PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jennifer E Kacmar

Publications and source records attributed to Jennifer E Kacmar.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Abortion training in United States obstetrics and gynecology residency programs.

OBJECTIVE: To identify characteristics of programs which provide training in abortion, to calculate the number of procedures done during training, and to compare the availability of abortion training in 2004 with that of prior national surveys. METHODS: An investigator-designed questionnaire about abortion training in obstetrics and gynecology residency programs was mailed to all U.S. residency directors. Collected data included program information, abortion training, and numbers of residents trained. Data were analyzed to estimate differences in abortion training by region, program size, and type of training offered. RESULTS: Of the 252 questionnaires mailed, 185 (73%) were returned. Of the 185, 94 (51%) program directors reported routine instruction in elective abortion, 72 (39%) optional training, and 19 (10%) no training. Large programs and programs located in the Northeast and West Coast were significantly more likely to offer routine training in terminations (P < .01). In the programs offering routine training, more than 50% of residents received instruction in termination practices. Of those practices, the most common were first-trimester surgical abortion (85% of programs), followed by medical abortion (59%), second-trimester induction (51% of programs), and dilation and extraction (36%). As compared with those in programs with optional training, residents in programs with routine training were significantly more likely to receive instruction in all modalities of abortion provision and performed proportionally more first- and second-trimester terminations (P < .01). CONCLUSION: Routine training in elective abortion resulted in greater exposure to abortion practices and greater experience in more complicated abortion techniques during residency.

Abortion, Therapeutic↗
PubMed2005

A systematic review of the literature associating breastfeeding with type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes.

As diabetes becomes more prevalent in younger women, diabetes and maternal-child health issues such as breastfeeding co-exist with increasing frequency. We sought to determine the relationship between breastfeeding and both type 2 diabetes and gestational diabetes (GDM) in a variety of clinical contexts, with a focus on prevention. The Medline database from 1966-2003, relevant references of selected articles, the Cochrane database, and the NIH Clinical Trials website were searched. Search terms included breastfeeding, infant nutrition, and diabetes. The search was restricted to the English language and human subjects. Each study was reviewed by at least two of the authors and included if it pertained to the relationship between type 2 diabetes or GDM and breastfeeding. Twelve of 15 identified studies (80%) met selection criteria. All studies were observational. Specific maternal-child health populations varied by study. Two of the authors abstracted information from each article on 1) study design, 2) target population, 3) sample size/power, 4) definition of breastfeeding, 5) definition of diabetes, and 6) confounders. Higher rates of pregnancy and neonatal complications among women with type 2 or gestational diabetes can pose significant challenges to breastfeeding. Low estrogen levels in breastfeeding women may have a protective effect on glucose metabolism and subsequent risk of diabetes. Having been breastfed for at least 2 months may lower the risk of diabetes in children. Initial research has begun on the long-term effects of diabetes during pregnancy on children. Breastfeeding may lower both maternal and pediatric rates of diabetes. Women with diabetes should be strongly encouraged to breastfeed because of maternal and childhood benefits specific to diabetes that are above and beyond other known benefits of breastfeeding.

Breast Feeding↗
PubMed2004

Identification of educational objectives for obstetrics and gynecology residents in the ambulatory setting.

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to identify specific educational goals for obstetrics and gynecology residents in the ambulatory setting. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study of current practice patterns in primary care, benign gynecology, and office procedures was performed with mailings to local private practice obstetrician-gynecologists. Questions for the anonymous written survey were generated using the Council on Resident Education in Obstetrics and Gynecology educational objectives. Telephone interviews with staff from billing offices confirmed practitioner responses. RESULTS: Of 88 practitioners, 43 (49%) responded. Diagnoses made in the office correlated well with the topics considered important for resident knowledge. Most important primary care diagnoses were depression and abdominal pain; important gynecologic diagnoses were abnormal uterine bleeding, chronic pelvic pain, contraception, and vulvovaginal infection. CONCLUSION: This study offers a valid, practical foundation for developing a focused ambulatory resident education program based on current outpatient obstetrics-gynecology practice patterns.

Ambulatory Care↗