PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jens Reden

Publications and source records attributed to Jens Reden.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Recovery of olfactory function following closed head injury or infections of the upper respiratory tract.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the outcome of olfactory function in patients with olfactory loss following infections of the upper respiratory tract (post-URTI) or head trauma. DESIGN: Retrospective patient-based study. SETTING: Smell and Taste Outpatient Clinic at a university hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 361 patients (228 women, 133 men) were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Olfactory function was assessed using the "Sniffin' Sticks" test battery, which result in a threshold, discrimination, and identification score. The mean interval between first and last visit was 14 months. RESULTS: In comparing the overall threshold, discrimination, and identification scores between the last and first visit, olfactory function improved in 26% of the patients whereas it decreased in 6%. The cause of olfactory impairment had a significant effect on the recovery rate of olfactory function. Within the post-URTI group (n = 262), 32% of the patients improved, but in the posttraumatic group (n = 99) only 10% improved. In patients with post-URTI olfactory loss, a negative correlation was found between age and recovery of olfactory function. In general, the factor "sex" had no significant effect on recovery of smell function. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, the series of patients presented herein is the largest in the literature to date in which standardized testing methods were used to assess the progression of impaired olfaction. It showed that the rate of improvement of olfactory function was significantly higher in patients with post-URTI dysosmia compared with patients with posttraumatic dysosmia. During an observation period of approximately 1 year, more than 30% of patients with post-URTI olfactory loss experienced improvement, whereas only 10% of patients with posttraumatic olfactory loss experienced improvement. Furthermore, age plays a significant role in the recovery of olfactory function.

Adolescent↗

Reduced olfactory bulb volume in post-traumatic and post-infectious olfactory dysfunction.

The olfactory bulb is a highly plastic structure the volume of which partly reflects the degree of afferent neural activity. In this study, 22 patients with post-infectious olfactory deficit, nine participants with post-traumatic olfactory deficit, and 17 healthy controls underwent magnetic resonance volumetry of the olfactory bulb. Patients presented with significantly smaller olfactory bulb volumes than controls; significant correlations between olfactory function and bulb volume were observed. Patients with parosmia exhibited smaller olfactory bulb volumes than those without parosmia. Findings indicate that smell deficits leading to a reduced sensory input to the olfactory bulb result in structural changes at the level of the bulb. Reduced olfactory bulb volumes may also be considered to be characteristic of parosmia.

Adult↗

Differences between orthonasal and retronasal olfactory functions in patients with loss of the sense of smell.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate differences between orthonasal and retronasal olfaction in patients with loss of the sense of smell without taste complaints. DESIGN: Electrophysiological and psychophysical testing of orthonasal and retronasal olfactory functions. SETTING: Outpatient clinics. PATIENTS: A series of 18 patients who had olfactory loss due to various reasons but no "taste" complaints. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Orthonasal and retronasal olfactory functions assessed by olfactory event-related potentials and psychophysical smell tests. RESULTS: Psychophysical testing revealed retronasal olfaction to be normal or slightly altered, whereas orthonasal olfaction was either absent or severely compromised. Findings from nasal endoscopic examinations and computed tomographic scans were within the reference range in all subjects. In response to orthonasal stimulation there were neither detectable olfactory event-related potentials nor any with small amplitudes, whereas olfactory event-related potentials in response to retronasal stimulation were clearly present in some patients. CONCLUSION: These clinical observations, together with the psychophysical and electrophysiological findings, suggest that orthonasal and retronasal olfaction might be processed differently.

Adult↗