Biomedical subjects

Jochen Tillein

Publications and source records attributed to Jochen Tillein.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2007

Impact of intrascalar blood on hearing.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: The objective of this controlled animal study was to evaluate the effects of intrascalar blood on hearing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eight guinea pigs underwent intrascalar administration of their own blood in one ear and control solution in the contralateral ear. Solutions were applied through cochleostomy to the scala tympani. Compound action potential (CAP) thresholds were determined before administration and at different intervals for 2 months thereafter. RESULTS: Immediate deterioration of thresholds was seen mainly in the high-frequency range, averaging 27 dB and 20 dB in the study and control groups, respectively. At day 3, threshold shifts recovered in the control group but remained in the low-frequency range in the study group. An extensive recovery was seen in both groups. However, permanent threshold shifts persisted. There was an enhanced shift of thresholds of up to 7 dB in the study group. CONCLUSIONS: Even small amounts of intrascalar blood seem to cause transient and permanent detrimental effects on cochlear function. In procedures involving opening of the otic capsule-like stapes surgery and cochlear implantation with hearing preservation-minimizing surgical blood admixture to intracochlear compartments seems therefore fundamental.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Cochlear implants: cortical plasticity in congenital deprivation.

Congenital auditory deprivation (deafness) leads to a dysfunctional intrinsic cortical microcircuitry. This chapter reviews these deficits with a particular emphasis on layer-specific activity within the primary auditory cortex. Evidence for a delay in activation of supragranular layers and reduction in activity in infragranular layers is discussed. Such deficits indicate the incompetence of the primary auditory cortex to not only properly process thalamic input and generate output within the infragranular layers, but also incorporate top-down modulations from higher order auditory cortex into the processing within primary auditory cortex. Such deficits are the consequence of a misguided postnatal development. Maturation of primary auditory cortex in deaf animals shows evidence of a developmental delay and further alterations in gross synaptic currents, spread of activation, and morphology of local field potentials recorded at the cortical surface. Additionally, degenerative changes can be observed. When hearing is initiated early in life (e.g., by chronic cochlear-implant stimulation), many of these deficits are counterbalanced. However, plasticity of the auditory cortex decreases with increasing age, so that a sensitive period for plastic adaptation can be demonstrated within the second to sixth months of life in the deaf cat. Potential molecular mechanisms of the existence of sensitive period are discussed. Data from animal research may be compared to electroencephalographic data obtained from cochlear-implanted congenitally deaf children. After cochlear implantation in humans, three phases of plastic adaptation can be observed: a fast one, taking place within the first few weeks after implantation, showing no sensitive period; a slower one, taking place within the first months after implantation (a sensitive period up to 4 years of age); and possibly a third, and the longest one, related to increasing activation of higher order cortical areas.

Animals↗

PubMed2006

Brain plasticity under cochlear implant stimulation.

The benefit of cochlear implantation crucially depends on the ability of the brain to learn to classify neural activity evoked by the cochlear implant. Brain plasticity is a complex property with massive developmental changes after birth. The present paper reviews the experimental work on auditory plasticity and focuses on the plasticity required for adaptation to cochlear implant stimulation. It reviews the data on developmental sensitive periods in auditory plasticity of hearing, hearing-impaired and deaf, cochlear-implanted, animals. Based on the analysis of the above findings in animals and comparable data from humans, a cochlear implantation within the first 2 years of age is recommended.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Combined electric and acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: results of a clinical study.

Combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS) of the auditory system is a new therapy for patients with severe to profound high- and mid-frequency hearing loss but remaining low-frequency hearing. In a prospective study, 13 patients with low-frequency hearing of better than 60 dB below 1 kHz were implanted with a MED-EL COMBI 40+ cochlear implant. Pure tone thresholds as well as monosyllabic word scores and Hochmair-Schulz-Moser sentences in quiet and in noise were measured with hearing aids, cochlear implant alone and in the combined stimulation mode (EAS) in the same ear. Hearing could be partially preserved in 11 out of the 13 patients. All patients scored significantly higher with cochlear implant alone than with hearing aids. Seven patients scored higher in the EAS mode than with cochlear implant alone for sentences in noise, 4 remained unchanged, and 2 could not use EAS. Synergistic effects of EAS were most prominent for hearing in noise with increases of up to 72% as compared to cochlear implant alone.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2004

Conservation of low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation.

OBJECTIVES: As results with cochlear implants have continued to improve, patients with some remaining cochlear function have become eligible for cochlear implantation. Thus, preservation of acoustic hearing after implantation has gained importance. Hearing preservation can be considered a benchmark for atraumatic implantation preventing neural degeneration from loss of residual hair cells or subsequent to local trauma. In this prospective study, the possibility of preserving low-frequency hearing in cochlear implantation using a modified surgical technique has been explored. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a prospective study design, 14 subjects with considerable low-frequency hearing of 20-60 dB in the frequency range 125-500 Hz but with unsatisfactory speech understanding with hearing aids of < 35% monosyllabic word understanding were implanted with a MED-EL COMBI-40+ cochlear implant. The insertion depth was intentionally limited to 19-24 mm to prevent damage to low-frequency regions of the cochlea. Pre- and postoperative pure-tone thresholds were measured. RESULTS: Hearing was conserved within 0-10 dB in 9/14 subjects and within 11-20 dB in 3/14; in 2/14 subjects hearing was completely lost in the implanted ear. Thus hearing could at least partially be conserved in 12/14 subjects (86%). Median threshold values decreased by 10, 15, 17.5 and 5 dB at 125, 250, 500 and 1000 Hz, respectively. Even high levels of hearing, e.g. 30 dB at 500 Hz, could be maintained after implantation in some subjects. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports successful conservation of hearing after cochlear implantation using a modified surgical technique. Even high levels of hearing could be maintained, showing that implantation of an intracochlear electrode can be performed atraumatically with preservation of functional structures.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Application of carbon dioxide and erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet lasers in inner ear surgery: an experimental study.

BACKGROUND: Surgery of the inner ear requires atraumatic techniques to preserve the sensory structures of the inner ear. With modern laser technology, surgery can be performed without mechanical contact, reducing the risk of direct mechanical trauma. However, energy transfer by laser light has the potential to induce damage by heating, pressure waves, or direct irradiation, depending on the properties of the laser and parameters of application. HYPOTHESIS: The application of laser systems in inner ear surgery may have an advantage over traditional techniques; the carbon dioxide laser in continuous mode with an automated scanning procedure and the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser were compared with a mechanical technique, using a diamond drill. METHODS: A cochleostomy in the basal cochlear turn of guinea pigs was created. Thresholds in response to frequency-specific stimuli and clicks were established by recording compound action potentials, both before and after the procedure. RESULTS: The best results in terms of preservation of cochlear function were obtained with the diamond drill. However, a single ear had a complete loss after fracture of the cochlear wall. Mean threshold shifts observed with the carbon dioxide laser were slightly greater, showing mild high-frequency losses, although differences to the group of drilling were not statistically significant. Results with the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser showed significantly higher degrees of hearing loss than the other two groups, predominantly in the high-frequency region. CONCLUSIONS: Mechanical opening of the inner ear using a microdrill can be performed with minimal hearing loss; however, it carries the risk of direct trauma to the inner ear. The carbon dioxide laser with a new scanning technology as a noncontact procedure is shown to be effective and safe. It can be regarded as a useful tool in inner ear surgery. The erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser has a greater potential to cause damage.

Aluminum↗