Clinical practice. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Joan Bladé.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Thalidomide administered as a single agent produces a response rate of about 40% in patients with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of our study was to determine the quality and duration of such responses. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-two consecutive patients with refractory (20) or relapsed (22) MM were given thalidomide as a single agent at our institution. Most of them (70%) had previously received two or more lines of therapy, and 38% had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (43%) responded to thalidomide [11 minimal responses (MR) and seven partial responses (PR)] according to the European Marrow Transplant Registry (EBMT) criteria. The median time to response was 3 months and the median duration of therapy in responding patients was 9 months. Treatment was discontinued because of toxicity in 10 responding patients. The toxicity mainly led to peripheral neuropathy and fatigue. At the time of this analysis, all responding patients had progressed except one who remains in continued stable PR. The median time to progression was 15.6 months (range 1.3 to 70+), with a trend towards a longer duration for patients who achieved PR vs. MR (21.2 vs. 11.2 months, P = 0.11). The median duration of response was 12.4 months (range: 0.3-67+) (17.2 months for PR vs. 9.7 months for MR, P = 0.11). CONCLUSION: These results show that the effect of thalidomide in refractory/relapsed MM can be sustained, particularly in patients who achieve a greater degree of response, and support the finding that this drug can be used for maintenance therapy.
Standard first-line treatment for elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients ineligible for stem cell transplantation is melphalan plus prednisone (MP). However, complete responses (CRs) are rare. Bortezomib is active in patients with relapsed MM, including elderly patients. This phase 1/2 trial in 60 untreated MM patients aged at least 65 years (half older than 75 years) was designed to determine dosing, safety, and efficacy of bortezomib plus MP (VMP). VMP response rate was 89%, including 32% immunofixation-negative CRs, of whom half of the IF- CR patients analyzed achieved immunophenotypic remission (no detectable plasma cells at 10(-4) to 10(-5) sensitivity). VMP appeared to overcome the poor prognosis conferred by retinoblastoma gene deletion and IgH translocations. Results compare favorably with our historical control data for MP--notably, response rate (89% versus 42%), event-free survival at 16 months (83% versus 51%), and survival at 16 months (90% versus 62%). Side effects were predictable and manageable; principal toxicities were hematologic, gastrointestinal, and peripheral neuropathy and were more evident during early cycles and in patients aged 75 years or more. In conclusion, in elderly patients ineligible for transplantation, the combination of bortezomib plus MP appears significantly superior to MP, producing very high CR rates, including immunophenotypic CRs, even in patients with poor prognostic features.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although alkylating agents are clearly beneficial in multiple myeloma (MM), their deleterious effect on bone marrow hematopoietic progenitor cells usually precludes their use as front-line therapy in patients scheduled to undergo autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We analyzed the impact of first-line chemotherapy with alkylating agents on stem cell collection in MM patients. DESIGN AND METHODS: Seven hundred and eighty-nine patients included in the Spanish multicenter protocol GEM-2000 underwent mobilization therapy after four courses of alternating VBMCP/VBAD chemotherapy. RESULTS: The mobilization regimens consisted of standard or high-dose granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 551 (70%) patients, and chemotherapy and G-CSF in 206 (26%) patients. The CD34+ cell yield was lower than 4x10(6)/kg in 388 patients (49%), and equal or greater than 4x10(6)/kg in 401 patients (51%). Multivariate analysis indicated that advanced age (p<0.0001) and longer interval between diagnosis and mobilization (p=0.012) were the two variables associated with a lower CD34+ cell yield. Significant differences in CD34+ cell yield were not observed between the mobilization regimens. Of the 789 patients included in the protocol, 726 (92%) underwent the planned ASCT, whereas 25 (3%) patients did not because of the low number of CD34+ cells collected. Following ASCT, 0.5x10(9) neutrophils/L could be recovered after 11 days (median time; range, 5-71 days) and 20x10(9) platelets/L could be recovered after 12 days (median time; range, 6-69 days). INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: A short-course of therapy with alkylating agents according to the GEM-2000 protocol was associated with an appropriate CD34+ cell collection, and allowed the planned ASCT to be performed in the majority of MM patients.
Bortezomib is a potent and selective proteasome inhibitor recently introduced in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). This drug produces significant responses in about one-third of patients with relapsed/refractory disease. We first recognized the lack of efficacy of thalidomide in soft-tissue plasmacytomas. There is little information on the effect of bortezomib on extramedullary myeloma. Four of 23 patients treated with bortezomib at our institution had extramedullary involvement at the time of relapse. In three of these patients large soft-tissue plasmacytomas disappeared. This indicates that bortezomib may be useful in clinical situations of extramedullary disease in which other agents, such as thalidomide, may not be effective.
Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) consists of the presence of a serum M protein of 30 g/L or more and/or 10% or more bone marrow plasma cells (BMPCs), with no clinical manifestations or symptoms of myeloma. It accounts for approximately 10% of all myelomas, and the median time to progression to a symptomatic multiple myeloma ranges from 2 to 3 years. The main factors for progression are the plasma cell mass (M-protein size and percent of BMPCs), the spinal MRI pattern, the plasma cell proliferative index, and the variant of SMM ("evolving" vs "nonevolving"). Although treatment with thalidomide is promising (based on the results of two phase II trials), outside the context of a clinical trial, a watch-and-wait approach with clinical evaluation every 4 months is recommended until evident symptomatic disease progression occurs. Patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) have a serum M protein lower than 30 g/L and a proportion of BMPCs of less than 10%, with no clinical findings or symptoms attributable to the monoclonal gammopathy. MGUS has a high prevalence, and its annual rate of malignant transformation is 1%, such that the actuarial probability of progression to a symptomatic monoclonal gammopathy at 25 years of follow-up is as high as 40%. The factors associated with a higher probability of malignant transformation are a relatively high plasma cell mass, immunoglobulin A M-protein type, and the "evolving" variant. It is recommended that patients with MGUS are monitored annually. Importantly, patients with asymptomatic monoclonal gammopathies must not be treated before the development of overt multiple myeloma.
Light chain deposition disease (LCDD) is a multisystemic disorder seen in the setting of plasma cell dyscrasias. The histological characteristic of this disorder is the deposition of a homogeneous, granular, slightly eosinophilic and non-Congophilic material that shows immunostaining for monoclonal light chains (kappa or gamma), while in primary amyloidosis (AL) the proteinaceous substance is fibrillar and Congo red positive. In contrast with AL, the light chain in LCDD is usually of the kappa-type. Renal involvement, resulting in nephrotic syndrome, is usually the prominent feature of LCDD. Patients with this disease may also have heart, liver or other organ involvement, mimicking the picture of primary systemic amyloidosis. However, liver failure has rarely been described in patients with LCDD. A patient with myeloma-associated LCDD who developed rapidly progressive liver kappa light chain deposition with fatal outcome after undergoing the first cycle of vincristine/doxorubicin/dexamethasone chemotherapy is reported.
Although multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease, its treatment has improved over the past decade. This improvement has been at least in part due to the introduction of novel antimyeloma agents with new mechanisms of action, including those that target both myeloma cells and the tumor microenvironment, with antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory properties. Among these drugs, bortezomib (Velcade), a selective proteasome inhibitor, has been approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory MM patients after one line of therapy. The toxicity profile of bortezomib includes gastrointestinal symptoms, fatigue, thrombocytopenia, peripheral neuropathy, postural hypotension, as well as some uncommon events. A patient with relapsed MM who developed recurrent bortezomib-induced rhabdomyolysis is reported. To our knowledge, this adverse event has not been previously described is this context.
Despite intensive therapy, multiple myeloma (MM) remains an incurable disease, and novel treatment approaches are therefore needed to improve outcome. Bortezomib is the first proteasome inhibitor to be approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products for the treatment of refractory or relapsed MM following the failure of at least two prior lines of therapy. Recently, it also received approval from the FDA for use as a second-line agent. An expert panel of hematologists met at the Ninth Congress of the European Hematology Association to review clinical data and experience in the treatment of MM with bortezomib, including bortezomib-based combination therapy. The conclusions of this expert panel, together with updated clinical data from the American Society of Hematology 46th Annual Meeting, provide a practical update on the use of bortezomib in MM. Bortezomib has demonstrated significant antitumor activity as a single agent in refractory and/or relapsed MM, with a significantly longer survival than with dexamethasone (1-year overall survival rate of 80% vs. 66%) and a 78% longer median time to progression. In combination therapy, patient responses suggest the possibility of chemosensitization and synergy. Furthermore, bortezomib does not appear to have an adverse effect on subsequent stem cell therapy. Bortezomib is well tolerated; most side effects are only mild to moderate and are manageable. Information is given on the practical management of the most common adverse events, including peripheral neuropathy and thrombocytopenia, and the use of bortezomib in renal and hepatic impairment.
This report by an international consensus panel updates current recommendations for defining clinical response in Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM). The previously published response criteria incorporated parameters for monoclonal protein reduction and/or improvement of marrow and nodal involvement, and included definitions of complete and partial remissions. The criteria have been updated to include minor response and stable disease categories. In addition, the criteria now recognize that delayed responses after treatment with nucleoside analogues and biologic agents and the time point for assessing response in patients with WM should be considered so as to not miss or miscategorize a response. The new criteria should therefore help in better delineating responses to therapy in patients with WM, particularly with the wide use of nucleoside analogues and biologically based agents for this disease.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The aim of the present randomized trial was to compare high-dose therapy (HDT) with continued conventional chemotherapy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who responded to the initial treatment. From May 1994 to October 1999, 216 patients (122 men/94 women; stage II or III; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] score less than 3) entered the study. Initial chemotherapy consisted of 4 cycles of alternating vincristine, BCNU, melphalan, cyclophosphamide, prednisone/vincristine, BCNU, Adriamycin, dexamethasone (VBMCP/VBAD). Responding patients were randomly assigned to receive 8 additional cycles of VBMCP/VBAD, intensification with melphalan 200 mg/m2, or melphalan 140 mg/m2 plus 12 Gy fractionated total body irradiation (TBI). One-hundred sixty-four patients were randomly assigned, 83 to continued chemotherapy and 81 to HDT. The complete remission (CR) rate was significantly higher with HDT (30% vs 11%; P = .002). However, progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different between HDT and conventional therapy (median, 42 vs 33 months; P = not significant [NS]), and overall survival (OS) was similar in both groups (median, 61 vs 66 months). Finally, survival after relapse was identical in the 2 arms (15.9 vs 16.4 months). In conclusion, these results show that HDT intensification, when given to myeloma patients who have responded to the initial chemotherapy, significantly increases the CR rate but has no significant impact on PFS or OS.
BACKGROUND: This study compared bortezomib with high-dose dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma who had received one to three previous therapies. METHODS: We randomly assigned 669 patients with relapsed myeloma to receive either an intravenous bolus of bortezomib (1.3 mg per square meter of body-surface area) on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 for eight three-week cycles, followed by treatment on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 for three five-week cycles, or high-dose dexamethasone (40 mg orally) on days 1 through 4, 9 through 12, and 17 through 20 for four five-week cycles, followed by treatment on days 1 through 4 for five four-week cycles. Patients who were assigned to receive dexamethasone were permitted to cross over to receive bortezomib in a companion study after disease progression. RESULTS: Patients treated with bortezomib had higher response rates, a longer time to progression (the primary end point), and a longer survival than patients treated with dexamethasone. The combined complete and partial response rates were 38 percent for bortezomib and 18 percent for dexamethasone (P<0.001), and the complete response rates were 6 percent and less than 1 percent, respectively (P<0.001). Median times to progression in the bortezomib and dexamethasone groups were 6.22 months (189 days) and 3.49 months (106 days), respectively (hazard ratio, 0.55; P<0.001). The one-year survival rate was 80 percent among patients taking bortezomib and 66 percent among patients taking dexamethasone (P=0.003), and the hazard ratio for overall survival with bortezomib was 0.57 (P=0.001). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were reported in 75 percent of patients treated with bortezomib and in 60 percent of those treated with dexamethasone. CONCLUSIONS: Bortezomib is superior to high-dose dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have had a relapse after one to three previous therapies.
Myelomatous plasma cells show a high heterogeneity both in their immunophenotypic characteristics as well as in their cytogenetic features. Thus far, no extensive studies have been carried out to explore whether such antigenic diversity is associated with specific genetic characteristics. We have investigated the relationship between the immunophenotypic profile at plasma cell and both their DNA ploidy status (evaluated by flow cytometry) and specific genetic features (ascertained by fluorescence in situ hybridization) in a large series of 915 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. The non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma group (n = 454, 52%) was associated with a significantly higher frequency of positivity for CD28 and CD20 as well as a higher incidence of CD56(-) and CD117(-) cases (P < 0.001). Remarkably, 13q deletion and immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGH) gene rearrangements, which were significantly more common in non-hyperdiploid multiple myeloma, showed a strong association with CD117(-) cases. IGH translocation to 11q13 was associated with reactivity for CD20 (P < 0.001), down-regulation of CD56 (P < 0.001), and lack of expression of CD117 (P = 0.001). By contrast, IGH translocations to other chromosome partners were almost exclusively found among CD20(-) and CD117(-) cases (P < 0.001). These results suggest that genetic categories in multiple myeloma exhibit particular immunophenotypic profiles which in turn are strongly associated with the DNA ploidy status.
Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) represents the most aggressive form of monoclonal gammopathy for which new treatment approaches are needed. Here we report the effect of Bortezomib on cells from 4 patients with PCL, as well as the in vivo efficacy on a patient with secondary PCL. Bortezomib reduced PCL numbers and was more efficient in cell growth inhibition than dexamethasone or doxorubicin. Treatment with Bortezomib induced procaspase-3 and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage and decreased the amount of extracellular signal regulated kinase (Erk1/2) and phospho-Erk1/2. However, Bortezomib did not substantially affect the levels of the Erk1/2 upstream activating kinase (MEK1), p27 or p21. Finally, we had the opportunity to use Bortezomib in a heavily pretreated patient with overt secondary PCL and severe anemia and thrombocytopenia. Following Bortezomib treatment, circulating plasma cells disappeared; what is more striking, the peripheral blood counts returned to normal, becoming transfusion-independent. These data support the inclusion of Bortezomib in the therapeutic armamentarium of PCL.
PURPOSE: There is a need for a simple, reliable staging system for multiple myeloma that can be applied internationally for patient classification and stratification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical and laboratory data were gathered on 10,750 previously untreated symptomatic myeloma patients from 17 institutions, including sites in North America, Europe, and Asia. Potential prognostic factors were evaluated by univariate and multivariate techniques. Three modeling approaches were then explored to develop a staging system including two nontree and one tree survival assessment methodologies. RESULTS: Serum beta2-microglobulin (Sbeta2M), serum albumin, platelet count, serum creatinine, and age emerged as powerful predictors of survival and were then used in the tree analysis approach. A combination of Sbeta2M and serum albumin provided the simplest, most powerful and reproducible three-stage classification. This new International Staging System (ISS) was validated in the remaining patients and consists of the following stages: stage I, Sbeta2M less than 3.5 mg/L plus serum albumin > or = 3.5 g/dL (median survival, 62 months); stage II, neither stage I nor III (median survival, 44 months); and stage III, Sbeta2M > or = 5.5 mg/L (median survival, 29 months). The ISS system was further validated by demonstrating effectiveness in patients in North America, Europe, and Asia; in patients less than and > or = 65 years of age; in patients with standard therapy or autotransplantation; and in comparison with the Durie/Salmon staging system. CONCLUSION) The new ISS is simple, based on easy to use variables (Sbeta2M and serum albumin), and recommended for early adoption and widespread use.
Bortezomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor with significant antimyeloma activity. Its toxicity is manageable, and the most frequent adverse effects mainly consist of gastrointestinal symptoms, peripheral neuropathy, neuropatic pain, and thrombocytopenia. Severe liver toxicity has not been previously recognized. A patient with relapsed multiple myeloma who developed bortezomib-induced severe recurrent hepatitis is described. The importance of recognizing this rare potential toxicity is highlighted in order to discontinue this agent if liver adverse reaction is suspected.