The diagnosis and management of common anorectal disorders.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Jeremy Schweitzer.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
As the status of health-care insurance changes in the United States, studies have indicated that uninsured patients are less likely to receive timely and quality health care. Previous studies of appendicitis have shown that insurance status may effect the stage of presentation and outcome. However, these studies were based on databases lacking information regarding stage of presentation, timeliness of diagnosis and treatment, and character of hospitalization (length of stay, duration of antibiotic therapy, hospital costs). We accomplished a case control study, retrospective analysis of 975 patients treated for acute appendicitis between January 1996 and December 1999. Times to operation, number of preoperative outpatient visits, number of studies, severity of presentation, length of antibiotics and hospital stay, and hospital costs were analyzed [analysis of variance (ANOVA) techniques, P < 0.05 significant]. We sought answers to the following: (1) Did insurance status affect the timeliness of diagnosis and treatment? (2) Did insurance status affect the stage of presentation? (3) Did insurance status affect hospitalization, as measured by length of stay, duration of antibiotic therapy, and hospital costs? (4) Did age affect outcome independent of insurance status? There were no correlations between insurance status and timeliness of diagnosis or severity of presentation. Length of stay and hospital costs were also not different between insurance categories. Pediatric patients (< 12 years old) and the elderly (> 65 years old) presented with more advanced appendicitis, independent of insurance category. In contrast to previously published data, the treatment of acute appendicitis is not affected by insurance coverage in the sample community. Age and timeliness of presentation were the only factors correlating to outcomes.
Acute diverticulitis historically has been considered rare before the age of 40 but "virulent" when it does occur and frequently requiring emergency operation. Recent experience suggests that the demographics and management of this disease are changing. Outcomes at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center were reviewed. Between January 1997 and July 2001 261 patients were discharged with the diagnosis of acute diverticulitis; 46 or 18 per cent of these were aged < or = 40. Patients' mean age was 35, 76 per cent were men, 65 per cent were Latino, and 72 per cent were obese (body mass index > or = 30 kg/m2). An operation at initial presentation was performed on 35 per cent (16/46) patients. Only 19 per cent of these (3/16) had a correct preoperative diagnosis. The 30 patients who were treated nonoperatively all were managed successfully; one required a percutaneous drain. Given the apparent increasing frequency of acute diverticulitis in young adults and the high success rate of initial nonoperative management surgeons should consider this diagnosis in selected patients who present with abdominal symptoms. Knowledge of typical clinical features and judicious use of computed tomography may decrease the number of unnecessary emergency operations in young adults with acute diverticulitis. Our data do not support a "virulent" label for this disease in the young.