Jens Beckschebe | PubMed Health

PubMed2006

Evaluation of Eustachian tube function by sonotubometry: results and reliability of 8 kHz signals in normal subjects.

Sonotubometry allows an assessment of the Eustachian tube (ET) function under physiological conditions. The reliability of the application of an 8 kHz pure-tone signal was investigated. In 40 normal subjects (80 ears) sonotubometric studies were performed with a custom-made device. ET opening was provoked by swallowing, yawning and Valsalva manoeuvre. An opening was detected in all patients but not in all manoeuvres. Four characteristic sonotubogram types were found. Most common was the spike-type (60%). The double-peak and the plateau-shaped curves occurred in 17% each. The finding of an descendant curve was rare (5%). Of 623 measurements, only in 55% manouvres a positive sonotubometric result was found despite the fact that the patients reported an opening in all cases. The median opening time in dry swallowing, liquid swallowing, yawning and Valsalva was found to be 486, 355, 1,263 and 1,250 ms. A median sound increase of 16.0, 13.8, 15.0 and 15.0 dB was recorded for these manoeuvres. There was a statistic significant difference (P < 0.02) between the increase in sound intensity of liquid and dry swallowing. There was also a statistic significant difference found for the duration of the forced manoeuvres Valsalva and yawning as compared to dry and liquid swallowing (P < 0.0001). The use of an 8 kHz pure-tone signal showed a limited sensitivity for the detection of ET openings. This is mainly due to noise pollution, but also because of an altered positioning and/or dislocation of the probes and compression of the nostrils. The application of an 8 kHz signal is therefore not reliable enough for the use in practice. Further technical refinements and the use of alternative signals are necessary for a broader clinical application.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Amplitude-mapping effects on speech intelligibility with unilateral and bilateral cochlear implants.

OBJECTIVE: A study was conducted examining the effects of amplitude-mapping adjustments on speech intelligibility with bilateral cochlear implant users, for both unilateral and bilateral device use. The main motivation for this study was the consideration that bilateral loudness summation may result in sounds becoming too loud if no adjustments are made to standard monaural amplitude-mapping functions (maps) when used bilaterally. In that case, reductions of the stimulation levels may be needed. The objective was to assess the impact of such adjustments on speech intelligibility in noise and in quiet. DESIGN: Four different maps were compared in eight bilateral users of the Nucleus 24 system. Each map variation was taken home for 1 week and used bilaterally. After each week, the map used was tested both unilaterally and bilaterally using an adaptive speech-in-noise test and bilaterally for low-level speech in quiet. For the tests in noise, both speech and noise were presented from the same loudspeaker placed directly in front of the listener (S0N0). One of the maps evaluated was a standard clinical map, fitted as if only one ear were to be used. The three other maps used stimulation levels that were reduced more near the maximal stimulation levels, near thresholds, or else by a similar amount over the entire dynamic range. RESULTS: The data showed a modest but statistically significant decrease in performance when stimulation levels were lowered. This was true both in noise and in quiet. For level reductions corresponding to binaural loudness summation effects, the performance decrease was on the order of 1 to 2 dB. Altering the slope of the map had relatively little effect on performance. Comparison of unilateral with bilateral performance using the same map (i.e., no compensation for bilateral loudness summation) and with speech and noise both presented from in front of the listeners showed a modest but statistically significant improvement in the bilateral condition. CONCLUSIONS: Using higher stimulation levels in amplitude-mapping functions can improve both monaural and binaural speech perception performance in quiet and in noise, even when the slope of the acoustic to electrical amplitude-mapping function is held constant (i.e., when the electrical signal-to-noise ratio remains constant). The results in noise can be understood if we assume that the relation between electrical stimulation levels and loudness grows faster at higher stimulation levels. When comparing the monaural better ear with binaural performance in noise (S0N0) by using the same map, that is to say, when no adjustments were made in the bilateral condition for bilateral loudness summation, an average signal-to-noise ratio benefit of 1.4 dB was found in the bilateral condition. These findings indicate that when fitting bilateral devices clinically, although binaural performance may decrease slightly if levels need to be reduced to compensate for binaural loudness summation, the binaural S0N0 advantage over the better ear will offset this. Consequently, performance with both ears after adjustment is likely to remain at least as good as for the better ear alone without level adjustment, even in the S0N0 condition where binaural advantages are minimized.

Acoustic Stimulation↗