PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jim Mansell

Publications and source records attributed to Jim Mansell.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Deinstitutionalisation and community living: progress, problems and priorities.

BACKGROUND: Deinstitutionalisation of services for people with intellectual disabilities has become a focus of disability policy in many countries. Research for the most part supports this strategy. However, outcomes are not uniformly better for everyone who moves to community living. This paper explores reasons for variability in service quality and highlights important lessons for countries starting to modernise services. METHOD: The effects of deinstitutionalisation are summarised and emerging problems identified. The changing context of different welfare-state models and paradigms in disability and public administration are outlined. RESULTS: The main changes which have impacted on the implementation of deinstitutionalisation include: the rise of market-based approaches to service provision, arrangements for rationing services, the "de-differentiation" of intellectual disability services, and the rise of a rights-based model in disability policy. CONCLUSIONS: The paper sets out priorities for the future development of community services. Success is likely to require a renewed focus on demonstrating improvement in the quality of life of people with intellectual disabilities and a change in the role of staff to provide more facilitative, enabling support of individuals, especially those with the most severe or complex disabilities.

Australia↗

Engagement in meaningful activity and "active support" of people with intellectual disabilities in residential care.

Forty-nine adults with learning disabilities living in 13 small staffed homes in England were studied as part of larger projects in 1997 and again in 2000. A pre-test/post-test comparison group design was used to assess differences in staff implementation of "active support," service user engagement in meaningful activities and adaptive behaviour. Homes which adopted active support showed significantly increased engagement in meaningful activity and adaptive behaviour between 1997 and 2000. A comparison group showed no significant change.

Activities of Daily Living↗

Functional grouping in residential homes for people with intellectual disabilities.

The effects of functional grouping of people with intellectual disabilities on care practices in small residential homes in the community were investigated. A group comparison and a matched-pairs comparison were carried out in settings where less than or more than 75% residents were non-verbal, non-ambulant, had severe challenging behaviour, severe social impairment or were verbal and ambulant. Further analysis, focused on those with challenging behaviour was carried out using ordinal regression. In the group-comparison study, no significant differences were found for three of the five groups. Residents who were non-ambulant were rated as receiving care with less interpersonal warmth in grouped settings; residents with severe challenging behaviour were rated as receiving less good care practices in four respects (interpersonal warmth, assistance from staff, level of speech and staff teamwork) in grouped settings. The matched-pairs comparison found significant differences only for people with challenging behaviour, where grouped settings achieved less good results in terms of interpersonal warmth and staff teamwork. Higher adaptive behaviour and mixed settings were predictive of better care practices on 13 of 14 items of the Active Support Measure (ASM), with some setting variables also predictive for some items. Care practices only appear to vary for people with challenging behaviour, where grouped settings appear to offer less good results in some respects.

Activities of Daily Living↗