PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joe B Putnam

Publications and source records attributed to Joe B Putnam.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Long-term outcome of phase II trial evaluating chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and surgery for locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the long-term outcome of chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and surgery for patients with locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-eight patients with locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer were entered into a Phase II study between November 1996 and October 1998 at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Patients initially received two cycles of chemotherapy with paclitaxel (200 mg/m(2)), 5-fluorouracil (750 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days), and cisplatin (15 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days), followed by chemoradiotherapy, consisting of radiation (45 Gy during 5 weeks) with 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m(2)/d during radiation) and cisplatin (15 mg/m(2)/d for 5 days). Surgical resection was performed 4-6 weeks after the completion of the chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: Most patients had adenocarcinoma (n = 32; 84%). Pretreatment endoscopic ultrasonography revealed T3 tumors in 33 patients (87%) and N1 disease in 25 patients (66%). Thirty-seven patients (97%) completed the planned chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, and 35 patients (92%) underwent surgery, with a 30-day mortality rate of 6% (2 of 35 patients). A pathologic complete response or microscopic residual carcinoma (<10% viable) was found in 25 (71%) of 35 patients and was associated with a disease-free survival rate of 72% at 3 years and 51% at 5 years. On the basis of an intention-to-treat analysis and a median potential follow-up of 58 months, the 3- and 5-year overall survival rate for all 38 patients was 63% and 39%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The long-term results of this study suggest that the strategy of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy and surgery is safe and warrants further evaluation in the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced esophageal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2003

Induction of p53-regulated genes and tumor regression in lung cancer patients after intratumoral delivery of adenoviral p53 (INGN 201) and radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: We designed a prospective single arm Phase II study to evaluate the feasibility and mechanisms of apoptosis induction after Ad-p53 (INGN 201) gene transfer and radiation therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Nineteen patients with nonmetastatic non-small cell lung cancer who were not eligible for chemoradiation or surgery were treated as outpatients with radiation therapy to 60 Gy over 6 weeks in conjunction with three intratumoral injections of Ad-p53 (INGN 201) on days 1, 18, and 32. RESULTS: Seventeen of 19 patients completed all planned radiation and Ad-p53 (INGN 201) gene therapy as outpatients. The most common adverse events were grade 1 or 2 fevers (79%) and chills (53%). Three months after completion of therapy, pathologic biopsies of the primary tumor revealed no viable tumor (12 of 19 patients, 63%), viable tumor (3 of 19 patients, 16%), and not assessed (4 of 19 patients, 21%). Computed tomography and bronchoscopic findings at the primary injected tumor revealed complete response (1 of 19 patients, 5%), partial response (11 of 19 patients, 58%), stable disease (3 of 19 patients, 16%), progressive disease (2 of 19 patients, 11%), and not evaluable (2 of 19 patients, 11%). Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of the four p53 related genes [p21 (CDKN1A), FAS, BAK, and MDM2] revealed that Bak expression was increased significantly 24 h after Ad-p53 (INGN 201) injection and levels of CDKN1A and MDM2 expression were increased over the course of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Intratumoral injection of Ad-p53 (INGN 201) in combination with radiation therapy is well tolerated and demonstrates evidence of tumor regression at the primary injected tumor. Serial biopsies of the tumor suggest that BAK gene expression is most closely related to Ad-p53 (INGN 201) gene transfer.

Adenoviridae↗
PubMed2003

Epidermal growth factor receptor, cyclooxygenase-2, and BAX expression in the primary non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases.

PURPOSE: The purpose is to identify biological markers that predict brain metastasis and treatment outcome in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Samples were obtained from the primary tumors, lymph nodes, and brain metastases of 29 patients with NSCLC who had undergone resection of both the pulmonary tumors and the brain lesions. Samples from 29 patients matched for age, sex, and histology whose pulmonary tumors were resected served as controls. Samples were stained with H&E as well as immunohistochemical stains for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), and BAX. Comparisons were made between patients with and without brain metastasis. Independent investigators determined the percentage of positive cells. RESULTS: There was positive correlation in expression of all three biomarkers between primary lung tumors and lymph node metastases. Significantly higher levels of EGFR were found in lymph node metastases in the control group (P = 0.0147). COX-2 expression in brain lesions correlated with expression in primary tumors (P = 0.023). BAX levels were lower in poorly differentiated tumors in lymph node metastases in the control group (P = 0.01) and in brain metastases (P = 0.045). Low EGFR expression and high COX-2 expression in lymph node metastasis were associated with poorer treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Expression of EGFR, COX-2, and BAX in primary lung tumors did not differ between patients with brain metastases from NSCLC and those without brain metastases. These three biomarkers cannot be used to predict brain metastasis. Studies of other biomarkers are under way in an effort to predict brain metastasis among patients with NSCLC.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Increased phospho-AKT (Ser(473)) expression in bronchial dysplasia: implications for lung cancer prevention studies.

AKT, a downstream mediator of phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase, is activated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but we have not yet defined the stage of malignant transformation at which AKT is activated in the bronchial epithelium. We performed immunohistochemical analysis of activated AKT [phosphorylated (p)-AKT Ser(473)] in tissue specimens of normal bronchial epithelium, bronchial hyperplasia and squamous metaplasia ("reactive" epithelium), bronchial dysplasia, and NSCLC. Among NSCLC specimens, immunohistochemical findings were correlated with patient demographics, tumor stage, histology, and survival. We observed p-AKT expression in 12 of 44 (27.3%) normal bronchial biopsy specimens, 4 of 9 (44.4%) reactive epithelium specimens, 22 of 25 (88%) dysplastic specimens, and 25 of 76 (33%) NSCLC specimens. Among patients with resected early-stage or locally advanced NSCLC, p-AKT expression had no effect on tumor stage, histology, or survival. Of the histological groups examined, bronchial dysplasia specimens expressed p-AKT most frequently, supporting AKT activation as an early event in lung cancer progression. Given its role as a mediator of malignant transformation, p-AKT should be investigated as a potential target in future lung cancer prevention studies.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed2002

Association of Ki-67, p53, and bcl-2 expression of the primary non-small-cell lung cancer lesion with brain metastatic lesion.

PURPOSE: The study was conducted to determine whether immunohistochemical analysis of Ki-67, p53, and bcl-2 in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer is associated with a higher rate of brain metastases and whether the intrapatient expression of these biomarkers (in the primary tumors vs. brain lesions) is similar. METHODS AND MATERIALS: At the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, tumors from 29 case patients with primary lung tumor and brain metastasis and 29 control patients with primary lung tumor but no brain metastasis were resected and examined for immunohistochemical expression. Ki-67, p53, and bcl-2 were analyzed in resected primary lung, lymph node, and metastatic brain tumors. Each control patient was matched by age, gender, and histology to a patient with brain metastasis. RESULTS: No significant differences in patient survival characteristics were detected between the case group and control group. Also, difference in patient outcome between the two groups was not generally predicted by biomarker analysis. However, when the groups were combined, the biomarker analysis was predictive for certain patient outcome end points. Using median values as cutoff points between low and high expression of biomarkers, it was observed that high expression of Ki-67 (>40%) in lung primaries was associated with poorer disease-free survival (p = 0.04), whereas low expression of p53 in lung primaries was associated with poorer overall survival (p = 0.04), and these patients had a higher rate of nonbrain distant metastases (p = 0.02). The patients with brain metastases were particularly prone to developing nonbrain distant metastases if the percentage of p53-positive cells in brain metastases was low (p = 0.01). There was a positive correlation in the expression of Ki-67 (p = 0.02)(r(2) = 0.1608), as well as p53 (p < 0.001) (r(2) = 0.7380), between lung primaries and brain metastases. Compared to Ki-67 and p53, bcl-2 was the least predictive. CONCLUSION: Differences in biomarker expression between the case and control groups did not serve as significant predictors of brain metastasis or patient survival. There was a strong correlation between lung primary biomarker expression and brain metastasis expression for Ki-67 and p53. Univariate analysis showed that low p53 and high Ki-67 expression predicted poor prognosis. This study shows that there may be a strong correlation between biomarker expression in non-small-cell lung cancer primary tumors and their brain metastases.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Malignant pleural effusions.

The management of pleural effusions and, in particular, recurrent MPE require an accurate assessment of the characteristics of the pleural fluid and the relief of the patient's symptoms. Although a common problem, treatment of pleural effusions and MPE is highly variable. Selection of optimal treatment for the individual patient (or population of patients) requires a careful assessment of the benefits and associated risks of the therapy. Pleurodesis is an artificial measure of success that is hospital centered, not patient centered. Because patients with MPE have limited life expectancy, efforts to palliate or eliminate dyspnea, optimize function, eliminate hospitalization, and reduce excessive end-of-life medical care costs may be best achieved with a chronic indwelling pleural catheter. The need for expensive supplies may temper the use of such outpatient management. Alternative techniques of tube thoracostomy, drainage, and sclerosis or thoracoscopy with drainage and talc poudrage also have benefits but are associated with variable hospitalization and increased medical costs.

Catheterization↗
PubMed2002

Recurrent bronchogenic cyst causing recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy.

A case of a 50-year-old male who developed left recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy due to a bronchogenic cyst is presented. The bronchogenic cyst recurred following incomplete excision and multiple attempts at percutaneous aspiration. Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is an unusual complication of bronchogenic cysts. This case highlights the need for complete excision of these cysts and the lack of efficacy of cyst aspiration.

Bronchogenic Cyst↗
PubMed2002

Results of lung metastasectomy from breast cancer: prognostic criteria on the basis of 467 cases of the International Registry of Lung Metastases.

OBJECTIVE: Metastatic breast cancer is still defined as an incurable disease. Although the prognosis after resection of isolated metastases to the lung is much better than after chemotherapy most oncologists and gynecologists disapprove of lung metastasectomy. METHODS: In order to summarize the experience of pulmonary metastatic surgery and to achieve more relevant data by an increased number of cases, we evaluate the data of the International Registry of Lung Metastases of 467 patients having lung metastases from breast cancer with regard to long-term survival and prognostic factors. RESULTS: In 84% a complete metastatic resection was possible. The survival rates are 38% after 5 years, 22% after 10 years, and 20% after 15 years. Prognostic factors are a disease-free interval of > or = 36 months with 5-year survival of 45%, a 10-year survival of 26% and a 15-year survival of 21% (P=0.0001), solitary lung metastasis is associated with a survival rate of 44% after 5 years and of 23% after 10 and 15 years, but this is not statistically significant compared to multiple metastases. When establishing prognostic groups as suggested by Pastorino and the International Registry of Lung Metastases based on the risk factors disease-free interval, number of metastases and complete resection the group with the best prognosis showed 5-year survival of 50%, 10- and 15-year survival of 26% with a median survival of 59 months. CONCLUSION: Considering the low morbidity and mortality rate, we think that lung metastasectomy today is the best treatment option in selected cases of lung metastases from breast cancer.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2002

New and evolving treatment methods for pulmonary metastases.

Treatment strategies other than surgery for pulmonary metastases are needed to improve disease-free and overall survival. Surgical attempts to solve a biologic problem by mechanical means. Alternative treatment may include induction or adjuvant chemotherapy, lung perfusion or regional drug delivery, biologic therapies (inhaled IL-2, biologic modifiers), and potentially, molecular or genetic therapy. Experimental radiofrequency ablation techniques are rarely applicable. Combinations of resection of macrometastases with treatment of occult micrometastases may be best in improving disease-free and overall survival.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2002

Salvage esophagectomy for recurrent tumors after definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVES: Some patients and oncologists choose to treat localized esophageal cancer with definitive chemotherapy and radiation therapy rather than surgery. A subset of these patients have local relapse without distant metastases and therefore have no other curative intent treatment option but salvage esophagectomy. METHODS: We reviewed our experience with salvage esophagectomy from 1987 to 2000 at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (n = 13, salvage after chemotherapy and radiotherapy group) and compared the data with those of patients receiving esophagectomy in a planned fashion 4 to 6 weeks after preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy (n = 99, preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy group). RESULTS: Increases in morbidity were seen after resection in the salvage after chemotherapy and radiotherapy group relative to the preoperative chemotherapy and radiotherapy group: mechanical ventilation (9.0 days vs 3.3 days, P =.08), intensive care unit stay (11.2 days vs 5.1 days, P =.07), hospital stay (29.4 days vs 18.4 days, P =.03), and anastomotic leak rates (5/13 [39%] vs 7/99 [7%], P =.005). Operative mortality (within 30 days) also tended to be increased statistically nonsignificantly (2/13 [15%] vs 6/99 [6%], P =.2). Salvage esophagectomy resulted in long-term survival (25% 5-year survival) in a subset of patients. Improved survival after salvage esophagectomy was associated with early pathologic stage (T1 N0, T2 N0), prolonged time to relapse, and R0 surgical resection. CONCLUSION: Patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy for relapse of tumor after definitive chemoradiation therapy have increased morbidity, mortality, and hospital use relative to patients undergoing planned esophagectomy after preoperative chemoradiation. Nevertheless, long-term survival can be achieved in this group, and such treatment should be considered for carefully selected patients at an experienced center.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Treatment outcomes of resected esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the evolution of treatment and outcome for resected esophageal cancer at a single institution. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Strategies for optimizing the treatment of resected esophageal cancer continue to evolve over time. The outcomes of these evolving treatments in the context of improved diagnostic staging and changing epidemiology have not been carefully analyzed in a single institution. METHODS: One thousand ninety-seven consecutive patients with primary esophageal cancer underwent surgery during the period 1970 to 2001. Nine hundred ninety-four patients underwent curative esophagectomy and were analyzed for changing demographics. Eight hundred seventy-nine patients who did not have systemic metastases and survived the perioperative period were assessed by multivariate analysis for factors associated with long-term survival. RESULTS: During the study period the overall median survival increased from 17 to 34 months, and combined hospital and 30-day mortality decreased from 12% to 6%. The R0 resection rate increased from 78 to 94%, and adenocarcinoma replaced squamous cell carcinoma as the predominant histology (83% vs. 17%). No change in survival with time was noted for patients treated with surgery alone having the same postoperative pathologic stage (pTNM). An increased proportion of patients had preoperative chemoradiation in the last 4 years of the study (59% vs. 2%). Preoperative chemoradiation was associated with a longer survival and increased likelihood of achieving a complete resection. Multivariate analysis showed that long-term survival was associated with a complete resection and the preoperative staging strategy used, while the use of preoperative chemoradiation was the most significant factor associated with ability to achieve an R0 esophageal resection. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows favorable trends in the survival of patients with resected esophageal cancer over time. The increased use of preoperative chemoradiation, better preoperative staging, and other time-dependent factors may have contributed to the observed increase in survival.

Adenocarcinoma↗