Biomedical subjects

Joan Serra-Batlles

Publications and source records attributed to Joan Serra-Batlles.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Differences in asthma clinical outcomes according to initial severity.

UNLABELLED: Information on asthma morbidity outcomes in relation to the initial degree of severity is scarce. OBJECTIVE: To determine the differences in asthma morbidity, quality of life (QOL), and lung function outcomes according to the initial severity of the illness. METHOD: A cohort of 235 (102 mild, 69 moderate, and 64 severe) asthma patients was followed up for 3 years. The following parameters were collected for all patients: asthma morbidity, clinical data, spirometry, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). RESULTS: A significant reduction in asthma morbidity and an improvement in pulmonary function and QOL were observed in the total group 3 years later. However, when the sample was stratified according to the initial severity, differences were observed between means in the third year compared with the first year in the following: number of primary care visits (patient/year) due to asthma: mild -1 (95% CI: -1.42 to -0.56); moderate -0.9 (-.92 to 0.18); and severe 1 (-0.23 to 2.27) (p = 0.020); FEV, (%): mild 8.5 (-5.3 to 11.6), moderate -0.3 (-3.2 to 2.6), and severe -1.5 (-5 to 2) (p < 0.001); and total score of the SGRQ: mild -9.8 (-12.2 to -7.3), moderate -9.1 (-12.9 to -5.2), and severe -7.9 (-11.9 to -3.9) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that asthma prognosis varies according to the initial severity. Clinical, QOL, and pulmonary function outcomes in the mild asthma group are better than in the moderate and severe groups.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Health-related quality of life and mortality in male patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

To assess whether generic and specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) are independently associated with total and specific mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), we followed until 1999 a cohort of 321 male patients with COPD, recruited in 1993-1994 at outpatient respiratory clinics. Baseline characteristics recorded under stable clinical conditions included forced spirometry, arterial blood gas tensions, dyspnea scales, 11 comorbid conditions, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and SF-36 Health Survey. Vital status was assessed through reinterviews, the Mortality Register, and clinical records. Subjects who died (106) were older (69.8 versus 62.5 years) (p < 0.001), had lower body mass index (BMI) (25.4 versus 27.1) (p < 0.01), were more impaired in the clinical characteristics studied (%FEV(1), 34.0 versus 51.0) (p < 0.001), and had long-term oxygen therapy more frequently (31% versus 7%) (p < 0.001). Survival was shorter when worse HRQL was reported. SGRQ total and SF-36 physical summary scores were independently associated with total and respiratory mortality in Cox models, including age, FEV(1), and BMI. The total mortality-standardized hazard ratios for both HRQL measures were 1.3, whereas those for FEV(1) were 1.6. HRQL measures provide independent and relevant information on the health status of male patients with COPD. Their use should be considered for a more thorough evaluation and staging of patients with COPD.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Patient perception and acceptability of multidose dry powder inhalers: a randomized crossover comparison of Diskus/Accuhaler with Turbuhaler.

This study was designed to provide information on correct use and preference to features and device handling of two multidose dry powder inhalers, the Diskus/Accuhaler and the Turbuhaler. A total of 169 powder-naive patients (mean age 40 years) with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) were enrolled in a randomized crossover comparison of both inhalers. An effective use of either inhaler was assessed before (leaflet only) and after inhaler education. Ease of use especially during an attack and the presence of a dose counter were regarded as the most important features for an ideal inhaler. The percentage of correct handling maneuvers and the percentage of patients achieving 100% of correct maneuvers increased significantly (p < 0.001) after inhaler education in both devices, but percentage of correct use after the intervention was significantly higher for the Diskus/Accuhaler (92.6%) than for the Turbuhaler (89.8%; p = 0.036). Overall 60% of patients thought the Diskus/Accuhaler was preferable to the Turbuhaler (p < 0.001). The main reasons given were presence of a dose counter, perceived ease of use including ease of learning to use, design, and attached cover. Among those who preferred the Turbuhaler device, the main reason cited was small size, discreetness, and ease of holding. In the multivariate analysis, inhaler education (p = 0.005) and education level (p = 0.009) were significantly associated with the percentage of correct maneuvers. Age, sex, or tested inhaler showed no effect on appropriateness of the inhalation technique.

Administration, Inhalation↗