Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Joanne Stekler.
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) nucleic acid testing is increasingly being used by researchers and public health screening programs to identify highly infectious, HIV antibody-negative individuals with acute HIV infection. We present cases to illustrate unusual instances of acute HIV screening, which include "window period" testing and the discovery of low-level HIV RNA.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate risk factors associated with the abacavir hypersensitivity reaction during primary HIV infection (PHI). DESIGN: Acute HIV Infection and Early Disease Research Program protocol (AIEDRP) AI-02-001 provided antiretroviral therapy including abacavir. This retrospective analysis evaluated variables potentially associated with hypersensitivity in the cohort enrolled in AI-02-001 at the University of Washington Primary Infection Clinic. METHODS: Cases of suspected hypersensitivity were identified prospectively and reviewed retrospectively using a standardized case definition. Controls were the remaining cohort without hypersensitivity. Univariate analyses were performed by linear logistic regression. RESULTS: Nine (18%) of 50 individuals treated with abacavir developed suspected hypersensitivity. Two of nine cases and no controls were HLA-B5701 positive. When antiretroviral medications were started, cases had lower mean CD8 T-cell percentage and plasma HIV RNA value. After 2 weeks on abacavir, cases had a lower mean HIV RNA value and a trend towards greater decrease in RNA. Cases began abacavir a median of 103 days after HIV acquisition compared to 48 days for controls. There was no significant in vitro abacavir-specific lymphoproliferation or IFN-gamma production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from individuals following the suspected hypersensitivity reaction. CONCLUSIONS: Abacavir use during PHI may be associated with increased risk of hypersensitivity. As in chronic infection, HLA-B5701 is associated with the abacavir hypersensitivity reaction in PHI. Although levels of CD8 T cells and HIV RNA may be risk factors for hypersensitivity, the observed association may be due to correlation with HLA-B5701. The interesting temporal association of hypersensitivity with initiation of abacavir later in PHI merits future investigation.
BACKGROUND: Although many individuals who acquire HIV are symptomatic, primary HIV infection (PHI) is infrequently diagnosed, even after the integration of RNA testing into HIV screening programs. Until more individuals with PHI seek evaluation, the public health impact of RNA testing is likely to be small. OBJECTIVE: To describe knowledge of PHI and attitudes toward health care-seeking behavior for symptoms consistent with PHI in men who have sex with men (MSM). METHODS: Between April 2004 and March 2005, HIV-negative MSM attending the Public Health-Seattle and King County sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic completed an anonymous, self-administered, written questionnaire. RESULTS: Ninety-six (64%) of 150 subjects named > or =1 symptom associated with PHI. Only 18 (39%) of 46 men who knew PHI could resemble influenza would seek care for flu-like symptoms. Fifteen (65%) of 23 men reporting a week-long febrile illness with rash in the preceding year sought health care, but only 7 (30%) were tested for HIV. CONCLUSIONS: Although most subjects identified some symptoms of PHI, relatively few would seek care for such symptoms. MSM seeking attention for febrile illnesses were infrequently tested for HIV. Increased symptom recognition, health care-seeking behavior, and routine HIV RNA testing are needed if PHI screening programs are to have meaningful impact.
HIV-RNA testing may identify individuals with primary HIV infection. Men who have sex with men (MSM) having HIV testing through Public Health, Seattle and King County were screened for primary infection through pooled RNA testing. Eighty-one out of 3525 specimens (2.3%) had detectable antibody and RNA, and seven out of 3439 antibody-negative specimens (0.2%) had HIV RNA. Targeted screening for primary infection through pooled RNA testing in MSM is a useful addition to HIV case finding.
BACKGROUND: Patient-delivered partner therapy (PDPT) is the practice of providing disease-specific antimicrobial agents to patients for delivery to their sex partners. Some partners who receive PDPT may forgo clinical evaluation, resulting in missed opportunities for the diagnosis and treatment of comorbid conditions. METHODS: We conducted a review of electronic charts for 8623 individuals attending 4 sexually transmitted disease clinics who were sex partners of patients with selected sexually transmitted infections (STIs). We evaluated the concordance between STIs diagnosed in partners and their reported exposures for which they might have received PDPT. RESULTS: Among 3503 female and 4647 heterosexual male partners, 19 (0.4%) of 4716 individuals tested were newly diagnosed with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, and 61 individuals (0.7%) had syphilis. Pelvic inflammatory disease was diagnosed in 133 women (3.8%). Seventy-two (3.2%) of 2226 female and heterosexual male partners reporting exposure to patients with chlamydial infection had gonorrhea diagnosed. Chlamydial infection or gonorrhea was diagnosed in 81 heterosexual male partners (10.3%) who reported contact with women with trichomoniasis. Among 473 men who have sex with men (MSM; including bisexual men), 13 (6.3%) of 207 tested were newly diagnosed with HIV infection, and 8 (1.7%) had syphilis. Six (6.1%) of 98 MSM reporting exposure to patients with chlamydial infection had gonorrhea diagnosed. CONCLUSIONS: Infrequent coinfections in female and heterosexual male partners exposed to patients with chlamydial infection or gonorrhea would not preclude use of PDPT. However, PDPT for male partners of women with trichomoniasis and for MSM requires further study.
Primary HIV infection refers to the events surrounding acquisition of HIV infection. It is associated with a nonspecific clinical syndrome that occurs 2 to 4 weeks after exposure in 40% to 90% of individuals acquiring HIV. Patients identified before seroconversion often have very high plasma HIV RNA titers that, without treatment, gradually decrease to reach a set point. Treatment of primary HIV infection with highly active antiretroviral therapy does not prevent establishment of chronic infection. However, very early therapy could potentially decrease the viral set point, prevent viral diversification, preserve immune function, improve clinical outcomes, and decrease secondary transmission. These benefits have not yet been definitely demonstrated. Transmission of viral strains with decreased susceptibility to antiviral drugs has led to recommendations for resistance testing in primary infection before initiation of therapy. Immunomodulators and vaccines are also under study as adjuvant therapy for treatment of primary HIV infection.
Primary HIV-1 infection refers to the events surrounding the acquisition of HIV-1 infection. It is commonly associated with a nonspecific clinical syndrome that occurs within 2 to 4 weeks after exposure in 40% to 90% of persons acquiring HIV-1. Patients identified prior to seroconversion often have plasma titers in excess of 500,000 copies/mL. Over time, plasma HIV-1 RNA titers decrease and eventually reach a "set point." Treatment of primary HIV-1 infection with highly active antiretroviral therapy does not prevent establishment of chronic infection. However, it potentially may decrease the viral set point, prevent evolution of resistant mutants, preserve immune function, improve clinical outcome, and possibly allow for viral control after withdrawal of antiretroviral therapy. Transmission of viral strains with decreased susceptibility to antiviral drugs increases the difficulty of choosing an antiretroviral regimen. Other medications, including immunomodulators, are under study as adjuvant therapy for treatment of primary HIV-1 infection.