Biomedical subjects

Jingjing Bi

Publications and source records attributed to Jingjing Bi.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Corneal epithelial cell growth over tethered-protein/peptide surface-modified hydrogels.

In this study, we investigated the corneal epithelial cell growth rate and adhesion to novel hydrogels with (1) extracellular matrix proteins [fibronectin, laminin, substance P, and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1)] and (2) peptide sequences [RGD and fibronectin adhesion-promoting peptide (FAP)] tethered to their surface on poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) chains. The growth rate to confluence of primary rabbit cornea epithelial cells was compared for plain polymethacrylic acid-co-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (PHEMA/MAA) hydrogels, PHEMA/MAA hydrogels coated with extracellular matrix proteins or peptides, and PHEMA/MAA hydrogels with tethered extracellular matrix proteins or peptides on the surface. The development of focal adhesions by the epithelial cells grown on the surfaces was determined by F-actin staining. Little to no epithelial cell growth occurred on the plain hydrogel surfaces throughout the 15-day culture period. Of the coated hydrogels, only the fibronectin-coated surfaces showed a significant increase in cell growth compared to plain hydrogels (p < 0.009). However, even these surfaces reached a maximum of only 20% confluence. Laminin, fibronectin adhesion-promoting peptide (FAP), and fibronectin/laminin (1:1) tether-modified hydrogels all achieved 100% confluence by the end of the culture period, although the rates at which confluence was reached differed. F-actin staining showed that focal adhesions were formed for the laminin, FAP, and fibronectin/laminin tether-modified surfaces. The results support the hypothesis that tethering certain extracellular matrix proteins and/or peptides to the hydrogel surface enhances epithelial cell growth and adhesion, compared with that seen for protein-coated or plain hydrogel surfaces.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Corneal epithelial adhesion strength to tethered-protein/peptide modified hydrogel surfaces.

In this study, we investigated the suitability of microjet impingement for use on hydrogel materials to determine the cellular adhesion strength of corneal epithelial cells grown on novel hydrogels with extracellular matrix proteins (laminin and/or fibronectin) or a peptide sequence (fibronectin adhesion promoting peptide, FAP) tethered to their surface with poly(ethylene glycol) chains. The deformation of the hydrogel surface in response to the force of the microjet was analyzed both visually and mathematically. After the results of these experiments and calculations determined that no deformation occurred and that the pressure required for indentation (1.25 x 10(6) Pa) was three factors of 10 greater than the maximum pressure of the microjet, the relative mean adhesion strength of primary rabbit corneal epithelial cells grown on the novel poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate-co-methacrylic acid) hydrogels was determined and compared with that of the same type of cells grown on control glass surfaces. Only confluent cell layers were tested. Cells grown on control glass surfaces adhered with a mean relative adhesion strength of 488 +/- 28 dynes/cm2. Under identical conditions, cells grown on laminin- and FAP-tethered hydrogel surfaces were unable to be removed, indicating an adhesion strength greater than 516 dynes/cm2. Cells grown on fibronectin- and fibronectin/laminin (1:1)-tethered surfaces showed significantly lower relative adhesion strengths (201 +/- 50 and 189 +/- 11 dynes/cm2, respectively), compared with laminin- and FAP-tethered surfaces (p = 0.001). Our results demonstrate that the microjet impingement method of cell adhesion analysis is applicable to hydrogel substrates. Additionally, analysis of our test surfaces indicates that fibronectin tethered to this hydrogel in the quantity and by the method used here does not induce stable ligand/receptor bonding to the epithelial cell membrane to the same degree as does laminin or FAP.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Tethered protein/peptide-surface-modified hydrogels.

We investigated a wet chemistry method to covalently bond polyethylene glycol (PEG)-tethered extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins (laminin and fibronectin) or peptide (fibronectin-adhesion-peptide sequence) onto the surface of a poly(2-hydroxylethyl methacrylate-co-methylacrylic acid) (PHEMA/MAA) hydrogel that could potentially be used as a replacement for corneal tissue in the eye. An essential requirement for the success of such a surface in the biological environment is its ability to support the growth and attachment of corneal epithelial cells; ECM proteins are known to promote cellular attachment and growth. We hypothesized that the use of tethers or long hydrophilic chains would allow the attached ECM protein/peptide molecules to move two-dimensionally in space, thereby increasing their ability to bind with epithelial cell membranes. Additionally, the tethers would prevent the specifically added growth-enhancing factors from being obscured by any non-specific protein binding occurring on the hydrogel surface. In this surface-modification study, carbodiimidazole (CDI) was used to activate the carboxylic groups (-COOH) on the hydrogel surface in anhydrous dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) before addition of the PEGylated proteins/peptide. The resulting tethered protein/peptide surface-modified hydrogels were analyzed in terms of percent grafting efficiency, biological activity and mechanical properties. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and 125I radioactive labeling demonstrated the successful covalent bonding between the moieties and the hydrogel surface. Radiolabeling and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) studies indicated that the tethered proteins attached to the hydrogel surface at a concentration of approx. 0.1 microg/cm2. ELISA testing further showed that tethered proteins remained biologically active. However, mechanical tensile testing indicated that the mechanical properties of these chemically modified hydrogels were somewhat altered in comparison with the unmodified hydrogel. Future studies will evaluate the cellular response to these surface-modified materials in vitro and in vivo.

Biocompatible Materials↗