PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jean-Yves Blay

Publications and source records attributed to Jean-Yves Blay.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Brostallicin, an agent with potential activity in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: a phase II study from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group.

The study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of brostallicin, a new DNA minor groove binder, at a dose of 10mg/m2, intravenous (i.v.) every three weeks, in patients with advanced or inoperable soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and gastrointestinal stromal tumour (GIST) failing first line therapy. Two groups were recruited: (1) GIST following treatment with imatinib; (2) other STS following treatment with single agent doxorubicin or ifosfamide or a single line of combination therapy. The primary end-point was overall response rate (ORR) as defined by response evaluation criteria in solid tumours (RECIST). Progression free survival (PFS) was a secondary end-point. In the GIST group, a Simon two step design was planned: first step 18 patients, total 32 patients (p1=20% p0=5% alpha=beta=0.1). In the non-GIST group, planned sample size was 40 in a standard Fleming one-step design (p0=10%, p1=25%, alpha=beta=0.1). Forty-three patients with non-GIST and 21 patients with GIST were recruited. In general, the drug was well tolerated. Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 3 or grade 4 toxicity was granulocytopenia: 70% of patients, 50% of cycles; fatigue: 25% of patients, 8% of cycles; febrile neutropenia: 14% of patients, 4% of cycles. There was one confirmed toxic death due to neutropenic septicaemia. Three patients had clinically significant allergic reactions in 249 cycles delivered. In the GIST group, no patients had a confirmed response and recruitment was discontinued at the first step. In the non-GIST group, there were two confirmed partial responses. The 3 month PFS was 46% in the non-GIST group and 33% in the GIST group. In the non-GIST group, this PFS is in the range of other agents considered active in STS, and may predict for more substantial first line activity. Further investigation in STS other than GIST appears warranted.

Adult↗

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of imatinib and its main metabolite in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

PURPOSE: This study explored factors affecting the pharmacokinetic variability of imatinib and CGP 74588, and the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic correlations in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Thirty-five patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors received 400 mg of imatinib daily. Six blood samples were drawn: before intake, during 1- to 3- and 6- to 9-hour intervals after intake on day 1, and before intake on days 2, 30, and 60. Plasma imatinib and CGP 74588 concentrations were quantified by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, and analyzed by the population pharmacokinetic method (NONMEM program). The influence of 17 covariates on imatinib clearance (CL) and CGP 74588 clearance (CLM/fm) was studied. These covariates included clinical and biological variables and occasion (OCC = 0 for pharmacokinetic data corresponding to the first administration, or OCC = 1 for the day 30 or 60 administrations). RESULTS: The best regression formulas were: CL (L/h) = 7.97 (AAG/1.15)(-0.52), and CLM/fm (L/h) = 58.6 (AAG/1.15)(-0.60) x 0.55(OCC), with the plasma alpha1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) levels indicating that both clearance values decreased at a higher AAG level. A significant time-dependent decrease in CLM/fm was evidenced with a mean (+SD) CGP 74588/imatinib area under the curve (AUC) ratio of 0.25 (+/-0.07) at steady state, compared with 0.14 (+/-0.03) on day 1. Hematologic toxicity was correlated with pharmacokinetic variables: the correlation observed with the estimated unbound imatinib AUC at steady-state (r = 0.56, P < 0.001) was larger than that of the total imatinib AUC (r = 0.32, NS). CONCLUSIONS: The plasma AAG levels influenced imatinib pharmacokinetics. A protein-binding phenomenon needs to be considered when exploring the correlations between pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

Adult↗

Docetaxel and gemcitabine combination in 133 advanced soft-tissue sarcomas: a retrospective analysis.

Advanced soft-tissue sarcomas are usually resistant to cytotoxic agents such as doxorubicin and ifosfamide. Antitumor activity has been observed for gemcitabine and docetaxel combination. We conducted a retrospective study on 133 patients (58 males/75 females) with unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. The median age at diagnosis was 51.7 (18-82), with 76 patients with leiomoyosarcoma and 57 patients with other histological subtypes. The initial localizations were limb (44), uterine (32), retroperitoneal (23) and organs or bone (34). Patients received 900 mg/m2 of gemcitabine (days 1 and 8) over 90 min plus 100 mg/m2 of docetaxel (day 8), intravenously every 21 days. Gemcitabine/docetaxel combination was well tolerated with an overall response of 18.4% and with no clear statistical difference between leiomyosarcomas and other histological subtypes (24.2% versus 10.4% (p=0.06)). No difference was found between uterine soft-tissue sarcomas versus others. The median overall survival was 12.1 months (1-28). Better overall survival was correlated with leiomyosarcoma (p=0.01) and with the quality of the response, even for patients with stable disease (p<10(-4)). No statistical difference was found for the initial localization. Response to treatment and overall survival were better for patients in World Health Organization (WHO) performance status classification (PS) 0 at baseline versus patients in WHO PS-1, 2 or 3 (p=0.023 and p<10(-4), respectively). Gemcitabine/docetaxel combination was tolerable and demonstrated better response and survival for leiomyosarcoma, especially for patients in WHO PS-0 at baseline. For the other histological subtypes, the response was not encouraging, but the survival for patients in response or stable suggests further investigation.

Adolescent↗

Predicting toxicities for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours treated with imatinib: a study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, the Italian Sarcoma Group, and the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group (EORTC-ISG-AGITG).

The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors for toxicity to treatment with imatinib. The study was based on 942 patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) randomised to receive imatinib at different doses. The correlation between toxicities occurring with a Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 2 or more (non-haematological) or grade 3 or 4 (haematological) and imatinib dose, age, sex, performance status, original disease site, site and size of lesions at trial entry, baseline haematological and biological parameters was investigated. Anaemia was correlated with dose and baseline haemoglobin level, and neutropaenia with baseline neutrophil count and haemoglobin level. The risk of non-haematological toxicities was dose dependent and higher in females (oedema, nausea, diarrhoea), and in patients of advanced age (oedema, rash fatigue), poor performance status (fatigue and nausea), prior chemotherapy (fatigue), tumour of identified gastrointestinal origin (diarrhoea) and small lesions (rash). A multivariate risk calculator that can be used in the clinic for individual patients is proposed.

Adult↗

KIT mutations and dose selection for imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours.

A recent randomized EORTC phase III trial, comparing two doses of imatinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), reported dose dependency for progression-free survival. The current analysis of that study aimed to assess if tumour mutational status correlates with clinical response to imatinib. Pre-treatment samples of GISTs from 377 patients enrolled in phase III study were analyzed for mutations of KIT or PDGFRA by combination of D-HPLC and direct sequencing of tumour genomic DNA. Mutation types were correlated with patients' survival data. The presence of exon 9-activating mutations in KIT was the strongest adverse prognostic factor for response to imatinib, increasing the relative risk of progression by 171% (P<0.0001) and the relative risk of death by 190% (P<0.0001) when compared with KIT exon 11 mutants. Similarly, the relative risk of progression was increased by 108% (P<0.0001) and the relative risk of death by 76% (P=0.028) in patients without detectable KIT or PDGFRA mutations. In patients whose tumours expressed an exon 9 KIT oncoprotein, treatment with the high-dose regimen resulted in a significantly superior progression-free survival (P=0.0013), with a reduction of the relative risk of 61%. We conclude that tumour genotype is of major prognostic significance for progression-free survival and overall survival in patients treated with imatinib for advanced GISTs. Our findings suggest the need for differential treatment of patients with GISTs, with KIT exon 9 mutant patients benefiting the most from the 800 mg daily dose of the drug.

Adult↗

CD40L induces multidrug resistance to apoptosis in breast carcinoma and lymphoma cells through caspase independent and dependent pathways.

BACKGROUND: CD40L was found to reduce doxorubicin-induced apoptosis in non Hodgkin's lymphoma cell lines through caspase-3 dependent mechanism. Whether this represents a general mechanism for other tumor types is unknown. METHODS: The resistance induced by CD40L against apoptosis induced by a panel of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs in non Hodgkin's lymphoma and breast carcinoma cell lines was investigated. RESULTS: Doxorubicin, cisplatyl, etoposide, vinblastin and paclitaxel increased apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner in breast carcinoma as well as in non Hodgkin's lymphoma cell lines. Co-culture with irradiated L cells expressing CD40L significantly reduced the percentage of apoptotic cells in breast carcinoma and non Hodgkin's lymphoma cell lines treated with these drugs. In breast carcinoma cell lines, these 5 drugs induced an inconsistent increase of caspase-3/7 activity, while in non Hodgkin's lymphoma cell lines all 5 drugs increased caspase-3/7 activity up to 28-fold above baseline. Co-culture with CD40L L cells reduced (-39% to -89%) the activation of caspase-3/7 induced by these agents in all 5 non Hodgkin's lymphoma cell lines, but in none of the 2 breast carcinoma cell lines. Co culture with CD40L L cells also blocked the apoptosis induced by exogenous ceramides in breast carcinoma and non Hodgkin's lymphoma cell lines through a caspase-3-like, 8-like and 9-like dependent pathways. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that CD40L expressed on adjacent non tumoral cells induces multidrug resistance to cytotoxic agents and ceramides in both breast carcinoma and non Hodgkin's lymphoma cell lines, albeit through a caspase independent and dependent pathway respectively.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

[Adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of sarcomas].

For many types of cancers, adjuvant chemotherapy showed a moderate but significant benefit in terms of survival improvement. In sarcomas, the situation is contrasted and depends on the histological, molecular sub-types, as well as the topography of the tumor. Soft tissue sarcomas are in general poorly chemosensitive tumors and while adjuvant chemotherapy was found effective to delay relapses or to decrease the local relapses, it failed to yield a significant benefit with regard to overall survival. Sub-groups analysis indicate a significant lengthening of survival for the soft tissues sarcomas of the extremities. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of the soft tissues sarcomas starts should be reserved to rhabdomyosarcomas and the bone sarcomas like the osteosarcomas and the Ewing's sarcomas of bones are more susceptible to chemotherapy, which is an integral part of the treatment with a preoperative chemotherapy and, following surgery of the primary tumor, an adjuvant chemotherapy adapted to the histological response to the neoadjuvant treatment.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

International study on low-grade primary central nervous system lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical presentation, course, and outcome of low-grade primary central nervous system lymphoma. METHODS: Cases were assessed in a retrospective series collected from 18 cancer centers in 5 countries. RESULTS: Forty patients (18 men, 22 women; median age, 60 years [range, 19-78]) were identified. Involvement of a cerebral hemisphere or deeper brain structures was seen in 37 patients, only leptomeningeal involvement in 2 patients, and spinal cord disease in 1 patient. Chemotherapy/radiotherapy was conducted in 15 patients, radiotherapy alone in 12, chemotherapy alone in 10, and tumor resection alone in 2, whereas 1 patient received no treatment. The median progression-free, disease-specific, and overall survival were 61.5 (range, 0-204), 130 (range, 1-204), and 79 (range, 1-204) months, respectively. Only age 60 years or older was associated with shorter progression-free (p = 0.009), disease-specific (p = 0.015), and overall survival (p = 0.001) in multivariate analysis. INTERPRETATION: Low-grade primary central nervous system lymphoma differs from the high-grade subtype in its pathological, clinical, and radiological features. It has a better long-term outcome than primary central nervous system lymphoma in general with age 60 years or older adversely affecting survival.

Age Factors↗

ET-743: a novel agent with activity in soft-tissue sarcomas.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: ET-743 (ecteinascidin-743, trabectedin, Yondelis) is a natural marine product that has shown clinical activity in sarcoma. This paper reviews the current knowledge on this compound. RECENT FINDINGS: ET-743 interferes with several transcription factors, traps protein from the nucleotide-excision repair system, thus resulting in DNA damage, modulates gene expression, and blocks cells in the G2-M phase. In the clinical setting, after failure of standard treatment, ET-743 at 1.5 mg/m2 in 24 h continuous infusion every 21 days yielded an overall response rate close to 8% and stabilization rates of 30-40%, some lasting beyond 3 years. Leiomyosarcomas, liposarcomas, and synovial sarcomas may be the more sensitive histotypes. The major toxicities of ET-743 are hepatic--through biliary duct destruction--and hematologic. They are not cumulative and a significant number of patients may receive 12 courses or more. In a randomized Phase II study testing weekly ET-743 with treatment every 3 weeks, an improved progression-free survival rate was observed in the 3-weekly arm; the results of the follow-up Phase III trial should be available at the American Society of Clinical Oncology meeting of 2006. Phase I combination studies are in currently progress. SUMMARY: ET-743 is a novel active drug for sarcoma which yields prolonged disease-free survival in subsets of patients.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: consensus statement on diagnosis and treatment.

In the multidisciplinary management of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs), there is a need to coordinate the efforts of pathology, radiology, surgery and oncology. Surgery is the mainstay for resectable nonmetastatic GISTs, but virtually all GISTs are associated with a risk of metastasis. Imatinib 400 mg/day with or without surgery is the recommended first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic GIST; a higher dose may be considered in patients who progress, develop secondary resistance or present with specific genotypic characteristics. Adjuvant or neoadjuvant imatinib is not advised for resectable nonmetastatic GISTs. Neoadjuvant imatinib may be considered when surgery would result in significant morbidity or loss of organ function. Follow-up computed tomography imaging is recommended every three to six months for at least five years. Patients with metastatic disease should be continued on imatinib due to the high risk of recurrence on discontinuation of therapy. Treatment should be continued until there is progression or intolerable adverse effects. If dose escalation with imatinib fails, a clinical trial with novel agents alone or in combination may be considered. The present recommendations were developed at a surgical subcommittee meeting and a subsequent full Advisory Committee meeting held in Toronto, Ontario, in April 2005, under the sponsorship of Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc.

Biopsy, Needle↗

Management of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the imatinib era: selected case studies.

The introduction of imatinib, an orally administered inhibitor of the KIT receptor tyrosine kinase, is prompting revision of the management algorithms that have traditionally guided the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Historically, patients with GISTs have had substantial rates of relapse as well as limited long-term survival even after complete surgical resection of a primary tumor. Imatinib has been shown to induce durable tumor responses in more than half of the patients with malignant metastatic or unresectable GISTs and to halt disease progression in an additional third. These encouraging results have led to the initiation of clinical trials of imatinib as an adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy with surgery. Until relevant data are reported to provide definitive direction for the management of operable or potentially operable GISTs, treatment decisions must be made on the basis of the available evidence and clinical experience with imatinib. This paper presents selected case studies describing approaches to the combined use of surgery and systemic therapy that have been applied in the treatment of individual GIST patients. The management of GIST in these cases required a coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving medical oncologists, diagnostic radiologists, gastroenterologists, surgeons, and pathologists.

Adult↗

[News of the year 2005 in sarcomas].

This year, the innovations were numerous in sarcomas. Important progress were accomplished in the search for predictive factors which make it possible to propose to the patient a personalized treatment with the therapeutic ones reduced in the event of good prognosis or on the contrary aggressive steps in the event of bad prognosis. These prognostic factors can be genetic or clinical. Progress were also accomplished in the clinical field with the research of the most adapted therapeutic strategies and of advanced in various drugs of chemotherapy in particular the ET-743. Lastly, research is active and of many ways are tested into preclinic with a detailed attention on the way of the angiogenesis.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗

[New generation cytokines to prevent anemia and febrile neutropenia].

Febrile neutropenia and anemia are two major complications of chemotherapy. Human recombinant cytokines as G-CSF and erythropoietin allow efficient fight against these secondary effects but require iterative injections due to a short half life. The glycosylation of natural cytokines results in enhanced stability of these molecules of new generation and makes it possible to space the injections which become concomitant of chemotherapies. With regard to the erythropoietin, the prolonged half-life form shows a similar effectiveness with the natural molecule. For the G-CSF, the glycosylated form could still show itself more effective for the prevention of febrile neutropenias. Finally, these new molecules allow an improvement of the quality of life while ensuring an optimal dose-intensity of the treatment.

Anemia↗

[Prognostic factors for febrile neutropenia].

Cytotoxic chemotherapy suppresses the haematopoietic system, impairing host protective mechanisms and limiting the doses of chemotherapy that can be tolerated. Febrile neutropenia, the most serious haematological toxicity, is associated with the risk of life-threatening infections as well as chemotherapy dose reductions and delays that may compromise treatment outcomes. The recent literature in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and its complications and impact was provided an update on research, and the implications for improving the management of patients with cancer who are treated with myelosuppressive chemotherapy was discussed. Despite its importance as the primary dose-limiting toxicity of chemotherapy, much concerning neutropenia and its consequences and impact remains unknown. Recent surveys indicate that neutropenia remains a prevalent problem associated with substantial morbidity, mortality, and costs. The colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) have been used effectively in a variety of clinical settings to prevent or treat febrile neutropenia and to assist patients receiving dose-intensive chemotherapy. A meta-analysis of the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has confirmed the efficacy of prophylactic CSFs. Much research has sought to identify risk factors that may predispose patients to neutropenic complications, including febrile neutropenia, in an effort to predict better which patients are at risk and to use preventive strategies, such as prophylactic colony-stimulating factors, more cost-effectively. Research in quantifying the risk of neutropenic complications may make it possible in the near future to target patients at greater risk with appropriate preventive strategies, thereby maximizing the benefits and minimizing the costs.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗

[Targeted therapies of cancer: not lost in translation].

The term "targeted therapies" designs treatments directed towards molecular targets present on or within tumor cells, and contributing to the process of malignant transformation. These can be categorized in several different groups: 1) Targeted therapies directed against molecular targets which play the initial and critical role in neoplastic transformation; these treatment generally yield high response rates as single agent treatment. 2) Targeted therapies on late molecular targets contributing to tumor progression, but which do not correspond to the initial event; these treatments provide limited response rates as single agent but most often improve progression free and/or overall survival in combination with cytotoxic treatments. When the molecular target is present in tumor cells, but does not contribute to neoplastic transformation, these agents are generally non active in an in vivo setting. These observations point out the need to introduce translational research as a key element to schedule and evaluate the activity of novel targeted agents in the clinics.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

[Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in sarcoma].

This document describe s the proposed clinical practices guidelines for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in soft tissue sarcomas proposed by the French Sarcoma Group.Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy remains an experimental therapeutic procedure in soft tissue sarcomas. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy may be proposed in three different types of situations: 1) a locally advanced tumor, non accessible to R0 or 1 removal of the lesion. Its objective is there to allow for R0 or R1 surgical removal of the tumor. 2) A locally advanced tumor, accessible to R0 or 1 removal of the lesion, but with a mutilating surgery (amputation). Its objective is there to allow for R0 or R1 conservative surgical removal of the tumor. In both situation, the strategy should be discussed beforehand in a multidisciplinary specialized consultation for sarcoma. 3) In the case where complete (R0 or R1) surgical removal of the tumor can be performed, neooadjuvant chemotherapy has no demonstrated role. The only randomized phase III clinical trial testing neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting, i.e. the STBSG 62871 STBSG trial, failed to demonstrate any benefit in terms of overall or progression free survival. The selection of the type of chemotherapy regimen given in the neoadjuvant setting should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting, considering the age and the general status of the patient; young patients, without associated concomittent illnesses should be proposed for a combined chemotherapy regimen, combining doxorubicin (> or = 50 mg/m2) and ifosfamide (> 5 g/m2) on the basis of randomized trials demonstrating an improvement of response rate versus single agent therapy with doxorubine. In elderly and/or frail patients, conversely, single agent doxorubicin may be the preferred option.

Antineoplastic Agents↗