PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jean-Pierre Pignon

Publications and source records attributed to Jean-Pierre Pignon.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy improves survival among patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer, but there is no validated clinical or biologic predictor of the benefit of chemotherapy. METHODS: We used immunohistochemical analysis to determine the expression of the excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) protein in operative specimens of non-small-cell lung cancer. The patients had been enrolled in the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial, thereby allowing a comparison of the effect of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy on survival, according to ERCC1 expression. Overall survival was analyzed with a Cox model adjusted for clinical and pathological factors. RESULTS: Among 761 tumors, ERCC1 expression was positive in 335 (44%) and negative in 426 (56%). A benefit from cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with the absence of ERCC1 (test for interaction, P=0.009). Adjuvant chemotherapy, as compared with observation, significantly prolonged survival among patients with ERCC1-negative tumors (adjusted hazard ratio for death, 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.50 to 0.86; P=0.002) but not among patients with ERCC1-positive tumors (adjusted hazard ratio for death, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.55; P=0.40). Among patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, those with ERCC1-positive tumors survived longer than those with ERCC1-negative tumors (adjusted hazard ratio for death, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.90; P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer and ERCC1-negative tumors appear to benefit from adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy, whereas patients with ERCC1-positive tumors do not.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Several trials have studied the role of unconventional fractionated radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, but the effect of such treatment on survival is not clear. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess whether this type of radiotherapy could improve survival. METHODS: Randomised trials comparing conventional radiotherapy with hyperfractionated or accelerated radiotherapy, or both, in patients with non-metastatic HNSCC were identified and updated individual patient data were obtained. Overall survival was the main endpoint. Trials were grouped in three pre-specified categories: hyperfractionated, accelerated, and accelerated with total dose reduction. FINDINGS: 15 trials with 6515 patients were included. The median follow-up was 6 years. Tumours sites were mostly oropharynx and larynx; 5221 (74%) patients had stage III-IV disease (International Union Against Cancer, 1987). There was a significant survival benefit with altered fractionated radiotherapy, corresponding to an absolute benefit of 3.4% at 5 years (hazard ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.86-0.97; p=0.003). The benefit was significantly higher with hyperfractionated radiotherapy (8% at 5 years) than with accelerated radiotherapy (2% with accelerated fractionation without total dose reduction and 1.7% with total dose reduction at 5 years, p=0.02). There was a benefit on locoregional control in favour of altered fractionation versus conventional radiotherapy (6.4% at 5 years; p<0.0001), which was particularly efficient in reducing local failure, whereas the benefit on nodal control was less pronounced. The benefit was significantly higher in the youngest patients (hazard ratio 0.78 [0.65-0.94] for under 50 year olds, 0.95 [0.83-1.09] for 51-60 year olds, 0.92 [0.81-1.06] for 61-70 year olds, and 1.08 [0.89-1.30] for over 70 year olds; test for trends p=0.007). INTERPRETATION: Altered fractionated radiotherapy improves survival in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Comparison of the different types of altered radiotherapy suggests that hyperfractionation has the greatest benefit.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Chemotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an individual patient data meta-analysis of eight randomized trials and 1753 patients.

OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of adding chemotherapy to radiotherapy (RT) on overall survival and event-free survival for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This meta-analysis used updated individual patient data from randomized trials comparing chemotherapy plus RT with RT alone in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. The log-rank test, stratified by trial, was used for comparisons, and the hazard ratios of death and failure were calculated. RESULTS: Eight trials with 1753 patients were included. One trial with a 2 x 2 design was counted twice in the analysis. The analysis included 11 comparisons using the data from 1975 patients. The median follow-up was 6 years. The pooled hazard ratio of death was 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.71-0.94; p = 0.006), corresponding to an absolute survival benefit of 6% at 5 years from the addition of chemotherapy (from 56% to 62%). The pooled hazard ratio of tumor failure or death was 0.76 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.86; p < 0.0001), corresponding to an absolute event-free survival benefit of 10% at 5 years from the addition of chemotherapy (from 42% to 52%). A significant interaction was observed between the timing of chemotherapy and overall survival (p = 0.005), explaining the heterogeneity observed in the treatment effect (p = 0.03), with the highest benefit resulting from concomitant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy led to a small, but significant, benefit for overall survival and event-free survival. This benefit was essentially observed when chemotherapy was administered concomitantly with RT.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2005

Hepatic and extrahepatic colorectal metastases: when resectable, their localization does not matter, but their total number has a prognostic effect.

BACKGROUND: The presence of extrahepatic disease (EHD) is considered a contraindication to hepatectomy in patients with colorectal liver metastases. After resection, the prognosis is based more on the total number of resected metastases (located inside and outside the liver) than on the site of these metastases (only inside the liver or not). METHODS: A total of 308 patients with colorectal cancer underwent hepatectomy, and 84 (27%) also underwent resection of miscellaneous EHD. The study was a prospective data registration and retrospective analysis. When considering the total number of resected metastases, each liver metastasis and each EHD location was counted as one lesion. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 99 months. The overall 5-year survival rate was 32%. In the multivariate analysis, the total number of metastases (inside or outside the liver) had a greater prognostic value than the criterion "presence or absence of EHD." Considering the total number of resected metastases (whatever their site), 5-year survival rates were 38% (SD: 4%) in the group with one to three metastases, 29% (SD: 5%) in patients with four to six metastases, and 18% (SD: 5%) in patients with more than six metastases (P = .002). A very simple prognostic score based on sex and the total number of metastases is proposed. CONCLUSIONS: EHD, when resectable, is no longer a contraindication to hepatectomy. More importantly, the total number of the metastases, whatever their location, has a stronger prognostic effect than the site of these metastases.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Adjuvant chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: contribution of the International Adjuvant Lung Trial.

The recently reported International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial (IALT) was designed to assess the potential benefit of three to four cycles of adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy after complete resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Each center predetermined the cisplatin dose (total 300-400 mg/m(2)), the combined drug (etoposide or a Vinca alkaloid), and the radiotherapy policy. From 1995 to 2000, 1,867 patients were randomized in 148 centers from 33 countries. On September 1, 2002, median follow-up was 56 months and >98% of patients had an updated follow-up. Overall survival was significantly different between the two arms: 5-year survival rate was 44.5% in the chemotherapy arm versus 40.4% in the control arm [relative risk = 0.86 (0.76-0.98), P < 0.03]. Disease-free survival, incidence of local recurrence, and incidence of distant metastases (but not brain metastases) were likewise significantly different, with an advantage for the chemotherapy arm. We concluded that adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy in resected NSCLC should become part of the standard management of operable NSCLC. Two other recently reported randomized prospective studies also showed a significant benefit for postoperative platin-based doublets in stage IB and II NSCLC and confirmed the role of adjuvant chemotherapy as part of the treatment of these patients. The Lung Adjuvant Cisplatin Evaluation program, a pooled analysis of all recent platin-based adjuvant trials, and the IALT-Bio study, which will investigate over 30 markers in the IALT patients' specimens, should allow us to better define the populations more likely to benefit from postoperative chemotherapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

Catalytic subunit of human telomerase reverse transcriptase is an independent predictor of survival in patients undergoing curative resection of hepatic colorectal metastases: a multicenter analysis.

PURPOSE: To determine the role of the catalytic subunit of human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) in predicting survival after resection of hepatic colorectal metastases (CRM). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred one patients who underwent curative resection of hepatic CRM between 1990 and 2000 were identified from a multicenter database. The CRM were analyzed for hTERT nucleolar expression by standard immunohistochemical techniques. hTERT expression and known clinicopathologic factors of survival were examined. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 80 months, 152 patients (75.6%) had died; the 5-year overall survival was 30.7%. On univariate analysis, number of metastases greater than two (P = .0005), extrahepatic disease (P = .0054), disease-free interval less than 12 months (P = .006), carcinoembryonic antigen level greater than 200 ng/mL (P = .0071), and positive hTERT nucleolar staining (P < .0001) were associated with decreased survival. On multivariate analysis, three factors independently predicted survival: number of metastases (relative risk [RR] = 1.74; P = .0011); disease-free interval (RR = 1.70; P = .0035); and positive hTERT nucleolar staining (RR = 2.03; P < .0001). Patients with none or one of these factors had a 5-year survival rate of 48%, whereas those with two or three of these factors had a 5-year survival of 15% (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: hTERT nucleolar expression is associated with worse survival after resection of hepatic CRM. hTERT expression in conjunction with number of hepatic metastases and disease-free interval may permit more accurate prediction of survival after resection of hepatic CRM.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Quality of life of patients operated on for low rectal cancer: impact of the type of surgery and patients' characteristics.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare the impact of a permanent colostomy and sociodemographic characteristics on the quality of life of patients operated on for low rectal cancer. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed by use of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and CR-38 questionnaires. Patients came to the hospital to fill out the self-administered questionnaire or were sent the questionnaire by mail, followed by a live or telephone interview. All patients had undergone one of four operations: low anterior resection with colorectal or coloanal anastomosis (non-stoma group), or abdominoperineal resection with pseudocontinent perineal colostomy (nonstoma group) or left lower quadrant colostomy (stoma group). RESULTS: A total of 132 patients were included for analysis and there were no missing data. For the majority of quality of life scores (26/29), there was no significant difference between stoma and nonstoma patients. However, stoma patients complained of diminished body image (P = 0.0022), and this was especially true for married (P = 0.0073) and less educated (P = 0.0014) patients at subgroup analysis. Stoma patients experienced greater financial worries (P = 0.0029), whereas nonstoma patients had greater gastrointestinal concerns (P = 0.0098). CONCLUSIONS: Although most quality of life scores between stoma and nonstoma patients were similar, significant differences regarding body image, finance, and gastrointestinal symptoms, especially for married and less educated patients, were noticed. These factors should be taken into account, along with oncologic criteria, to better tailor treatments to patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Should adjuvant chemotherapy become standard treatment in all patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer?

Surgery remains the main curative treatment for patients with early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, because many patients probably have undetectable micrometastasis even at diagnosis, adjuvant treatment is usually needed. The results for radiotherapy have mostly been disappointing, and a strong emphasis has, therefore, been placed on chemotherapy as the preferred modality. Adjuvant chemotherapy, and in particular, platinum-based regimens, have been assessed in several studies, but the results have been conflicting. Most trials have included patients with a wide range of disease stages and have shown, at most, only moderate improvements in survival. Thus, although clearly indicated in some patients, whether adjuvant chemotherapy should be used in all patients with resected disease is highly controversial. In this debate, Thierry Le Chevalier and colleagues and Giorgio Scagliotti present opposing arguments for whether this approach should be considered standard.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

Meta-analysis when only the median survival times are known: a comparison with individual patient data results.

BACKGROUND: The hazard ratio (HR) is the most appropriate measure for time to event outcomes such as survival. In systematic reviews, HRs can be calculated either from the raw trial data obtained as part of an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis or from the appropriate trial-level summary statistics. However, the information required for the latter are seldom reported in sufficient detail to allow reviewers to calculate HRs. In contrast, the median survival and survival rates at specific time points are frequently presented. We aimed to evaluate retrospectively the performance of meta-analyses using median survival times and survival rates by comparing them with meta-analyses using IPD to calculate HRs. METHODS: IPD from thirteen published meta-analyses (MAs) in cancers with high mortality rates were used. Median survival and survival rates were calculated from the IPD rather than taken from publications so that the same trials, patients, and extended follow-up are used in each analysis. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We show that using median survival times or survival rates at a particular point in time are not reasonable surrogate measures for meta-analyses of survival outcomes and that, wherever possible, HRs should be calculated. Individual trial publications reporting on time to event outcomes, therefore, should provide more detailed statistical information, preferably logHRs and their variances, or their estimators.

Data Interpretation, Statistical↗
PubMed2004

Benefits of adding a drug to a single-agent or a 2-agent chemotherapy regimen in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.

CONTEXT: Randomized trials have demonstrated that adding a drug to a single-agent or to a 2-agent regimen increased the tumor response rate in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), although its impact on survival remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical benefit of adding a drug to a single-agent or 2-agent chemotherapy regimen in terms of tumor response rate, survival, and toxicity in patients with advanced NSCLC. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: Data from all randomized controlled trials performed between 1980 and 2001 (published between January 1980 and October 2003) comparing a doublet regimen with a single-agent regimen or comparing a triplet regimen with a doublet regimen in patients with advanced NSCLC. There were no language restrictions. Searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE were performed using the search terms non-small-cell lung carcinoma/drug therapy, adenocarcinoma, large-cell carcinoma, squamous-cell carcinoma, lung, neoplasms, clinical trial phase III, and randomized trial. Manual searches were also performed to find conference proceedings published between January 1982 and October 2003. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent investigators reviewed the publications and extracted the data. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for the objective tumor response rate, 1-year survival rate, and toxicity rate were calculated using the fixed-effect model. Pooled median ratios (MRs) for median survival also were calculated using the fixed-effect model. ORs and MRs lower than unity (<1.0) indicate a benefit of a doublet regimen compared with a single-agent regimen (or a triplet regimen compared with a doublet regimen). DATA SYNTHESIS: Sixty-five trials (13 601 patients) were eligible. In the trials comparing a doublet regimen with a single-agent regimen, a significant increase was observed in tumor response (OR, 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37-0.47; P<.001) and 1-year survival (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.91; P<.001) in favor of the doublet regimen. The median survival ratio was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.89; P<.001). An increase also was observed in the tumor response rate (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.58-0.75; P<.001) in favor of the triplet regimen, but not for 1-year survival (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.85-1.21; P =.88). The median survival ratio was 1.00 (95% CI, 0.94-1.06; P =.97). CONCLUSION: Adding a second drug improved tumor response and survival rate. Adding a third drug had a weaker effect on tumor response and no effect on survival.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2004

Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of a previous meta-analysis, the International Adjuvant Lung Cancer Trial was designed to evaluate the effect of cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy on survival after complete resection of non-small-cell lung cancer. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients either to three or four cycles of cisplatin-based chemotherapy or to observation. Before randomization, each center determined the pathological stages to include, its policy for chemotherapy (the dose of cisplatin and the drug to be combined with cisplatin), and its postoperative radiotherapy policy. The main end point was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 1867 patients underwent randomization; 36.5 percent had pathological stage I disease, 24.2 percent stage II, and 39.3 percent stage III. The drug allocated with cisplatin was etoposide in 56.5 percent of patients, vinorelbine in 26.8 percent, vinblastine in 11.0 percent, and vindesine in 5.8 percent. Of the 932 patients assigned to chemotherapy, 73.8 percent received at least 240 mg of cisplatin per square meter of body-surface area. The median duration of follow-up was 56 months. Patients assigned to chemotherapy had a significantly higher survival rate than those assigned to observation (44.5 percent vs. 40.4 percent at five years [469 deaths vs. 504]; hazard ratio for death, 0.86; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.76 to 0.98; P<0.03). Patients assigned to chemotherapy also had a significantly higher disease-free survival rate than those assigned to observation (39.4 percent vs. 34.3 percent at five years [518 events vs. 577]; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.74 to 0.94; P<0.003). There were no significant interactions with prespecified factors. Seven patients (0.8 percent) died of chemotherapy-induced toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: Cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival among patients with completely resected non-small-cell lung cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Adjusting for patient selection suggests the addition of docetaxel to 5-fluorouracil-cisplatin induction therapy may offer survival benefit in squamous cell cancer of the head and neck.

When induction chemotherapy is used in locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN), patients often receive cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (PF) followed by radical loco-regional therapy. Phase II studies of docetaxel-cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (TPF) induction therapy, with or without leucovorin (L), have achieved high survival rates versus those reported in phase III PF trials. However, the distribution of prognostic factors may vary between phase II and phase III study populations, making the extrapolation of phase II TPF/L results to phase III PF populations difficult. This study used a patient selection standardization method and Cox model to adjust for potential selection bias. Thus, the survival benefit from adding docetaxel into PF induction regimens in SCCHN could be more accurately assessed. The TPF/L dataset comprised 195 patients from six phase II trials. The PF dataset of 585 patients was derived from five large randomized trials included in the Meta-Analysis of Chemotherapy in Head and Neck Cancer (MACH-NC) database. TPF/L and PF datasets differed significantly concerning the distribution of several prognostic factors. Adjusting for these differences, the relative risk of death in the PF versus TPF/L datasets was 1.85 (95% confidence interval 1.37-2.49), corresponding to a 20% 2-year survival benefit (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed that this improved 2-year survival rate of TPF/L over PF was robust, irrespective of the distribution of studied prognostic factors between treatment datasets. We conclude that this improved survival might be due either to docetaxel's pharmacologic effect or to uncontrolled prognostic factors.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2004

Results of R0 resection for colorectal liver metastases associated with extrahepatic disease.

BACKGROUND: Extrahepatic malignant disease has always been considered an absolute contraindication to hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. This study reports the long-term outcome and prognostic factors of patients undergoing extrahepatic disease resection simultaneously with hepatectomy for liver metastases. METHODS: From January 1987 to January 2001, 75 patients underwent a complete R0 resection of extrahepatic disease simultaneously with hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. They were inscribed in a registry and then prospectively followed up. They represented 25% of the 294 patients who underwent an R0 hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases during the same period. RESULTS: The mortality rate was 2.7%, and morbidity was 25%. After a median follow-up of 4.9 years (range, 1.7-13.4 years), the overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 45% and 28%, respectively. By using a Cox model, there was a significant difference in survival between patients with single versus multiple sites of extrahepatic disease. Also, the presence of more than five liver metastases was a significant parameter. CONCLUSIONS: Extrahepatic disease in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases should no longer be considered as a contraindication to hepatectomy. However, this intended R0 resection cannot be performed in 50% of laparotomized patients, and negative prognostic factors for surgery include the presence of multiple extrahepatic disease sites or more than five liver metastases.

Adult↗