PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jefferson L Gross

Publications and source records attributed to Jefferson L Gross.

2 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Surgical resection of unilateral lung metastases: is bilateral thoracotomy necessary?

UNLABELLED: Surgical resection of lung metastases is routine procedure for selected patients with pulmonary nodules and solid tumors. In some cases, patients present with unilateral pulmonary metastases amenable to surgical resection. Surgeons are still divided between unilateral approach directed to the radiologically detected nodules, or bilateral exploratory thoracotomy. This study evaluates the need for bilateral thoracotomy in patients diagnosed with unilateral lung metastases. A retrospective evaluation was made of a prospective database from a single institution (1990-1997) of all consecutive patients (n = 267) diagnosed on admission with unilateral (n = 179) or bilateral (n= 88) lung nodules. Ipsilateral thoracotomy was performed on all patients with unilateral disease. Bilateral thoracotomy was performed on all patients with bilateral lung metastases. HISTOLOGY: adenocarcinoma (25%), osteosarcoma (23%), squamous cell carcinoma (18%), soft-tissue sarcoma (18%), and other (16%). Median follow-up was 17 months. Contralateral disease-free survival and overall survival were determined. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine prognostic factors for overall and contralateral disease-free survival. The two groups of patients with confirmed bilateral metastases (synchronous or metachronous) were compared. Actuarial overall 5-year survival was 34.9%. Contralateral recurrence-free 6-month, 12-month, and 5-year survival were 95%, 89%, and 78%, respectively. Patients who experienced recurrence in the contralateral lung within 3, 6, or 12 months had an overall 5-year survival rate of 24%, 30%, and 37%, respectively. When patients with recurrence in the contralateral lung were compared to patients with bilateral metastases on admission, there was no significant difference in overall survival. Only histology and the number of pathologically proven metastases significantly (p < 0.05) predicted recurrence in the contralateral lung. Bilateral exploration of unilateral lung metastases is not warranted in all cases. Most patients will have only unilateral disease, and delaying contralateral thoracotomy until disease is detected radiologically does not appear to affect outcome.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

When to remove a chest tube? A randomized study with subsequent prospective consecutive validation.

BACKGROUND: Operative procedures on the pleural space are usually managed by chest tube drainage. Timing for removing the tube is empirically established, with wide variation among surgeons. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of establishing a volume of 200 mL/d of uninfected drainage as a threshold for removal of chest tube, as compared with more frequently used volumes of 100 and 150 mL/d. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized study was performed in a single institution. Patients (n = 139) submitting to pleural drainage after surgical procedures were randomized to one of three groups, defined by the planned timing of chest tube removal (depending on the threshold volume per day of pleural fluid drained): G-100 (< or = 100 mL/d, n = 44); G-150 (< or =150 mL/d, n = 58); and G-200 (< or = 200 mL/d, n = 37). Subsequently, another 91 consecutive patients had chest tubes removed when drainage was less than 200 mL/d (G-val, prospective validation group). All patients had similar discharge and 60-day followup. Drainage time, hospital stay, and reaccumulation rate were registered. RESULTS: Drainage time (median days: 3.5 for G-100, 3 for G-150, 3 for G-200, 3 for G-val) and hospital stay (median days: 4 for G-100, 3 for G-150, 3 for G-200, 3 for G-val) were not statistically different among groups. Radiologic reaccumulation rates were 9.1% for G-100, 13.1% for G-150, 5.4% for G-200, and 10.9% for G-val, and the thoracenteses rates were 2.3%, 0.8%, 2.7%, and 3.3%, respectively, with no major differences among groups (G-100 versus G-150 versus G-200; G-200 versus G-val). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the threshold of daily drainage to 200 mL before removing the chest tube did not markedly affect drainage, hospitalization time, or overall costs, nor did it increase the likelihood of major pleural fluid reaccumulation. This volume (200 mL/d) could be recommended for chest tube withdrawal decision for uninfected pleural fluid with no evidence of air leaks.

Chest Tubes↗