Jessica K Lee | PubMed Health

PubMed2026

Prospective Evaluation of Circulating Tumor DNA in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: There are few established prognostic biomarkers in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Disease volume and timing of metastases are prognostic and predictive factors but may be inadequate due to heterogeneity. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) provides both circulating volume (tumor fraction [TF]) and genomic data. There are limited data on ctDNA in mHSPC. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective study of ctDNA testing in mHSPC. Presented here are the results before androgen-deprivation therapy initiation. The primary objective was to evaluate the association between TF and overall survival (OS) and time to mCRPC (TTCRPC). Secondary analyses included evaluating outcomes in subgroups of interest and key genomic subtypes. RESULTS: Between 2018 and 2024, 85 patients were enrolled, of whom 72 (25% Black) had evaluable baseline ctDNA samples and are included herein. Baseline TF was positive in 46 patients (64%). Compared with patients with negative ctDNA TF, most patients with positive ctDNA TF had de novo (87% v 39%, P < .001) and high-volume disease (80% v 46%, P = .01). At a median follow-up of 20.8 months, median OS was not reached (NR) with those with negative ctDNA TF and 33 months with positive ctDNA TF (hazard ratio [HR], 3.33 [95% CI, 1.1 to 9.9]; P = .03). However, a negative TF at baseline was associated with an undetectable 7-month prostate-specific antigen, a validated OS surrogate. Median TTCRPC was NR versus 13 months (HR, 3.43 [95% CI, 1.5 to 7.9]; P = .004). ctDNA TF was also potentially prognostic in high-volume disease and those who received doublet therapy. CONCLUSION: In this diverse cohort, a positive ctDNA TF at baseline was associated with worse outcomes in mHSPC and may potentially complement current further risk stratification tools.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

C-Terminal Truncation and Fusion Partner Determine Oncogenicity of FGFR3.

UNLABELLED: Genomic alterations affecting components of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling axis can trigger aberrant pathway activation and tumor development. Genomic truncation of the FGF receptor 2 (FGFR2) exon 18 (E18) disrupts the FGFR2 carboxy (C)-terminal tail, acting as a potent driver alteration across multiple tumor types. In this study, we analyzed human oncogenomic datasets to reveal that E18 truncations are similarly prevalent in FGFR3, an FGFR2 paralog. FGFR3 E18 truncations primarily occur due to rearrangements (RE) that involve transforming acidic coiled-coil-containing protein 3 (TACC3), resulting in FGFR3ΔE18-TACC3 gene fusions. In contrast to E18-truncated FGFR2, functional in vitro and in vivo examination of Fgfr3 variants demonstrated that the truncation of Fgfr3 E18 is insufficient to promote oncogenic activity in cell lines or in the lungs and mammary glands of mice. Only the combination of an Fgfr3 E18 truncation with a RE partner gene that encodes a receptor-dimerizing domain resulted in the development of tumors, which were sensitive to FGFR inhibition. Overall, these findings suggest that patients with cancers that are positive for rearranged FGFR3, resulting in E18 truncation and a fusion to dimerizing partners, should be considered for FGFR-targeted therapies. SIGNIFICANCE: FGFR3, unlike its paralog FGFR2, requires both a C-terminal truncation and fusion to a partner gene that retains the expression of a dimerizing domain to effectively drive oncogenic signaling and tumorigenesis.

Receptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3↗