PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jennifer Trofe

Publications and source records attributed to Jennifer Trofe.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the management of human polyomaviruses.

Polyomaviruses [BK virus (BKV), JC virus (JCV) and simian virus 40 (SV40)] have been known to be associated with diseases in humans for over thirty years. BKV-associated nephropathy and JCV-induced progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) were for many years rare diseases occurring only in patients with underlying severe impaired immunity. Over the past decade, the use of more potent immunosuppression (IS) in transplantation, and the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) epidemic, have coincided with a significant increase in the prevalence of these viral complications. Prophylactic and therapeutic interventions for human polyomavirus diseases are limited by our current understanding of polyomaviral pathogenesis. Clinical trials are limited by small numbers of patients affected with clinically significant diseases, lack of defined risk factors and disease definitions, no proven effective treatment and the overall significant morbidity and mortality associated with these diseases. This chapter will focus on a review of the current and future research related to therapeutic targets and interventions for polyomavirus-associated diseases.

Disease Management↗

Simultaneous corticosteroid avoidance and calcineurin inhibitor minimization in renal transplantation.

Steroids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) have been mainstays of immunosuppression but both have numerous side effects that are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. This study was carried out to determine if steroids can be eliminated with early discontinuation of cyclosporine A (CsA) and later discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Ninety-six patients with kidney transplants were entered into four subgroups of two pilot studies. All patients received Thymoglobulin induction, rapamycin (RAPA), and the immunonutrients arginine and an oil containing omega-3 fatty acids. Mycophenolate mofetil was started in standard doses and discontinued by 2 years. CsA was given in reduced doses for either 4, 6, or 12 months. Follow-up was 12-36 months. Thirteen first rejection episodes occurred during the first year (14%). Combining all patients, 86% were rejection-free at 1 year, 80% at 2 years and 79% at 3 years. No kidney has been lost to acute rejection. Ninety percent of the 84 patients at risk at the end of the study were steroid-free and 87% were off CNI. Fifty-seven percent of 54 patients with a functioning kidney at 3 years were receiving monotherapy with RAPA. We conclude that this therapeutic strategy is worthy of a prospective multi-center clinical trial.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

Interplay of cellular and humoral immune responses against BK virus in kidney transplant recipients with polyomavirus nephropathy.

Reactivation of the polyomavirus BK (BKV) causes polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients and may lead to loss of the renal allograft. We have identified two HLA-A*0201-restricted nine-amino-acid cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) epitopes of the BKV major capsid protein VP1, VP1(p44), and VP1(p108). Using tetramer staining assays, we showed that these epitopes were recognized by CTLs in 8 of 10 (VP1(p44)) and 5 of 10 (VP1(p108)) HLA-A*0201+ healthy individuals, while both epitopes elicited a CTL response in 10 of 10 KTx recipients with biopsy-proven PVN, although at variable levels. After in vitro stimulation with the respective peptides, CTLs directed against VP1(p44) were more abundant than against VP1(p108) in most healthy individuals, while the converse was true in KTx recipients with PVN, suggesting a shift in epitope immunodominance in the setting of active BKV infection. A strong CTL response in KTx recipients with PVN appeared to be associated with decreased BK viral load in blood and urine and low anti-BKV antibody titers, while a low or undetectable CTL response correlated with viral persistence and high anti-BKV antibody titers. These results suggest that this cellular immune response is present in most BKV-seropositive healthy individuals and plays an important role in the containment of BKV in KTx recipients with PVN. Interestingly, the BKV CTL epitopes bear striking homology with the recently described CTL epitopes of the other human polyomavirus JC (JCV), JCV VP1(p36) and VP1(p100). A high degree of epitope cross-recognition was present between BKV and corresponding JCV-specific CTLs, which indicates that the same population of cells is functionally effective against these two closely related viruses.

Adult↗

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in renal transplantation: interdisciplinary analyses and recommendations.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) is an emerging cause of kidney transplant failure affecting 1-10% of patients. As uncertainty exists regarding risk factors, diagnosis, and intervention, an independent panel of experts reviewed the currently available evidence and prepared this report. Most cases of PVAN are elicited by BK virus (BKV) in the context of intense immunosuppression. No specific immunosuppressive drug is exclusively associated with PVAN, but most cases reported to date arise while the patient is on triple immunosuppressive combinations, often comprising tacrolimus and/or mycophenolate mofetil plus corticosteroids. Immunologic control of polyomavirus replication can be achieved by reducing, switching, and/or discontinuing components of the immunosuppressive regimen, but the individual's risk of rejection should be considered. The success rate of this intervention is increased with earlier diagnosis. Therefore, it is recommended that all renal transplant recipients should be screened for BKV replication in the urine: 1) every three months during the first two years posttransplant; 2) when allograft dysfunction is noted; and 3) when allograft biopsy is performed. A positive screening result should be confirmed in <4 weeks and assessed by quantitative assays (e.g. BKV DNA or RNA load in plasma or urine). Definitive diagnosis of PVAN requires allograft biopsy. If PVAN and concurrent acute rejection is diagnosed, antirejection treatment should be considered, coupled with subsequently reducing immunosuppression. The antiviral cidofovir is not approved for PVAN, but investigational use at low doses (0.25-0.33 mg/kg intravenously biweekly) without probenicid should be considered for refractory cases. Retransplantation after renal allograft loss to PVAN remains a treatment option for patients clearing polyomavirus replication.

Humans↗

African-American renal transplant recipients benefit from early corticosteroid withdrawal under modern immunosuppression.

African-Americans (AAs) have historically been considered high-risk renal transplant recipients due to increased rejection rates and reduced long-term graft survival. As a result, AAs are often excluded from corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD) protocols. Modern immunosuppression has reduced rejections and improved graft survival in AAs and may allow successful CSWD. Outcomes in 56 AAs were compared to 56 non-AAs. All patients were enrolled in one of four early CSWD protocols. Results are reported as AA versus non-AA. Acute rejection at 1-year was 23% and 18%; (p = NS); creatinine clearance at 1-year was 75 versus 80 mL/min (p = NS); patient and graft survival was 96% versus 98% and 91% versus 91%; (p = NS). AAs benefit from early CSWD with significantly improved blood pressure, LDL < 130 mg/dL and HDL > 45 mg/dL at 1-year, post-transplant diabetes of 8.7%, and mean weight change at 1-year of 4.8 +/- 7.2 kg. In conclusion, early CSWD in AAs is associated with acceptable rejection rates, excellent patient and graft survival, and improved cardiovascular risk, indicating that the risks and benefits of early CSWD are similar between AAs and non-AAs. Additional follow-up is needed to determine long-term renal function, graft survival, and cardiovascular risk in AAs with early CSWD.

Adrenal Cortex Hormones↗

Analysis of factors that influence survival with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder in renal transplant recipients: the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry experience.

Significant mortality is associated with post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) in kidney transplant recipients (KTX). Univariate/multivariate risk factor survival analysis of US PTLD KTX reported to Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry from November 1968 to January 2000 was performed. PTLD presented 18 (median) (range 1-310) months in 402 KTX. Death rates were greater for those diagnosed within 6 months (64%) versus beyond 6 months (54%, p = 0.04). No differences in death risk for gender, race, immunosuppression, EBV, B or T cell positivity were identified. Death risk increased for multiple versus single sites (73% vs. 53%, hazards ratio (HR) 1.4). A 1-year increase in age increased HR for death by 2%. Surgery was associated with increased survival (55% vs. 0% without surgery) (p < 0.0001). Patients with allograft involvement, treated with transplant nephrectomy alone (n = 20), had 80% survival versus 53% without allograft removal (n = 15) (p < 0.001). Overall survival was 69% for allograft involvement alone versus 36% for other organ involvement plus allograft (n = 19 alive) (p < 0.0001). Death risk was greater for multiple site PTLD and increasing age, and risks were additive. Univariate analysis identified increased death risk for those not receiving surgery, particularly allograft involvement alone.

Graft Rejection↗

Multivariate analysis of risk factors for acute rejection in early corticosteroid cessation regimens under modern immunosuppression.

The purpose of this study was to define risk factors for acute rejection with early corticosteroid withdrawal (CSWD; within 7 days posttransplant) in renal transplantation. Data from prospective, IRB-approved early CSWD trials were analyzed. Overall acute rejection rate in 308 patients was 17.1%. Acute rejection rates and observed risks (OR) in patients with individual risk factors were: repeat transplants 38.6%; current PRA >25%; 29.4%; African Americans 23.5%; delayed graft function (DGF) 26.1%; HLA DR mismatches >0 17.9%; female gender 19.7%; Thymoglobulin induction 15.3%; type 1 diabetes 30.8%; type 2 diabetes 11.1%; deceased donor recipients 21%; and living donor recipients 14%. Logistic regression analysis provided the following risks (OR) for acute rejection: repeat transplant 2.51; current PRA > 25% 1.53; African Americans 1.47; DGF 1.58; HLA DR mismatches > 0 1.61; female gender 1.43; Thymoglobulin induction 0.61; type 1 diabetes 2.23, type 2 diabetes 0.5, deceased donor recipients 1.11, and living donor recipients 0.9. Risk factors for acute rejection under early corticosteroid withdrawal are similar to those previously defined under chronic corticosteroid therapy. These observations provide implications for future CSWD trials including: use of T cell depleting antibody induction therapy (thymoglobulin) to reduce acute rejection risk, 2) enrollment stratification for high risk groups, and 3) modified immunosuppression for high risk groups.

Acute Disease↗

Experience with 274 cardiac transplant recipients with posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder: a report from the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry.

BACKGROUND: Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a life-threatening complication that occurs in a small but significant minority of solid organ transplant recipients. Published experiences with PTLD in cardiac transplant recipients are limited to relatively small single-center reports. METHODS: This report presents experience with 274 cases of PTLD in cardiac transplant recipients reported to the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry (IPITTR). RESULTS: PTLD carried an ominous prognosis: Kaplan Meier survival after PTLD diagnosis was 45%, 33%, 30%, and 13%, respectively, at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years. Common causes of death included: PTLD, cardiovascular collapse, and infection; all occurred at a median of less than 6 months. Risk of death from cardiovascular collapse secondary to immunosuppression withdrawal was substantial (28%), indicating that a fine balance exists between death from PTLD and from sudden cardiac death due to acute rejection. PTLD therapy in the majority of patients consisted of combination therapy (49%). Survival in patients receiving immunosuppression minimization (ISM) alone was 32%, with ISM plus other therapy was 27%, and with other therapies not containing ISM was 11% (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: PTLD in cardiac transplant recipients is associated with low long-term survival rates. Analysis of PTLD therapies and outcomes suggest that immunosuppression minimization, when applied, improves survival. However, risk of sudden death may mitigate the positive effect of ISM. This observation has important implications for ISM in PTLD therapy in cardiac transplant recipients. Carefully designed prospective studies are needed to evaluate the positive and negative effects of ISM in cardiac transplant recipients with PTLD.

Adult↗

Recurrence risk after organ transplantation in patients with a history of Hodgkin disease or non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

This study defines the incidence and recurrence risk of Hodgkin disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) after organ transplant. Patients from the United States with a history of HD or NHL before organ transplantation reported to the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry from 1968 to 2001 were analyzed. A total of 91 patients underwent organ transplantation with a lymphoma history: HD (38 patients) and NHL (53 patients). Median disease-free interval pretransplant was 99 (range 0-459.1) months, and median follow-up posttransplant was 25.7 (0.4-131.1) months. Ten patients were excluded from further analysis because of lack of follow-up information (n=9) or they never achieved remission (n=1). Recurrence incidence was 8 of 81 patients (10%) (HD=3/34 [9%] vs. NHL=5/47 [11%]). Gender, race, allograft type and source, age at lymphoma diagnosis, and immunosuppression did not influence recurrence. Patients with less than a 2-year period between diagnosis and transplant seem to be at increased risk of relapse. Median disease-free interval before transplant was longer for patients without recurrence (115 vs. 30.2 months, P=0.24), but was not statistically significant. Median time to recurrence posttransplant was 18.7 (range 1.9-82.2) months (HD=3.7 vs. NHL 23.6 months, P=0.10). Survival after recurrence was poor (HD [1/3] and NHL [1/5], median survival 6.8 [range 0-22.1] months). There is no difference in recurrence rates for HD and NHL. The outcome for recurrent lymphoma is poor. The low risk of recurrence (10%) indicates that preexisting HD and NHL need not be an absolute contraindication to transplantation.

Adolescent↗

Retransplantation in patients with graft loss caused by polyoma virus nephropathy.

The characteristics and outcome in 10 patients who underwent retransplantation after losing their renal grafts to BK virus-associated nephropathy (BKAN) are described. The patients underwent retransplantation at a mean of 13.3 months after failure of the first graft. Nephroureterectomy of the first graft was performed in seven patients. Maintenance immunosuppression regimens after the first and second grafts were similar, consisting of a combination of a calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. BKAN recurred in one patient 8 months after retransplantation, but stabilization of graft function was achieved with a decrease in immunosuppression and treatment with low-dose cidofovir. After a mean follow-up of 34.6 months, all patients were found to have good graft function with a mean creatinine of 1.5 mg/dL. From this collective experience from five transplant centers (although the follow-up after retransplantation was not extensive), it can be concluded that patients with graft loss caused by BKAN can safely undergo retransplantation. The risk of recurrence does not seem to be increased in comparison with the first graft.

Adult↗

Characteristics and survival patterns of solid organ transplant patients developing de novo colon and rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: Immunosuppression used in transplantation is associated with an increased incidence of various cancers. Although the incidence of colorectal cancer in transplant patients seems to be equal to nontransplant population, the effects of immunosuppression on patients who develop colorectal cancer are not well defined. The purpose of this study was to define the characteristics and survival patterns of transplant patients developing de novo colorectal cancer. METHODS: The Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry was queried for patients with colorectal cancer. Analysis included patient demographics, age at transplantation and colorectal cancer diagnosis, tumor stage, and survival. Age and survival rates were compared to United States population-based colorectal cancer statistics using the National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database. RESULTS: A total of 150 transplant patients with de novo colorectal cancer were identified: 93 kidney, 29 heart, 27 liver, and 1 lung. Mean age at transplantation was 53 years. Age at transplantation and colorectal cancer diagnosis was not significant for gender, race, or stage of disease. Compared to National Cancer Institute Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database, transplantation patients had a younger mean age at colorectal cancer diagnosis (58 vs. 70 years; P < 0.001), and a worse five-year survival (overall, 44 vs. 62 percent, P < 0.001; Dukes A and B, 74 vs. 90 percent, P < 0.001; Dukes C, 20 vs. 66 percent, P < 0.001; and Dukes D, 0 vs. 9 percent, P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Transplant patients develop colorectal cancer at a younger age and exhibit worse five-year survival rates than the general population. These data suggest that chronic immunosuppression results in a more aggressive tumor biology. Frequent posttransplantation colorectal cancer screening program may be warranted.

Aged↗

Polyomavirus nephropathy in kidney transplantation.

Polyomavirus nephropathy has become an important complication in kidney transplantation, with a prevalence of 1% to 8%. Unfortunately, the risk factors for polyomavirus nephropathy and renal allograft loss are not well defined. The definitive diagnosis is made through assessment of a kidney transplant biopsy. Recently, noninvasive urine and serum markers have been used to assist in polyomavirus nephropathy diagnosis and monitoring. Primary treatment is immunosuppression reduction, but must be balanced with the risks of rejection. No antiviral treatments for polyomavirus nephropathy have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Although cidofovir has shown in vitro activity against murine polyomaviruses, and has been effective in some patients, it is associated with significant nephrotoxicity. Graft loss due to polyomavirus nephropathy should not be a contraindication to retransplantation; however, experience is limited. This review presents potential risk factors, screening, diagnostic and monitoring methods, therapeutic management, and retransplantation experience for polyomavirus nephropathy.

Antiviral Agents↗

Posttransplant malignancy.

In the past few decades, great advances have been made in the field of solid-organ transplantation. A greater understanding of immune system function, the development of modern immunosuppression, and advancements in surgical technique have led to marked improvements in both recipient and graft survivals, as well as recipients' quality of life. However, improved survival rates have also led to prolonged exposure to chronic immunosuppression, which increases the risk for the development of posttransplant malignancies. In addition, older transplant candidates are being considered, carrying with them the increased likelihood of preexisting malignancy. Consequently, the potential risk of posttransplant malignancy must be considered. Moreover, as long-term transplant survivors continue to age, posttransplant malignancies will be seen more frequently. This review presents the more commonly encountered posttransplant malignancies and the measures that are currently being utilized to prevent and treat them.

Adult↗

Donor transmitted malignancies.

Early experiences in transplantation, which pre-dated brain death laws, utilized organs from donors with active malignancies. The use of organs from such donors occasionally resulted in the transmission of malignancy from the donor to an unknowing recipient. Over a period of three decades, Israel Penn, M. D. catalogued some two hundred and fifty cases of organs transplanted from donors with a history of malignancy; carefully examining each reported case for tumor histology, donor risk factors, method of tumor presentation and recipient outcome. Some recipients never developed malignancies, while others were less fortunate, developing cancers that were suspicious for donor origin. The evolution of transplantation has resulted in improved patient survival, which in turn has led to an increased demand for organ transplantation. Unfortunately, the supply of organs available for transplantation has failed to keep pace with the demand, with the worldwide deficit growing annually. In an effort to bridge the widening gap, utilization of older and more marginal donors has been suggested. However, use of older donors is accompanied by the likelihood that a significant proportion may have undiagnosed malignancies. Multiple transplant programs have considered the use of donors with tumors of non-malignant or even low-grade malignant histology, most often involving the central nervous system (CNS). According to a survey from the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), central nervous system malignancies are among the most commonly identified malignancies found in potential donors. This study examines the distribution of potential donor transmitted malignancies reported to the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry. The incidence of tumor transmission is examined in the overall group as well as among individual histologies. We also seek to identify specific factors associated with the risk of malignancy transmission from donor to recipient, in an effort to minimize future transmission of donor tumors to unwitting recipients. The study is based on voluntary registry data, which some argue can be criticized for a lack of true incidence data. In reality, however, this data may provide a more accurate insight since it is based on transmissions from high-risk donors rather than from the general population.

Humans↗

Basic and clinical research in polyomavirus nephropathy.

Over the last decade, polyomavirus nephropathy (PVN) has emerged as an important cause of renal allograft dysfunction and graft loss. PVN occurs with a prevalence of 1%-8% in renal transplant recipients and is most commonly reported within the first 12 months posttransplant. The human polyomavirus, BK virus, is thought to be the primary etiologic agent of PVN. Risk factors for PVN are not well defined and are most likely a result of a complex interaction between multiple donor and recipient factors. Definitive diagnosis of PVN is made through histological assessment of a renal allograft biopsy. Recent studies have also evaluated noninvasive urine and serum markers for screening of BK virus replication and as adjunct tools in PVN diagnosis and monitoring. The principal treatment for PVN is immunosuppression reduction, but this must be balanced against the risks of rejection. If rejection occurs concurrently with PVN, a brief increase in immunosuppression to treat the rejection episode followed by a subsequent reduction in immunosuppression is recommended. No antiviral treatments for PVN have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Although the antiviral drug cidofovir has shown in vitro activity against murine polyomaviruses, and has been effective in some patients, it is associated with significant nephrotoxicity. Small series of patients treated with leflunomide and intravenous immune globulin therapy for PVN have also recently been reported. Retransplantation after graft loss due to PVN is feasible, but experience is limited. Current research is focusing on identifying PVN risk factors, refining screening, diagnostic and monitoring methods, and developing therapy for prophylaxis and treatment of PVN with the goals of decreasing the prevalence of PVN and improving allograft outcomes in renal transplant recipients diagnosed with PVN. This review will present recent advances in basic and clinical research related to PVN and renal transplantation.

Humans↗

Donors with central nervous system malignancies: are they truly safe?

BACKGROUND: In an era of organ shortage, the use of expanded or marginal donors has been attempted to increase transplantation rates and diminish waiting list mortality. One strategy is the use of organs from patients with a history of or active central nervous system (CNS) tumor. METHODS: Sixty-two recipients were identified as the recipients of organs from donors with a history of or active CNS malignancy. Patient demographics, donor tumor management, incidence of tumor transmission, and patient survival were examined. RESULTS: Of the organs recovered and transplanted from donors with astrocytoma, 14 were associated with at least one risk factor including high-grade tumor (n=4), prior surgery (n=5), radiation therapy (n=4), and systemic chemotherapy (n=4). One tumor transmission was identified at 20 months posttransplant with the patient expiring from metastatic disease. Twenty-six organs were transplanted from glioblastoma patients with 15 demonstrating risk factors including high-grade tumor (n=9) and prior surgery (n=10). Eight transmissions were identified with a range of 2 to 15 months posttransplant, with seven patients dying as the result of metastatic disease. Seven organs were used from donors with a medulloblastoma. Three transmissions were identified at a range of 5 to 7 months, all associated with ventriculoperitoneal shunts. Two medulloblastoma recipients died as the result of metastatic disease, whereas the third is alive with diffuse disease. The rate of donor tumor transmission, in the absence of risk factors, was 7%, whereas in the presence of one or more risk factor this rate dramatically rose to 53% (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Organs from donors with CNS tumors can be used with a low risk of donor tumor transmission in the absence of the following risk factors: high-grade tumors, ventriculoperitoneal or ventriculoatrial shunts, prior craniotomy, and systemic chemotherapy.

Astrocytoma↗

Renal allograft loss as the result of polyomavirus interstitial nephritis after simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation: results with kidney retransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Polyomavirus (PV) infection in kidney transplant patients has been reported to cause interstitial nephritis and subsequent graft loss. The cornerstone of current therapy is a reduction in immunosuppression, which can subsequently lead to kidney allograft rejection. This dilemma becomes even more challenging in the setting of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation, because a reduction in immunosuppression may result in rejection of the pancreas allograft. Antiviral therapy has not been shown to be clinically successful in decreasing the risk of graft loss secondary to PV infection. Furthermore, because of limited experience, the decision to perform retransplantation in patients who lost their primary kidney grafts to PV interstitial nephritis becomes a difficult one. METHODS: Retrospective review and case studies. RESULTS: We report two successful living donor kidney retransplants in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant patients who lost their first kidney grafts to PV infection. Both patients are receiving rimantadine therapy and performing well, with functioning kidney and pancreas grafts and no evidence of recurrent PV interstitial nephritis 22 and 37 months after retransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Although follow-up is limited, our initial experience would indicate that graft loss secondary to PV interstitial nephritis is not an absolute contraindication for kidney retransplantation.

Adult↗