Snow carps as an emerging model for polyploid genome evolution.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Jing Luo.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Covalent BTK inhibitors (cBTKis) are the cornerstone of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic leukemia (SLL) therapy, yet real-world data on dose modifications and their differential impact on long-term outcomes remain incompletely defined. This study investigated the incidence, timing, and the effectiveness of drug switching in a real-world CLL cohort. METHODS: In this 7-year retrospective real-world study, 324 CLL/SLL patients treated at a specialized Shanghai outpatient clinic (April 2018-April 2025; median follow-up, 42 months) were analyzed. Dose modifications were classified as dose interruption (DI) or dose reduction (DR). Their prognostic impact on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression. RESULTS: The 42-month PFS rate was 70.2%. Of 324 patients, 229 (70.7%) experienced dose reductions or interruptions; infections were the predominant cause (61.9%). The full-dose (FD) group (n = 90) demonstrated superior 4-year PFS (93% vs. 58%, p < .001) and OS (98% vs. 76%, p = .007). Early modifications (0-3 months) were independent predictors of inferior PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 3.93, p = .008) and OS (HR, 3.29, p = .014). Prolonged DI (>14 days) was associated with inferior PFS (HR, 2.64) and OS (HR, 2.15), whereas DR and short DI (≤14 days) had negligible impact. Early (0-3 months) prolonged DI was devastating (3-year PFS, 41.2%; HR, 3.84, p < .001). cBTKi switching (n = 82; 100% nonprogression-driven) shortened DI (median, 6 vs. 14 days) and was independently associated with superior OS (HR, 0.34, p = .018) and PFS (HR, 0.36, p = .022). CONCLUSIONS: Early prolonged DI is the dominant adverse prognostic factor in cBTKi-treated CLL/SLL. Proactive switching minimizes treatment gaps and improves survival, supporting a timing-aware, DI- versus DR-informed approach to dose management.