Biomedical subjects

Jessica M Peirce

Publications and source records attributed to Jessica M Peirce.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Prize-based contingency management does not increase gambling.

A contingency management (CM) intervention that provides drug-abstinent patients a chance to win prizes of varying magnitudes is efficacious in retaining patients in treatment and reducing drug use. However, this intervention has been criticized as possibly increasing gambling because it contains an element of chance. Gambling behaviors before, during and 3 months after participation in a multi-site study of CM were compared for stimulant users randomly assigned to 12 weeks of standard care with (N=407) or without (N=396) prize-based CM. Among study participants enrolled in outpatient non-methadone drug abuse treatment (N=415), 26% reported gambling during the observation period, and this rate was 37% among participants (N=388) enrolled in methadone maintenance programs. No differences in gambling over time were noted between those assigned to the prize CM versus standard care conditions, indicating that this prize CM procedure does not adversely impact gambling behavior among stimulant abusers.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Effects of lower-cost incentives on stimulant abstinence in methadone maintenance treatment: a National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network study.

BACKGROUND: Contingency management interventions that provide tangible incentives based on objective indicators of drug abstinence have improved treatment outcomes of substance abusers, but have not been widely implemented in community drug abuse treatment settings. OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes achieved when a lower-cost prize-based contingency management treatment is added to usual care in community methadone hydrochloride maintenance treatment settings. DESIGN: Random assignment to usual care with (n = 198) or without (n = 190) abstinence incentives during a 12-week trial. SETTING: Six community-based methadone maintenance drug abuse treatment clinics in locations across the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred eighty-eight stimulant-abusing patients enrolled in methadone maintenance programs for at least 1 month and no more than 3 years. INTERVENTION: Participants submitting stimulant- and alcohol-negative samples earned draws for a chance to win prizes; the number of draws earned increased with continuous abstinence time. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total number of stimulant- and alcohol-negative samples provided, percentage of stimulant- and alcohol-negative samples provided, longest duration of abstinence, retention, and counseling attendance. RESULTS: Submission of stimulant- and alcohol-negative samples was twice as likely for incentive as for usual care group participants (odds ratio, 1.98; 95% confidence interval, 1.42-2.77). Achieving 4 or more, 8 or more, and 12 weeks of continuous abstinence was approximately 3, 9, and 11 times more likely, respectively, for incentive vs usual care participants. Groups did not differ on study retention or counseling attendance. The average cost of prizes was 120 dollars per participant. CONCLUSION: An abstinence incentive approach that paid 120 dollars in prizes per participant effectively increased stimulant abstinence in community-based methadone maintenance treatment clinics.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Contingency management for the treatment of methamphetamine use disorders.

OBJECTIVE: Theory and some preliminary evidence suggest that contingency management may be an effective treatment strategy or adjunct to psychosocial treatment for methamphetamine use disorders. An experimentally rigorous investigation on the topic was provided by a large multisite trial conducted under the auspices of the Clinical Trials Network of the National Institute on Drug Abuse. METHOD: The authors report data on 113 participants who were diagnosed with methamphetamine abuse or dependence. They were randomly assigned to receive 12 weeks of either treatment as usual or treatment as usual plus contingency management. Urine samples were tested for illicit drugs, and breath samples were tested for alcohol. The reinforcers for drug-negative samples were plastic chips, some of which could be exchanged for prizes. The number of plastic chips drawn increased with each week of negative samples but was reset to one after a missed or positive sample. RESULTS: The participants in both groups remained in treatment for equivalent times, but those receiving contingency management in addition to usual treatment submitted significantly more negative samples, and they were abstinent for a longer period of time (5 versus 3 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that contingency management has promise as a component in treatment strategies for methamphetamine use disorder.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Effect of prize-based incentives on outcomes in stimulant abusers in outpatient psychosocial treatment programs: a national drug abuse treatment clinical trials network study.

CONTEXT: Contingency management interventions that provide tangible incentives based on objective indicators of drug abstinence are efficacious in improving outcomes in substance abusers, but these treatments have rarely been implemented in community-based settings. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of an abstinence-based contingency management intervention as an addition to usual care in community treatment settings. DESIGN: Random assignment to usual care or usual care plus abstinence-based incentives for 12 weeks. SETTING: Eight community-based outpatient psychosocial drug abuse treatment programs. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 415 cocaine or methamphetamine users beginning outpatient substance abuse treatment. INTERVENTION: All participants received standard care, and those assigned to the abstinence-based incentive condition also earned chances to win prizes for submitting substance-free urine samples; the chances of winning prizes increased with continuous time abstinent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Retention, counseling attendance, total number of substance-free samples provided, percentage of stimulant- and alcohol-free samples submitted, and longest duration of confirmed stimulant abstinence. RESULTS: Participants assigned to the abstinence-based incentive condition remained in treatment for a mean +/- SD of 8.0 +/- 4.2 weeks and attended a mean +/- SD of 19.2 +/- 16.8 counseling sessions compared with 6.9 +/- 4.4 weeks and 15.7 +/- 14.4 sessions for those assigned to the usual care condition (P<.02 for all). Participants in the abstinence-based incentive condition also submitted significantly more stimulant- and alcohol-free samples (P<.001). The abstinence-based incentive group was significantly more likely to achieve 4, 8, and 12 weeks of continuous abstinence than the control group, with odds ratios of 2.5, 2.7, and 4.5, respectively. However, the percentage of positive samples submitted was low overall and did not differ between conditions. CONCLUSION: The abstinence-based incentive procedure, which provided a mean of 203 dollars in prizes per participant, was efficacious in improving retention and associated abstinence outcomes.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Behavioral contingencies improve counseling attendance in an adaptive treatment model.

Poor patient adherence remains a serious obstacle to improving the effectiveness of many drug abuse therapies and the overall quality of care delivered in programs. The present study evaluated the utility and efficacy of incorporating behavioral contingencies in a stepped care treatment approach to motivate patient attendance to the varying amounts of prescribed weekly counseling. Study participants were opioid-dependent patients (n = 127) newly admitted to an ambulatory treatment program that provides methadone. Participants were randomly assigned to a Motivated Stepped Care condition (MSC; n = 65) with behavioral contingencies to specifically motivate counseling attendance vs. a Standard Stepped Care condition (SSC; n = 62) without these contingencies. The MSC vs. SSC condition was associated with a higher rate of counseling attendance (83% vs. 44%, p < .001) and a lower rate of poor treatment response (46% vs. 79%, p < .001). The behavioral contingencies were well tolerated and strongly associated with excellent attendance across both lower and higher doses of weekly counseling.

Adult↗