PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Jochen Senges

Publications and source records attributed to Jochen Senges.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Carotid artery stenting in octogenarians: results from the ALKK Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) Registry.

AIMS: We tried to determine the influence of age on complication rates of carotid artery stenting (CAS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Two thousand seven hundred eighty CAS procedures were included in the registry. Median age of the patients was 70.8 years, with a proportion of octogenarians of 11.2% and a significant increase between 1996 (5.9%) and 2005 (13.7%; P for trend = 0.002). In octogenarians, a symptomatic stenosis was a more frequent indication for CAS (60.7% vs. 48%, P < 0.001), the CAS procedure was aborted more frequently (6.9% vs. 2.2%; P < 0.001) and the duration of intervention was longer (Median 45 vs. 40 min; P = 0.008). Increasing age was associated with a significant increase in the in-hospital death or stroke rate (P for trend: 0.001). In-hospital death or stroke rate was also higher in octogenarians compared with younger patients (5.5 vs. 3.2%; P = 0.032, OR = 1.79; 95%CI: 1.04-3.06). Logistic regression analysis showed that age analysed as a continuous variable was a strong predictor of in-hospital death or stroke (P < 0.001), whereas octogenarians had only a trend towards a higher event rate (P = 0.062). CONCLUSION: CAS in octogenarians is performed in an increasing proportion of patients. In-hospital stroke or death rates increase significantly with older age; however, there was no excess complication rate in octogenarians.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2006

Efficacy and safety of clopidogrel 600 mg administered pre-hospitally to improve primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction (CIPAMI): study rationale and design.

Clopidogrel, in combination with acetylsalicylic acid, has become a mainstay of the pharmacological therapy for patients with acute coronary syndromes, especially in those undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). While a series of studies has shown that pre-treatment with a loading dose of clopidogrel 300 or 600 mg prior to PCI is effective in reducing cardiovascular complications, the optimal dose and timing in various patient groups is still unclear. The primary objective of the present randomized, open-label Clopidogrel to Improve Primary percutaneous coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction (CIPAMI) study is to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel in addition to standard acetylsalicylic acid/heparin treatment in the pre-hospital setting in 654 patients with acute ST elevation myocardial infarction scheduled for primary PCI. The primary efficacy endpoint is the TIMI 2/3 patency of the infarct-related artery immediately prior to PCI. The rationale, design and methods of this study are described.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Effect of clopidogrel on 1-year mortality in hospital survivors of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in clinical practice.

AIMS: We sought to assess the effect of clopidogrel on clinical events 1 year after discharge in survivors of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in clinical practice. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed data of consecutive survivors of acute STEMI and either concomitant therapy with aspirin or aspirin plus clopidogrel at discharge, who were prospectively enrolled in the Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACOS) registry between July 2000 and November 2002. A total of 5886 (3795 with and 2091 without clopidogrel) patients were included into this analysis. Patients were divided into three groups according to the initial reperfusion therapy: no reperfusion therapy (n=1445), fibrinolysis (n=1734), or primary PCI (n=2707). The multivariable analysis for 12+2 month mortality after discharge using the propenstiy score with adjustment for baseline characteristics and treatments (age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, prior MI, hyperlipidaemia, renal insufficiency, cardiogenic shock, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, anterior infarct location, reduced left ventricular function, elective revascularization, beta-blockers, statins, ACE-inhibitors) showed that mortality was significantly lower in the aspirin plus clopidogrel group compared with the aspirin group in the total group and patients with reperfusion therapy [total group odds ratio (OR) 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.61; no reperfusion therapy OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.65-1.45; fibrinolysis OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.87; primary percutaneous coronary intervention OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.23-0.62]. CONCLUSION: In clinical practice, adjunctive therapy with clopidogrel, in addition to aspirin, in survivors after STEMI is associated with a reduction in 1-year mortality in patients treated with early reperfusion therapy.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Statin use and survival in patients with chronic heart failure--results from two observational studies with 5200 patients.

BACKGROUND: There is minimal evidence that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) are beneficial in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Treatment with statins may lead to a lower mortality in CHF, independent of cholesterol levels, CHF etiology and clinical status. METHODS: In a first study, we included 3132 patients with CHF from the ELITE 2 study in whom information on body mass index (BMI) and statin use at baseline were available. In a second study, we pooled the databases of 5 tertiary referral centers with 2068 CHF patients. In this cohort 705 patients were on a statin (34%), 585 of 1202 (49%) patients with ischemic etiology, and 120 of 866 (14%) patients with non-ischemic etiology (established by coronary angiography). FINDINGS: Patients in ELITE 2 who received statin therapy at baseline (n=397, 13%) had lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.83; p=0.0007). In univariate analysis, increasing age, NYHA class, creatinine, and decreasing BMI, LVEF, and cholesterol, as well as lack of beta-blocker treatment and ischemic etiology (all p<0.002) related to higher mortality. In multivariable analysis, statin therapy related to lower mortality independently of all these variables (adjusted HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.93; p=0.017). In the second study CHF patients on statins had lower mortality (adjusted HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.44-0.77; p=0.0001). Both in patients with ischemic (p<0.0001) and non-ischemic etiology (p=0.028) statin treatment related to better survival. INTERPRETATION: In chronic heart failure, treatment with statins is related to lower mortality, independent of cholesterol levels, disease etiology and clinical status.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Gender differences in acute non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

To assess gender-based differences in presentation and outcome after non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in clinical practice, this study examined data from the Acute Coronary Syndrome registry, which enrolled 16,817 patients from 2000 through the end of 2002, 6,358 of them with NSTEMIs (34.1% women). Women with NSTEMIs were 7.5 years older, had a history of myocardial infarction and percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass graft less often, and were less likely to have smoked. They more often had a history of systemic hypertension and diabetes mellitus, but this difference was due to their older age. Reperfusion therapy was performed less often in women, which still was significant after adjustment for baseline variables (odds ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.63 to 0.80). Clopidogrel was given less often in women (43.4% vs 56%). After adjustment for age, gender differences in medical therapy with statins, aspirin, and beta blockers were not significant. Hospital mortality was 1.7 times greater in women. This difference was not significant after adjustment for age (odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.35). Women had greater crude long-term mortality, but after age adjustment, this difference was no longer significant (odds ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.11). In conclusion, women with NSTEMIs were older than men and thus more often had concomitant diseases but less often had a history of myocardial infarction or coronary artery bypass grafts. They less often received acute percutaneous coronary intervention and less often were treated with clopidogrel. However, there was no difference in age-adjusted mortality in women.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Clinical benefit of enoxaparin in patients with high-risk acute coronary syndromes without ST elevations in clinical practice.

In randomized clinical trials, low-molecular-weight heparin enoxaparin has been shown to decrease ischemic complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACSs) without ST elevations who are treated conservatively. Enoxaparin has been shown to be equally effective as unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with an early invasive approach. Little is known about the use and efficacy of enoxaparin in unselected patients with non-ST-elevation ACSs in clinical practice. In a retrospective analysis of the prospective ACOS registry, we compared the outcome of patients who were >60 years of age with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction or unstable angina with ST-segment changes who were treated with enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin. In total, 4,806 patients (55%) with non-ST-elevation ACS fulfilled our inclusion criteria for this analysis; 1,178 (25%) were treated with enoxaparin and 3,628 (75%) with unfractionated heparin. There were no differences between groups in baseline characteristics. We observed a significant decrease in the combined end point of death or nonfatal reinfarction with enoxaparin in the entire study group (odds ratio 0.51, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.70) and in subgroups treated with early percutaneous coronary intervention (n = 1,333, odds ratio 0.36, 95% confidence interval 0.17 to 0.80), coronary artery bypass grafting during the index hospitalization (n = 270, odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 2.42), or conservatively (n = 3,203, odds ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.81). There was no significant increase in severe bleeding complications with enoxaparin (5.2% vs 4.5%). In conclusion, in clinical practice, in unselected high-risk patients with non-ST-elevation ACSs who are treated conservatively or with early percutaneous coronary intervention, early treatment with enoxaparin is associated with a significant decrease in the combined end point of in-hospital death and reinfarction, without a significant increase in severe bleeding complications.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Highly purified omega-3 fatty acids for secondary prevention of sudden cardiac death after myocardial infarction-aims and methods of the OMEGA-study.

INTRODUCTION: During the last decades a large body of data has been accumulated indicating omega-3 fatty acids to exert beneficial effects on the prognosis of patients with cardiovascular disease. Especially, omega-3 fatty acids are regarded to be effective in reducing the risk of sudden cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction. However, treatment of acute myocardial infarction and secondary prevention considerably have been improved within the past years including early revascularization by PCI, the routine use of beta-blockers, statins and ACE-inhibitors as well as cardiac rehabilitation for improving life style measures. To date, there exists no controlled randomized trial testing the prognostic effect of omega-3 fatty acids after acute myocardial infarction in a double blind regimen under the conditions of modern treatment of myocardial infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study therefore evaluates the effect of highly purified omega-3 fatty acid ethylesters (omega-3-acid ethyl esters 90=Zodin) on the rate of sudden cardiac death within 1 year after acute myocardial infarction. Secondary endpoints are total mortality, non-fatal cardiovascular events, rhythm abnormalities in holter monitoring and depression score. RESULT AND CONCLUSION: The recruitment-period started in October 2003 and is expected to last until December 2006. The results of the study are therefore expected for the beginning of 2008, when all patients will have completed the 12-months follow up-period.

Death, Sudden, Cardiac↗
PubMed2006

Predictors of death or myocardial infarction during follow-up after coronary stenting with the sirolimus-eluting stent. Results from the prospective multicenter German Cypher Stent Registry.

BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting coronary stents are the most recent "breakthrough" technology in interventional cardiology. Whereas risk factors influencing restenosis and need for target vessel revascularization are well known, risk factors for dying or developing a myocardial infarction (MI) after drug-eluting coronary stent implantation need to be evaluated yet. METHODS: We evaluated data from the German Cypher Stent Registry. RESULTS: From April 2002 to December 2004, 7445 patients at 122 hospitals, who received at least one sirolimus-eluting stent during percutaneous coronary intervention, were included. Complete follow-up at a median of 6.6 months (quartiles 6.1-8.1 months) was available in 6755 patients (91%). Death occurred in 1.8% (120/6755) of patients, nonfatal MI in 2.3% (156/6635), and death or MI in 4.1% (276/6755) of patients. Independent predictors of death or MI were initial presentation with ST-elevation MI or non-ST-elevation MI (OR [odds ratio] 2.21, 95% CI 1.66-2.95, P < .0001), cardiogenic shock (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.67-5.55, P = .0003), renal insufficiency (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.24-2.44, P = .0017), reduced left ventricular function (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.21-2.50, P = .0027), age (per decade) (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.05-1.36, P = .0058), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.84, P = .0183), 3-vessel disease (OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.99-1.77, P = .043), and prior MI (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.01-1.80, P = .0468), whereas interventional and lesion characteristics showed no significant association. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that the most powerful predictors of death or MI after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation during percutaneous coronary intervention are presentation with an acute coronary syndrome, impaired left ventricular ejection fraction, and conventional risk factors for coronary heart disease. Interventional and lesion characteristics do not play a major role.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Actual clinical practice of exercise testing in consecutive patients after non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: results of the acute coronary syndromes registry.

BACKGROUND: Exercise testing has been advocated for risk stratification and determination of therapeutic strategies after acute myocardial infarction. Frequency and therapeutic impact of exercise testing after non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) in actual clinical practice, however, is not known. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the German acute coronary syndrome (ACOS) registry patients with acute NSTEMI (n = 5281) were evaluated: 20.8% of patients (1097/5281) had predischarge exercise testing, and from these tests 33.5% (367/1097) were positive. The strongest predictors for renunciation of predischarge exercise testing were ejection fraction under 40%, age over 70 years and stroke history. In-hospital coronary angiographies or percutaneous coronary interventions were not associated with a lower rate of exercise testing. During 1-year follow-up all-cause mortality was 13.6% in patients without and 5.1% in patients with exercise test respectively (P < 0.0001). In patients with positive exercise test 1-year mortality was 6.5%, in patients with negative exercise test 4.4% (P = 0.13). During follow-up no significant difference was found in the rate of coronary revascularizations between patients either with positive or negative exercise tests. Furthermore, no significant difference was found in the rate of death and revascularizations comparing different groups of exercise capacity. CONCLUSIONS: After NSTEMI in Germany the majority of patients do not get predischarge exercise testing, although this group appears to be of special risk for fatality during follow-up. Furthermore, in actual clinical practice, neither exercise induced signs of ischemia nor exercise capacity have a significant impact on the rate of revascularization procedures during follow-up.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2005

Beta-blocker treatment of chronic systolic heart failure improves prognosis even in patients meeting one or more exclusion criteria of the MERIT-HF study.

AIMS: Improved prognosis of patients with chronic systolic heart failure by treatment with beta-blockers has been shown in several randomized controlled multicentre trials. However, in clinical practice only a part of heart failure patients meet the inclusion criteria of these trials. The present study evaluates whether reduction of mortality by beta-blockers also can be achieved in patients presenting one or more exclusion criteria of the MERIT-HF trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: From the Ludwigshafen Heart Failure Registry 675 patients with chronic systolic heart failure consecutively enrolled between January 1995 and June 2004 were divided in two groups either meeting the inclusion criteria of the MERIT-HF trial ('trial patients': n = 278, 60% treated with beta-blockers) or not ('non-trial patients': n = 397; 51% treated with beta-blockers). The distribution of the MERIT-HF exclusion criteria in the group of 'non-trial patients' was as follows: acute myocardial infarction 9.6%; systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg 7.5%; chronic obstructive lung disease 33.2%; other serious diseases potentially limiting prognosis 16.9%; acutely performed or planned ICD, bypass surgery, PCI, heart transplantation: 17.1, 15.9, 7.8, and 4.8%, respectively. Median follow-up was 31.3 months (upper/lower quartile 16.3/50.0 months). All-cause mortality was significantly reduced by beta-blocker treatment not only in 'trial patients' (adjusted hazard ratio 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86) but also in 'non-trial patients' (adjusted hazard ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.53-0.97). CONCLUSION: In clinical practice only the smaller part of the population to be treated for chronic systolic heart failure meets the inclusion criteria of the MERIT-HF study. However, beta-blocker treatment is associated with a significantly reduced long-term mortality even in patients meeting one or more exclusion criteria of the MERIT-HF study.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2005

Embolic protection devices for carotid artery stenting: is there a difference between filter and distal occlusive devices?

OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare the efficacy of a filter embolic protection device (F-EPD) and a distal occlusive embolic protection device (DO-EPD) in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting (CAS). BACKGROUND: The embolic protection device (EPD) may lower the periprocedural rate of cerebral ischemic events during CAS. However, it is unclear whether there is a difference in effectiveness between the different types of EPD. METHODS: We analyzed data from the Carotid Artery Stent (CAS) Registry. RESULTS: From July 1996 to July 2003, 1,734 patients were included in the prospective CAS Registry. Of these patients, 729 patients were treated with an EPD, 553 (75.9%) with F-EPD, and 176 (24.1%) with DO-EPD. Patients treated with DO-EPD were more likely to be treated for symptomatic stenosis (64.5% vs. 53.4%, p = 0.011). The carotid lesions in patients treated under DO-EPD seemed to be more complicated, as expressed by a higher proportion of ulcers (p = 0.035), severe calcification (p = 0.039), a longer lesion length (p = 0.025), and a higher pre-interventional grade of stenosis (p < 0.001). The median duration of the CAS intervention was 30 min in the DO-EPD group, compared with 48 min in the filter group (p < 0.001). No differences in clinical events rate between the two groups of protection devices were observed. Multivariate analysis on the occurrence of the combined end point of in-hospital death or stroke found no difference between filter- and DO-EPD (4 of 176 [2.3%] for DO-EPD vs. 10 of 551 [1.8%] for F-EPD; adjusted odds ratio = 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.24 to 4.44; p = 0.958). CONCLUSIONS: Filter EPD is the currently preferred method of EPD in clinical practice. Both F-EPD and DO-EPD seem to be equally effective during CAS.

Brain Ischemia↗
PubMed2005

Incidence and predictors of target vessel revascularization and clinical event rates of the sirolimus-eluting coronary stent (results from the prospective multicenter German Cypher Stent Registry).

Randomized trials have demonstrated the ability of drug-eluting stents to decrease the risk of restenosis after coronary stent implantation. However, the incidences of major cardiovascular/cerebral adverse events (MACCEs) and target vessel revascularization (TVR) during follow-up in a routine clinical setting remain to be determined. We analyzed data of the multicenter German Cypher Stent Registry. From April 2002 to March 2003, 1,726 patients at 93 hospitals who received >/=1 sirolimus-eluting coronary stent were included. Median follow-up was 6.7 months. During follow-up, death occurred in 1.2% of patients (20 of 1,726), nonfatal myocardial infarction in 2.5% (43 of 1,706), and nonfatal stroke in 0.5% (7 of 1,469). TVR was performed in 8.6% of patients, with percutaneous coronary intervention in 7.3% and coronary artery bypass grafting in 1.5%. The overall rate of MACCEs or TVR was 10.8% (186 of 1,726). Independent predictors of TVR were the target vessel being a bypass graft (odds ratio [OR] 2.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.41 to 4.18, p = 0.001), management of >1 lesion during the same intervention (OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.96, p = 0.035), 2- or 3-vessel disease (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.05 to 2.72, p = 0.030), and age (per decade; OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.98, p = 0.025). These data confirm the safety and effectiveness of using the sirolimus-eluting stent in daily clinical practice. The management of bypass grafts and multiple lesions in 1 session and the presence of multivessel disease were predictors of MACCEs or TVR.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed2005

Early eptifibatide improves TIMI 3 patency before primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction: results of the randomized integrilin in acute myocardial infarction (INTAMI) pilot trial.

AIMS: Adjunctive therapy with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors has been shown to reduce ischaemic complications and improve clinical outcome in patients with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction. Little is known about the use of eptifibatide in this setting. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and two patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction <12 h scheduled for primary percutaneous intervention were randomly assigned to early eptifibatide given in the emergency room (early) or optional eptifibatide at the time of PCI (late or no). Primary endpoint was the patency of the infarct vessel before PCI. Patients in the early group received their first eptifibatide bolus, a mean of 45 min before angiography. TIMI 3 patency before PCI was observed in 34% in the early group and 10% in late or no group (P=0.01). The incidence of complete ST resolution 1 h after PCI was 61% in early group and 66% in the late or no group, respectively (P=n.s.). There were no significant differences in the rates of TIMI 3 flow after PCI, death, reinfarction, stroke, and major bleeding complications until day 30. CONCLUSION: In this pilot trial, double bolus eptifibatide given in the emergency room improved TIMI 3 grade flow of the infarct-related coronary artery before PCI. These results should be confirmed in a larger trial and whether this advantage translates into an improvement in clinical outcome should be tested in a trial with primary clinical endpoints.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Do statins influence the prognostic impact of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia after ST-elevation myocardial infarction?

AIMS: The study evaluates the effect of statin therapy on the prognostic impact of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) occurring after acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: From the German Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry (ACOS), 3137 patients with STEMI and in-hospital Holter monitoring were analysed. Three hundred and forty-six (11.0%) patients had NSVT. When compared with patients with no documented NSVT, patients with NSVT were older, more often had myocardial infarction in their history, diabetes mellitus, and an ejection fraction <40%. Regarding frequency of drug application, medication at discharge did not (beta-blockers, ACE-inhibitors, amiodarone) or only slightly (acetylsalicylic acid, statins, and sotalol) differ between both groups. Multivariable analysis of 1 year mortality, adjusted for age, gender, diabetes, reperfusion therapy, ejection fraction <40%, and beta-blocker therapy showed the following results: In patients without statin treatment and no NSVT, 1 year mortality after STEMI was 9.2%, but increased to 25.0% [odds ratio (OR) 3.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.47-6.20], if NSVT were present. In patients on statin treatment and no NSVT, 1 year mortality was only 3.2%, and in the presence of NSVT 1 year mortality was not significantly increased anymore (5.3%; OR 1.03; 95% CI 0.55-1.92). CONCLUSION: After STEMI, only in patients not on statin treatment, the occurrence of NSVT is associated with a significant and marked increase in 1 year mortality.

Aged↗