PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Joel Leroy

Publications and source records attributed to Joel Leroy.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

The impact of obesity on technical feasibility and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic left colectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare technical aspects and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic left colectomy in obese and nonobese patients. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Obesity has been generally associated with increased surgical risk. The data regarding outcomes after laparoscopic colectomy in obese and nonobese patients are limited and quite controversial; however, most reports have suggested that obesity is associated with a greater technical difficulty as well as an increased risk for conversions and postoperative complications. METHODS: All patients undergoing laparoscopic left colectomy for any pathologic condition between January 2001 and January 2003 were analyzed. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) above 30 kg/m were defined as obese and patients with BMI below 30 kg/m were defined as nonobese. Data collected included age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, diagnosis, technical parameters of the procedure, operative time, conversion, pathology, length of hospital stay, and complications over a 30-day postoperative course. RESULTS: A total of 123 patients underwent elective laparoscopic left colectomy during the 2-year period. Twelve patients were excluded from analysis because missing data did not allow calculation of their BMI. Of the 111 patients analyzed, 23 (20.7%) were obese and 88 patients (79.3%) were nonobese. Patients' preoperative clinical characteristics were similar in obese and nonobese patients except for BMI (P > 0.001). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with respect to intraoperative parameters, duration of the operation, resection margin, and number of harvested nodes as well as overall postoperative complication rates. There were no conversions in the obese patients, whereas 5 procedures in the nonobese group required conversion to open surgery (P = not significant). Obese patients had shorter hospital stays than nonobese subjects (7 +/- 2.5 days vs. 9.5 +/- 7 days; P = 0.018). CONCLUSION: In contrast with previously reported series of laparoscopic colectomy, our findings show that obesity does not have an adverse impact on the technical difficulty and postoperative outcomes of laparoscopic left colectomy. Our study supports the safety of using laparoscopic surgery for colorectal diseases in obese patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer surgery.

The introduction of total mesorectal excision in the early 1980s has improved local control and survival in patients with rectal cancer. Laparoscopic resections for colonic malignancies are gaining acceptance in the light of the recent evidence of oncologic adequacy from randomized clinical trials. Technical difficulties and the difference in the natural history of the disease have excluded rectal cancer from major clinical trials comparing laparoscopic to conventional rectal surgery. This review examined the feasibility, safety and oncologic outcomes of reported laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for surgical treatment of operable rectal cancer.

Humans↗
PubMed2004

Safe laparoscopic surgery in the elderly.

BACKGROUND: The elderly are more prone to complications of surgery because of comorbidity, and they may benefit most from a minimally invasive approach. This study was intended to evaluate the safety of the use of a laparoscopic approach for emergency and elective surgery in elderly patients. METHODS: From January 2000 to June 2001, all patients over 75 years of age who underwent a procedure that began laparoscopically were included. Physiologic and operative scores according to the POSSUM scoring system were recorded. These were then used to calculate predicted morbidity and mortality by both the POSSUM and P-POSSUM systems. Predicted outcomes were compared with actual outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-two patients with a mean age of 80 years were included; 52% were emergency cases. The overall morbidity was 14.5% and the mortality rate was 1.8%. Fourteen procedures (8.4%), all emergencies, were converted. Both mortality and morbidity rates were lower than the predicted values (P = 0.001 and P = 0.0001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: A laparoscopic approach can be used safely in an elderly population undergoing surgery in a daily practice for miscellaneous conditions, whether elective or emergency operations.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2004

[Total mesorectal excision by laparoscopy for rectal cancer].

The treatment of rectal cancer has improved mostly because of the emergence of total mesorectal excision (TME), first described by Heald, and the adjunct of adjuvant therapy in the form of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Laparoscopy has now been performed for more than a decade with results showing faster return to activity and decreased postoperative pain for intra-abdominal surgery. Laparoscopy is now widely used and is well accepted for the treatment of most intra-abdominal benign pathologies. Furthermore, several authors now report excellent short and medium-term results for the treatment of colorectal cancer. These study tends to show that laparoscopy can be safely applied to digestive malignancies, when oncological principles specific to laparoscopy are respected. The laparoscopic approach is in our opinion a perfect approach for the performance of TME, because of the magnification of structures that it provides, and allows the surgeon to see important structures that need to be identified for the performance of the best oncological and functional procedure possible. This paper describes in a through manner our standardized technique. We also review our own experience with laparoscopic TME, the multimodal treatment of rectal cancer, and provide an analysis of the literature about TME when performed by laparotomy and laparoscopy.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2002

Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications.

OBJECTIVE: To show the feasibility of performing surgery across transoceanic distances by using dedicated asynchronous transfer mode (ATM) telecommunication technology. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Technical limitations and the issue of time delay for transmission of digitized information across existing telecommunication lines had been a source of concern about the feasibility of performing a complete surgical procedure from remote distances. METHODS: To verify the feasibility and safety in humans, the authors attempted remote robot-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy on a 68-year-old woman with a history of abdominal pain and cholelithiasis. Surgeons were in New York and the patient in Strasbourg. Connections between the sites were done with a high-speed terrestrial network (ATM service). RESULTS: The operation was carried out successfully in 54 minutes without difficulty or complications. Despite a round-trip distance of more than 14,000 km, the mean time lag for transmission during the procedure was 155 ms. The surgeons perceived the procedure as safe and the overall system as perfectly reliable. The postoperative course was uneventful and the patient returned to normal activities within 2 weeks after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Remote robot-assisted surgery appears feasible and safe. Teletransmission of active surgical manipulations has the potential to ensure availability of surgical expertise in remote locations for difficult or rare operations, and to improve surgical training worldwide.

Aged↗