PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jeffrey Crawford

Publications and source records attributed to Jeffrey Crawford.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Effect of patient socioeconomic status and body mass index on the quality of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and the use of intentionally reduced doses of chemotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with breast cancer treated with a standard chemotherapy regimen (n = 764) were enrolled in a prospective registry after signing informed consent. Detailed information was collected on patient, disease, and treatment, including chemotherapy doses. Zip code level data on median household income, proportion of people living below the poverty level, and educational attainment were obtained from the US Census. Doses for the first cycle of chemotherapy lower than 85% of standard were considered to be reduced. Univariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with the use of reduced first cycle doses. RESULTS: In univariate analysis, individual education attainment, zip code SES measures, body mass index, and geographic region were all significantly associated with receipt of intentionally reduced doses of chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, controlling for geography, factors independently associated with reduced doses were obesity (odds ratio [OR], 2.47; 95% CI, 1.36 to 4.51), severe obesity (OR, 4.04; 95% CI, 1.46 to 11.19), and education less than high school (OR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.57 to 5.99). CONCLUSION: Social disparities in breast cancer outcomes may be in part the result of lower quality chemotherapy doses in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. Efforts to address such prescribing patterns may help reduce SES disparities in breast cancer survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Randomized phase II study of bortezomib alone and bortezomib in combination with docetaxel in previously treated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of bortezomib +/- docetaxel as second-line therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to bortezomib 1.5 mg/m2 (arm A) or bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 plus docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (arm B). A treatment cycle of 21 days comprised four bortezomib doses on days 1, 4, 8, and 11, plus, in arm B, docetaxel on day 1. Patients could receive unlimited cycles. The primary end point was response rate. RESULTS: A total of 155 patients were treated, 75 in arm A and 80 in arm B. Baseline characteristics were comparable. Investigator-assessed response rates were 8% in arm A and 9% in arm B. Disease control rates were 29% in arm A and 54% in arm B. Median time to progression was 1.5 months in arm A and 4.0 months in arm B. One-year survival was 39% and 33%, and median survival was 7.4 and 7.8 months in arms A and B, respectively. Adverse effect profiles were as expected in both arms, with no significant additivity. The most common grade > or = 3 adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, and dyspnea (4% and 53%, 19% and 26%, and 17% and 14% of patients in arms A and B, respectively). CONCLUSION: Bortezomib has modest single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory advanced NSCLC using this schedule, with minor enhancement in combination with docetaxel. Additional investigation of bortezomib in NSCLC is warranted in combination with other drugs known to be active, or using different schedules.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Assessing the ability of the antiangiogenic and anticytokine agent thalidomide to modulate radiation-induced lung injury.

PURPOSE: Thalidomide has broad anticytokine properties, which might protect normal tissues in patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximal tolerated dose of thalidomide when used in combination with vinorelbine plus thoracic radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients had inoperable Stage III non-small-cell lung cancer, a Karnofsky Performance Status>or=70, and life expectancy>or=6 months. Patients underwent pretreatment evaluation of lung function. Radiotherapy consisted of 66 Gy in 6.5 weeks. Vinorelbine was administered i.v. (5 mg/m2) 3 times per week just before radiotherapy. Thalidomide was begun at 50 mg, p.o., on day 1 of chemoradiotherapy and continued once daily for 6 months. Side effects were scored using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. RESULTS: Ten patients were enrolled. Of the first 6 patients, 2 developed major thrombotic events that were believed to be possibly related to thalidomide. The study was suspended and modified to require prophylactic anticoagulation. Of the last 4 patients, 2 developed dose-limiting toxicity attributable to thalidomide; both patients required a dose reduction of thalidomide to <50 mg/day. Because the drug is not available in an oral product providing <50 mg/day, the study was closed. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of thalidomide concurrently with thoracic radiotherapy and vinorelbine resulted in excessive toxicity.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Predictors of reduced dose intensity in patients with early-stage breast cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective study was undertaken to define risk factors for reductions in dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with early stage breast cancer (ESBC). METHODS: A nationwide survey of 190 community oncology practices was conducted between 1998 and 2002 with data collected retrospectively on 3,707 patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy for ESBC. End points included reductions in dose intensity, delivered relative dose intensity (RDI) <85%, and the incidence of chemotherapy dose delays >/=7 days and dose reduction >/=15%. Demographic and clinical characteristics, incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN), and patterns of use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) were also assessed. RESULTS: Average RDI for all regimens was 88%, with 30% of patients receiving <85% of standard for their regimen. Seventeen percent of the reduction in average RDI was planned from the start of therapy, and 13% was unplanned. In univariate analysis, significant predictors of reduced RDI were: age >/=65 years (41%, P < 0.001), body surface area (BSA) >2 m(2) (37%, P < 0.001), negative lymph nodes (33%, P < 0.001), FN (36%, P = 0.013), and comorbidities (40%, P = 0.013), particularly renal disease (86%, P = 0.004). Dose reduction was less with prophylactic G-CSF (24%, P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, significant independent predictors of reduced RDI included: advanced age, greater BSA, comorbidities, anthracycline-based regimens, a 28-day schedule and FN, while primary G-CSF prophylaxis was associated with a significant reduction in risk. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients with potentially curable ESBC continue to experience planned and unplanned reductions in RDI.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Mortality, morbidity, and cost associated with febrile neutropenia in adult cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Hospitalization for febrile neutropenia (FN) in cancer patients is associated with considerable morbidity, mortality, and cost. The study was undertaken to better define mortality, length of stay (LOS), cost, and risk factors associated with mortality and prolonged hospitalization in cancer patients with FN. METHODS: The longitudinal discharge database derived from 115 US medical centers was used to study all adult cancer patients hospitalized with FN between 1995 and 2000, comprising a total of 41,779 patients. Primary outcomes included mortality, LOS, and cost per episode. RESULTS: Overall, in-hospital mortality was 9.5%. Patients without any major comorbidities had a 2.6% risk of mortality, whereas 1 major comorbidity was associated with a 10.3% and more than 1 major comorbidity with a > or = 21.4% risk of mortality, respectively. Mean (median) length of stay was 11.5 (6) days, and the mean (median) cost was $19,110 ($8,376) per episode of FN. Patients hospitalized for > or = 10 days (35% of all patients) accounted for 78% of overall cost. Independent major risk factors for inpatient mortality included invasive fungal infections, Gram-negative sepsis, pneumonia and other lung disease, cerebrovascular, renal, and liver disease. Main predictors for LOS > or = 10 days included leukemia, invasive fungal infections, other types of infection, and several comorbid conditions. CONCLUSION: Factors associated with increased mortality, LOS, and cost in hospitalized adult cancer patients with FN include patient characteristics, type of malignancy, comorbidities, and infectious complications. These factors may be useful in identifying patients at increased risk of serious medical complications and mortality for more aggressive supportive care measures.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline.

PURPOSE: To update the 2000 American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on the use of hematopoietic colony-stimulating factors (CSF). UPDATE METHODOLOGY: The Update Committee completed a review and analysis of pertinent data published from 1999 through September 2005. Guided by the 1996 ASCO clinical outcomes criteria, the Update Committee formulated recommendations based on improvements in survival, quality of life, toxicity reduction and cost-effectiveness. RECOMMENDATIONS: The 2005 Update Committee agreed unanimously that reduction in febrile neutropenia (FN) is an important clinical outcome that justifies the use of CSFs, regardless of impact on other factors, when the risk of FN is approximately 20% and no other equally effective regimen that does not require CSFs is available. Primary prophylaxis is recommended for the prevention of FN in patients who are at high risk based on age, medical history, disease characteristics, and myelotoxicity of the chemotherapy regimen. CSF use allows a modest to moderate increase in dose-density and/or dose-intensity of chemotherapy regimens. Dose-dense regimens should only be used within an appropriately designed clinical trial or if supported by convincing efficacy data. Prophylactic CSF for patients with diffuse aggressive lymphoma aged 65 years and older treated with curative chemotherapy (CHOP or more aggressive regimens) should be given to reduce the incidence of FN and infections. Current recommendations for the management of patients exposed to lethal doses of total body radiotherapy, but not doses high enough to lead to certain death due to injury to other organs, includes the prompt administration of CSF or pegylated G-CSF.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Myelotoxicity from chemotherapy.

Myelosuppression continues to be a major dose-limiting toxicity for most chemotherapy regimens. While the development of growth factors has changed the approach to myelosuppression, costs remain high and can be measured both in terms of quality of life (QOL) and economic outcomes. Growing data suggest that there may also be effects on response and survival in some tumors. This review will highlight the incidence, effect, and treatment/prevention of myelosuppression and briefly discuss the questions that remain.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

A phase I study of dose-dense topotecan given upfront to standard therapy in patients with small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility and maximum tolerated dose of dose-dense topotecan as induction chemotherapy before standard therapy (carboplatin plus etoposide alone or in combination with radiotherapy) in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with SCLC and good performance status were eligible. Three 2-week cycles of dose-dense topotecan administered on days 1-3 with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support were followed by four cycles of standard carboplatin plus etoposide therapy alone (extensive-stage SCLC) or with radiotherapy (limited-stage SCLC). The dose of topotecan was escalated from 1.5 mg/m2/day to 2.5 mg/m2/day in increments of 0.25 mg/m2/day within cohorts of 3-5 patients each. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as any grade 3 or 4 toxicity resulting in a treatment reduction or a delay of >3 days. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with SCLC (5 limited-stage, 17 extensive-stage) were enrolled. Treatment was well tolerated. The dose-limiting toxicities were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia, and the maximum tolerated dose of dose-dense topotecan induction therapy was 2.25 mg/m2/day. Overall, topotecan-related grade 3/4 haematological toxicities included neutropenia (n = 4), thrombocytopenia (n = 3) and febrile neutropenia (n = 1). No grade 4 non-haematological toxicities occurred. Grade 3 adverse events included nausea (n = 2), renal toxicity (n = 1) and anorexia (n = 1). Toxicity during the carboplatin plus etoposide +/- radiotherapy phase of therapy was consistent with that reported in previous trials. The overall response rate was 80% for limited-stage and 76% for extensive-stage SCLC. Median survival was 8 months in patients with limited-stage SCLC and 13.5 months for patients with extensive-stage SCLC. CONCLUSION: The results of this phase I study suggest that a regimen of sequential dose-dense topotecan and carboplatin plus etoposide is feasible, and the preliminary activity observed in patients with SCLC warrants further investigation at a starting dose of topotecan 2.25 mg/m2/day.

Anorexia↗
PubMed2006

Risk assessment and guidelines for first-cycle colony-stimulating factor use in the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Neutropenia is the primary dose-limiting toxicity in patients with cancer treated with systemic chemotherapy. The risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) has been estimated on the basis of the chemotherapy regimen, but studies are now finding a number of patient-related and disease-related risk factors for FN and other complications, such as hospitalization, chemotherapy dose reductions and delays, and mortality. These patient-related risk factors have been incorporated into clinical guidelines for managing neutropenia. The newly released guidelines on the use of myeloid growth factors with cancer chemotherapy of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network use disease- and patient-related factors along with the chemotherapy regimen risk. These guidelines also differ from previous guidelines in that they recommend the routine use of colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) in patients in whom the risk of neutropenia is > 20% (the previous threshold was > or = 40%); this recommendation is based on recent data that show the clinical benefits of filgrastim (Neupogen) and pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) in studies in which the overall populations had FN risks of between 20% and 40%. The use of guidelines such as these in clinical practice will make it possible to target CSFs to appropriate patients in the first cycle of chemotherapy, when the risk of neutropenia is highest.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Erythropoiesis-stimulating protein support and survival.

Anemia is common in many patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy. One option for managing chemotherapy-induced anemia (CIA) is erythropoiesis-stimulating proteins (ESPs), which are indicated for the treatment of CIA in patients with most types of cancer. They have been shown to be safe and effective in numerous well-documented studies, and their side effects are well known. The rate of thrombotic events with the long-acting ESP darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp) has been consistent in studies conducted before and after its approval. The association of thrombotic events with high hemoglobin levels or rapid increases in its levels in patients with cancer remains controversial. Adjusting the dose of the ESP to maintain and monitor a target hemoglobin level of 11 to 12 g/dL is certainly prudent and may help prevent or minimize these events. Chemotherapy-induced anemia has been associated with shorter survival in patients with cancer, and the relation is likely multifactorial. Data on the treatment of CIA with ESPs have not shown a consistent effect on survival. Two studies in patients with hemoglobin levels above the target level showed that survival was shorter in the patients treated with ESPs. A review of data from other trials found no effect of ESPs on survival, and other trials suggested a positive effect. This article reviews data on survival in patients treated with ESPs and discusses five large randomized controlled trials of darbepoetin alfa that are addressing this issue.

Anemia↗
PubMed2005

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Over the last two decades, several approaches to multimodality therapy have been investigated in patients with advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer. These include induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Both approaches have been shown to be superior to radiation therapy alone. However, in several randomized trials, concomitant chemoradiotherapy was shown to be superior to the induction chemotherapy approach. It has been hypothesized that the addition of systemic dose sequential chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiotherapy, either as induction or as consolidation chemotherapy, might further improve survival rates. Recently, the Cancer and Leukemia Group B reported on a randomized phase III trial directly evaluating the addition of two cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. In this study, induction chemotherapy failed to further improve survival rates of concurrent chemoradiotherapy. A previously conducted randomized phase II study also suggested no benefit from the addition of induction chemotherapy to concomitant chemoradiotherapy. Favorable phase II data have been published supporting the use of consolidation chemotherapy. However, to date, no large randomized study evaluating a possible benefit from consolidation chemotherapy has been completed. In addition to evaluating optimal sequencing strategies of combined modality therapy, current investigations are also focusing on the integration of novel agents, including chemotherapeutic and targeted therapies. Currently ongoing trials involving novel approaches are reviewed here.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

Randomized phase III study of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BMS-275291 in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: National Cancer Institute of Canada-Clinical Trials Group Study BR.18.

PURPOSE: To determine whether BMS-275291, a broad-spectrum matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (MMPI), added to systemic chemotherapy improved survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In early phase studies, BMS- 275291 was not associated with dose-limiting joint toxicity seen with other MMPIs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, performance status (PS) 0 to 2, and adequate organ function were eligible. All patients received paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 plus carboplatin (area under the curve, 6 mg/mL-min) intravenously every 21 days for up to 8 cycles, and were randomly assigned to receive BMS-275291, 1,200 mg orally daily, or placebo until disease progression. The primary study end point was survival (OS); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), response rates (RR), toxicity, and quality of life. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2002, 774 patients were randomly assigned. Pretreatment characteristics were well balanced between arms: median age, 61 years; male sex, 73%; stage IV, 79%; PS 0 to 1, 88%. Interim safety analysis revealed no survival advantage and increased toxicity in the experimental arm, and study treatment was stopped. Median OS, PFS and RR in the final analysis in the BMS-275291 arm were 8.6 months, 4.9 months, and 25.8% respectively, and in the control arm 9.2 months, 5.3 months, 33.7%. Toxicity was significantly higher in the BMS-275291 arm, including flu-like symptoms, rash, hypersensitivity reactions (8.6% v 2.4%), and febrile neutropenia (9.7% v 5.5%). CONCLUSION: BMS-275291 added to chemotherapy increases toxicity and does not improve survival in advanced NSCLC.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

Bronchial stenosis: an underreported complication of high-dose external beam radiotherapy for lung cancer?

PURPOSE: To assess the incidence of clinically significant bronchial stenosis in patients treated with high doses (i.e., >70 Gy) of twice-daily external beam radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The outcomes of 103 patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer, treated twice daily to doses ranging from 7080 to 8640 cGy between 1992 and 2001, were analyzed. Most were treated on prospective clinical trials. For the dose-effect comparison, the patients were divided on the basis of the total dose: 67 received 74 Gy (range, 70.8-74.5 Gy; median, 73.6 Gy), 20 received 80 Gy, and 16 received 86 Gy (range, 85.2-86.4 Gy; median, 86.4 Gy). Sixty-six patients received sequential chemotherapy before RT. RT-induced bronchial stenosis was defined as symptomatic airway narrowing diagnosed by bronchoscopy or computed tomography scan without evidence of recurrent tumor in that region. RESULTS: Eight patients developed RT-induced, clinically significant, bronchial stenosis 2-48 months (median, 6 months) after RT. The 1-year and 4-year actuarial rate of stenosis was 7% and 38%, respectively. The median overall survival was 2.5 years (5 of 8 were alive at the writing of this report). A suggestion was also found of a dose-response effect with external beam radiotherapy-induced stenosis, with a rate of 4% and 25% at a dose of approximately 74 Gy and 86 Gy, respectively. CONCLUSION: Radiation therapy-induced bronchial stenosis is a significant clinical complication of dose escalation for lung cancer. This complication has been previously mentioned in the literature, but ours is the largest report to date, and the findings suggest that the risk rises with increasing dose. It is likely that this process would manifest in more patients if their disease were controlled well enough for more prolonged survival.

Bronchi↗
PubMed2005

Limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (stages I-III): observations from the National Cancer Data Base.

The standard treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) has changed over the past 15 years. Standard treatment for LS-SCLC currently involves multiple-agent chemotherapy and early concurrent thoracic radiation therapy. Four patient cohorts (total number of patients, 22,969) diagnosed with LS-SCLC in 1985 (N=2123), 1990 (N=6279), 1995 (N=7815), and 2000 (N=6752) were studied in order to describe demographic and treatment pattern changes as well as 5-year survival rates across cohorts. Women composed 40.2% of patients in the 1985 cohort but represented a significant proportional increase over each successive cohort, representing 50.8% of the 2000 cohort. The proportion of patients aged >or=70 years also significantly increased over time, from 31.6% in 1985 to 44.9% in 2000 (P<0.001). Over these years, the use of chemoradiation as the primary treatment for patients with LS-SCLC increased from 34.6% to 51.9% (from 37% to 60.5% for patients aged <70 years, and from 29.5% to 41.3% for patients aged >or=70 years). During the same time, the use of chemotherapy as the sole treatment decreased from 30.7% in 1985 to 21.7% in 2000. Chemotherapy as the sole treatment was used in 25.9% of the population>or=70 years of age in 2000, compared with 18.3% in patients aged <70 years. The percent of patients for which there was no treatment given did not change significantly between the cohorts (14.3% in 1985 and 13.7% in 2000; P<0.001). The 5-year survival rates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the 1985, 1990, and 1995 cohorts of all ages of patients treated with chemoradiation therapy are as follows: 10.5% (CI, 6.75%-14.25%), 11.88% (CI, 9.63%-14.13%), and 13.3% (CI, 11.2%-15.4%). Between 1985 and 2000 there was a significant increase in the percentage of women diagnosed with LS-SCLC. The use of combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy also increased during this period. This increase in chemoradiation therapy was associated with a decreased use of chemotherapy alone. Despite changes in demographics and treatment during these time intervals, the 5-year survival for patients with LS-SCLC treated with chemoradiation therapy did not increase significantly. These results demonstrate the continued need for the evaluation of new treatments in this group of patients.

Age Distribution↗
PubMed2005

Topotecan in the treatment of elderly patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Almost 70% of all patients with lung cancer in the United States are>65 years of age, and the incidence of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) increases with age until the eighth decade of life. However, elderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials and are often suboptimally treated. The validity of age as a prognostic factor for toxicity or survival remains controversial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To investigate the safety and efficacy of topotecan (an approved treatment for relapsed SCLC) in older patients, we performed a retrospective analysis in patients >or= 65 years of age versus patients < 65 years of age from 5 large topotecan trials. In all 5 trials, patients received topotecan 1.5 mg/m2 per day via a 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1 through 5 of a 21-day cycle. Efficacy and tolerability outcomes were assessed for both age groups. RESULTS: Topotecan was similarly tolerated in both age groups, with generally manageable hematologic toxicity. The incidence, duration, and onset of severe hematologic toxicities did not vary significantly with age. In the<65 age group, grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia were reported in 72% and 32% of patients, respectively; in the >or= 65 age group, grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia were reported in 77% and 31% of patients, respectively. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia was less common in the<65 age group. Nonhematologic toxicities, median time to progression, and overall survival were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: This is the first demonstration of the safety and efficacy of topotecan in older patients with recurrent SCLC. Future studies are needed to fully characterize the role of topotecan in the treatment of older patients.

Adult↗