PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jeffrey W Clark

Publications and source records attributed to Jeffrey W Clark.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Phase I study of gefitinib, irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTD), toxicities, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of gefitinib combined with irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (IFL) in patients with previously untreated advanced colorectal cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Starting doses were gefitinib 250 mg/day orally without interruption, irinotecan 100 mg/m(2) as a 90 min intravenous (i.v.) infusion, 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) bolus i.v. and leucovorin 20 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Dose escalations involved increasing gefitinib to 500 mg then increasing irinotecan to 125 mg/m(2) and 5-FU to 500 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received therapy. The starting doses proved to be the MTD, as attempts to increase the dose of either gefitinib or the chemotherapeutic agents resulted in dose-limiting toxicities. Gastrointestinal effects and bone marrow suppression were the principal toxicities; however, only 1/17 (6%) patients treated with the MTD had severe (grades 3-4) diarrhea and severe neutropenia occurred in only two (12%) patients. Partial responses occurred in 10/17 patients receiving the MTD and another five had stable disease. Median progression-free and overall survivals were 12.2 and 26.6 months, respectively. In ten patients treated with the MTD, the steady-state PK of gefitinib was not affected by IFL nor did gefitinib appear to influence the PK of either irinotecan or 5-FU. CONCLUSIONS: Gefitinib can be safely combined with an intermittent weekly schedule of IFL. Evidence of promising activity should encourage further clinical evaluation of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as gefitinib, combined with multiagent chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Phase I clinical trial of bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Bortezomib is the first proteasome inhibitor to show preliminary evidence of activity against solid tumors. Findings from preclinical studies prompted a Phase I trial to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of bortezomib in combination with gemcitabine in patients with recurring/refractory advanced solid tumors. The effect of gemcitabine on proteasome inhibition by bortezomib in whole blood was also investigated. METHODS: Bortezomib was administered as an intravenous bolus injection on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11, with gemcitabine (30-minute infusion) on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Groups of > or =3 patients were evaluated at each dose level. Escalating doses of gemcitabine 500 mg/m(2) to 1000 mg/m(2) with bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) to 1.5 mg/m(2) were planned. RESULTS: There were no DLTs in patients receiving bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 500 mg/m(2) to 1000 mg/m(2) in the first 3 dose levels. Dose-limiting nausea, vomiting, gastrointestinal obstruction, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 4 of 5 evaluable patients in dose level 4 (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m(2), gemcitabine 800 mg/m(2)), establishing bortezomib 1.0 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) as the MTD. Most common Grade > or =3 toxicities were neutropenia (6 patients), thrombocytopenia (5 patients), gastrointestinal disorders (6 patients), and general disorders (4 patients) such as fatigue. One patient with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma achieved a partial response and 7 achieved stable disease. Inhibition of 20S proteasome activity by bortezomib was unaffected by gemcitabine coadministration. CONCLUSION: Dosages of bortezomib and gemcitabine suitable for further evaluation of antitumor activity have been established.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of S-1 administered for 14 days in a 21-day cycle in patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal cancer.

PURPOSE: S-1 is a novel oral fluoropyrimidine that combines tegafur with CDHP and oxonic acid. To decrease the incidence of late onset, severe diarrhea observed in a previous study, a phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of S-1 utilizing a 14-day schedule, repeated every 21 days, in patients with chemotherapy-refractory upper gastrointestinal malignancies. METHODS: S-1 was administered orally, twice-daily, at an initial dose level of 30 mg/m2/dose; doses were escalated by 5 mg/m2 at each level. A minimum of three patients were enrolled at each dose level. S-1 toxicity, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics were assessed. The MTD was based on the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first treatment cycle. RESULTS: At 30 mg/m2 no DLT was observed in the first three evaluable patients. Two of the first three patients at the 35 mg/m2 dose level developed DLTs (grade 3 rash and dehydration). An additional nine patients were subsequently treated at 30 mg/m2 without DLT and this dose was established as the MTD. Common toxicities at 30 mg/m2 included diarrhea, nausea, skin rash, anorexia, and fatigue. No grade 4 toxicities were observed. One partial response was seen in a patient with gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma and ten patients with pancreatic, gastric, or gallbladder carcinomas achieved stable disease as their best response to therapy. The AUC(0-8) of 5-FU at the 30 and 35 mg/m2 dose levels were 875 +/- 212 and 894 +/- 151 h ng/ml, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In a 14-day dosing schedule, the MTD of S-1 was 30 mg/m2 and preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was seen in a North American population with refractory upper gastrointestinal malignancies.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Phase II study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in combination with bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a vascular tumor with poor prognosis. Given the reported activity of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in HCC and the potential benefits of targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway with bevacizumab (B), a phase II study of GEMOX-B was undertaken to define efficacy and toxicity profiles in HCC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had pathologically proven measurable unresectable or metastatic HCC. For cycle 1 (14 days), bevacizumab 10 mg/kg was administered alone intravenously on day 1. For cycle 2 and beyond (28 days/cycle), bevacizumab 10 mg/kg was administered on days 1 and 15, gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 was administered as a dose rate infusion at 10 mg/m2/min followed by oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 on days 2 and 16. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients were enrolled and 30 patients were assessable for efficacy. The objective response rate was 20%, and 27% of patients had stable disease. Median overall survival was 9.6 months (95% CI, 8.0 months to not available) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 8.7 months); the PFS rate at 3 and 6 months was 70% (95% CI, 54% to 85%) and 48% (95% CI, 31% to 65%), respectively. The most common treatment-related grade 3 to 4 toxicities included leukopenia/neutropenia, transient elevation of aminotransferases, hypertension, and fatigue. CONCLUSION: GEMOX-B could be safely administered with close monitoring and had moderate antitumor activity for patients with advanced HCC. The high 6-month PFS rate is encouraging, and this regimen is worthy of further investigation.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Phase II study of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and erlotinib in previously treated patients with metastastic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the combination of erlotinib, capecitabine, and oxaliplatin in patients who were previously treated for metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had metastatic colorectal cancer that progressed, were intolerant to first-line chemotherapy, or had disease recurrence within 1 year of adjuvant therapy for early-stage disease. Each 21-day cycle consisted of daily oral erlotinib at 150 mg, oral capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 (reduced to 750 mg/m2 after the first 13 patients) twice a day on days 1 to 14, and intravenous oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 on day 1. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients were enrolled onto this phase II study. By intention-to-treat analyses, eight patients (25%) experienced a partial response and 14 patients (44%) had stable disease for at least 12 weeks. The median progression-free survival was 5.4 months and the median overall survival was 14.7 months. These results were essentially unchanged when limited to the cohort of patients (78%) who received prior irinotecan for metastatic colorectal cancer. Most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities included diarrhea (38%), nausea/emesis (19%), fatigue (16%), dehydration (16%), and dermatitis (13%); grade 3 or 4 toxicities were reduced with a lower starting dose of capecitabine. CONCLUSION: The combination of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and erlotinib seems to have promising activity against metastatic colorectal cancer in patients who received prior chemotherapy, with a relatively higher response rate and progression-free survival compared with previous reports of either infusional FU, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin or capecitabine and oxaliplatin in similar patient populations.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2006

Phase II study of temozolomide and thalidomide in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

PURPOSE: Standard, intravenous chemotherapy regimens for neuroendocrine tumors have been associated with limited response rates and significant toxicity. We evaluated the efficacy of an oral regimen of temozolomide and thalidomide in patients with metastatic carcinoid, pheochromocytoma, or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were treated with a combination of temozolomide, administered at a dose of 150 mg/m2 for 7 days, every other week, and thalidomide at doses of 50 to 400 mg daily. Patients were followed for evidence of toxicity, biochemical response, radiologic response, and survival. RESULTS: Treatment with temozolomide and thalidomide was associated with an objective biochemical (chromogranin A) response rate of 40%, and a radiologic response rate of 25% (45% among pancreatic endocrine tumors, 33% among pheochromocytomas, and 7% among carcinoid tumors). The median duration of response was 13.5 months, 1-year survival was 79%, and 2-year survival was 61%. The median administered dose of temozolomide was 150 mg/m(2), and the median administered dose of thalidomide was 100 mg daily. Grade 3-4 toxicities were uncommon, with the exception of grade 3-4 lymphopenia, which developed in 69% of the patient population. Opportunistic infections occurred in three patients (10%) during the time of lymphopenia, and included single cases of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, disseminated varicella zoster virus, and herpes simplex virus. CONCLUSION: Orally administered temozolomide and thalidomide seems to be an active regimen for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. In this 29-patient study, this regimen appeared more active in pancreatic endocrine tumors than in carcinoid tumors.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗
PubMed2006

A phase II trial of irinotecan and cisplatin in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

The role of systemic chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors is controversial. While combination regimens containing cisplatin and etoposide have activity against more aggressive neuroendocrine tumor variants, such regimens appear to have little efficacy in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor subtypes. The combination of irinotecan and cisplatin is active both against small cell lung cancer and in upper gastrointestinal malignancies but has not been prospectively evaluated in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors. We therefore assessed the efficacy of an irinotecan/cisplatin combination in patients with this disease. Eighteen patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors (excluding small cell carcinoma) were treated with irinotecan, 65 mg/m2, and cisplatin, 30 mg/m2, administered weekly for 2 of every 3 weeks. Patients were followed for evidence of toxicity, response, and survival. The toxicities associated with this regimen were mild and included myelosuppression, nausea, and diarrhea. Only one radiologic response was observed among four patients with poorly differentiated neuroendocrine tumors. No radiologic responses were observed in 14 patients with well-differentiated tumors. The median overall survival duration of patients treated with this regimen was 11.4 months. We conclude that while the combination of irinotecan and cisplatin may have activity in aggressive neuroendocrine tumor subtypes, this combination is inactive in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Lessons from phase III clinical trials on anti-VEGF therapy for cancer.

In randomized phase III trials two anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) approaches have yielded survival benefit in patients with metastatic cancer. In one approach, the addition of bevacizumab, a VEGF-specific antibody, to standard chemotherapy improved overall survival in colorectal and lung cancer patients and progression-free survival in breast cancer patients. In the second approach, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors that block VEGF receptor and other kinases in both endothelial and cancer cells, demonstrated survival benefit in gastrointestinal stromal tumor and renal-cell-carcinoma patients. By contrast, adding bevacizumab to chemotherapy failed to increase survival in patients with previously treated and refractory metastatic breast cancer. Furthermore, addition of vatalanib, a kinase inhibitor developed as a VEGF receptor-selective agent, to chemotherapy did not show a similar benefit in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. These contrasting responses raise critical questions about how these agents work and how to combine them optimally. We summarize three of the many potential mechanisms of action of anti-VEGF agents, and also discuss progress relating to the identification of potential biomarkers for anti-VEGF-agent efficacy in humans.

Angiogenesis Inhibitors↗
PubMed2006

The combination of capecitabine and thalidomide in previously treated, refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: With the increasing survival of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) there is a growing need for effective second- and third-line agents. We conducted a multicenter, phase II study to examine the combination of capecitabine and thalidomide (Cape/Thal) in patients with refractory metastatic CRC. METHODS: Patients with previously treated stage IV CRC were eligible. Treatment consisted of capecitabine at 1,000 mg/m2 po BID for 14 days every 3 weeks and thalidomide, starting at 200 mg po QD continuously. Thalidomide was escalated individually to 600 mg po QD as tolerated. We analyzed overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, response, and toxicity rates. RESULTS: Thirty-four eligible patients were enrolled. The median age was 57 years, and most patients had a normal performance status (65%). All patients had received prior chemotherapy and 19 (56%) had received 2 or 3 prior regimens. The median number of Cape/Thal cycles administered was 3 (range, 1-15). Grade 3/4 toxicities included fatigue (15%), venous thromboembolic events (12%), somnolence (12%), and constipation (9%). Grade 2 hand-foot syndrome occurred in 5 (15%) patients. There were no radiographic responses; 13 patients (38%) achieved stable disease. The median PFS was 2.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.2-3.9) and the median OS was 7.1 month (95% CI = 5.2-12.0). CONCLUSIONS: Though well-tolerated, the combination of capecitabine and thalidomide was not associated with objective tumor responses in a population of patients with previously treated metastatic CRC.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Rubitecan.

The only approved camptothecins for use in patients to date (topotecan and irinotecan) are delivered intravenously. Thus, an oral camptothecin analogue that would provide the convenience of oral delivery with the flexibility for a variety of prolonged treatment schedules would be advantageous. Rubitecan is an orally available camptothecin analogue that also has potential for delivery transdermally or by inhalation. Like all of the camptothecins, its antitumour activity is mediated through the inhibition of DNA topoisomerase I, which is involved in relaxing supercoiled DNA, which is important for the process of DNA replication and RNA transcription. Rubitecan exists in equilibrium as 9-nitro-camptothecin (9-NC) and 9-amino-camptothecin (9-AC), a metabolite that is thought to be active although it failed in clinical trials. Both 9-NC and 9-AC contain a lactone ring that is required for optimal activity with the carboxylic acid (open ring) forms being significantly less active or inactive. A more acidic environment favours the lactone ring structure, whereas neutral or basic conditions favour the conversion to the carboxylic acid form. In addition to issues of lactone ring stability at physiological pH (true for all of the camptothecin analogues), there is pharmacokinetic variability that has had to be dealt with during the development of rubitecan. Preclinically, rubitecan has shown activity against a broad spectrum of tumour types in in vitro and in vivo human tumour xenograft models. Frustratingly, the level of activity of an agent in preclinical models has not always translated into similar activity against human tumours in clinical trials. To date, with the exception of pancreatic and possibly ovarian cancer, rubitecan has had disappointing activity against a number of other solid tumours in relatively small Phase I/II trials; however, it has shown sufficient activity against pancreatic cancer, a malignancy that remains difficult to treat, to continue to be evaluated in clinical trials for this indication. Results of clinical trials in the next few years should determine whether rubitecan can find a role in cancer therapy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Efficacy of cetuximab after treatment with oral epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor-based chemotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: We studied the efficacy of cetuximab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) previously treated with an oral inhibitor of the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the posttrial records of 73 patients with mCRC who participated in 1 of 3 clinical trials that examined a combination of gefitinib or erlotinib with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy. Medical and pharmacy records were used to identify patients who were subsequently treated with cetuximab-based therapy. Computed tomography scans during cetuximab-based therapy were reviewed, and the clinical activity of cetuximab was assessed by response rate using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and progression-free survival. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients with mCRC previously treated with gefitinib or erlotinib and combination cytotoxic chemotherapy who subsequently received cetuximab-based therapy were identified. While receiving cetuximab-based therapy, no patient experienced a partial or complete response; however, 3 patients (16% of patients with available scans for formal measurements) had a minor response, defined as a 15%-29.9% decrease in the sum of longest dimensions of target lesions, and 72% had stable disease. The progression-free survival was 5.1 months for all patients and 6 months for patients who had documented progression of disease while previously receiving gefitinib- or erlotinib-based therapy. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab appears to have clinical benefit in patients with mCRC previously treated with a chemotherapy regimen that included an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor. Whether these results apply to other cancer types is unknown but worthy of further study.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Phase I study of gefitinib plus FOLFIRI in previously untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: In this study, the maximum tolerated dose and toxicity profile of FOLFIRI (infusional fluorouracil [5-FU]/leucovorin/irinotecan) plus gefitinib (an oral inhibitor of the epidermal growth factor receptor) were evaluated as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixteen patients participated in this study. Oral gefitinib was administered at 250 mg or 500 mg daily in 2 dose-escalation cohorts. FOLFIRI was administered without dose escalation on a 14-day cycle with treatment on day 1 with irinotecan 180 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 mg/m2, and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus, followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 46 hours. RESULTS: The maximum tolerated dose of gefitinib was 250 mg, with diarrhea and neutropenia noted as the principal dose-limiting toxicities. Dose reductions in 5-FU and irinotecan were required in 4 patients because of diarrhea and 1 patient because of neutropenia. A partial response was observed in 25% of patients, and 56% had stable disease for > 12 weeks, corresponding to a disease control rate of 81%. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that gefitinib can be safely combined with FOLFIRI as first-line treatment of metastatic CRC and support the safety of further investigations of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors with multiagent chemotherapy in this patient population.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2005

Phase I clinical trial of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor BMS-214662 administered as a weekly 24 h continuous intravenous infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: BMS-214662 is a novel farnesyltransferase (FT) inhibitor that has shown promising suggestions of single agent activity in patients with advanced solid tumors when administered as a 1 h intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 3 weeks. The degree of FT inhibition in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) was greatest at the end of the infusion and rapidly reversed as the concentration of the drug in the plasma decayed. A second phase I trial of BMS-214662 administered as a weekly 24 h i.v. infusion was initiated to determine if the duration of maximum FT inhibition could be significantly extended by prolonging the infusion time and increasing the frequency of administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Infusion of BMS-214662 was prolonged from 2, 4, 8, 16, 24 h in single patient cohorts and repeated weekly for 3 out of 4 weeks. The initial dose was 56 mg/m(2). When the infusion duration reached 24 h, the dose was escalated at a constant multiples of 1.4 in single patient cohorts until the occurrence of toxicity greater than grade 1, upon which groups of at least three patients were evaluated at each dose level. The plasma pharmacokinetics and FT inhibition in PBMCs were measured in all patients at the prospective maximum tolerated dose. RESULTS: Nineteen patients participated in the study (11 males/8 females) and the weekly dose was increased to a maximum of 300 mg/m(2) given as a 24 h i.v. infusion. Drug-related toxicity greater than grade 1 first occurred at 300 mg/m(2), with two patients experiencing dose-limiting toxicity. One patient developed a grade 3 hyponatremia and another developed reversible grade 3 diarrhea, grade 2 renal toxicity, and grade 3 transaminitis. A 275 mg/m(2) dose was then evaluated, where one of the three patients treated experienced reversible grade 4 renal toxicity and grade 3 diarrhea. In view of the identical renal toxicity at 275 mg/m(2) in another study and limited drug availability, there was no further accrual to this dose level and the study was closed. No evidence of antitumor activity was observed. The plasma pharmacokinetics of BMS-214662 was linear with high interpatient variability. In the three patients evaluated at the 275 mg/m(2) dose level, the maximum inhibition of FT activity in PBMCs was 47+/-23% of the baseline. CONCLUSION: Administering BMS-214662 as a weekly 24 h continuous i.v. infusion permitted a considerably greater dose intensity to be delivered as compared to a single 1 h infusion given once every 3 weeks. The more prolonged infusion schedule resulted in a much lower degree of maximum FT inhibition in PBMCs than achieved with the 1 h infusion, although the duration of enzyme inhibition was longer, consistent with the lower peak plasma concentration of the drug provided by comparably tolerated doses when given as a 24 h infusion. Similarly, delivering the drug with increased dose intensity permitted by this weekly administration schedule did not appear to enhance its therapeutic benefit, at least in this phase I trial. Continued development of BMS-214662 may depend upon the potential for using it in combination with other anticancer drugs.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Molecular alterations in tumors and response to combination chemotherapy with gefitinib for advanced colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Recently, activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene were discovered in non-small cell lung cancers sensitive to gefitinib (ZD1839, an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor) but not in gefitinib-resistant cancers. Abnormalities of EGFR and related pathways may have an effect on responsiveness of advanced colorectal cancer to combination chemotherapy with gefitinib. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We examined patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer, who were enrolled into two phase I/II trials of combination chemotherapy (irinotecan, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) and daily oral gefitinib. We obtained paraffin tissue blocks of primary tumors from 31 patients, sequenced the EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF genes, and did immunohistochemistry for EGFR, phosphorylated AKT1, p53, p21, and p27. RESULTS: Twelve (39%) of the 31 patients experienced a partial objective response to the therapy. A novel EGFR mutation in exon 18 (c.2170G>A, p.Gly724Ser) was identified in only one patient who did not experience an objective tumor response. EGFR immunohistochemistry was not predictive of responsiveness. In contrast, loss of p21 was associated with a higher response rate to therapy (P = 0.05). Moreover, the response rate among patients whose tumors maintained p21 expression and possessed a mutation in p53 was only 9% (1 of 11, P = 0.005). Overexpression of phosphorylated AKT1 also seemed to predict a trend towards resistance to the therapy. CONCLUSIONS: p21 expression in colorectal cancer, especially in combination with p53 mutation, is a predictor of resistance to the combination chemotherapy with gefitinib. Activating EGFR mutations are rare in colorectal cancer and do not seem to confer sensitivity to gefitinib and chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Safety and pharmacokinetics of the dual action Raf kinase and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor, BAY 43-9006, in patients with advanced, refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: BAY 43-9006, a novel multikinase inhibitor, prevents tumor growth by combining two antitumor activities: inhibition of both tumor cell proliferation and tumor angiogenesis. This phase I, open-label, nonrandomized, noncontrolled, single-arm, dose escalation study was done to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety profile, pharmacokinetic variables, effect on biomarkers, and tumor response with BAY 43-9006 in 19 patients with advanced, refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: BAY 43-9006 was given orally in repeated cycles of 1-week on/1-week off. The study comprised five dose levels, ranging from 100 mg twice daily (bid) to 800 mg bid. Treatment of each patient continued until unacceptable toxicity, tumor progression, or death. RESULTS: Rash and hypertension were the dose-limiting toxicities at the 800 mg bid dose requiring study drug discontinuation; therefore, the MTD of BAY 43-9006 in this study was determined to be 600 mg bid. BAY 43-9006 was generally well tolerated, with mild to moderate toxicities. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed early absorption followed by delayed secondary peaks and slow terminal elimination. Stable disease was achieved in five patients: one patient showed reduced tumor activity (positron emission tomography scan) and reduced mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling (lower phospho-ERK); one patient remained on treatment until study end point. CONCLUSIONS: The results confirm the favorable safety profile of BAY 43-9006 and support the development of this compound for the treatment of solid tumors.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Phase I dose-escalation study of tezacitabine in combination with 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Tezacitabine [(E)-2'-deoxy-2'-(fluoromethylene) cytidine; FMdC] is a novel nucleoside analog with potent antiproliferative and antitumor activity in preclinical studies. A tolerable safety profile and clinical activity have been shown in Phase I and Phase II clinical studies. The purpose of the current open-label, Phase I dose-escalation trial was to evaluate the combination of tezacitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Twenty-four patients with a variety of advanced solid tumors for which there was no curative therapy were enrolled. Bolus infusion tezacitabine was administered on Day 1 of a 14-day cycle at escalating doses of 150-350 mg/m(2), with continuous infusion 5-FU (CI 5-FU) given on Days 1-7 at a fixed dose of 200 mg/m(2) per day. Patients underwent objective tumor evaluation by radiologic methods or clinical examination at baseline and after every fourth treatment cycle. RESULTS: The maximum tolerated dose of the combination therapy was determined to be tezacitabine, 200 mg/m(2), with CI 5-FU, 200 mg/m(2) per day. The toxicities were manageable, the most notable being transient severe (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria Grade 3 or 4) neutropenia in 23 patients (96%). Eleven (55%) of the 20 assessable patients had partial responses or stabilization of disease. The highest response rate was in patients with primary tumors of esophageal origin. CONCLUSIONS: Tezacitabine at a dose of 200 mg/m(2) in combination with CI 5-FU at a dose of 200 mg/m(2) per day was relatively well tolerated and had clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors, particularly in patients with esophageal and other gastrointestinal carcinomas.

Aged↗