A vaccine for hypertension.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Joël Ménard.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Most studies in animals use diets with several features (for example low-fat, rich in micronutriments), likely to be strongly protective against chronic diseases. AIM OF THE STUDY: The present study, performed in wild type outbred mice, was designed to evaluate the validity of a model of 'westernized' (W) diet reproducing, as closely as possible, the overall composition of an average human regime in western countries RESULTS: In contrast to the standard (S) diet, the W diet triggered a marked increase in adiposity with some characteristics of metabolic syndrome (hypercholesterolemia, hyperinsulinemia...). There was an heterogeneity in the propensity to become obese upon exposure to the W diet in female mice. Overweight mice also presented some disturbances of renal function, such as hyperalbuminuria and hypocitraturia. Mice adapted to the W diet showed a reduction of bone mineral density, especially the non-obese ones. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that a model of westernized diet could be appropriate for exploring the effects of mutations, drugs, or specific nutritional factors in animals and could be more relevant for human situations.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the effects on hemostasis variables of a contraceptive vaginal ring with those of an oral contraceptive. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-three and 22 healthy premenopausal women were randomized to the contraceptive vaginal ring (150 microg Nestorone and 15 microg ethinyl estradiol) or Stediril 30 during 3 cycles. Analysis of covariance was performed with baseline values as covariate. RESULTS: The contraceptive vaginal ring changed most hemostasis variables similarly but raised (95% confidence intervals of percent treatment differences) Factor VIIt (28% to 49%), extrinsic activated protein C resistance (14% to 65%), and sex hormone-binding globulin (117% to 210%) and lowered Protein S (-32% to -16%) and the global activated partial thromboplastin time-based activated protein C resistance (-12% to -2%) more than the oral contraceptive. CONCLUSION: The contraceptive vaginal ring affected some measured hemostasis variables and sex hormone-binding globulin differently from the oral contraceptive, most likely because of difference in androgenicity of the progestins. The results suggest that the contraindications for oral contraceptive use would also apply to the tested contraceptive vaginal ring.
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to define the pharmacodynamic profile of the new dual neutral endopeptidase (NEP)/angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor AVE7688. METHODS: We compared the effects of single oral doses of AVE7688 (5 and 25 mg) with those of 10 mg ramipril (R10), a selective ACE inhibitor, in a placebo-controlled crossover study in sodium-depleted normotensive subjects. We also compared the effects of 25 mg AVE7688 with those of a renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade induced by a high dose of an angiotensin II receptor antagonist (300 mg irbesartan) and a dual blockade of the RAS (150 mg irbesartan plus 10 mg ramipril) in sodium-replete normotensive subjects by use of the same study design. The in vivo inhibition of ACE and NEP was monitored by measuring the urinary excretion of N-acetyl-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro (AcSDKP) and atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), respectively. The intensity of RAS blockade was assessed by the increase in plasma active renin concentration. RESULTS: The 24-hour urine AcSDKP cumulative excretion increased significantly more after 25 mg AVE7688 (919 nmol [95% confidence interval (CI), 803-1052 nmol], P < .05) than after 5 mg AVE7688 (706 nmol [95% CI, 612-813 nmol]) or 10 mg ramipril (511 nmol [95% CI, 440-593 nmol]). The 25-mg dose of AVE7866 significantly and transiently (4 to 8 hours after drug intake) increased urinary ANP (2.02 +/- 1.05 ng/h, P < .05), whereas 5 mg AVE7688 (1.14 +/- 0.77 ng/h) and 10 mg ramipril (0.93 +/- 0.65 ng/h) had no effect compared with placebo (0.80 +/- 0.37 ng/h). In the low-salt panel the rise in plasma active renin concentration achieved 24 hours after dosing by 25 mg AVE7688 (247 pg/mL [95% CI, 157-389 pg/mL], P < .05) was significantly higher than that achieved by 5 mg AVE7688 (129 pg/mL [95% CI, 75-221 pg/mL]) or 10 mg ramipril (113 pg/mL [95% CI, 67-193 pg/mL]), which did not differ. In the high-salt panel group the effects of 25 mg AVE7688 on renin release did not significantly differ from those after administration of the combination of 150 mg irbesartan plus 10 mg ramipril or 300 mg irbesartan alone. All of these active drugs similarly decreased blood pressure compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: AVE7688 at a dose of 25 mg has a favorable pharmacodynamic profile compared with other RAS blockers. These results support further clinical studies of its long-term effects in essential or resistant hypertension, chronic proteinuric nephropathy, and chronic heart failure.
The Délégation à la Recherche Clinique d'Ile-de-France et de l'Assistance Publique/Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) has elaborated a pragmatic approach for the monitoring of institutionally sponsored clinical studies. The mandatory practices aiming at preventing enrolled volunteers from risks and results from fraud and poor quality have been reviewed and a four-stage graduate monitoring has been defined, which is applied since 2002. This system needs to be scientifically assessed and adapted to the permanent evolution of national and international regulations. double dagger.
BACKGROUND: Some renin inhibitors induce changes in the conformation of prorenin in vitro and influence the quantification of active renin by immunoradiometric assays. Whether such changes in renin recognition by monoclonal antibodies exist after oral administration of aliskiren, the first orally available renin inhibitor, is not known. METHODS: Two commercially available immunoradiometric assays (Cisbio and Nichols) were compared to determine immunoreactive active renin concentrations in plasma samples collected in a single oral dose crossover study comparing the renin inhibitor, aliskiren (300 mg), with the angiotensin II antagonist, valsartan (160 mg), in healthy male subjects. RESULTS: The addition of aliskiren to plasma samples in vitro, at concentrations of 1-100 micromol/l, increased active renin immunoreactivity in both the Cisbio and Nichols assays. In the crossover study, the two assays gave similar values for the plasma immunoreactive active renin concentration before treatment and following valsartan administration (intraclass coefficient for agreement between the two assays = 0.92). However, a Bland-Altman plot showed a systematic bias towards higher values (1.75-fold higher; 95% confidence interval = 1.02-3.01) in the Nichols than in the Cisbio assay following aliskiren administration. The difference between the results obtained with the two assays depended on incubation time. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on incubation conditions, circulating renin inhibitors interfere with the recognition of active renin molecules by the monoclonal antibodies used in commercially available assays. Careful consideration must therefore be given to the methodology used for quantifying immunoreactive plasma active renin when patients are treated with renin inhibitors, to avoid an overestimation of the magnitude of active renin release attributable to conformational changes in plasma prorenin.
The beneficial effects of spironolactone, eplerenone, amiloride and potassium in preventing cardiovascular damage in various experimental models of salt-induced hypertension can be dissociated from blood pressure effects, and have drawn attention to the direct genomic and non-genomic actions of aldosterone at the level of the vessels, the heart and the kidneys. Exposure to endogenous aldosterone could be decreased by direct and specific aldosterone-synthase inhibition. FAD 286A, the dextroenantiomer of the aromatase inhibitor fadrozole, might be a first candidate to investigate in humans, the physiological impact and therapeutic properties of aldosterone-synthase inhibition, especially in various forms of primary aldosteronism.
BACKGROUND: In-vivo investigation of aldosterone-synthase inhibitors requires experimental models to characterize the biological effects of these compounds. METHODS: Seven successive experiments were performed in groups of 2-month-old male spontaneously hypertensive rats. Urinary free aldosterone was the main end-point measured during two contrasted diets: low sodium-high potassium (LS), inducing high urinary aldosterone (839 pmol/24 h, 95% confidence interval 654-1077), and high sodium-normal potassium (HS), inducing low urinary aldosterone (38.1 pmol/24 h; 95% confidence interval, 32.4-44.9). RESULTS: FAD 286 A (10 and 30 mg/kg) decreased urinary free aldosterone by 53 and 87% on the LS diet, and 50 and 75% on the HS. Plasma renin concentration increased three-fold after a 4-week treatment of 30 mg/kg FAD 286 A on the LS diet and did not change on the HS. The combination of FAD 286 A (30 mg/kg) and spironolactone (30 mg/kg) on the LS diet induced a biological picture of severe hypoaldosteronism and was not tolerated, whereas the HS diet prevented these abnormalities. The combination of FAD 286 A (30 mg/kg) and furosemide (30 mg/kg) on the HS diet corrected the diuretic-induced hypokalemia (4.1 +/- 0.2 versus 3.7 +/- 2.2 mEq/l, P < 0.033). CONCLUSION: This experimental model will be useful to screen future aldosterone-synthase inhibitors and study their biological effects in various experimental conditions.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess patients' and physicians' compliance with ACE inhibitor treatment, by measuring an endogenous biomarker of ACE inhibition, urinary N-acetyl-Ser-Asp-Lys-Pro (AcSDKP), in the Noninsulin-Dependent Diabetes, Hypertension, Microalbuminuria, Proteinuria, Cardiovascular Events, and Ramipril (DIABHYCAR) trial, which compared ramipril (1.25 mg o.d.) with placebo in 4,912 patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria/proteinuria. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The urine AcSDKP-to-creatinine ratio was measured blind to treatment in all participants who completed follow-up and provided spot urine samples (n = 1,871). RESULTS: The median urinary AcSDKP-to-creatinine ratio was six times higher for ramipril than for placebo. Urinary AcSDKP-to-creatinine ratios displayed a bimodal distribution in both groups, with a very large intergroup overlap. Based on cluster analysis, we defined truly adherent ramipril patients as those with a ratio > or =4 nmol/mmol and truly adherent placebo patients as those with a ratio < 4 nmol/mmol. After excluding patients withdrawing prematurely from the study or known to have used a nonstudy ACE inhibitor, 27.3% of the 597 ramipril patients had ratios <4, indicating poor compliance, and 9.7% of the 621 placebo patients had ratios > or =4, indicating intake of a nonstudy ACE inhibitor. Correcting for compliance by using AcSDKP-guided analysis affected surrogate outcome results (decrease in systolic blood pressure and urinary albumin excretion) only slightly. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic use of spot urinary AcSDKP determination facilitated the detection of defects in compliance with ACE inhibitor treatment in both patients and physicians. Urinary AcSDKP measurement could be a useful biomarker for assessing compliance with ACE inhibition in the routine care of diabetic patients.
THE POSITIVE IMPACT OF TREATMENT: Antihypertensive treatments have clearly demonstrated their capacity to reduce cardiovascular mortality. The limits to the reduction in risk are imputable to insufficient early management, morbidity and poor compleance insufficiency of pharmacological treatments, absence of individualised adaptation to the causal pathology and inappropriate management of other cardiovascular risk factors. TO IMPROVE MANAGEMENT: Rather than creating more cardiovascular prevention Centres which only concern specific cases and research, it is fundamental to provide physicians, nurses and other health care workers with greater competence in hypertension and the management of cardiovascular risks. Conceptual changes are also necessary, particularly in that which concerns the end of the dichotomy between normotension and hypertension, hypercholesterolemia and normocholesterolemia and its individual and populational impact. PROMOTION OF NUTRITIONAL MEANS: Nutritional means should not be forgotten applied to accompany the whole pharmacological treatment of hypertension, they can be used for individual prevention and for reduction of the incidence of high blood pressure in the general population. NEW THERAPEUTIC STRATEGIES: Other than the search for antihypertensive drugs with greater efficacy and improved tolerance, several targets should be envisaged such as optimising the blockage of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, inihibiting aldo-synthase. A CONSERVATIVE ATTITUDE: Although attractive, the individualisation of treatment based on genetic analysis will not be accessible to the majority of hypertensive patients. The attitude to be considered in 2004 consists above all in improving the use of available drugs at appropriate doses and especially in combinations at fixed-doses to allow for an easier therapeutic schedule.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
At the early stage of its development in 1957, the daily dose of spironolactone necessary to improve various pathological conditions was not precisely determined and dose-dependent sexual side effects limited its long-term use. Prescription of high daily doses and absence of selectivity for the mineralocorticoid receptor explain these limitations. The 9-11alpha epoxy group added to mexrenone by the Ciba-Geigy chemists in 1984 and improved chemical synthesis at Searle, permitted the original international clinical development of a selective antagonist for high blood pressure and congestive heart failure treatment. This review deals with the main methodological issues of a 20-year biological and clinical development of eplerenone, the second antimineralocorticoid drug. The investigation of a large range of daily doses (25-400mg) initially selected in normal volunteers by the 9alpha-fluorohydrocortisone test has led to the conclusion that 50-100mg q.i.d. doses of eplerenone offer a favorable benefit/risk ratio in various patient populations by neutralization of the aldosterone effects on blood pressure and target organ damage. The absence of sexual side-effects has confirmed the clinical relevance of the initial biological hypothesis on the need for more selectivity at the androgen and progestogen receptor sites. Widening the distance between efficacy and adverse effects of an anti-mineralocorticoid drug will facilitate the long-term maintenance of a moderately negative sodium balance and a slightly positive potassium balance, while minimizing the direct effects of salt and aldosterone on the heart, vessels, brain, and kidneys. Wide use in unselected patients and additional controlled clinical trials are necessary to confirm the benefits expected from animal and clinical research given that a 45-year interval also characterizes the story of the Na-Cl cotransporter (NCC) blocker, chlorthalidone, from its initial clinical use to the demonstration of its beneficial effects on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Renin release into plasma has been used to investigate the drug dose-dependence of renin-angiotensin system inhibition because it is proportional to the interruption of the permanent negative feedback loop of angiotensin II on renin secretion. We investigated the 24-hour between-subject differences in renin profiles by analyzing the time-dependence of individual renin responses in 16 mildly sodium-depleted normotensive subjects exposed in a 4-period crossover study to single oral doses of 8- and 16-mg (C8 and C16) candesartan cilexetil and 80- and 160-mg (V80 and V160) valsartan. C8 had a similar effect to V160 in terms of the increase in active renin concentration and decrease in blood pressure. C16 had the strongest effect and V80 the weakest effect on renin release. Within- and between-subject variability was more marked for valsartan pharmacokinetics than for candesartan pharmacokinetics and influenced variability in renin response. To eliminate some of the variability caused by the pharmacokinetics of each drug, we corrected the area under time curve of plasma renin levels by that of plasma drug levels to obtain an individual normalized index of renin release or "renin/pharmacokinetic index". In these experimental conditions, this index was found to be a reproducible individual characteristic affecting renin response, in addition to the pharmacokinetics and pharmacological properties of angiotensin II type-1 receptor antagonists. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model of renin release described here could be of value for the identification and investigation of renin release abnormalities in patients with hypertension and for the comparison of renin-angiotensin system blockers.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a low dose of the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor ramipril lowers cardiovascular and renal events in patients with type 2 diabetes who have microalbuminuria or proteinuria. DESIGN: Randomised, double blind, parallel group trial comparing ramipril (1.25 mg/day) with placebo (on top of usual treatment) for cardiovascular and renal outcomes for at least three years. SETTING: Multicentre, primary care study conducted mostly by general practitioners in 16 European and north African countries. PARTICIPANTS: 4912 patients with type 2 diabetes aged >50 years who use oral antidiabetic drugs and have persistent microalbuminuria or proteinuria (urinary albumin excretion > or = 20 mg/l in two consecutive samples), and serum creatinine < or = 150 micromol/l. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the combined incidence of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure leading to hospital admission, and end stage renal failure. RESULTS: Participants were followed for 3 to 6 (median 4) years. There were 362 primary events among the 2443 participants taking ramipril (37.8 per 1000 patient years) and 377 events among the 2469 participants taking placebo (38.8 per 1000 patient years; hazard ratio 1.03 (95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.20, P = 0.65)). None of the components of the primary outcome was reduced. Ramipril lowered systolic and diastolic blood pressures (by 2.43 and 1.06 mm Hg respectively after two years) and favoured regression from microalbuminuria (20-200 mg/l) or proteinuria (> 200mg/l) to normal level (< 20 mg/l) or microalbuminuria (P < 0.07) in 1868 participants who completed the study. CONCLUSIONS: Low dose (1.25 mg) ramipril once daily has no effect on cardiovascular and renal outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria, despite a slight decrease in blood pressure and urinary albumin. The cardiovascular benefits of a daily higher dose (10 mg) ramipril observed elsewhere are not found with an eightfold lower daily dose.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the mechanisms responsible for the adverse renal effects induced by dual blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and the role of salt therein. METHODS: The effects of enalapril, losartan and their combination on blood pressure, renal haemodynamics, renal function and RAS were investigated over a wide range of doses in spontaneously hypertensive rats fed either a low-sodium or a high-sodium diet. RESULTS: In rats fed the low-sodium diet, the losartan-enalapril combination induced the same dose-dependent haemodynamic and hormonal changes as did three- to 10-fold greater doses of enalapril or losartan alone. When a strong decrease (> 50%) in blood pressure was achieved (with 10 mg/kg enalapril plus 10 mg/kg losartan, 100 mg/kg enalapril or 100 mg/kg losartan), a massive renal vasoplegia occurred and renal insufficiency developed. In addition, because of the huge release of renin, angiotensinogen concentrations were reduced, leading to a decrease in intrarenal angiotensins. In rats fed the high-sodium diet, those treated with the enalapril 30 mg/kg plus losartan 30 mg/kg combination, despite complete functional RAS blockade, exhibited smaller decreases in blood pressure and renal resistance, lesser release of renin and angiotensinogen consumption, and a normal renal function. These effects were similar to those produced by 100 mg/kg of enalapril or losartan in rats fed the high-salt diet, or by 10 mg/kg of enalapril or of losartan in rats fed the low-salt diet. CONCLUSIONS: Dual RAS blockade could be either beneficial, when sodium intake is unrestricted, or dangerous, when sodium intake is restricted.
Interrupting the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) with a usual daily dose of a single-site RAS inhibitor does not achieve complete and long-lasting pharmacologic blockade. Hormonal and BP effects were compared for 48 h after administration of single oral doses of 300 mg (high dose) of the renin inhibitor aliskiren (A300) and 160 mg (standard antihypertensive dose) of the AT1 receptor antagonist valsartan (V160) and their combination each at half dose (A150+V80) in 12 mildly sodium-depleted normotensive individuals. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, four-period crossover study, A300 decreased plasma renin activity and angiotensin I and II levels for 48 h, stimulated immunoreactive active renin release more strongly than V160, and decreased urinary aldosterone excretion for a longer duration than V160. In contrast to V160, the A150+V80 combination did not increase plasma angiotensins. The renin and aldosterone effects of the A150+V80 combination were similar to those of A300 and greater than those of V160. When plasma drug concentrations were taken into account, the A150 +V80 combination had a synergistic effect on renin release. The A150+V80 combination lowered BP at least as effectively as either higher dose monotherapy. In conclusion, in mildly sodium-depleted normotensive individuals, the long-lasting effects of aliskiren alone or in combination with valsartan on plasma immunoreactive active renin and urinary aldosterone effects demonstrate strong and prolonged blockade of angiotensin II at the kidney and the adrenal level. Moreover, a renin inhibitor and AT1R antagonist combination may provide synergistic effects on RAS hormone levels.
All components of the renin-angiotensin system are present in the kidneys. Angiotensin II production is specifically regulated within the kidneys, and this regulation may differ from that operating in plasma or, possibly, in other organs. Coordination between renin synthesis and release (locally influenced by angiotensin II levels) and the activity of many proteins involved in sodium epithelial transfer, may be imperfect and contribute to create a high basal blood pressure which, in the long term, accelerates the onset and progression of cardiac, vascular and renal lesions.