PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jeffrey L Benovic

Publications and source records attributed to Jeffrey L Benovic.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Regulation of receptor trafficking by GRKs and arrestins.

To ensure that extracellular stimuli are translated into intracellular signals of appropriate magnitude and specificity, most signaling cascades are tightly regulated. One of the major mechanisms involved in the regulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involves their endocytic trafficking. GPCR endocytic trafficking entails the targeting of receptors to discrete endocytic sites at the plasma membrane, followed by receptor internalization and intracellular sorting. This regulates the level of cell surface receptors, the sorting of receptors to degradative or recycling pathways, and in some cases the specific signaling pathways. In this chapter we discuss the mechanisms that regulate receptor endocytic trafficking, emphasizing the role of GPCR kinases (GRKs) and arrestins in this process.

Animals↗

Regulation of CXCR4 signaling.

The chemokine receptor CXCR4 belongs to the large superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors, and is directly involved in a number of biological processes including organogenesis, hematopoiesis, and immune response. Recent evidence has highlighted the role of CXCR4 in a variety of diseases including HIV, cancer, and WHIM syndrome. Importantly, the involvement of CXCR4 in cancer metastasis and WHIM syndrome appears to be due to dysregulation of the receptor leading to enhanced signaling. Herein we review what is currently known regarding the regulation of CXCR4 and how dysregulation contributes to disease progression.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Arrestin-2 and G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5 interact with NFkappaB1 p105 and negatively regulate lipopolysaccharide-stimulated ERK1/2 activation in macrophages.

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are a recently described receptor class involved in the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity. Here, we demonstrate that arrestin-2 and GRK5 (G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5), proteins that regulate G protein-coupled receptor signaling, play a negative role in TLR4 signaling in Raw264.7 macrophages. We find that lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced ERK1/2 phosphorylation is significantly enhanced in arrestin-2 and GRK5 knockdown cells. To elucidate the mechanisms involved, we tested the effect of arrestin-2 and GRK5 knockdown on LPS-stimulated signaling components that are upstream of ERK phosphorylation. Upon LPS stimulation, IkappaB kinase promotes phosphorylation and degradation of NFkappaB1 p105 (p105), which releases TPL2 (a MAP3K), which phosphorylates MEK1/2, which in turn phosphorylates ERK1/2. We demonstrate that knockdown of arrestin-2 leads to enhanced LPS-induced phosphorylation and degradation of p105, enhanced TPL2 release, and enhanced MEK1/2 phosphorylation. GRK5 knockdown also results in enhanced IkappaB kinase-mediated p105 phosphorylation and degradation, whereas GRK2 and GRK6 knockdown have no effect on this pathway. In vitro analysis demonstrates that arrestin-2 directly binds to the COOH-terminal domain of p105, whereas GRK5 binds to and phosphorylates p105. Taken together, these results suggest that p105 phosphorylation by GRK5 and binding of arrestin-2 negatively regulates LPS-stimulated ERK activation. These results reveal that arrestin-2 and GRK5 are important negative regulatory components in TLR4 signaling.

Animals↗

Distinct clathrin-coated pits sort different G protein-coupled receptor cargo.

Upon activation, many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) internalize by clathrin-mediated endocytosis and are subsequently sorted to undergo recycling or lysosomal degradation. Here we observe that sorting can take place much earlier than previously thought, by entry of different GPCRs into distinct populations of clathrin-coated pit (CCP). These distinct populations were revealed by analysis of two purinergic GPCRs, P2Y(1) and P2Y(12), which enter two populations of CCPs in a mutually exclusive manner. The mechanisms underlying early GPCR sorting involve differential kinase-dependent processes because internalization of P2Y(12) is mediated by GPCR kinases (GRKs) and arrestin, whereas P2Y(1) internalization is GRK- and arrestin-independent but requires protein kinase C. Importantly, the beta(2) adrenoceptor which also internalizes in a GRK-dependent manner also traffics exclusively to P2Y(12)-containing CCPs. Our data therefore reveal distinct populations of CCPs that sort GPCR cargo at the plasma membrane using different kinase-dependent mechanisms.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

The structure of G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)-6 defines a second lineage of GRKs.

We describe the 2.6-A crystal structure of human G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK)-6, a key regulator of dopaminergic signaling and lymphocyte chemotaxis. GRK6 is a member of the GRK4 subfamily of GRKs, which is represented in most, if not all, metazoans. Comparison of GRK6 with GRK2 confirms that the catalytic core of all GRKs consists of intimately associated kinase and regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) homology domains. Despite being in complex with an ATP analog, the kinase domain of GRK6 remains in an open, presumably inactive conformation, suggesting that G protein-coupled receptors activate GRKs by inducing kinase domain closure. The structure reveals a putative phospholipid-binding site near the N terminus of GRK6 and structural elements within the kinase substrate channel that likely influence G protein-coupled receptor access and specificity. The crystalline GRK6 RGS homology domain forms an extensive dimer interface using conserved hydrophobic residues distinct from those in GRK2 that bind Galpha(q), although dimerization does not appear to occur in solution and is not required for receptor phosphorylation.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

Nonvisual arrestin oligomerization and cellular localization are regulated by inositol hexakisphosphate binding.

Interactions between arrestins and phosphoinositides have been reported to regulate multiple membrane-associated signaling and trafficking events including clathrin-mediated endocytosis and light adaptation in Drosophila. Arrestins have been proposed to have nuclear and cytosolic functions as well, although the ligand dependence of these functions has not been investigated. Here we characterize the structural, molecular, and cellular interactions between arrestin-2 and inositol hexakisphosphate (inositol 1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate (IP(6))). The crystal structure of the arrestin-2.IP(6) complex was solved to 2.9 A with crystal lattice contacts suggesting two sites on a protein monomer mediating IP(6) binding. Mutagenesis coupled to isothermal titration calorimetry and tritiated IP(6) binding assays confirmed two-site binding with a low affinity IP(6)-binding site in the N-domain and a high affinity site in the C-domain. Native gel electrophoresis, gel filtration, and analytical ultracentrifugation demonstrated the ability of IP(6) to promote arrestin-2 oligomerization via the two crystallographically defined ligand-binding locations. In addition, analysis in mammalian cells revealed that arrestin-2 not only undergoes homo-oligomerization, but it can also hetero-oligomerize with arrestin-3 in a manner that depends on IP(6)-binding sites. Mutation of either IP(6)-binding site in arrestin-2 disrupted oligomerization while interactions with known binding partners including clathrin, AP-2, and ERK2 were maintained. Subcellular localization studies showed that arrestin-2 oligomers are primarily cytoplasmic, whereas arrestin-2 monomers displayed increased nuclear localization. Thus, by promoting cytosolic oligomerization, IP(6) binding is proposed to be a negative regulator of interactions of arrestin with plasma membrane and nuclear signaling proteins.

Animals↗

Caenorhabditus elegans arrestin regulates neural G protein signaling and olfactory adaptation and recovery.

Although regulation of G protein-coupled receptor signaling by receptor kinases and arrestins is a well established biochemical process, the physiological significance of such regulation remains poorly understood. To better understand the in vivo consequences of arrestin function, we have examined the function of the sole arrestin in Caenorhabditis elegans (ARR-1). ARR-1 is primarily expressed in the nervous system, including the HSN neuron and various chemosensory neurons involved in detecting soluble and volatile odorants. arr-1 null mutants exhibit normal chemotaxis but have significant defects in olfactory adaptation and recovery to volatile odorants. In contrast, adaptation is enhanced in animals overexpressing ARR-1. Both the adaptation and recovery defects of arr-1 mutants are rescued by transgenic expression of wild-type ARR-1, whereas expression of a C-terminally truncated ARR-1 effectively rescues only the adaptation defect. A potential mechanistic basis for these findings is revealed by in vitro studies demonstrating that wild-type ARR-1 binds proteins of the endocytic machinery and promotes receptor endocytosis, whereas C-terminally truncated ARR-1 does not. These results demonstrate that ARR-1 functions to regulate chemosensory signaling, enabling organisms to adapt to a variety of environmental cues, and provide an in vivo link between arrestin, receptor endocytosis, and temporal recovery from adaptation.

Alleles↗

P2Y1 and P2Y12 receptors for ADP desensitize by distinct kinase-dependent mechanisms.

Adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) plays a central role in regulating platelet function by the activation of the G protein-coupled receptors P2Y(1) and P2Y(12). Although it is well established that aggregation responses of platelets to ADP desensitize, the underlying mechanisms involved remain unclear. In this study we demonstrate that P2Y(1)- and P2Y(12)-mediated platelet responses desensitize rapidly. Furthermore, we have established that these receptors desensitize by different kinase-dependent mechanisms. G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) 2 and GRK6 are both endogenously expressed in platelets. Transient overexpression of dominant-negative mutants of these kinases or reductions in endogenous GRK expression by the use of specific siRNAs in 1321N1 cells showed that P2Y(12), but not P2Y(1), desensitization is mediated by GRKs. In contrast, desensitization of P2Y(1), but not P2Y(12), is largely dependent on protein kinase C activity. This study is the first to show that both P2Y(1) and P2Y(12) desensitize in human platelets, and it reveals ways in which their sensitivity to ADP may be differentially and independently altered.

Adenosine Diphosphate↗

Structure/function analysis of alpha2A-adrenergic receptor interaction with G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate the ability of a diverse array of extracellular stimuli to control intracellular signaling. Many GPCRs are phosphorylated by G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), a process that mediates agonist-specific desensitization in many cells. Although GRK binding to activated GPCRs results in kinase activation and receptor phosphorylation, relatively little is known about the mechanism of GRK/GPCR interaction or how this interaction results in kinase activation. Here, we used the alpha2A-adrenergic receptor (alpha(2A)AR) as a model to study GRK/receptor interaction because GRK2 phosphorylation of four adjacent serines within the large third intracellular loop of this receptor is known to mediate desensitization. Various domains of the alpha(2A)AR were expressed as glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins and tested for the ability to bind purified GRK2. The second and third intracellular loops of the alpha(2A)AR directly interacted with GRK2, whereas the first intracellular loop and C-terminal domain did not. Truncation mutagenesis identified three discrete regions within the third loop that contributed to GRK2 binding, the membrane proximal N- and C-terminal regions as well as a central region adjacent to the phosphorylation sites. Site-directed mutagenesis revealed a critical role for specific basic residues within these regions in mediating GRK2 interaction with the alpha(2A)AR. Mutation of these residues within the holo-alpha(2A)AR diminished GRK2-promoted phosphorylation of the receptor as well as the ability of the kinase to be activated by receptor binding. These studies provide new insight into the mechanism of interaction and activation of GRK2 by GPCRs and suggest that GRK2 binding is critical not only for receptor phosphorylation but also for full activity of the kinase.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Phosphorylation-independent internalisation and desensitisation of the human sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor S1P3.

Here we demonstrate that phosphorylation of the sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor S1P(3) is increased specifically in response to S1P. Truncation of the receptor's carboxyl-terminal domain revealed that the presence of a serine-rich stretch of residues between Leu332 and Val352 was essential to observe this effect. Although agonist-occupied wild-type (WT) S1P(3) could be phosphorylated in vitro by G-protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2), a role of S1P(3) phosphorylation in controlling S1P(3)-G(q/11) coupling was excluded since A) a phosphorylation-resistant S1P(3) mutant desensitised in a manner indistinguishable from the WT receptor and was phosphorylated to a greater extent than the WT receptor by GRK2 in vitro, and B) co-expression with GRK2 or GRK3 failed to potentiate S1P(3) phosphorylation. S1P(3) phosphorylation was also not required for receptor sequestration away from the cell surface. Together, these data suggest that S1P(3) function is not subject to conventional regulation by GRK phosphorylation and that novel aspects of S1P(3) function distinct from classical G-protein coupling and receptor internalisation may be controlled its carboxyl-terminal domain.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Regulation of cysteinyl leukotriene type 1 receptor internalization and signaling.

Cysteinyl leukotrienes activate the cysteinyl leukotriene type 1 receptor (CysLT1R) to regulate numerous cell functions important in inflammatory processes and diseases such as asthma. Despite its physiologic importance, no studies to date have examined the regulation of CysLT1R signaling or trafficking. We have established model systems for analyzing recombinant human CysLT1R and found regulation of internalization and signaling of the CysLT1R to be unique among G protein-coupled receptors. Rapid and profound LTD4-stimulated internalization was observed for the wild type (WT) CysLT1R, whereas a C-terminal truncation mutant exhibited impaired internalization yet signaled robustly, suggesting a region within amino acids 310-321 as critical to internalization. Although overexpression of WT arrestins significantly increased WT CysLT1R internalization, expression of dominant-negative arrestins had minimal effects, and WT CysLT1R internalized in murine embryonic fibroblasts lacking both arrestin-2 and arrestin-3, suggesting that arrestins are not the primary physiologic regulators of CysLT1Rs. Instead, pharmacologic inhibition of protein kinase C (PKC) was shown to profoundly inhibit CysLT1R internalization while greatly increasing both phosphoinositide (PI) production and calcium mobilization stimulated by LTD4 yet had almost no effect on H1 histamine receptor internalization or signaling. Moreover, mutation of putative PKC phosphorylation sites within the CysLT1R C-tail (CysLT1RS(313-316)A) reduced receptor internalization, increased PI production and calcium mobilization by LTD4, and significantly attenuated the effects of PKC inhibition. These findings characterized the CysLT1R as the first G protein-coupled receptor identified to date in which PKC is the principal regulator of both rapid agonist-dependent internalization and rapid agonist-dependent desensitization.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Bimodal regulation of the human H1 histamine receptor by G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2.

The H1 histamine receptor (H1HR) is a member of the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and regulates numerous cellular functions through its activation of the G(q/11) subfamily of heterotrimeric G proteins. Although the H1HR has been shown to undergo desensitization in multiple cell types, the mechanisms underlying the regulation of H1HR signaling are poorly defined. To address this issue, we examined the effects of wild type and mutant G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) on the phosphorylation and signaling of human H1HR in HEK293 cells. Overexpression of GRK2 promoted H1HR phosphorylation in intact HEK293 cells and completely inhibited inositol phosphate production stimulated by H1HR, whereas GRK5 and GRK6 had lesser effects on H1HR phosphorylation and signaling. Interestingly, catalytically inactive GRK2 (GRK2-K220R) also significantly attenuated H1HR-mediated inositol phosphate production, as did an N-terminal fragment of GRK2 previously characterized as a regulator of G protein signaling (RGS) protein for Galpha(q/11). Disruption of this RGS function in holo-GRK2 by mutation (GRK2-D110A) partially reversed the quenching effect of GRK2, whereas deletion of both the kinase activity and RGS function (GRK2-D110A/K220R) effectively relieved the inhibition of inositol phosphate generation. To evaluate the role of endogenous GRKs on H1HR regulation, we used small interfering RNAs to selectively target GRK2 and GRK5, two of the primary GRKs expressed in HEK293 cells. A GRK2-specific small interfering RNA effectively reduced GRK2 expression and resulted in a significant increase in histamine-promoted calcium flux. In contrast, knockdown of GRK5 expression was without effect on H1HR signaling. These findings demonstrate that GRK2 is the principal kinase mediating H1 histamine receptor desensitization in HEK293 cells and suggest that rapid termination of H1HR signaling is mediated by both the kinase activity and RGS function of GRK2.

Base Sequence↗

Characterization of the GRK2 binding site of Galphaq.

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) transmit signals from membrane bound G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) to intracellular effector proteins. The G(q) subfamily of Galpha subunits couples GPCR activation to the enzymatic activity of phospholipase C-beta (PLC-beta). Regulators of G protein signaling (RGS) proteins bind to activated Galpha subunits, including Galpha(q), and regulate Galpha signaling by acting as GTPase activating proteins (GAPs), increasing the rate of the intrinsic GTPase activity, or by acting as effector antagonists for Galpha subunits. GPCR kinases (GRKs) phosphorylate agonist-bound receptors in the first step of receptor desensitization. The amino termini of all GRKs contain an RGS homology (RH) domain, and binding of the GRK2 RH domain to Galpha(q) attenuates PLC-beta activity. The RH domain of GRK2 interacts with Galpha(q/11) through a novel Galpha binding surface termed the "C" site. Here, molecular modeling of the Galpha(q).GRK2 complex and site-directed mutagenesis of Galpha(q) were used to identify residues in Galpha(q) that interact with GRK2. The model identifies Pro(185) in Switch I of Galpha(q) as being at the crux of the interface, and mutation of this residue to lysine disrupts Galpha(q) binding to the GRK2-RH domain. Switch III also appears to play a role in GRK2 binding because the mutations Galpha(q)-V240A, Galpha(q)-D243A, both residues within Switch III, and Galpha(q)-Q152A, a residue that structurally supports Switch III, are defective in binding GRK2. Furthermore, GRK2-mediated inhibition of Galpha(q)-Q152A-R183C-stimulated inositol phosphate release is reduced in comparison to Galpha(q)-R183C. Interestingly, the model also predicts that residues in the helical domain of Galpha(q) interact with GRK2. In fact, the mutants Galpha(q)-K77A, Galpha(q)-L78D, Galpha(q)-Q81A, and Galpha(q)-R92A have reduced binding to the GRK2-RH domain. Finally, although the mutant Galpha(q)-T187K has greatly reduced binding to RGS2 and RGS4, it has little to no effect on binding to GRK2. Thus the RH domain A and C sites for Galpha(q) interaction rely on contacts with distinct regions and different Switch I residues in Galpha(q).

Binding Sites↗

A predicted amphipathic helix mediates plasma membrane localization of GRK5.

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) specifically phosphorylate agonist-occupied G protein-coupled receptors at the inner surface of the plasma membrane (PM), leading to receptor desensitization. GRKs utilize a variety of mechanisms to bind tightly, and sometimes reversibly, to cellular membranes. Previous studies demonstrated the presence of a membrane binding domain in the C terminus of GRK5. Here we define a mechanism by which this short C-terminal stretch of amino acids of GRK5 mediates PM localization. Secondary structure predictions suggest that a region contained within amino acids 546-565 of GRK5 forms an amphipathic helix, with the key features of the predicted helix being a hydrophobic patch of amino acids on one face of the helix, hydrophilic amino acids on the opposite face, and a number of basic amino acids surrounding the hydrophobic patch. We show that amino acids 546-565 of GRK5 are sufficient to target the cytoplasmic green fluorescent protein (GFP) to the PM, and the hydrophobic amino acids are necessary for PM targeting of GFP-546-565. Moreover, full-length GRK5-GFP is localized to the PM, but mutation of the hydrophobic patch or the surrounding basic amino acids prevents PM localization of GRK5-GFP. Last, we show that mutation of the hydrophobic residues severely diminishes phospholipid-dependent autophosphorylation of GRK5 and phosphorylation of membrane-bound rhodopsin by GRK5. The findings in this report thus suggest the presence of a membrane binding motif in GRK5 and define the importance of a group of hydrophobic amino acids within this motif in mediating its PM localization.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

A new key in breast cancer metastasis.

Unlocking the mysteries of cell metastasis, a major cause of cancer mortality, is essential in the development of novel therapies. In this issue of Cancer Cell, Li et al. (2004) identify a link between HER2 and CXCR4, two receptors previously implicated in breast cancer progression and metastasis. HER2 enhances the expression of CXCR4 by stimulating CXCR4 translation and attenuating CXCR4 degradation. Importantly, coexpression of HER2 and CXCR4 occurs in approximately 22% of human breast tumors and correlates with poor survival of breast cancer patients.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Analysis of G-protein-coupled receptor kinase RGS homology domains.

G-protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) specifically phosphorylate agonist-occupied G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). All seven mammalian GRKs contain an N-terminal domain that is homologous to the regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) family of proteins. The RGS domain of GRK2 has been shown to interact specifically with Galphaq family members. While the specificity and functional consequences of GRK/Galpha interaction remain somewhat poorly defined, GRK RGS homology (RH) domains likely function to provide specificity for GRK interaction with a particular Galpha subunit or GPCR/Galpha complex. Indeed, GRK2 binds Galphaq, alpha11, and alpha14, but not Galpha16, Galphas, Galphai, or Galpha(12/13), while the RGS domains of GRK5 and GRK6 do not bind Galpha(q/11), Galphas, Galphai, or Galpha(12/13). In this chapter we describe various in vitro and intact cell strategies that can be used to elucidate the function of GRK RH domains.

Animals↗

Arrestin2 expression selectively increases during neural differentiation.

Arrestins and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are key players in homologous desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors. Two non-visual arrestins, arrestin2 and 3, and five GRKs (GRK2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) are involved in desensitization of many receptors. Here, we demonstrate a steady increase in arrestin2 expression during prenatal development. The density of arrestin2 mRNA is higher in differentiated areas as compared with proliferative zones, whereas arrestin3 mRNA shows the opposite distribution. At embryonic day 14, concentrations of arrestin proteins are similar (32-34 nM). Later in development, arrestin2 expression rises, leading to a fourfold excess of arrestin2 over arrestin3 at birth (48 vs. 11 ng/mg protein or 102 vs. 25 nM). Among GRKs, only GRK5 increased with embryonic age from 124 nm at E14 to 359 nM at birth. Similarly, in vitro differentiation of cultured precursor cells, neurospheres, leads to a significant up-regulation of arrestin2 resulting in > 20-fold excess of arrestin2 (160 vs. 7 nM). GRK5 is the only subtype increased with neurosphere differentiation, although the change is only about twofold. The data demonstrate selective increases in the expression of arrestin2 associated with neural development and suggest specific yet unappreciated roles for arrestin2 in neural differentiation.

Animals↗

Ubiquitination of G-protein-coupled receptors.

In this chapter we describe methods for detecting the ubiquitination state of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). This involves coexpression of a GPCR with an epitope-tagged ubiquitin construct in a heterologous expression system. Modification by ubiquitin of the GPCR resulting from agonist activation is detected by immunoprecipation and subsequent immunoblotting for the epitope-tagged ubiquitin. We use here the chemokine receptor CXCR4 as the model receptor; however, this could be easily modified to detect the ubiquitination state of any GPCR.

Humans↗