PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jeanine M Walenga

Publications and source records attributed to Jeanine M Walenga.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Product individuality of commercially available low-molecular-weight heparins and their generic versions: therapeutic implications.

The currently available brand-name low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) in the United States include dalteparin (Pfizer), enoxaparin (Aventis), and tinzaparin (Pharmion). Other products available, in Europe, include certoparin (Novartis), reviparin (Abbott), nadroparin (GlaxoSmithkline), and parnaparin (Alpha-Wasserman). Each of these LMWHs has a characteristic molecular weight profile and biological activity in terms of an anti-FXa and anti-FIIa potency. The mean molecular weight of these drugs ranges from 4.0 kDa to 7.0 kDa and the anti-FXa:anti-FIIa ratio ranges from 1.5 to 3.5. These agents may also be characterized by the presence of specific chemical end groups such as 2-O-sulfo-4-enepyranosuronic acid at the nonreducing terminus (enoxaparin) or 2,5-anhydro-D-mannose at the reducing terminus (dalteparin). Further, the component oligosaccharide chains exhibit product-specific distribution profiles. It is now widely accepted that individual LMWHs are chemically unique agents and cannot be interchanged therapeutically. Each commercial LMWH has been individually developed for specific clinical indications, which are dose and product dependent. Recently, several generic LMWHs have become available in India (Cutenox and Markaparin) and South America (dilutol, clenox, dripanina), and three companies have filed for regulatory approval of a generic version of enoxaparin in the United States. As the primary aim of a generic drug is to reduce cost without compromising patient care, a generic drug is required to be chemically and biologically equivalent to the pioneer drug. Because LMWHs represent complex natural mucopolysaccharide drugs that have undergone chemical and enzymatic modifications, physicochemical and biological information in addition to molecular weight and anti-FXa:anti-FIIa ratio should be used to determine generic equivalency to the branded drug. We have utilized a previously reported approach to systematically compare three generic versions of enoxaparin obtained from India and Brazil with the branded enoxaparin (Lovenox) available in the United States. Testing included molecular and structural profiling, evaluation in clot-based and amidolytic anti-FXa and anti-FIIa assays, and heparinase-I digestion profiles. While the molecular profiles (4.8 +/- 1.8 kD) and anticoagulant potencies as determined by activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) were comparable for all four agents, the generic products showed variations in the thrombin time (TT) and Heptest assays. Two generic and the branded enoxaparin were readily digested by heparinase-I, losing most of their anticoagulant activity, but one generic product resisted digestion. This may have been due to a unique structural feature in this product. These studies show that, while generic LMWHs may exhibit acceptable molecular weight and anti-FXa profiles, they can exhibit assay-based differences and digestion profiles. Testing in animal models to determine safety, efficacy, and pharmacodynamic parameters may be important to verify equivalence. In order to assure that the generic LMWHs are equivalent to branded LMWHs such that equivalent clinical results are obtained, there is a need to develop clear stepwise guidelines that will establish equivalency in terms of physical, chemical, biochemical, pharmacokinetic, and pharmacodynamic properties for these anticoagulant drugs.

Blood Coagulation Tests↗
PubMed2005

Incidence of antiplatelet factor 4/heparin antibody induction in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary revascularization.

The incidence of antiplatelet factor-4/heparin antibody formation in patients who receive contemporary doses of unfractionated heparin in the setting of percutaneous coronary revascularization is unknown. Also unknown is the ability of these antibodies to activate platelets or adversely affect clinical outcome in the absence of clinically recognized heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. To address these questions, we serially measured antiplatelet factor-4/heparin antibody levels and performed serotonin release assays in patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention. Correlations were then made across antibody induction, heparin exposure, and clinical outcome at 6 months.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Unfractionated heparin compared with low-molecular-weight heparin as related to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a severe side effect of treatment with unfractionated heparin. The relation of low-molecular-weight heparin to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is less well understood. This review will summarize what is known about the similarities and differences between thrombocytopenia induced by low-molecular-weight heparin and that induced by unfractionated heparin. RECENT FINDINGS: The pathophysiology of unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, caused by the development of antibodies to heparin/platelet factor 4 complexes, holds true for low-molecular-weight heparin because the molecules of the latter are of the same saccharidic structure as those of unfractionated heparin. Owing to their smaller size, however, low-molecular-weight heparin does not interact with platelet factor 4 and platelets as efficiently as does unfractionated heparin. This translates to a two- to threefold lower risk of immune sensitization (antibody generation and occurrence of clinical heparin-induced thrombocytopenia). Low-molecular-weight heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies are more often immunoglobulin A and immunoglobulin M, in contrast to the immunoglobulin G antibodies generated with unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, which tend to be more often associated with clinical heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. The clinical expression of low-molecular-weight heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is generally similar to that of unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia but can have a slower onset, more severe thrombocytopenia, and slower platelet count recovery. Given that low-molecular-weight heparin, of itself, is linked with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia pathophysiology and it can interact with most preexisting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia antibodies generated after exposure to unfractionated heparin, treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia patients with low-molecular-weight heparin is contraindicated. SUMMARY: The risk of the development of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with low-molecular-weight heparin treatment is reduced relative to the frequency of unfractionated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, but it is not eliminated, and platelet counts should be monitored with treatment.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2005

Argatroban treatment for patients with intolerance to heparin and hirudin.

Argatroban is a synthetic thrombin inhibitor that acts independently of any cofactor. It inhibits free as well as fibrin- and clot-bound thrombin. The clinical history of two patients is presented, both with previous allergic reactions toward heparin and hirudin. In both patients, antibodies against hirudin were documented. Argatroban was successfully used in both patients without any side effects. We conclude argatroban to be the drug of choice in patients with intolerance to heparin and hirudin. Moreover, genetic variations affecting the hepatic catabolism of argatroban might exist, because very different dosages of argatroban were needed in the two patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Short- and long-acting synthetic pentasaccharides as antithrombotic agents.

Fondaparinux sodium (Arixtra; GlaxoSmithKline) is the first of a new class of antithrombotic agents. It is a chemically synthesised pentasaccharide mimicking the site of heparin that binds to antithrombin. It is purely a factor Xa inhibitor and an inhibitor of thrombin generation that requires binding to antithrombin. Fondaparinux sodium differs from heparin, low-molecular-weight heparin and heparinoids, and cannot be used interchangeably. It has been approved in the US and Europe for the prophylaxis of venous thrombosis after orthopaedic surgery by a fixed dose of 2.5 mg/day without monitoring. Using this pentasaccharide as a backbone, other structures have been synthesised. Idraparinux sodium (Sanofi-Aventis) differs structurally from fondaparinux sodium as it has additional methyl groups, a long half-life, and once-weekly administration. Both drugs are being developed as antithrombotics for venous and arterial thrombosis, acute coronary syndrome, stroke and as adjuncts to thrombolytic therapy.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Argatroban use during pediatric interventional cardiac catheterization.

Argatroban is a synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor that does not interact with or induce heparin-dependent antibodies. It is approved for use in adults for prevention and treatment of thrombosis associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). It has been administered safely in adults with HIT during coronary interventions. There are no reports of argatroban use for anticoagulation in pediatric patients. The present case describes the use of argatroban during coil embolization of a Fontan fenestration in a child with a history of HIT. The patient received a single bolus dose of 150 microg/kg of argatroban at the onset of the intervention. The fenestration was successfully occluded with a detachable coil. The activated clotting time (ACT) was > 200 sec throughout the procedure. The ACT returned to baseline 72 min after the bolus. No complications occurred. This case demonstrates the safe and successful use of argatroban during a transcatheter intervention in a pediatric patient with a history of HIT. The use of argatroban is promising for anticoagulation in children who require an alternative to heparin.

Antithrombins↗
PubMed2004

Differential prevalence of anti-heparin-PF4 immunoglobulin subtypes in patients treated with clivarin and heparin: implications in the HIT pathogenesis.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) syndrome is a catastrophic complication of heparin therapy that may result in arterial/venous thromboembolic events. The pathophysiology of HIT is mediated by the generation of a functionally and molecularly heterogeneous group of anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 (AHPF4) antibodies that cause platelet/endothelial cell activation/destruction. These AHPF4 antibodies may be of various subtypes and cause differential pathogenic responses during HIT. This study evaluated the differential prevalence and functionality of AHPF4 Ig subtypes (IgA, IgG, and IgM) in plasma samples obtained from clinically suspected HIT patients (n = 111) and two clinical trials. In these trials, a low-molecular-weight heparin, clivarin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) were used to treat deep-vein thrombosis (CORTES) and for prophylaxis of the orthopedic surgery (ECHOS). In the CORTES study, three randomized groups of patients (n = 312-328) received prophylactic treatment with either UFH or clivarin (o.d. or b.i.d.). In the ECHOS study, there were approximately 600 patients per group. Citrated plasma samples were analyzed for cumulative IgA/IgG/IgM and individual Ig subtypes of AHPF4 utilizing ELISA. Functionality of the ELISA-positive samples was ascertained by 14C-serotonin release assay. In clinically confirmed HIT patients (and UFH-treated CORTES and ECHOS samples), the Ig subtyping revealed a predominance of IgG AHPF4 antibodies in contrast to the asymptomatic high AHPF4 antibody titers, which were found to be mostly IgM and/or IgA subtypes. In the clivarin-treated patients in both trials, the prevalence of AHPF4 antibodies was found to be lower (2-3 fold, p < 0.01) in comparison to UFH group. In addition, the clivarin-treated patients with positive AHPF4 antibodies were found to be predominantly of the non-functional type and were found in the order of IgM > IgA > IgG Together, these observations demonstrate that ELISA-detectable IgG subtype in UFH-treated patients may be more likely to cause functional/pathologic responses during HIT syndrome. Thus, determination of IgG subtype of AHPF4 antibodies during HIT syndrome may be crucial in the diagnosis; however, the relevance of the pathologically non-functional (IgA and/or IgM) antibodies and the overall mechanism(s) of these HIT-associatied antibodies need further investigation.

Anticoagulants↗
PubMed2004

Newer insights on the mechanism of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II is a complex clinical syndrome. It is an immune reaction to heparin in which the formation of antibodies targeted against the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex results in platelet activation. Platelet activation plays a central role in HIT; however, platelet activation does not occur as an isolated physiologic response. To elucidate further the mechanism of thrombogenesis in HIT, we undertook studies to determine the effect of heparin antibodies on endothelial cells, leukocytes, and the inflammatory state. We summarize our previous and new findings. For endothelial cells: Antiheparin antibodies bind to and directly activate microvascular endothelial cells, whereas binding to and activating macrovascular endothelial cells requires preactivation by platelets or tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha). Increased circulating levels of hemostatic activation factors as observed with thrombosis, particularly soluble P-selectin, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAI-1), tissue factor, and thrombomodulin, were associated with endothelial cell activation and were also found in the blood circulation of patients with HIT. For the inflammatory state: Neutrophils and monocytes (but not lymphocytes) bind to and form complexes with platelets in the presence of HIT antibodies. Activated monocytes bind to endothelial cells and produce a procoagulant state. Patients with HIT have an increased level of cytokines in their blood circulation. For HIT antibodies: Only heparin fractions larger than 5 kd interacted with HIT antibodies, explaining why low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) usually does not generate antibodies. HIT antibodies are heterogeneous in structure, affinity, and specificity. These data suggest that, in addition to the platelet component, several other mechanisms are associated with the pathophysiology of HIT. These include an inflammatory state, endothelial cell remodeling, and the known procoagulant state. Differences between patients in the levels of the inflammatory markers may relate to various stages of the inflammatory/procoagulant state that exists in patients with HIT. The variations within the HIT antibodies may influence their ability to activate platelets, endothelial cells, and leukocytes, and thus contribute further to the variations in the pathogenicity of HIT.

Autoantibodies↗
PubMed2004

Decreased prevalence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with low-molecular-weight heparin and related drugs.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) Type II represents a disease spectrum associated with a high risk of thrombosis leading to limb loss and death. The pathophysiology of HIT is based on the development of antibodies to the heparin-platelet factor 4 (PF4) complex. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is heterogeneous in molecular chain length and degree of sulfation accounting in part, for, the heterogeneity of HIT antibodies. Because of its smaller size, low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) does not interact with PF4 and platelets as efficiently as does UFH. This translates into a lower risk of immune sensitization with LMWH than with UFH treatment. LMWH is less likely than UFH to cause antibody generation and thus patients do not develop clinical HIT at the same frequency with LMWH as with UFH treatment. The antibodies generated by LMWH treatment are more often immunoglobulin A (IgA) and IgM as opposed to IgG antibodies, which are associated with symptomatic clinical HIT generated by exposure to UFH. However, platelet activation/aggregation can occur from LMWHs in the presence of most pre-existing HIT antibodies that had been generated from UFH exposure, although the response is less than that caused by UFH plus HIT antibody. With the expanded use of LMWH, the frequency of clinical HIT may naturally decline, given that LMWHs are less likely to generate HIT antibody.

Heparin↗
PubMed2004

Monitoring the new antithrombotic drugs.

Today there is a diverse group of anticoagulant and antithrombotic drugs available that includes warfarin derivatives, heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, thrombin inhibitors, factor Xa inhibitors, and various antiplatelet agents. Many of these new drugs do not alter measurable blood coagulation parameters, yet they are effective antithrombotic agents through their actions on vascular endothelial cells and proteins. Thus, these new agents do not affect the traditional clot-based prothrombin time/International Normalized Ratio (PT/INR) and activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) tests, and monitoring and standardization require the development of new methods. In addition to clot-based assays, chromogenic assays, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), flow cytometry, and other techniques have been used to monitor these new drugs. On the other hand, some of the new antithrombotic drugs do affect the PT, aPTT, and activated clotting time (ACT); however, they behave differently from the warfarin derivatives and heparin. The traditionally used relationship of target time to clot values and INR to clinical effect cannot necessarily be transferred to the new drugs. Unfortunately, monitoring is not as simple as it was for warfarin and heparin. Although the new antithrombotic drugs have been approved for clinical use, assay systems for monitoring most of them are still in development or have not been clinically validated. This applies to each of the clinical settings targeted for prophylaxis, treatment, or interventional procedures (i.e., high- and low-dosing regimens typically require different monitoring methods). In addition to basic monitoring, other issues such as sensitivity of the drug to different laboratory monitoring reagents and instrumentation, drug combination monitoring, and patient-related factors that contribute to the variability of the results still need to be addressed.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2004

Transition from argatroban to oral anticoagulation with phenprocoumon or acenocoumarol: effects on prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, and Ecarin Clotting Time.

Treatment with the direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban (ARG) is often followed by vitamin K-antagonist treatment (VKA). Phenprocoumon (PC) and acenocoumarol (AC) are frequently used in Europe. The standard monitoring test for VKA, pro-thrombin time (PT), is prolonged by direct thrombin inhibitors. Therefore the International Normalized Ratio (INR) obtained during combined treatment does not reflect the true effect of the VKA. A similar interference of the VKA on the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), a monitoring assay for direct thrombin inhibitors, can occur. In 39 healthy volunteers the effect of ARG alone or combined with PC or AC on PT, INR, aPTT, and Ecarin Clotting Time (ECT) was investigated. 6 groups each of 6-8 volunteers received a 5-hour infusion of either 1.0, 2.0 or 3.0 microg/kg/min ARG (days 1, 3, 4 and 5) before initiation of either PC or AC (day 1) and during continued VKA dosing (target INR 2-3). A linear relationship (INR(ARG+VKA) = intercept + slope * INR (VKA alone)) was observed between the INR measured "on" and "off" ARG. The slope depended on the argatroban dose and on the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) of the PT reagent, the steepest slope (i.e., the largest difference between INR (ARG+VKA) and INR (VKA alone)) was seen with the highest ARG dose and the PT reagent with an ISI of 2.13. There was a close correlation between plasma levels of ARG and aPTT or ECT. Under VKA the ARG-aPTT relationship indicated an increased sensitivity of the aPTT to ARG, VKA treatment had no effect on the prolongation of the ECT induced by argatroban. In conclusion, ARG at doses up to 2 microg/kg/min can be discontinued at an INR of 4.0 on combined therapy with VKA, as this would correspond to an INR between 2.2 and 3.7 for the VKA. If it is necessary to monitor ARG in the critical transition period, the ECT which is not influenced by VKA can be used as an alternative to the aPTT.

Acenocoumarol↗
PubMed2004

Prevalance of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies in preterm newborns after exposure to unfractionated heparin.

Heparin is frequently used in preterm infants to prolong the patency of intravascular catheters. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies in newborns. A cross-section of all preterm newborn infants expected to require heparin to maintain patency of a central venous access line were enrolled. A blood sample was obtained soon after birth before heparin exposure to exclude the possibility of placental transfer of maternal heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies. A second sample was obtained at termination of heparin use (mean duration of heparin exposure was 23 +/- 13 days; range, 6-67). Paired samples, at birth and after heparin use, were available for 42 infants with a mean gestational age of 27.8 +/- 2.2 weeks and birth weight of 1036 +/- 267 g. Thrombocytopenia developed in 57% (24/42) of the infants. None of these infants had clinical suspicion of thrombosis during the study period. The etiology of thrombocytopenia was confirmed sepsis in six, presumed sepsis in three, necrotizing enterocolitis in one, and unclear in 14 infants. Anti-heparin/platelet factor 4 antibodies measured using the standard assays for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (two commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests and the functional platelet serotonin release assay) were negative on all infants. Although it could be related to the poor ability of these infants to mount an immunologic response, further research is necessary to fully understand this lack of response to heparin and to elucidate further the reasons for thrombocytopenia in very-low-birth-weight infants.

Autoantibodies↗