Biomedical subjects

Jian Jing

Publications and source records attributed to Jian Jing.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

The construction of movement with behavior-specific and behavior-independent modules.

Growing evidence suggests that different forms of complex motor acts are constructed through flexible combinations of a small number of modules in interneuronal networks. It remains to be established, however, whether a module simply controls groups of muscles and functions as a computational unit for use in multiple behaviors (behavior independent) or whether a module controls multiple salient features that define one behavior and is used primarily for that behavior (behavior specific). We used the Aplysia feeding motor network to examine the two proposals by studying the functions of identifiable interneurons. We identified three types of motor programs that resemble three types of behaviors that Aplysia produce: biting, swallowing, and rejection. Two ingestive programs (biting, swallowing) are defined by two movement parameters of the feeding apparatus (the radula): one is the same in both programs (phasing of radula closure motoneurons relative to radula protraction-retraction), whereas the other parameter (protraction duration) is different in the two programs. In each program, these two parameters were specified together by an individual neuron, but the neurons in each were different (B40 for biting, B30 for swallowing). These findings support the existence of behavior-specific modules. Furthermore, neuron B51 was found to mediate a phase that can be flexibly added on to both ingestive and egestive-rejection programs, suggesting that B51 may be a behavior-independent module. The functional interpretation of the role played by these modules is supported by the patterns of synaptic connectivity that they make. Thus, both behavior-specific and behavior-independent modules are used to construct complex behaviors.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

A specific synaptic pathway activates a conditional plateau potential underlying protraction phase in the Aplysia feeding central pattern generator.

A common feature in the architecture of neuronal networks is a high degree of seemingly redundant synaptic connectivity. In many cases, the synaptic inputs converging on any particular neuron all use the same neurotransmitter and appear to be fundamentally equivalent. Here, we analyze a striking counterexample in which such inputs are not equivalent and, as a result, play very different roles in the generation of the pattern of activity produced by the network. In the feeding central pattern generator of Aplysia, the pattern-initiating neuron B50 elicits motor programs by exciting the plateauing neuron B31/B32 in two ways: directly and indirectly through neuron B63. All of the synaptic connections use ACh. Despite the direct input of B50 to B31/B32, the indirect pathway of exciting B31/B32 through B63 is required for B50 to elicit the B31/B32 plateau potential and the motor program. We dissect this requirement using the muscarinic cholinergic antagonist pirenzepine. Pirenzepine blocks the B50-elicited motor program, the plateau potential in B31/B32, and, notably, a slow component of the EPSP elicited in B31/B32 by B63 but not that elicited by B50. The muscarinic agonist oxotremorine restores the plateau potential in B31/B32 and eliminates the necessity for B63 in B50-elicited motor programs. Together, our analysis shows that the plateau potential in B31/B32 is not endogenous but conditional, furthermore conditional on one particular synaptic input, that from B63. Thus, among several inputs to B31/B32 that use the same transmitter, the input from B63 is functionally distinct in its preferential access to the plateau potential that represents the committed step toward the initiation of a motor program.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Dopaminergic contributions to modulatory functions of a dual-transmitter interneuron in Aplysia.

The feeding central pattern generator of Aplysia produces motor programs that can differ in the degree to which they are ingestive or egestive. A number of pattern-generating interneurons that play an important role in shaping motor programs have been identified. One of these interneurons, B65, is unusual in that it contains two classical neurotransmitters, dopamine and gamma-aminobutyric acid. Here, we study the role of one of these transmitters, dopamine, using a combination of pharmacological and electrophysiological means. We show that B65 uses dopamine to elicit fast synaptic potentials in several follower neurons. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the dopamine antagonist sulpiride mimics the effect of bilateral B65 hyperpolarization on egestive motor programs. Thus our data suggest that dopaminergic transmission serves to increase the degree of egestiveness of motor programs, and decrease the duration of the protraction phase.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Frequency-dependent regulation of afferent transmission in the feeding circuitry of Aplysia.

During rhythmic behaviors, sensori-motor transmission is often regulated so that there are phasic changes in afferent input to follower neurons. We study this type of regulation in the feeding circuit of Aplysia. We characterize effects of the B4/5 interneurons on transmission from the mechanoafferent B21 to the radula closer motor neuron B8. In quiescent preparations, B4/5-induced postsynaptic potentials (PSPs) can block spike propagation in the lateral process of B21 and inhibit afferent transmission. B4/5 are, however, active during the retraction phase of motor programs, i.e., when mechanoafferent transmission to B8 presumably occurs. To determine whether mechanoafferent transmission is necessarily inhibited when B4/5 are active, we characterize the B4/5 firing frequency during retraction and show that, for the most part, it is low (below 15 Hz). There is, therefore, a low probability that spike propagation will be inhibited. The relative ineffectiveness of low frequency activity is not simply a consequence of insufficient PSP magnitude, because a single PSP can block spike propagation. Instead, it is related to the fact that PSPs have a short duration. When B4/5 fire at a low frequency, there is therefore a low probability that afferent transmission in the lateral process of B21 can be inhibited. In conclusion, we demonstrate that afferent transmission will not always be affected when a neuron that exerts inhibitory effects is active. Although a cell may be ineffective when it fires at a low frequency, ineffectiveness is not necessarily a consequence of spike frequency per se. Instead it may be due to spike timing.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Concerted GABAergic actions of Aplysia feeding interneurons in motor program specification.

GABAergic inhibitory interneurons regulate the activity of diverse types of neural networks, but the specific roles of these interneurons in motor control are poorly understood. In the Aplysia feeding motor network, three interneurons, cerebral-buccal interneuron-3 (CBI-3) and buccal interneurons B40 and B34, are GABA-immunoreactive and evoke fast IPSPs in their postsynaptic followers. Using a combination of pharmacological experiments with GABA antagonists, agonists, and uptake inhibitors, we found that these fast IPSPs are likely mediated by GABA. Functionally, these fast IPSPs specify two parameters for ingestive motor programs elicited by the command-like interneuron CBI-2: (1) the appropriate phasing of activity of the radula closer motor neuron B8 relative to protraction-retraction, and (2) protraction duration. First, in ingestive programs, B8 activity is phased such that it fires minimally during protraction. CBI-3 and B40 exert fast inhibition to minimize B8 activity during protraction, by either acting directly on B8 (B40) or indirectly on B8 (CBI-3). Second, these ingestive programs are characterized by long protraction duration, which is promoted by B40 and B34 because hyperpolarization of either cell shortens protraction. Such effects of B40 and B34 are attributable, at least partly, to their inhibitory effects on the retraction-phase interneuron B64 whose activation terminates protraction. Consistent with a GABAergic contribution to both B8 phasing and protraction duration, blockade of GABAergic inhibition by picrotoxin increases B8 activity during protraction and shortens protraction, without disrupting the integrity of motor programs. Thus, the concerted actions of GABAergic inhibition from three Aplysia feeding interneurons contribute to the specification of multiple features that define the motor program as an ingestive one.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Identification of a GABA-containing cerebral-buccal interneuron-11 in Aplysia californica.

The cerebral-buccal interneurons (CBIs) in Aplysia are a group of inter-ganglionic projection neurons that regulate feeding motor programs. In this study, electrophysiological and immunocytological methods were used to identify a previously uncharacterized CBI, designated CBI-11. CBI-11 is a gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-immunoreactive neuron located in the G cluster of the cerebral ganglion. Firing CBI-11 produced fast picrotoxin-sensitive inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) in buccal motor neuron B3. Local application of GABA to B3 produced a picrotoxin-sensitive hyperpolarization that reversed at the same membrane potential as the IPSPs elicited by stimulation of CBI-11. Together, these observations indicate that CBI-11 utilizes GABA as its transmitter. Finally, stimulation of CBI-11 elicited rhythmic motor programs in quiescent buccal ganglia. Thus, CBI-11 is a GABAergic CBI that can function as a motor program initiator.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Regulation of spike initiation and propagation in an Aplysia sensory neuron: gating-in via central depolarization.

Afferent transmission can be regulated (or gated) so that responses to peripheral stimuli are adjusted to make them appropriate for the ongoing phase of a motor program. Here, we characterize a gating mechanism that involves regulation of spike propagation in Aplysia mechanoafferent B21. B21 is striking in that afferent transmission to the motor neuron B8 does not occur when B21 is at resting membrane potential. Our data suggest that this results from the fact that spikes are not actively propagated to the lateral process of B21 (the primary contact with B8). When B21 is peripherally activated at its resting potential, electrotonic potentials in the lateral process are on average 11 mV. In contrast, mechanoafferent activity is transmitted to B8 when B21 is centrally depolarized via current injection. Our data suggest that central depolarization relieves propagation failure. Full-size spikes are recorded in the lateral process when B21 is depolarized and then peripherally activated. Moreover, changes in membrane potential in the lateral process affect spike amplitude, even when the somatic membrane potential is virtually unchanged. During motor programs, both the lateral process and the soma of B21 are phasically depolarized via synaptic input. These depolarizations are sufficient to convert subthreshold potentials to full-size spikes in the lateral process. Thus, our data strongly suggest that afferent transmission from B21 to B8 is, at least in part, regulated via synaptic control of spike initiation in the lateral process. Consequences of this control for compartmentalization in B21 are discussed, as are specific consequences for feeding behavior.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2003

Directional avoidance turns encoded by single interneurons and sustained by multifunctional serotonergic cells.

Avoidance turns in the sea slug Pleurobranchaea are responses to noxious stimuli and replace orienting turns to food stimuli after avoidance conditioning or satiation. Avoidance turns proved to be centrally patterned behaviors, the fictive expression of which could be elicited in reduced preparations and the isolated CNS. Activity in one of a bilateral interneuron pair, the A4 cells, was necessary and sufficient to drive the avoidance turn toward the contralateral side. Single A4 cells appeared to encode both turn direction and angle, in contrast to directional behaviors of other animals in which displacement angle is usually encoded by multiple units. The As1-4 cells, bilateral serotonergic cell clusters, excited the prolonged A4 burst during the turn through electrical and chemical coupling. However, during the escape swim, As1-4 became integral elements of the swim motor network, and A4 activity was entrained to the swim rhythm by alternating excitatory-inhibitory inputs, with only weak spiking. This provides a likely mechanism for the previously observed suppression of the avoidance turn by escape swimming. These observations add significant new aspects to the multiplying known functions of As1-4 and their homologs in other molluscs and point to a pivotal role of these neurons in the organization of gastropod behavior. Simple functional models predict (1) the essential actions of inhibitor neurons in the directionality of the turning network motor output and (2) an integrating role for As1-4 in the behavioral switch between turning avoidance and swimming escape, on the basis of their response to increasing stimulus intensity.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Interneuronal basis of the generation of related but distinct motor programs in Aplysia: implications for current neuronal models of vertebrate intralimb coordination.

Coordination of two sets of movements, protraction-retraction versus opening-closing, of the feeding apparatus (the radula) in ingestive and egestive motor programs of Aplysia resembles vertebrate intralimb coordination in that the relative timing of the two sets of movements differs in the two motor programs. In both ingestion and egestion, radula protraction and retraction alternate, whereas radula closure shifts its phase relative to protraction-retraction. In egestion, the radula closes in protraction; in ingestion, the radula closes in retraction. In both ingestive and egestive motor programs elicited by the command-like neuron, cerebral-buccal interneuron-2 (CBI-2), the protraction and retraction movements are mediated by the same sets of controller interneurons. In contrast, radula closure is mediated by two controller interneurons, B20 and B40, that are preferentially active in egestion and ingestion, respectively. In egestion, B20, active in protraction, drives closure motorneuron B8 in protraction, whereas in ingestion, B40, also active in protraction, uses a functionally novel mechanism, fast inhibition and slow excitation, to drive B8 in retraction. Our findings are summarized in a neural model that permits a conceptual comparison of our model with two previous hypothetical models of intralimb coordination in spinal circuits that were proposed by Grillner (1981, 1985) and Berkowitz and Stein (1994). Although our model supports the existence of separate controllers for different movements as in the Grillner (1981, 1985) model; in terms of basic mechanisms, our model is similar to the Berkowitz and Stein (1994) model because the closure movement is mediated by separate controllers in different programs, and thus both models can be classified as recruitment models.

Action Potentials↗

PubMed2002

Interneuronal and peptidergic control of motor pattern switching in Aplysia.

It has been proposed that a choice of specific behaviors can be mediated either by activation of behavior-specific higher order neurons or by distinct combinations of such neurons in different behaviors. We examined the role that two higher order neurons, CBI-2 and CBI-3, play in the selection of motor programs that correspond to ingestion and egestion, two stimulus-dependent behaviors that are generated by a single central pattern generator (CPG) of Aplysia. We found that CBI-2 could evoke either ingestive, egestive, or ambiguous motor programs depending on the regime of stimulation. When CBI-2 recruited CBI-3 firing via electrical coupling, the motor program tended to be ingestive. In the absence of CBI-3 activation, the program was usually egestive. When CBI-2 was stimulated to produce ingestive programs, hyperpolarization of CBI-3 converted the programs to egestive or ambiguous. When CBI-2 was stimulated to produce egestive or ambiguous programs, co-stimulation of CBI-3 converted them into ingestive. These findings are consistent with the idea that combinatorial commands are responsible for the choice of specific behaviors. Additional support for this view comes from the observations that appropriate stimulus conditions exist both for activation of CBI-2 together with CBI-3, and for activation of CBI-2 without a concomitant activation of CBI-3. The ability of CBI-3 to convert egestive and ambiguous programs into ingestive ones was mimicked by application of APGWamide, a neuropeptide that we have detected in CBI-3 by immunostaining. Thus combinatorial actions of higher order neurons that underlie pattern selection may involve the use of modulators released by specific higher order neurons.

Animals↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Feeding neural networks in the mollusc Aplysia.

Aplysia feeding is striking in that it is executed with a great deal of plasticity. At least in part, this flexibility is a result of the organization of the feeding neural network. To illustrate this, we primarily discuss motor programs triggered via stimulation of the command-like cerebral-buccal interneuron 2 (CBI-2). CBI-2 is interesting in that it can generate motor programs that serve opposing functions, i.e., programs can be ingestive or egestive. When programs are egestive, radula-closing motor neurons are activated during the protraction phase of the motor program. When programs are ingestive, radula-closing motor neurons are activated during retraction. When motor programs change in nature, activity in the radula-closing circuitry is altered. Thus, CBI-2 stimulation stereotypically activates the protraction and retraction circuitry, with protraction being generated first, and retraction immediately thereafter. In contrast, radula-closing motor neurons can be activated during either protraction or retraction. Which will occur is determined by whether other cerebral and buccal neurons are recruited, e.g. radula-closing motor neurons tend to be activated during retraction if a second CBI, CBI-3, is recruited. Fundamentally different motor programs are, therefore, generated because CBI-2 activates some interneurons in a stereotypic manner and other interneurons in a variable manner.

Action Potentials↗