Jodie C Avery | PubMed Health

PubMed2006

Postmenopausal hormone therapy: who now takes it and do they differ from non-users?

BACKGROUND: Considerable changes in hormone therapy use have taken place in the last few years. AIMS: To determine current usage of postmenopausal hormone therapy and assess the trend and rate of change in hormone therapy usage over the last 13 years. Additionally, to assess differences between current users and non-users for health-related and risk factor variables. METHODS: Questions regarding hormone therapy use have been included in an annual face to face population health survey of South Australians eight times since 1991. In 2004, additional questions on health status and quality of life were included. RESULTS: In 2004, current use of hormone therapy was 15.4, 19.8 and 31.2% in all women over 40, 50 and 50-59 years, respectively. Ever use of hormone therapy among all women over 50 years was 46.5% with a mean duration of use of 7.46 years. Hormone therapy users did not differ from non-users in chronic disease indicators, body mass index, complementary medicine or therapist use, other health service use, socioeconomic status or quality of life. Increased hormone therapy use was associated with higher income, better educated, employed and married women in their sixth decade. Current use has varied over the years, with an increase to 2000, but a drop in 2003 and 2004. CONCLUSION: Apart from menopausal symptoms, there is no evidence to support differences between users and non-users in terms of quality of life or health characteristics, requiring more appropriate selection of women for hormone therapy.

Age Factors↗

PubMed2004

The impact of incontinence on health-related quality of life in a South Australian population sample.

OBJECTIVE: To assess prevalence of incontinence in a South Australian representative population sample and compare the health-related quality-of-life impact of incontinence with other chronic conditions. METHOD: The 1998 South Australian Health Omnibus Survey interviewed 3,010 male and female respondents aged 15 to 97 years (response rate 70.2%). This representative population survey included questions to determine the prevalence of urinary (stress and urge), and anal (faecal and flatus) incontinence, and other chronic conditions. Respondents also completed the MOS SF-36 questionnaire. RESULTS: Self-reported prevalence of all types of incontinence was 26.0%. The prevalence of anal and urinary incontinence were 10.5% and 20.3% respectively, with 4.8% of respondents experiencing both. Univariate analysis found the prevalence of incontinence was statistically significantly higher among females, and those who were older, widowed, had no post-school education, and lower incomes. After adjusting for differences in age and sex, it was found that people with incontinence were significantly impaired across all dimensions of the SF-36, scoring in the lowest 42% of the population, compared with those people without incontinence. People with incontinence exhibited different SF-36 profiles to those with other chronic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Incontinence is common in South Australia, affecting more than one-quarter of the population, particularly older women (56.2% for 60 years and over). The impact of incontinence on health-related quality of life is characteristically different to that demonstrated by other chronic conditions. IMPLICATIONS: In an ageing population, identification of the impact of incontinence is necessary to direct policy development and resource allocation to this area.

Female↗