PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jerome H Check

Publications and source records attributed to Jerome H Check.

13 recordsLinked to original sources

Evaluation of a nonhomogeneous endometrial echo pattern in the midluteal phase as a potential factor associated with unexplained infertility.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the failure to develop a homogeneous hyperechogenic pattern in the midluteal phase is associated with decreased fecundity in infertile women who are not receiving follicle-maturing drugs. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: Outpatient infertility clinic of a University Medical Center. PATIENT(S): Two hundred ninety-six infertile women (> or =6 months) with regular menses, normal fallopian tubes and uterine cavity, and absence of severe male factor on their initial investigation cycle for follicular dynamic studies. INTERVENTION(S): Midluteal phase sonographic endometrial evaluation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Viable pregnancy rates (live fetus at end of first trimester) according to endometrial echo pattern in the midluteal phase. Other variables considered were age of patient, endometrial thickness and serum E(2) levels at midcycle and midluteal phase, midcycle echo pattern, and P levels in the midluteal phase. RESULT(S): The viable pregnancy rate was significantly higher in those women who exhibited a homogeneous hyperechogenic pattern (8.5%) compared to those women whose endometrium was found to be nonhomogenous (2.2%). No other confounding variables were found that could explain this outcome. CONCLUSION(S): A nonhomogeneous hyperechogenic sonographic endometrial echo pattern predicts lower fertility potential in women who are not receiving follicle-maturing drugs.

Endometrium↗

An evaluation of the efficacy of in vitro fertilization with intracytoplasmic sperm injection for sperm with low hypoosmotic swelling test scores and poor morphology.

PURPOSE: To corroborate or refute a previous study demonstrating that in vitro fertilization (IVF) with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is an effective therapy for infertility related to males with subnormal hypoosmotic swelling tests (HOST). The study would also determine if the copresence of poor morphology has any adverse effect on outcome. METHODS: Clinical and viable pregnancy rates and implantation rates were evaluated in a second series of patients. The data were further stratified according to whether the semen specimen demonstrated morphology using strict criteria < 4% normal vs > or = 4%. RESULTS: Clinical and viable pregnancy rates and implantation rates were 49.1, 45.3, and 23.4% for those with subnormal HOST scores and subnormal morphology vs 38.0, 34.3, and 22.5% for those with low HOST and strict morphology > or = 4% (p = NS, chi-square analysis). CONCLUSIONS: In vitro fertilization with ICSI is an effective therapy for infertility related to subnormal HOST scores. Poor morphology does not adversely affect the outcome.

Female↗

Increased endometrial thickness on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin injection does not adversely affect pregnancy or implantation rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the controversy whether an increased endometrial thickness has an effect on pregnancy, implantation, or abortion rates in in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: A university-based IVF center. PATIENT(S): Five hundred seventy women under the age of 40. INTERVENTION(S): Measurements of endometrial thickness on day of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) administration. Cycles were compared by endometrial thickness of </=14 mm in 510 women to a thickness of >14 mm in 60 women. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Implantation, pregnancy, and abortion rates. RESULT(S): Implantation, pregnancy, and abortion rates were similar in each group. In cycles where the endometrial thickness was </=14 mm, the rates were 20.9%, 43.1%, and 11.8% compared with 25.5%, 48.3%, and 13.8% in cycles >14 mm. CONCLUSION(S): No adverse effects of a thickened endometrium were demonstrated on implantation, pregnancy, or abortion rates in the first IVF-ET cycle. These findings fail to corroborate with those of Weissman et al. and support those of Yakin et al.

Abortion, Spontaneous↗