase pathway. Metabolism of [3H]ArA was also examined in cellular homogenates. Although > 50% of the [3H]ArA was metabolized to PGF2alpha, PGE2, PGD2, HHT, 15- and 11-HETE in cultured astrocyte homogenates, no [3H]ArA metabolism could be detected in cultured striatal neuron homogenates. Moreover, neuronal homogenates did not inhibit the metabolism of [3H]ArA observed in either astrocyte or platelet homogenates. These results indicate that central neurons in primary culture possess very low lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase activities. They emphasize the need to identify the cellular source of ArA metabolites in the brain, particularly when considering the multiple new messenger roles proposed for these molecules, such as that of retrograde messengers involved in synaptic plasticity phenomena.

Journal Article↗