PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

Jin Peng

Publications and source records attributed to Jin Peng.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Multidisciplinary mHealth Rehabilitation for Patients With Abdominal Cancer Who Are Receiving Chemoradiotherapy: Randomized Phase II Trial.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for abdominal cancer frequently induces muscle loss, weight loss, and malnutrition. OBJECTIVE: This exploratory randomized phase II trial evaluated whether a multidisciplinary, mobile health (mHealth)-based multimodal rehabilitation program could preserve handgrip strength and muscle mass in patients with abdominal cancer undergoing CCRT. METHODS: In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label phase II trial (NCT05325554), 111 eligible patients with abdominal malignancies scheduled for CCRT were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either multidisciplinary mHealth rehabilitation care (MRC; n=57) or standard care (SC; n=54). The MRC program was delivered by a dedicated multidisciplinary team using the AiNST mHealth platform and wearable heart rate monitors. The primary end point was handgrip strength at the end of CCRT (analyzed with analysis of covariance adjusting for baseline). Secondary end points were exploratory and analyzed without multiplicity adjustment; sensitivity analysis using false discovery rate (FDR) correction was performed. RESULTS: Between February 2022 and April 2023, 111 patients were enrolled. Adherence was high (n=93, 83.9% achieved exercise targets). After adjusting for baseline handgrip strength, the MRC group had significantly higher handgrip strength at the end of CCRT than the SC group (adjusted mean difference 4.87 kg, 95% CI 3.36-6.38; P<.001). Exploratory analyses of secondary end points (without multiplicity adjustment) showed that the MRC group also had better preservation of body weight (P=.005), skeletal muscle mass (P<.001), serum albumin (P=.009), prealbumin (P=.02), and lower rates of hematological toxicity (P<.05), as well as improved psychological status (distress thermometer [DT] and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale [HADS]) and nutritional scores (Nutritional Risk Screening 2002 [NRS-2002] and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment [PG-SGA]) at the end of CCRT (all P<.05). All nominally significant secondary end points remained significant after FDR correction (q<.05). These findings are preliminary and should be interpreted with caution due to the open-label design, population heterogeneity, and exploratory secondary analyses. CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory phase II trial, a multidisciplinary, mHealth-based multimodal rehabilitation program was associated with better preservation of handgrip strength, muscle mass, and nutritional status, as well as lower rates of certain treatment toxicities, compared with SC. However, definitive conclusions are limited by the open-label design, heterogeneity of tumor types, and short follow-up. Larger, blinded phase III trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Humans

SERPINE1-centric inflammatory signature associates with treatment resistance and survival in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) prognosis remains poor despite treatment advances. More accurate prognostic assessment models can help guide individualized treatment and improve prognosis. Chronic inflammation contributes to tumorigenesis, yet inflammatory response-related genes (IRGs) in LSCC prognosis are underexplored. This study aimed to construct an IRG prognostic signature for LSCC and further dissect core IRG-mediated mechanisms of immune escape and chemoresistance. METHODS: Transcriptional profiles and clinical data from LSCC patients were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). IRGs were sourced from Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) hallmark gene set. We identified differentially expressed IRGs linked to survival outcomes in LSCC. Key IRGs were subsequently selected using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis to establish an inflammatory risk score model. This model underwent internal validation within the TCGA cohort and external validation using independent Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) datasets. We further assessed the model's association with the tumor immune microenvironment and the impact of IRGs on chemotherapy response. Finally, the functional roles of interested signature IRG were experimentally validated in LSCC cell lines. RESULTS: Four significant IRGs (AQP9, ITGA5, LCK, SERPINE1) were identified to build the risk score model. The model stratified LSCC patients into distinct prognostic groups: TCGA cohort: 5-year area under the curve (AUC) =0.836, P<0.001; GSE25727 cohort: 5-year AUC =0.706, P=0.02; GSE27020 cohort: 5-year AUC =0.798, P<0.01. Multivariate analysis confirmed the risk score as an independent prognostic factor (P<0.05). High-risk patients showed reduced immune cell infiltration (CD8+ T cells, dendritic cells) and suppressed immune pathways. Multi-algorithm immune analysis further revealed defective antigen presentation and reduced anti-tumor immune infiltration in high-risk LSCC, promoting tumor immune escape. GSEA/Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment combined with drug sensitivity prediction further revealed that high-risk tumors activate invasive signaling and acquire broad chemoresistance alongside impaired anti-tumor immunity. SERPINE1 might be associated with chemotherapy resistance and exhibited the highest alteration frequency (predominantly amplification) and overexpression in LSCC tissues. Its knockdown significantly suppressed proliferation, migration, invasion and chemoresistance in LSCC cells. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) confirmed tumor SERPINE1 overexpression (P=0.002 vs. normal tissues), correlating with poor survival (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The 4-IRG risk signature is a reliable prognostic indicator reflecting immune dysfunction in LSCC. SERPINE1 is validated as a therapeutic target and biomarker, enriching our understanding of gene regulation dynamics in LSCC.

Laryngeal cancer