PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joan T Merrill

Publications and source records attributed to Joan T Merrill.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

The effect of combined estrogen and progesterone hormone replacement therapy on disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: There is concern that exogenous female hormones may worsen disease activity in women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on disease activity in postmenopausal women with SLE. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled noninferiority trial conducted from March 1996 to June 2002. SETTING: 16 university-affiliated rheumatology clinics or practices in 11 U.S. states. PATIENTS: 351 menopausal patients (mean age, 50 years) with inactive (81.5%) or stable-active (18.5%) SLE. INTERVENTIONS: 12 months of treatment with active drug (0.625 mg of conjugated estrogen daily, plus 5 mg of medroxyprogesterone for 12 days per month) or placebo. The 12-month follow-up rate was 82% for the HRT group and 87% for the placebo group. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end point was occurrence of a severe flare as defined by Safety of Estrogens in Lupus Erythematosus, National Assessment-Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index composite. RESULTS: Severe flare was rare in both treatment groups: The 12-month severe flare rate was 0.081 for the HRT group and 0.049 for the placebo group, yielding an estimated difference of 0.033 (P = 0.23). The upper limit of the 1-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was 0.078, within the prespecified margin of 9% for noninferiority. Mild to moderate flares were significantly increased in the HRT group: 1.14 flares/person-year for HRT and 0.86 flare/person-year for placebo (relative risk, 1.34; P = 0.01). The probability of any type of flare by 12 months was 0.64 for the HRT group and 0.51 for the placebo group (P = 0.01). In the HRT group, there were 1 death, 1 stroke, 2 cases of deep venous thrombosis, and 1 case of thrombosis in an arteriovenous graft; in the placebo group, 1 patient developed deep venous thrombosis. LIMITATIONS: Findings are not generalizable to women with high-titer anticardiolipin antibodies, lupus anticoagulant, or previous thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Adding a short course of HRT is associated with a small risk for increasing the natural flare rate of lupus. Most of these flares are mild to moderate. The benefits of HRT can be balanced against the risk for flare because HRT did not significantly increase the risk for severe flare compared with placebo.

Adolescent↗

Emergence of targeted immune therapies for systemic lupus.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prototypical autoimmune disease, characterised by flares of rampant inflammation that can threaten, in an unpredictable manner, almost any organ in the body. Current standard of care is largely empiric, involving the use of corticosteroids and toxic immune suppressive agents that are widely acknowledged to have unacceptable side effects for long-term use. Recently, there have been significant advances in understanding the nature of some fundamental immune imbalances underlying the complicated clinical manifestations of SLE. Nevertheless attempts to develop and test more targeted, and potentially safer immune-modulating drugs for lupus have encountered significant obstacles, due to the lack of validated biological markers for disease flare and remission, and difficulties in the clinical assessment of the heterogeneous patients. In support of renewed interest in drug development for lupus, large collaborative groups have formed, and efforts are underway to develop objective biomarkers for SLE as well as to improve the standardisation and reproducibility of clinical outcome measures in multi-centre trials.

Drug Delivery Systems↗

Effects of prasterone on disease activity and symptoms in women with active systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether prasterone administration results in improvement or stabilization of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) disease activity and its symptoms. METHODS: Women with active SLE were treated with prasterone 200 mg/day plus standard SLE treatments or with placebo plus standard SLE treatments for up to 12 months in this randomized, double-blind investigation conducted at 27 centers. Standard SLE treatments included prednisone (</=10 mg/day), antimalarials, and immunosuppressive agents; dosages were required to be stable for >/=6 weeks prior to enrollment and remain unchanged during protocol treatment. Responders were patients who experienced no clinical deterioration and had improvement or stabilization over the duration of the study in 2 disease activity measures (the SLE Disease Activity Index [SLEDAI] and the Systemic Lupus Activity Measure) and 2 quality of life measures (patient's global assessment and the Krupp Fatigue Severity Scale). RESULTS: A total of 381 women with SLE were enrolled. Among patients with clinically active disease at baseline (SLEDAI score >2), 86 of 147 in the prasterone group (58.5%) demonstrated improvement or stabilization without clinical deterioration, as compared with 65 of 146 in the placebo group (44.5%) (P = 0.017). Acne and hirsutism were reported in 33% and 16%, respectively, of the prasterone group and in 14% and 2%, respectively, of the placebo group (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). However, most cases of acne and hirsutism were mild and did not require withdrawal from therapy. Myalgias and oral stomatitis were reported less frequently in the prasterone group (22% and 15%, respectively) than in the placebo group (36% and 23%, respectively) (P < 0.05 for both comparisons). Serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, and C3 complement significantly decreased, while levels of testosterone and, to a lesser extent, estradiol increased in the prasterone group. CONCLUSION: In adult women with active SLE, administration of prasterone at a dosage of 200 mg/day improved or stabilized signs and symptoms of disease and was generally well tolerated.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

Genetics of antiphospholipid syndrome.

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by recurrent arterial or venous thrombosis or fetal loss and the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). Genetic factors are thought to play a role in the susceptibility to APS. Similar to many other polygenic autoimmune diseases, human leukocyte antigen associations have been reported. The genetics of b(2)-glycoprotein I, one of the most representative target antigens of aPL, has been extensively studied. Additional genetic risk factors for the development of thrombosis in patients with aPL have also been discussed. However, the genes involved in APS have not been identified because antigen specificity of aPL and the pathophysiology of APS are highly heterogeneous and multifactorial. Genome-wide linkage analysis and larger cohort studies would lead to better understanding of the genes that might be involved in APS.

Antiphospholipid Syndrome↗

Diagnosis of the antiphospholipid syndrome: how far to go?

The past decade has seen an evolution in the way that thrombophilic conditions are diagnosed and understood. This has largely evolved through the detection of single nucleotide polymorphisms in critical regulating proteins that are thought to confer significant structural-functional changes at key points in the coagulation cascade. The antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a complex hypercoagulable disorder that as yet defies the possibility of simple, predictive testing.

Antibodies, Antiphospholipid↗

Challenges in bringing the bench to bedside in drug development for SLE.

It is now widely accepted that the current standard of care for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients is inadequate. There has not been a new medication approved for this disease in thirty years. Attempts to develop and test new drugs have been ongoing since the mid-1990s, but have encountered formidable obstacles. Current models for lupus pathogenesis have provided a theoretical framework for understanding how heterogeneous genetic defects might combine in various ways to increase susceptibility to SLE in different individuals, and could have important implications for new drug development. With the current burst of drug discovery and increased public awareness of SLE, the impetus to overcome these obstacles has never been greater.

Animals↗

Anti-beta 2-glycoprotein I and antiphosphatidylserine antibodies are predictors of arterial thrombosis in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome.

The predictive value (PV) and association of 4 antiphospholipid antibodies with clinical manifestations of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) were evaluated in 90 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and 100 with APS. Patients with APS were classified into arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis, and pregnancy morbidity subgroups. IgG, IgM, and IgA anticardiolipin (aCL), antiphosphatidylserine (aPS), anti-beta 2-glycoprotein I (anti-B2GPI), and antiprothrombin (aPT) antibodies were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Individually, anti-B2GPI and aPS antibodies had the strongest PV for APS (86.4%-94.1%; P < .001) in patients with SLE. The PV for APS reached 100% when 2 or more antibodies were present. Similarly, anti-B2GPI and aPS antibodies had a stronger PV and association for arterial thrombosis (87%-95%; P < .001) compared with venous thrombosis (80%-92%; P = .01). Weak PV and association with pregnancy morbidity were seen with all antibodies. These results suggest an important pathogenic role of anti-B2GPI antibodies in arterial thrombosis. In addition, anti-B2GPI and aPS antibodies seem to provide the best diagnostic value for the laboratory assessment of APS.

Abortion, Spontaneous↗

Defining response in systemic lupus erythematosus: a study by the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics group.

OBJECTIVE: In a preliminary attempt to develop a drug responder index for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 2 validated disease activity instruments were studied for their responsiveness and compared to a physician visual analog scale (VAS) assessment of disease activity. We attempted to determine whether these validated instruments were useful components in characterizing response in the setting of a clinical trial. METHODS: Eighty paper patients were assessed using the British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG) and Systemic Lupus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) and by physician's assessment of global activity. The cases were arranged in random order and divided into groups of 20 patients and each group was assessed by 20 lupus experts; change in disease activity was recorded at 3 and 6 months compared to baseline using a physician VAS. RESULTS: Four different lupus experts assessed disease activity in all 80 patients at baseline and 3 and 6 months after initiation of therapy using the BILAG and SLEDAI instruments. BILAG and SLEDAI scores correlated well over time; however, in a regression analysis where average physician VAS were chosen as the outcome variable, a significant amount of variation in the average physician VAS not related to the SLEDAI and BILAG scores was noted. CONCLUSION: The physician VAS may be too blunt to assess response in SLE, because even among experienced lupus assessors, there were considerable differences in what influenced scoring decisions.

Adult↗

Identification and characterization of a peptide mimetic that may detect a species of disease-associated anticardiolipin antibodies in patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: To test the feasibility of applying a mimetic (specific for a patient-derived prothrombotic anticardiolipin antibody [aCL]) to study the homologous, disease-associated aCL in patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: We used the CL15 monoclonal aCL to screen 17 phage-display peptide libraries. Peptides (corresponding to recurrent peptide sequences) and their derivatives were synthesized and analyzed for binding to CL15 and for their abilities to inhibit CL15 from binding to cardiolipin. A peptide was chosen and used to study CL15-like IgG aCL in plasma samples from patients with APS, patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) but without APS, and normal healthy donors. RESULTS: Library screening with CL15 yielded 4 recurrent peptide sequences. Analyses of peptides showed that peptide CL154C reacted with antibody CL15 and inhibited binding of CL15 to cardiolipin, indicating that peptide CL154C may be a peptide mimetic for the CL15 aCL. Initial studies with plasma samples revealed that CL154C-reactive IgG was present (positivity defined as the mean + 3 SD optical density of the 25 normal controls) in 15 of 21 APS patients and 1 of 12 SLE patients. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that it is feasible to develop a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for each immunologically and functionally distinct disease-associated aCL. Additional testing of CL154C with a larger number of APS patients and SLE patients, as well as identification of peptide mimetics for each distinct aCL, will reveal the diagnostic potential of CL154C and other mimetics in identifying patients with aCL who are at risk of developing life-threatening thrombosis.

Adolescent↗

The antiphospholipid syndrome and atherosclerosis: clue to pathogenesis.

Regulation of blood vessels is intrinsically tied to inflammatory signaling. Recent research suggests that chronic inflammation is associated with atherosclerosis risk. The antiphospholipid syndrome is a prototypic autoimmune disease. Disturbance of blood vessel homeostasis in this disorder may increase risk for atherosclerosis by mechanisms that are direct (through antibody targeting of blood vessel-regulating proteins) or indirect (via inflammatory mechanisms that have recently been implicated in autoantibody-mediated thrombosis).

Antiphospholipid Syndrome↗

Antibodies directed to protein S in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: prevalence and clinical significance.

Antibodies directed against protein S (anti-ProtS) may be involved in the development of thrombosis in patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome. We assessed the prevalence and clinical significance of anti-ProtS and evaluated their immunological characteristics in 184 patients with SLE and 99 healthy donors. All patients were tested for IgG anti-ProtS by an in-house ELISA. Plasma levels and functional activity of protein S were also tested. Anti-ProtS were found in 57 patients (31%) and 4 healthy controls (4%). Patients with thrombosis had anti-ProtS more frequently than controls (29% vs 4%, OR 9.5 [95% CI 3.07-29.3], p<0.0001). Anti-ProtS were more frequent in patients with venous thrombosis and in those with arterial thrombosis, than in controls (41% vs. 4%, OR 16.5 [95% CI 5-54], p<0.0001 and 23% vs. 4%, OR 7 [95%CI 2.1-23.5], p=0.0008, respectively). Patients with prematurity, preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction had anti-ProtS more frequently than the control group (36%, 47% and 44% vs. 4%; OR 13.6 [95% CI 2.8-66], p=0.003, OR 21 [95% CI 5-86], p<0.0001 and OR 19 [95% CI 4-99], p=0.0014, respectively). Plasma levels of free protein S were not statistically different between patients with and without anti-ProtS and controls (77.9% [20.7-100] vs. 83.7% [52.7-100] vs. 89% [62-101], respectively). Free protein S functional activity was no different between subgroups (105% [48-230] in anti-ProtS positive vs. 123% [95-283] in anti-ProtS negative vs. 136% [60-174] in controls). Anti-ProtS are frequent in SLE patients with thrombosis and pregnancy morbidity. These antibodies do not interfere with free protein S in plasma since its level and/or functional activity are not impaired.

Antibodies, Antiphospholipid↗

Dehydroepiandrosterone, a sex steroid metabolite in development for systemic lupus erythematosus.

Deficiency of the weak androgen dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfoconjugated metabolite DHEA-S has been associated with a number of serious illnesses, including lupus, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease and some cancers. Accordingly, supplementation with DHEA has been proposed for a variety of illnesses. Observational clinical studies and in vitro experiments have suggested that DHEA treatment might have a significant impact on immunological function, bone density, cognition, atherosclerotic disease, some malignancies, insulin resistance and obesity. Endogenous circulating DHEA levels, however, may vary widely by gender, age and ethnicity and can be affected by acute changes in corticosteroid production, alcohol intake, smoking, body mass index, medications and thyroid function [1-3]. Clearly, these variables complicate the interpretation of clinical data. DHEA also gives rise to a number of as yet poorly characterised metabolites, further confusing the assessment of its net effects when considered as treatment in heterogenous populations. Given the complexity of potential effects of DHEA and its metabolites, coupled to the diversity of clinical conditions that they might, at least in theory, affect, it is not surprising that clinical confirmation of efficacy in several clinical contexts has been inconsistent and controversial, hampering drug development in what might potentially be an important and widespread market. The current review will consider recent work suggesting efficacy of DHEA (GL-701, prasterone, Prestara( trade mark ) [US], Anastar( trade mark ) [Europe]; Genelabs) in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Androgens↗

Effects of prasterone on corticosteroid requirements of women with systemic lupus erythematosus: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether treatment with prasterone (dehydroepiandrosterone [DHEA]) would allow the dosage of prednisone (or an equivalent corticosteroid) to be reduced to < or = 7.5 mg/day for 2 months or longer while maintaining stable or reduced disease activity in steroid-dependent women with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized trial, 191 female SLE patients receiving prednisone (10-30 mg/day) were treated daily with either placebo, 100 mg of oral prasterone (an adrenal androgen), or 200 mg of oral prasterone for 7-9-months. At monthly intervals, corticosteroid dosages were reduced by algorithm in patients whose SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score was stable or improved. Patients for whom a sustained reduction in the dosage of prednisone (< or = 7.5 mg/day) was achieved for at least the last 2 months of the 7-9-month treatment period were classified as responders. RESULTS: Response rates were 41% in the placebo group, 44% in the 100-mg prasterone group, and 55% in the 200-mg group (P = 0.110, 200 mg versus placebo). Among the 137 subjects (45 in the placebo group, 47 in the 100-mg group, and 45 in the 200-mg group) who had active disease at baseline (defined as SLEDAI score >2), 29%, 38%, and 51%, respectively, were responders (P = 0.031 for 200 mg prasterone versus placebo). Acne was the most common adverse event but was generally mild. Clinical and laboratory changes primarily reflected androgenic effects of prasterone. CONCLUSION: Among women with lupus disease activity, reducing the dosage of prednisone to < or = 7.5 mg/day for a sustained period of time while maintaining stabilization or a reduction of disease activity was possible in a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with oral prasterone, 200 mg once daily, compared with patients treated with placebo.

Administration, Oral↗