Biomedical subjects

Jens A Lundbaek

Publications and source records attributed to Jens A Lundbaek.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

GABA(A) receptor function is regulated by lipid bilayer elasticity.

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and other polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) promote GABA(A) receptor [(3)H]-muscimol binding, and DHA increases the rate of GABA(A) receptor desensitization. Triton X-100, a structurally unrelated amphiphile, similarly promotes [(3)H]-muscimol binding. The mechanism(s) underlying these effects are poorly understood. DHA and Triton X-100, at concentrations that affect GABA(A) receptor function, increase the elasticity of lipid bilayers measured as decreased bilayer stiffness using gramicidin channels as molecular force transducers. We have previously shown that membrane protein function can be regulated by amphiphile-induced changes in bilayer elasticity and hypothesized that GABA(A) receptors could be similarly regulated. We therefore studied the effects of four structurally unrelated amphiphiles that decrease bilayer stiffness (Triton X-100, octyl-beta-glucoside, capsaicin, and DHA) on GABA(A) receptor function in mammalian cells. All the compounds promoted GABA(A) receptor [(3)H]-muscimol binding by increasing the binding capacity of high-affinity binding without affecting the associated equilibrium binding constant. A semiquantitative analysis found a similar quantitative relation between the effects on bilayer stiffness and [(3)H]-muscimol binding. Membrane cholesterol depletion, which also decreases bilayer stiffness, similarly promoted [(3)H]-muscimol binding. In whole-cell voltage-clamp experiments, Triton X-100, octyl-beta-glucoside, capsaicin, and DHA all reduced the peak amplitude of the GABA-induced currents and increased the rate of receptor desensitization. The effects of the amphiphiles did not correlate with the expected changes in monolayer spontaneous curvature. We conclude that GABA(A) receptor function is regulated by lipid bilayer elasticity. PUFAs may generally regulate membrane protein function by affecting the elasticity of the host lipid bilayer.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Regulation of sodium channel function by bilayer elasticity: the importance of hydrophobic coupling. Effects of Micelle-forming amphiphiles and cholesterol.

Membrane proteins are regulated by the lipid bilayer composition. Specific lipid-protein interactions rarely are involved, which suggests that the regulation is due to changes in some general bilayer property (or properties). The hydrophobic coupling between a membrane-spanning protein and the surrounding bilayer means that protein conformational changes may be associated with a reversible, local bilayer deformation. Lipid bilayers are elastic bodies, and the energetic cost of the bilayer deformation contributes to the total energetic cost of the protein conformational change. The energetics and kinetics of the protein conformational changes therefore will be regulated by the bilayer elasticity, which is determined by the lipid composition. This hydrophobic coupling mechanism has been studied extensively in gramicidin channels, where the channel-bilayer hydrophobic interactions link a "conformational" change (the monomer<-->dimer transition) to an elastic bilayer deformation. Gramicidin channels thus are regulated by the lipid bilayer elastic properties (thickness, monolayer equilibrium curvature, and compression and bending moduli). To investigate whether this hydrophobic coupling mechanism could be a general mechanism regulating membrane protein function, we examined whether voltage-dependent skeletal-muscle sodium channels, expressed in HEK293 cells, are regulated by bilayer elasticity, as monitored using gramicidin A (gA) channels. Nonphysiological amphiphiles (beta-octyl-glucoside, Genapol X-100, Triton X-100, and reduced Triton X-100) that make lipid bilayers less "stiff", as measured using gA channels, shift the voltage dependence of sodium channel inactivation toward more hyperpolarized potentials. At low amphiphile concentration, the magnitude of the shift is linearly correlated to the change in gA channel lifetime. Cholesterol-depletion, which also reduces bilayer stiffness, causes a similar shift in sodium channel inactivation. These results provide strong support for the notion that bilayer-protein hydrophobic coupling allows the bilayer elastic properties to regulate membrane protein function.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

PubMed2002

ReN 1869, a novel tricyclic antihistamine, is active against neurogenic pain and inflammation.

The tricyclic compound (R)-1-(3-(10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d]cyclohepten-5-ylidene)-1-propyl)-3-piperidine carboxylic acid (ReN 1869) is a novel, selective histamine H(1) receptor antagonist. It is orally available, well tolerated, easily enters the central nervous system (CNS) but no adverse effects are seen in mice at 300 mg/kg. ReN 1869 at 0.01-10 mg/kg is antinociceptive in tests of chemical nociception in rodents (formalin, capsaicin, phenyl quinone writhing) but not in thermal tests (hot plate and tail flick). ReN 1869 amplifies the analgesic action of morphine but does not show tolerance after chronic dosing. Moreover, the compound is effective against inflammation of neurogenic origin (antidromic nerve stimulation, histamine-evoked edema) but not in carrageenan-induced inflammation. We suggest that ReN 1869, via H(1) blockade, counteracts the effect of histamine liberated from activated mast cells and inhibits pain transmission in the dorsal spinal cord. ReN 1869 represents a new class of antihistamines with pain-relieving properties that probably is mediated centrally through histamine H(1) receptors but alternative mechanisms of action cannot be excluded.

Animals↗