Biomedical subjects

Jochen Müsseler

Publications and source records attributed to Jochen Müsseler.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Action-feature integration blinds to feature-overlapping perceptual events: evidence from manual and vocal actions.

Previous studies showed that the identification of a left- or right-pointing arrowhead is impaired when it appears while planning and executing a spatially compatible left or right keypress (Müsseler & Hommel, 1997a). We attribute this effect to stimulus processing and action control operating on the same feature codes so that, once a code is integrated in an action plan, it is less available for perceptual processing. In three pairs of experiments we tested the generality of this account by using stimulus-response combinations other than arrows and manual keypresses. Planning manual left-right keypressing actions impaired the identification of spatially corresponding arrows but not of words with congruent meaning. On the contrary, planning to say "left" or "right" impaired the identification of corresponding spatial words but not of congruent arrows. Thus, as the feature-integration approach suggests, stimulus identification is impaired only with overlap of perceptual or perceptually derived stimulus and response features while mere semantic congruence is insufficient.

Distance Perception↗

PubMed2005

Processing of irrelevant location information under dual-task conditions.

This study deals with the problem of whether the processing of irrelevant location information in Simon-like tasks is triggered exogenously or endogenously. In Experiment 1, the primary task required one to press, as fast as possible, a left-hand-side key or a right-hand-side key (R1) to the pitch of a tone that was presented binaurally (S1). The secondary task required identifying, without time constraints, a visual stimulus (S2) that appeared randomly to the left or right of screen center. Results showed that there was a correspondence (i.e., a cross-task Simon effect) between the location of R1 and the location of S2 when S2 was presented alone. The cross-task Simon effect became much smaller (and insignificant) when a noise stimulus was presented contralateral to S2. Experiment 2 was similar to Experiment 1, except that S2 appeared unpredictably in only one-third of the trials. Results of Experiment 2 closely replicated those of Experiment 1: the cross-task Simon effect was much greater when S2 was presented alone. Experiment 3 differed from Experiment 1 because S2 had to be processed in only one-third of the trials, in which its identity was to be reported. In the remaining two-thirds of the trials, participants could ignore S2. Results confirmed that the cross-task Simon effect was much greater when S2 was presented alone. In contrast, it did not matter whether S2 had to be processed or not. In conclusion, the present study supports the hypothesis that the task-irrelevant spatial code of the stimulus is formed automatically, likely through an exogenously triggered selection. The role of endogenously initiated selection, if any, is much less important.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

German capitalization of nouns and the detection of letters in continuous text.

The missing-letter effect refers to the phenomenon that letters are more difficult to detect in common function words (such as the) than in content words. Assuming that the missing-letter effect is diagnostic of the extraction of text structure, we exploited a special feature of German--the convention to capitalize the initial letter of nouns. Given the great flexibility of word order in German, it was proposed that this convention might help readers specify the structure of the sentence. Therefore orthographic variations that violate the capitalization rules should disrupt structure extraction and should result in a reduced missing-letter effect. The results indicated that: 1) capitalization of function words eliminated the missing-letter effect, but not at the beginning of a sentence; 2) A missing-letter effect occurred when the capitalization of the first letter was correct, but was followed by typecase alternation, and also when the size of the initial letters was relatively large for function words, but relatively small for content words. The results were discussed with respect to the possible contributions of visual familiarity, structural role, and processing time to the missing-letter effect, taking into account that a capitalized initial letter conveys significant information about the word class for German readers. Thus, the present results indicate that readers take advantage not only of function words but of any other information (here the capitalization of nouns) that helps to extract the structure of a sentence.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed2005

When do irrelevant visual stimuli impair processing of identical targets?

Three experiments investigated whether the repeated-letter inferiority effect (RLIE) and repetition blindness (RB) are identical phenomena or not and how the RLIE can be reconciled with the flanker compatibility effect (FCE). Participants reported a masked target and ignored an unmasked distractor. We manipulated the type of distractor (identical, alternative target, or neutral), the order of presenting distractor and target, and the predictability of target location. When distractors preceded the targets, distractors identical to the target always caused deficits in target processing (i.e., RB). With simultaneous presentation, identical distractors caused deficits (i.e., an RLIE) for unpredictable target locations only. Yet the RLIE was significantly smaller than RB. This result suggests that simultaneously presented stimuli are identified serially, in random order, if target position is unpredictable. As a result, RB arises only in the 50% of all trials with identical distractors in which the distractor is identified before the target. With simultaneous presentation and predictable target location, however, parallel processing of targets and distractors was possible that gave rise to an FCE in recognition accuracy. Analyses of false alarm rates revealed no evidence of significant response biases.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Action-induced blindness with lateralized stimuli and responses.

Previous dual-task studies showed that the selection and/or execution of a response interfere with concurrent visual encoding (action-induced blindness). Four experiments examined how the lateralization of stimuli and responses might affect action-induced blindness. Participants responded to tones (S1) by pressing keys with the left or right hand (R1), and simultaneously identified stimuli (S2) presented to the left or right visual field. Results revealed a complex pattern of cross-talk effects between response preparation and visual encoding. Firstly, preparing a response generally impaired concurrent visual encoding. Secondly, action-induced blindness was equally present for ipsilaterally and contralaterally presented stimuli. Thirdly, response preparation facilitated processing of visual stimuli at ipsilateral locations, probably a case of action-centered attention. Finally, the facilitatory effect of R1-S2 correspondence on visual encoding was complemented by a S2-R1 correspondence effect on response execution. Thus, acting while seeing can have both beneficial and detrimental effects on identification performance at the same time.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

Where action impairs visual encoding: an event-related fMRI study.

Behavioral experiments revealed an impairment in a perceptual task when a motor task has to be planned in parallel. In two event-related fMRI experiments healthy participants performed a GO-NOGO motor task and a visual identification task. Thus, we were able to investigate the influence of a motor task on visual identification. The paradigm allowed to compare visually identical trials with and without a concurrently performed motor response. In Experiment 1, the visual task focused on shape identification, whereas in Experiment 2, the visual task focused on color identification. We found an action-dependent BOLD response modulation in extrastriate visual areas (V3, V3A in Experiment 1 and additionally V4 in Experiment 2). Thus, results demonstrate that the planning of an action has modulatory effects in brain areas concerned with early processes in visual encoding.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

The trial context determines adjusted localization of stimuli: reconciling the Fröhlich and onset repulsion effects.

It is known that observers make localization errors in the direction of motion when asked to localize the perceived onset position of a moving target (Fröhlich effect). However, recent studies also revealed the contrary: In the onset repulsion effect, the error is opposite to the direction of motion. In four experiments we demonstrate that the conflict between these findings is resolved by considering the trial context: when the stimuli appeared at predictable positions to the left or right of fixation, pointing responses to the perceived onset position were displaced in movement direction. In contrast, when the stimuli appeared at unpredictable positions in the visual field, pointing errors were displaced opposite to motion or at least drastically reduced. Thus, localization of the perceived onset position varies with the trial context.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Effects of stimulus material on the Fröhlich illusion.

In the Fröhlich illusion, judgements of the first position of a moving object are typically displaced in the direction of motion. The illusion has been obtained with linear motion of a small target, and with rotary motion of a spatially extended line. We compared judgements of the initial orientation of a small dot and a line that rotated around the point of fixation. The illusion was absent with the dot, whereas it was reliably obtained with the line. When the density of the line was reduced to two dots, the illusion persisted. However, the illusion was absent when a half-line extending to only one side from fixation was presented. We discuss the results with respect to two attentional accounts of the Fröhlich illusion and an account based on spatiotemporal integration.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Intentionally-evoked modulations of smooth pursuit eye movements.

When observers pursue a moving target with their eyes, they use predictions of future target positions in order to keep the target within the fovea. It was suggested that these predictions of smooth pursuit (SP) eye movements are computed only from the visual feedback of the target characteristics. As a consequence, if the target vanishes unexpectedly, the eye movements do not stop immediately, but they overshoot the vanishing point. We compared the spatial and temporal features of such predictive eye movements in a task with or without intentional control over the target vanishing point. If the observers stopped the target with a button press, the overshoot of the eyes was reduced compared to a condition where the offset was computer generated. Accordingly, the eyes started to decelerate well before the target offset and lagged further behind the target when it disappeared. The involvement of intentionally-generated expectancies in eye movement control was also obvious in the spatial trajectories of the eyes, which showed a clear flexion in anticipation of the circular motion path we used. These findings are discussed together with neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the SP eye movements.

Acceleration↗